On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 7:36 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> at a line break, ties and slurs are cloned in order to reappear after
> the line break.
>
> The same cloning should happen for repeat alternatives: a slur or tie
> that is started before the alternatives block needs to be present/cloned
> at
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:55 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> StdbassEngraver = #`((listeners
>>> (note-event .
>>> ,(lambda (engraver event)
>>> (let* ((pitch (ly:event-property event 'pitch)))
>>> (ly:e
Le mardi 19 janvier 2010 à 09:47 -0800, Mark Polesky a écrit :
> I see. Okay, here's a new patch that
> * cleans up some more `make help' outputs
> * incorporates multiple lines of "@echo"
LGTM, except that changes to mutopia-targets.make is completely useless,
as
find -name 'GNUmakefile*' |
Marc Hohl wrote Tuesday, January 19, 2010 10:09 AM
Trevor Daniels schrieb:
Marc Hohl wrote Tuesday, January 19, 2010 9:04 AM
Trevor Daniels schrieb:
Marc Hohl wrote Monday, January 18, 2010 8:13 PM
Marc Hohl schrieb:
Neil Puttock schrieb:
2010/1/8 Marc Hohl :
Hmmm - you are right. Is
---
.../extending/programming-interface.itely |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/extending/programming-interface.itely
b/Documentation/extending/programming-interface.itely
index 4bae49a..3806d35 100644
--- a/Documentation/extending/pr
Hi,
at a line break, ties and slurs are cloned in order to reappear after
the line break.
The same cloning should happen for repeat alternatives: a slur or tie
that is started before the alternatives block needs to be present/cloned
at the start of _all_ alternatives, not just the first alternat
Marc Hohl wrote:
I don't know. The staff lines should end a little bit earlier, see
http://lilypond.googlecode.com/issues/attachment?aid=-394070284723943851&name=segno-end.png&inline=1
I don't think it is a good idea to let the segno sign reach into the
margin, so
the staff lines have to end
John Mandereau wrote:
> As for any portability issue, you can't simply remove the
> "-e" just because it works better for you. Least you
> should do by submitting such a patch is telling us your OS
> and shell name and version; in order to be sure whether to
> apply this patch or not is to investi
2010/1/19 Graham Percival :
>>> �...@downloadstablesource{"Another_Prefix"} should do the trick. Do you
>>> think that should work? I could test it and make a patch.
>
> Changing the python function call won't add another option to the texinfo
> macro.
Of course not, but make_macro can be modifie
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Francisco Vila wrote:
> 2010/1/19 Francisco Vila :
>> scripts/build/create-version-itexi.py
Yesterday it was put in scripts/build/create-weblinks-itexi.py, BTW.
>> def make_download_source(name, vstring, version):
>>
>> accepts an additional argument prefix="So
2010/1/19 Francisco Vila :
> IMO, the @downloadStableSource{} call from download.itexi should be i13zed.
>
> This could be done modifying
>
> scripts/build/create-version-itexi.py
>
> so that
>
> def make_download_source(name, vstring, version):
>
> accepts an additional argument prefix="Source"
IMO, the @downloadStableSource{} call from download.itexi should be i13zed.
This could be done modifying
scripts/build/create-version-itexi.py
so that
def make_download_source(name, vstring, version):
accepts an additional argument prefix="Source" and making make_macro
to include that pref
2010/1/19 John Mandereau :
> Le lundi 18 janvier 2010 à 16:13 -0800, Mark Polesky a écrit :
>> Here's a small patch to clean up the `make help' output.
>
> As for any portability issue, you can't simply remove the "-e" just
> because it works better for you.
There's two issues here: the changed te
On 19 Jan 2010, at 15:27, Francisco Vila wrote:
Is there a difference between `make' and `make all'?
No. Where does the convention that all is the default target come
from,
by the way? Is it a GNU standard?
After reading the manuals of GNU make, I am confused. GNU software
should have
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 11:29 PM, Mark Polesky wrote:
> I've attached a patch for gub that incorporates this; let me
> know if you don't like it...
Looks ok.
> One question, though: I
> changed the text in lilypond-sharhead.sh, but do I also need
> to change it in sharhead.sh?
Dunno, but a fres
2010/1/19 John Mandereau :
> Le lundi 18 janvier 2010 à 19:25 -0800, Mark Polesky a écrit :
>> Is there a difference between `make' and `make all'?
>
> No. Where does the convention that all is the default target come from,
> by the way? Is it a GNU standard?
After reading the manuals of GNU mak
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:34 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> I am currently wrestling with accordion standard bass support.
>> Basically, there are single bass buttons and chord buttons, and in the
>> simplest mode, single basses are written in the -2 octave, and chord
>>
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:34 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> I am currently wrestling with accordion standard bass support.
> Basically, there are single bass buttons and chord buttons, and in the
> simplest mode, single basses are written in the -2 octave, and chord
> notes are wrapped/inversed to th
Hi,
I am currently wrestling with accordion standard bass support.
Basically, there are single bass buttons and chord buttons, and in the
simplest mode, single basses are written in the -2 octave, and chord
notes are wrapped/inversed to the -1 octave.
When writing stuff, single basses are writte
Le lundi 18 janvier 2010 à 16:13 -0800, Mark Polesky a écrit :
> Here's a small patch to clean up the `make help' output. I
> know, it may soon be obsolete, but it was bothering me, and
> it may yet help people who start compiling in the meantime.
> I mentioned this idea a little while ago, but h
Le lundi 18 janvier 2010 à 19:25 -0800, Mark Polesky a écrit :
> Is there a difference between `make' and `make all'?
No. Where does the convention that all is the default target come from,
by the way? Is it a GNU standard?
Best,
John
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message
Trevor Daniels schrieb:
Marc Hohl wrote Tuesday, January 19, 2010 9:04 AM
Trevor Daniels schrieb:
Marc Hohl wrote Monday, January 18, 2010 8:13 PM
Marc Hohl schrieb:
Neil Puttock schrieb:
2010/1/8 Marc Hohl :
Hmmm - you are right. Is it possible to whiteout this small part
of the bar
Marc Hohl wrote Tuesday, January 19, 2010 9:04 AM
Trevor Daniels schrieb:
Marc Hohl wrote Monday, January 18, 2010 8:13 PM
Marc Hohl schrieb:
Neil Puttock schrieb:
2010/1/8 Marc Hohl :
Hmmm - you are right. Is it possible to whiteout this small
part
of the barlines?
I found out how t
Trevor Daniels schrieb:
Marc Hohl wrote Monday, January 18, 2010 8:13 PM
Marc Hohl schrieb:
Neil Puttock schrieb:
2010/1/8 Marc Hohl :
Hmmm - you are right. Is it possible to whiteout this small part
of the barlines?
I found out how to define a whiteout stencil, but it seems that it is
pla
24 matches
Mail list logo
