> On Sep 1, 2021, at 00:07, ZmnSCPxj wrote:
>
> Good morning Matt and all,
>
>> Please be careful accepting the faulty premise that the proposed algorithm
>> is “optimal”. It is optimal under a specific heuristic used to approximate
>> what the user wants. In reality, there are a ton of
Good morning Matt and all,
> Please be careful accepting the faulty premise that the proposed algorithm is
> “optimal”. It is optimal under a specific heuristic used to approximate what
> the user wants. In reality, there are a ton of different things to balance,
> from CLTV to feed to
Good morning Stefan,
> > For myself, I think a variant of Pickhardt-Richter payments can be created
> > which adapts to the reality of the current network where `base_fee > 0` is
> > common, but is biased against `base_fee > 0`, can be a bridge from the
> > current network with `base_fee > 0`
Good morning Orfeas,
> Such an approach is much more suitable to debian, since they have
> full control and a complete view over their "network" of packages, as opposed
> to LN, which is decentralized, nodes come and go at will and they can be
> private (even from developers!).
Hi list,
On 8/31/21 5:01 AM, Anthony Towns wrote:
>> "Do we really want users to solve an NP-hard problem when
>> they wish to find a cheap way of paying each other on the Lightning
>> Network?"
> FWIW, my answer to this is "sure, if that's the way it turns out".
>
> Another program which
Good morning aj and Rene,
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 04:33:23PM +0200, René Pickhardt via Lightning-dev
> wrote:
>
> > As we thought it was obvious that the function is not linear we only
> > explained
> > in the paper how the jump from f(0)=0 to f(1) = ppm+base_fee breaks
> > convexity.
>
>
On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 04:33:23PM +0200, René Pickhardt via Lightning-dev
wrote:
> As we thought it was obvious that the function is not linear we only explained
> in the paper how the jump from f(0)=0 to f(1) = ppm+base_fee breaks convexity.
(This would make more sense to me as "f(0)=0 but
Dear fellow lightning developers,
with a mixture of shock and disbelief I have been following the (semi)
public discussions for the last 6 weeks and the reaction of some companies
/ people that reached out to me. I have to say I am really surprised by the
amount of hesitation that - despite
