Hello Matt, can you clarify what you mean with this particular paragraph?:
But for some reason those pesky users keep wanting to use lightning for
> tips, or at least accept
> payment on their phones without keeping them unlocked with the lightning
> app open on the foreground
> 24/7.
So the
Completely agree with this. How to move this forward? Set up a vote? What
would be the reasoning for not moving it?
On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 at 23:25, Fabrice Drouin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When you navigate to https://github.com/lightningnetwork/ you find
> - the Lightning Network white paper
> - the
How is this related to the youtube video posted? Can you link to a specific
time in it where it is discussed?
On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 at 00:30, Daki Carnhof wrote:
> This text was brought to life by repelling magnet forces of reading
> ZmnSCPxj's Algorithm For Channel Fee Settings. Thank you, Zmn!
Hey ZmnSCPxj,
On Fri, 12 Feb 2021 at 08:52, ZmnSCPxj wrote:
> Good morning Andres,
>
> > Hey ZmnSCPxj,
> >
> > On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 15:33, ZmnSCPxj wrote:
> >
> > > Good morning Andres,
> > >
> > > > This looks cool but would hinder UX too much for certain scenarios:
> e.g. if the escrow in
Hey ZmnSCPxj,
On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 15:33, ZmnSCPxj wrote:
> Good morning Andres,
>
> > This looks cool but would hinder UX too much for certain scenarios: e.g.
> if the escrow in place is part of a bitcoin exchange, then you require the
> bitcoin buyer to have bitcoin already, which makes it
This looks cool but would hinder UX too much for certain scenarios: e.g. if
the escrow in place is part of a bitcoin exchange, then you require the
bitcoin buyer to have bitcoin already, which makes it harder to on-ramp new
users (which could maybe only have fiat). Am I right?
So are you saying
Hey ZmnSCPxj,
Am I correct in understanding that this is a proposal to change the spec
(maybe add a new BOLT) so that all lightning implementations can try to
support this feature.
If the above is true, then I'm wondering: could a Lightning-based escrow
system be implemented that doesn't require
Hey Antoine, just a small note, [3] is missing in your footnotes, can you
add it? Thanks
On Tue, 5 May 2020 at 18:17, Antoine Riard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> (cross-posting as it's really both layers concerned)
>
> Ongoing advancement of BIP 157 implementation in Core maybe the
> opportunity to reflect
Hey ZmnSCPxj,
On Tue, 21 Jan 2020 at 08:47, ZmnSCPxj via Lightning-dev <
lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Good morning Subhra,
>
> Refer to this protocol instead of DLAS:
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/2019-June/002035.html
> In this protocol, an
