On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 6:05 AM, Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.euwrote:
Just in addition to this - Lift is very community driven, if there is
something you really believe should make it into Lift core then we'll
gladly
listen to people's input and discuss it openly.
That's exactly right. We strive to be as transparent as possible with Lift
development. Tyler pointed you to the 1.1 thread.
We respond to community need as well as the needs that we each have for the
projects that we're working on.
I place a priority on features (and defects) related to public and/or
reference Lift implementations. I place a very very high priority on fixing
defects for production Lift sites.
Are there features or needs that you have for your project?
Cheers, Tim
On 17/04/2009 13:48, TylerWeir tyler.w...@gmail.com wrote:
1.1 thread:
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/aca84784b81a6a2c/5
539edffc1c874d1?lnk=gstq=1.1#5539edffc1c874d1
On Apr 17, 5:27 am, Amit Kumar Verma cdac.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David,
We are using the lift-scala framework for our development and thinking
about it even more seriously. Can you please give some information on
Roadmap of development of Lift framework. It will be more useful if it
will give a brief description on areas on which framework is working
on.
Thanks
Amit Kumar Verma
--
Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net
Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp
Git some: http://github.com/dpp
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
