Good morning Ecurrencyhodler,
> Hi ZmnSCPxj!
>
> Submarine swaps are a great current solution, but we still have to wait for
> confirmations.
So would `push_msat`; until confirmed deeply the channel opening can still be
cancelled by double-spending and it would be foolhardy to deliver the prod
On August 13, 2019 6:23:31 AM GMT+02:00, ZmnSCPxj
wrote:
>Good morning Gregorio,
>
>
>> We argue that in such scenario, in a network of n connected nodes,
>there is a tendency towards a state where exactly n-1 channels have
>perfectly balanced flows in the two directions ("self-balancing"
>cha
>So would `push_msat`; until confirmed deeply the channel opening can still
be cancelled by double-spending and it would be foolhardy to deliver the
product until the channel is deeply confirmed to be opened.
Okay so there's 2 situations here I'd like to explore:
1. Bob -> routing node -> Me
2.
Good morning Ecurrencyhodler,
It seems to me a trusted model then.
Regardless of who makes the channel (the payee cannot determine who the payer
is anyway) the payee cannot trustlessly release the product until the channel
is deeply confirmed, else your security is only 0-conf, not off-chain.
F
