I'd like to propose that we add a second commitment requirement to the
PoDLE that JoinMarket uses, to limit the use of a commitment's validity to
be only between an initiator and a single peer. Otherwise you can enable
something I'll call the "pouncing venus-flytrap attack"[1]. Venus-flytrap
Here's some thoughts I had on PoDLE's and lightning. An enormous
tip-of-the-hat is due to ZmnSCPxj for surfacing the work that JoinMarket
has done here already.
- The initiating message (in the case of open channel, this would be
`open_channel2`) is extended to include an 'H2' field in its TLV, a
> But if you impose the blockheight - 6 in the Lightning protocol level,
and Lightning succeeds (meaning a substantial fraction of blockchain
transactions are Lightning opens)...
> --- then transactions with `nLockTime` equal to the block they are
included in minus 5 will be more common than
Thanks a lot for clarification René.
Sorry for that, next time I will not use dev list to ask such questions,
but in "keysend" there are some details would like to discuss.
Do we agree, that because payee doesn't know amount that payer wants to
send him, the last hub can just prepare own HTLC
Overview of Components
==
Ant Routing
---
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/2020-February/002505.html
Ant Routing is a distributed pathfinding algorithm where nodes emit
"pheromones", which are broadcasted over the entire network.
When a node
