ZmnSCPxj writes:
> Might it be possible to use SURBs as in the other thread?
It's possible, but you still don't want it for all the same reasons: you
have a nicely anonymized path you know works, so why use something else?
Cheers,
Rusty.
___
Lightning-
Good morning Rusty,
>
> Yes. But how does the payee know to give the bolt12 offer to the payer?
>
> That's the piece that's missing here, which is actually independent.
Ah, I understand now.
In the context of this thread, payer is a service, while payee is user.
So I presume an HTTPS PUT or POST
