On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 09:23:37AM -0500, ZmnSCPxj via Lightning-dev wrote:
> Good morning Corne and Conner,
> Ignoring the practical matters that Corne rightly brings up, I think,
> it is possible to use ZKCP to provide a "stronger" proof-of-payment in
> the sense that Conner is asking for.
I
Good morning Corne and Conner,
Ignoring the practical matters that Corne rightly brings up, I think, it is
possible to use ZKCP to provide a "stronger" proof-of-payment in the sense that
Conner is asking for.
All that is needed is to create a message (possibly in some standard language)
Hi Conner,
I do believe proof of payment is an important feature to have,
especially for the use case of a payer/payee pair that doesn't
completely trust each other, but does have the possibility to go to court.
However, I'm not convinced by what you wrote. I do think a combination
of signed
