Arigato gozaimasu, Sawada-san!
I noticed a few small English details, but the quality is consistent
with the rest of the web pages -- I've already asked my two new doc
helpers to proofread the pages, so I'll add this to their burden.
It'll be good practice for my kohai. :)
Patch has been added a
Hi all,
I put the description of "Windows on the command-line" of
Documentation/web/download.itexi into:
http://lilypond.web.fc2.com/patch/Windows-on-the-command-line.patch.gz
My description will be correct in technical.
However, I have no confidence in my English grammar.
Please, check it out.
On 1/2/10 6:44 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 07:18:51PM +0100, Wilbert Berendsen wrote:
>> I could imagine one other addition to the list of topics in Scope and
>> Limitation:
>>
>> - the values that are used as arguments to common used overrides. Sometimes
>> they ar
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Valentin Villenave
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 6:49 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Don't load this as a picture into firefox on X11. It is something like
>> 1x1 pixels, and apparently firefox allocates a full-size
>> display-depth pixmap for that, making
Guys,
Please don't report bugs or try to discuss problems in the bloody
comments of a texinfo file. I don't care if you do this in the source
code (although I think it's a stupid way to communicate), but don't
mess up my precious documentation. We cleaned up a lot of this in
GDP, and we'll be do
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 02:26:06PM -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote:
>> On 2010-01-02, John Mandereau wrote:
>> > the new website, I don't understand why it's there: the topmost parent
>> > section of the page currently viewed is already reachab
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 06:12:17PM -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Graham Percival
> wrote:
> > Thanks, updated. Is there a signup / archive page for that list?
> > Totally not urgent, but when it's up, I'll add the link to the
> > gliss webpage.
>
> You mean this
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 03:07:57AM +0100, John Mandereau wrote:
> Le dimanche 03 janvier 2010 à 01:52 +, Graham Percival a écrit :
> > When you're clicked through a few options in a chapter, you've
> > been staring at the highlighted second-level TOC changing. It's
> > not obvious how to get b
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 02:09:07AM +0100, John Mandereau wrote:
>> Le dimanche 03 janvier 2010 à 00:54 +, Graham Percival a écrit :
>> > Oh, we did, but I forgot to update my notes. Valentin, what was
>> > the name again?
>>
>> I've bee
Le dimanche 03 janvier 2010 à 01:30 +, Graham Percival a écrit :
> Thanks, updated. Is there a signup / archive page for that list?
http://lists.lilynet.net/syntax/
--
John Mandereau
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
__
Le dimanche 03 janvier 2010 à 01:52 +, Graham Percival a écrit :
> When you're clicked through a few options in a chapter, you've
> been staring at the highlighted second-level TOC changing. It's
> not obvious how to get back to the first page, if you want to see
> the overview of pages in tha
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 09:37:55AM -0700, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
> On 1/2/10 1:51 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
>
> > Sorry, I was thinking about \overrideBeamSettings, which has been
> > around for a few months (a year?). You're quite right; there's no
> > reason not to change \overrideTimeSign
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 02:26:06PM -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On 2010-01-02, John Mandereau wrote:
> > the new website, I don't understand why it's there: the topmost parent
> > section of the page currently viewed is already reachable from the top
> > bar. Therefore, I'm for removing it; how
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 07:18:51PM +0100, Wilbert Berendsen wrote:
> I could imagine one other addition to the list of topics in Scope and
> Limitation:
>
> - the values that are used as arguments to common used overrides. Sometimes
> they are a symbol (e.g. #'around), sometimes a predefined var
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 02:06:31PM +0100, John Mandereau wrote:
> After having noticed that
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/web/examples
> doesn't return the expected web page,
Sigh.
> I propose to rename source directory Documentation/web/examples
> to Documentation/web/ly-examples
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 02:09:07AM +0100, John Mandereau wrote:
> Le dimanche 03 janvier 2010 à 00:54 +, Graham Percival a écrit :
> > Oh, we did, but I forgot to update my notes. Valentin, what was
> > the name again?
>
> I've been added on a list named syn...@lilynet.net around the same tim
Le dimanche 03 janvier 2010 à 00:54 +, Graham Percival a écrit :
> Oh, we did, but I forgot to update my notes. Valentin, what was
> the name again?
I've been added on a list named syn...@lilynet.net around the same time
you first announced GLISS.
Best,
John
signature.asc
Description: Ceci
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 01:24:00AM +0100, John Mandereau wrote:
> Le samedi 02 janvier 2010 à 06:47 +, Graham Percival a écrit :
> > It's up, such as it is:
> > http://lilypond.org/~graham/gliss/
>
> Excellent. I only wonder why you haven't already decided on the mailing
> list name on li
Le samedi 02 janvier 2010 à 06:47 +, Graham Percival a écrit :
> Grand LilyPond Input Syntax Stabilization (GLISS)
>
> It's up, such as it is:
> http://lilypond.org/~graham/gliss/
Excellent. I only wonder why you haven't already decided on the mailing
list name on lilynet.net.
Best,
Joh
2010/1/2 John Mandereau
> Le samedi 02 janvier 2010 à 22:57 +0100, Francisco Vila a écrit :
> > Hello, for the new year I have upgraded my Ubuntu system to 9.10
> > Karmic and I have been able to compile the lilypond binary and docs
> > after many attempts and permutations. Finally it seems the
On 2010-01-02, Graham Percival wrote:
> Grand LilyPond Input Syntax Stabilization (GLISS)
>
> It's up, such as it is:
> http://lilypond.org/~graham/gliss/
>
> If you remember the email from a few months ago, nothing much has
> changed (I've rephrased a few things based on the comments). If y
On 2010-01-02, John Mandereau wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As I'm wondering about i18n the string "(main)" in the navigation bar of
> the new website, I don't understand why it's there: the topmost parent
> section of the page currently viewed is already reachable from the top
> bar. Therefore, I'm for re
On 2010.01.02., at 22:28, John Mandereau wrote:
>> I just don't have to do distclean.
>
> I disagree with this. If you don't distclean or doc-clean in the source
> tree, you'll probably get weird build errors.
I mean, if I run ./autogen.sh --noconfigure first after cloning the repo, that
is fin
Hello,
As I'm wondering about i18n the string "(main)" in the navigation bar of
the new website, I don't understand why it's there: the topmost parent
section of the page currently viewed is already reachable from the top
bar. Therefore, I'm for removing it; however, if somebody gives a good
reas
Le samedi 02 janvier 2010 à 22:57 +0100, Francisco Vila a écrit :
> Hello, for the new year I have upgraded my Ubuntu system to 9.10
> Karmic and I have been able to compile the lilypond binary and docs
> after many attempts and permutations. Finally it seems the main issue
> was texi2html. The p
Hello, for the new year I have upgraded my Ubuntu system to 9.10
Karmic and I have been able to compile the lilypond binary and docs
after many attempts and permutations. Finally it seems the main issue
was texi2html. The packaged version on my distribution is old, 1.78.
Then I compiled 1.83 from
Le samedi 02 janvier 2010 à 21:34 +0100, Harmath Dénes a écrit :
> The result is the same,
Gosh, I should have noticed the actual error earlier, see below.
> I just don't have to do distclean.
I disagree with this. If you don't distclean or doc-clean in the source
tree, you'll probably get we
On 2010.01.02., at 21:26, John Mandereau wrote:
> Le samedi 02 janvier 2010 à 21:20 +0100, Harmath Dénes a écrit :
>>> /autogen.sh --noconfigure
>>
>> No success. This results in:
>>
>> thsoft-macbook:lily-build thsoft$
>> /Users/thsoft/Development/lilypond-translation/autogen.sh --noconfigure
Le samedi 02 janvier 2010 à 21:20 +0100, Harmath Dénes a écrit :
> > /autogen.sh --noconfigure
>
> No success. This results in:
>
> thsoft-macbook:lily-build thsoft$
> /Users/thsoft/Development/lilypond-translation/autogen.sh --noconfigure
> stepmake/aclocal.m4 is newer. Copying file.
> cp: ste
On 2010.01.02., at 20:58, John Mandereau wrote:
> Le samedi 02 janvier 2010 à 20:12 +0100, Harmath Dénes a écrit :
>> make -C distclean
>> /configure --srcdir=
>
> The --srcdir flag is unnecessary, and between these two commands you
> should do
>
> /autogen.sh --noconfigure
No success. This re
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 2:51 AM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 02:04:18AM -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote:
>> On 2010-01-02, James Bailey wrote:
>> > I didn't find a history option, but I did find a log option, and it
>> > has 2009/03/07 for all of them.
>>
>> These were added betwe
Le samedi 02 janvier 2010 à 20:12 +0100, Harmath Dénes a écrit :
> make -C distclean
> /configure --srcdir=
The --srcdir flag is unnecessary, and between these two commands you
should do
/autogen.sh --noconfigure
This should be explained in the CG; if not, could somebody fix this?
Best,
John
Hi all,
I need to build LilyPond outside the source tree.
I check out LilyPond:
mkdir lilypond; cd lilypond
git init
git remote add -f -t master -m master origin git://git.sv.gnu.org/lilypond.git/
git checkout -b master origin/master
Creating configure:
./autogen.sh
Then, according to CG:
cd
Op zaterdag 02 januari 2010 schreef Trevor:
> Looks promising. Nice overview of the issues.
> I'll be happy to be part of the discussions when
> they start.
Same for me! I really love LilyPond (both the program and the project), and
stabilizing the syntax will make it more stable and professio
Carl Sorensen writes:
> I have received unambiguous guidance from Han-Wen that I should *not*
> add a general capability for doing override/revert for context
> properties, even though that's what you want to be able to do.
>
> I've asked for suggestions for a music function name that would
> acc
>> Is there a chance that you would consider this character for
>> inclusion in LilyPond 2.13?
>
> If Werner's OK with that, I'll open a feature request on the
> tracker.
Please go ahead.
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.
On 1/2/10 3:04 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
> Carl Sorensen writes:
>
>> On 1/1/10 10:27 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
>>
>>> Carl Sorensen writes:
>>>
In my defense, it's because timeSignatureSettings is a special case
of a context property that wants \override and \revert behavior
On 1/2/10 1:51 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 8:34 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Graham Percival writes:
>>
only with \overrideTimeSignatureSettings, but not with
\override timeSignatureSettings.
>>>
>>> Yes, it is. Fixing this has been planned for a year.
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> It has whatever priority people give it. Given that nobody has
> sent a patch, I can only assume that nobody cares about this.
Oops, I should clarify: nobody's sent a patch, **or even indicated a
willingness to work on it**.
If somebody s
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 02:09:19PM +0100, John Mandereau wrote:
> Le samedi 02 janvier 2010 à 12:49 +, Graham Percival a écrit :
> > Yes, this was already added to the tracker in Oct:
> > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=844
>
> As the old documentation index has been scraped
Le samedi 02 janvier 2010 à 12:49 +, Graham Percival a écrit :
> Yes, this was already added to the tracker in Oct:
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=844
As the old documentation index has been scraped preamturely, the new
website is the only way to access manuals, so could
Hi guys,
After having noticed that
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/web/examples
doesn't return the expected web page, I propose to rename source
directory Documentation/web/examples to Documentation/web/ly-examples,
in order to fix this name clash. This is the same kind of issue that
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Valentin Villenave
wrote:
> Carl, Marc, how would that affect the regtests-checking process? When
> applying this patch all outputted PNGs will look different than
> before, so isn't there a risk that some actual regressions go
> unnoticed?
I can handle it. If it
Yes, this was already added to the tracker in Oct:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=844
Cheers,
- Graham
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 01:35:53PM +0100, John Mandereau wrote:
> Message transféré
> De: Harmath Dénes
> À: translati...@lilynet.net
> Sujet: [translation
Message transféré
De: Harmath Dénes
À: translati...@lilynet.net
Sujet: [translations] Language negotiation on lilypond.org
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 13:32:28 +0100
Hi all,
I recently noticed that http://lilypond.org/doc/latest redirects to
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentati
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Carsten Steger
wrote:
> Is there a chance that you would consider this character for inclusion
> in LilyPond 2.13? If so, I would start working on optimizing the
> design of the character and also start working on modifying LilyPond
> to enable this character to be
Valentin Villenave writes:
> On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 6:49 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Don't load this as a picture into firefox on X11. It is something like
>> 1x1 pixels, and apparently firefox allocates a full-size
>> display-depth pixmap for that, making the server swallow more than 1
Le 2 janv. 2010 à 11:57, Joe Neeman a écrit :
> Any objections/comments? If not, I'll push in the next few days.
Please do, it looks good and is indeed more convenient.
>
> Cheers,
> Joe
>
> On Tue, 2009-12-22 at 21:52 -0800, Joe Neeman wrote:
>> http://codereview.appspot.com/182042/show
>>
>
Graham Percival wrote Saturday, January 02, 2010 6:47 AM
Grand LilyPond Input Syntax Stabilization (GLISS)
It's up, such as it is:
http://lilypond.org/~graham/gliss/
Looks promising. Nice overview of the issues.
I'll be happy to be part of the discussions when
they start.
Trevor
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 6:49 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Don't load this as a picture into firefox on X11. It is something like
> 1x1 pixels, and apparently firefox allocates a full-size
> display-depth pixmap for that, making the server swallow more than 1.2G
> of memory.
> I managed to ki
Any objections/comments? If not, I'll push in the next few days.
Cheers,
Joe
On Tue, 2009-12-22 at 21:52 -0800, Joe Neeman wrote:
> http://codereview.appspot.com/182042/show
>
> This patch implements nested property setting for \paper block (and
> \header block, etc) variables, similar to how \o
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> http://lilypond.org/~graham/gliss/
Neat! Looks promising; I hope soon I'll have some time to really give
these questions a proper thought.
Thanks for going through with this.
Cheers,
Valentin
_
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 02:04:18AM -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On 2010-01-02, James Bailey wrote:
> > I didn't find a history option, but I did find a log option, and it
> > has 2009/03/07 for all of them.
>
> These were added between 2.13.0 and 2.13.1, so 2.13.1 would be the
> correct version
On 2010-01-02, James Bailey wrote:
>
> On 02.01.2010, at 00:20, Graham Percival wrote:
>
> >On Fri, Jan 01, 2010 at 03:27:48PM +0100, James Bailey wrote:
> >>The regression tests for input/regression/tuplet-text*.ly have a
> >>version
> >>statement of 2.12.3, although they don't compile with 2.12
Carl Sorensen writes:
> On 1/1/10 10:27 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
>
>> Carl Sorensen writes:
>>
>>> In my defense, it's because timeSignatureSettings is a special case
>>> of a context property that wants \override and \revert behavior.
>>
>> Which just goes to show that people associate the
On 02.01.2010, at 00:20, Graham Percival wrote:
On Fri, Jan 01, 2010 at 03:27:48PM +0100, James Bailey wrote:
The regression tests for input/regression/tuplet-text*.ly have a
version
statement of 2.12.3, although they don't compile with 2.12.3, and
these
tests were not included in 2.12.3.
Hello,
I think this patch fixes Issue 885, even though I can't test it at the
moment. See
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=885
Thanks,
Patrick
0001-lilypond-sharhead-don-t-use-a-subshell-when-creating.patch
Description: Binary data
___
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 8:34 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Graham Percival writes:
>
>>> only with \overrideTimeSignatureSettings, but not with
>>> \override timeSignatureSettings.
>>
>> Yes, it is. Fixing this has been planned for a year.
>>
>> Why not "just do it" now? Well, we don't have a defi
Reinhold Kainhofer writes:
> Am Samstag, 2. Januar 2010 00:35:16 schrieb Carl Sorensen:
>> On 1/1/10 10:27 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
>> > Carl Sorensen writes:
>> >> OK, point taken. I'll come up with a different name for the music
>> >> function. Do you have any suggestions?
>> >>
>> >> How
Graham Percival writes:
> On Fri, Jan 01, 2010 at 02:13:51PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
>> "Trevor Daniels" writes:
>>
>> > For varying time signatures changes could still
>> > be made via \overrideTimeSignatureSettings.
>>
>> I consider it a grave user interface mistake to have some things w
60 matches
Mail list logo
