Good morning Rusty,
>
> Yes. But how does the payee know to give the bolt12 offer to the payer?
>
> That's the piece that's missing here, which is actually independent.
Ah, I understand now.
In the context of this thread, payer is a service, while payee is user.
So I presume an HTTPS PUT or
ZmnSCPxj writes:
> Good morning Rusty,
>
>> So we need a web way of asking a client to send an invoice or offer over
>> HTTPS. Is this a new URI scheme? How would this work?
>
> I thought that offers would work over LN alone?
>
> When you first proposed the offers, I thought it was this way:
>
>
Good morning Cezary,
> What, can't this this be done in easier way? For example:
>
> 1. Payee provides fee limit along with with Invoice. This can be amount
> percentage or absolute value in msats.
> 2. Payer in order to pay just finds route, that do not exceed limit from
> invoice
> 3. Payer
Good morning Cezary,
I have alluded to this issue before:
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/2019-January/001826.html
See "Withdrawing funds from a service".
From my point-of-view, the proper solution would involve the payee providing
one or more complete paths from the