Hey ZmnSCPxj, Am I correct in understanding that this is a proposal to change the spec (maybe add a new BOLT) so that all lightning implementations can try to support this feature.
If the above is true, then I'm wondering: could a Lightning-based escrow system be implemented that doesn't require to modify the existing implementations? Maybe if we simplify the requirements a bit? Like, removing the "Escrow only learns of dispute cases, never learns non-dispute case" aspect? That is, the third-party S always knows about an escrow between A and B taking place. I understand that the above requirement is a good to have, but if removing it allows a simpler version of escrow be implemented, then at least there could be an interim solution for non-custodial exchanges to start adopting this (otherwise they have to resort to custodial-based escrows, which is worse than lacking the escrow privacy brought by the requirement above). Thanks
_______________________________________________ Lightning-dev mailing list Lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev