Re: lilypond-book on windows

- Original Message - From: "Janek Warchoł" To: "Graham Percival" Cc: ; "Phil Holmes" Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 6:28 AM Subject: Re: lilypond-book on windows Graham, 2012/1/11 Graham Percival : Please test this version: http://lilypond.org/~graham/lilypond-2.15.25-1.mingw.e

Re: Possibly abandoned patches?

On Jan 11, 2012, at 3:54 AM, Colin Campbell wrote: > The following Tracker items have not been modified for over a month. Would > the owners please have a look, and update the status: either > "patch-abandoned" and close the related Rietveld issue, or "patch needs-work" > with a comment if tha

Re: explain how to add git-cl to PATH (issue 5503093)

http://codereview.appspot.com/5503093/diff/4003/Documentation/contributor/source-code.itexi File Documentation/contributor/source-code.itexi (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/5503093/diff/4003/Documentation/contributor/source-code.itexi#newcode926 Documentation/contributor/source-code.itexi

Re: lilypond-book on windows

On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 07:28:18AM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote: > This might be a stupid question, but i never used lilypond-book > before: should i call it without any input file? If no, can you > provide example input? Read the Usage manual. Specifically the lilypond-book chapter. - Graham __

Re: Let \footnote do the job of \footnote, \footnoteGrob, \autoFootnote and \autoFootnoteGrob (issue 5527058)

On 2012/01/11 05:11:39, janek wrote: There are some duplications in the docs now. (LBTM?) "The notation manual has not been revised yet." Since I am currently doing the convert-ly rules for juggling the argument order and this will, obviously, also affect the manual both with respect to autoco

Re: lilypond-book on windows

Graham, 2012/1/11 Graham Percival : > Please test this version: > http://lilypond.org/~graham/lilypond-2.15.25-1.mingw.exe > add it to your PATH, then me exactly what you see when you try to > call lilypond-book. This might be a stupid question, but i never used lilypond-book before: should i cal

lilypond-book on windows

ok, I'm really confused with all the reports about what happens on all sorts of different lilypond versions. Please test this version: http://lilypond.org/~graham/lilypond-2.15.25-1.mingw.exe add it to your PATH, then me exactly what you see when you try to call lilypond-book. I have various susp

Re: Patchy email

On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 06:52:38AM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote: > I guess i don't know how to write curly braces in texinfo. Should it be > @example > PATH=~/type-here-directory-containing-git-cl:"$\{PATH\}" > @end example escape with @ i.e. @{PATH@} this is in the CG. > How do i proceed? I und

Re: Patchy email

/1/11 : > *** FAILED BUILD *** > >        nice make -j3 CPU_COUNT=3 > >        Previous good commit:   ee12a32549ed3802251669b9ad511141fda7b9a0 > >        Current broken commit:  b70e6aaf640755d503add64bec847126761bc8c0 Looks like mine, sorry... and indeed, make fails LANG= makeinfo --enable-enc

Re: explain how to add git-cl to PATH (issue 5503093)

this fails to compile. Removed from staging. http://codereview.appspot.com/5503093/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Glyphs for Kievan Notation (issue 4951062)

http://codereview.appspot.com/4951062/diff/91002/input/regression/note-head-style.ly File input/regression/note-head-style.ly (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/4951062/diff/91002/input/regression/note-head-style.ly#newcode101 input/regression/note-head-style.ly:101: add break here http://c

Re: Let \footnote do the job of \footnote, \footnoteGrob, \autoFootnote and \autoFootnoteGrob (issue 5527058)

There are some duplications in the docs now. (LBTM?) http://codereview.appspot.com/5527058/diff/1/Documentation/notation/input.itely File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/5527058/diff/1/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode1053 Documentation/notatio

Patchy email

Begin LilyPond compile, commit: ee12a32549ed3802251669b9ad511141fda7b9a0 Merged staging, now at: b70e6aaf640755d503add64bec847126761bc8c0 Success:./autogen.sh --noconfigure Success:../configure --disable-optimising *** FAILED BUILD *** ni

Re: explain how to add git-cl to PATH (issue 5503093)

pushed to staging and closed. http://codereview.appspot.com/5503093/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Use forward slashes as path separators in latex (issue 2209). (issue 5530069)

http://codereview.appspot.com/5530069/diff/1/python/book_latex.py File python/book_latex.py (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/5530069/diff/1/python/book_latex.py#newcode274 python/book_latex.py:274: rep['base'] = basename.replace ('\\', '/') hmm, isn't there anything in os.path that could h

Possibly abandoned patches?

The following Tracker items have not been modified for over a month. Would the owners please have a look, and update the status: either "patch-abandoned" and close the related Rietveld issue, or "patch needs-work" with a comment if that is appropriate. *ID**Type* *Owner* *Summa

PATCH: Countdown to 20120112

For Thursday, January 12th, 2012 Documentation: Issue 2198 : Document use of PATH statement in Windows - R 5521056 Enhancement: Issue 2206

Build: Top-level GNUmakefile (issue 5535047)

Reviewers: , Message: Please review. Description: Build: Top-level GNUmakefile This file is chmoded to 444 so it cannot be overwritten by cat << EOF > GNUmakefile alone; it needs to be removed first. It also has some missing dependencies as evidenced by running `make' twice: on the second run i

Use forward slashes as path separators in latex (issue 2209). (issue 5530069)

Reviewers: , Message: Please review. Description: Use forward slashes as path separators in latex (issue 2209). Please review this at http://codereview.appspot.com/5530069/ Affected files: M python/book_latex.py Index: python/book_latex.py diff --git a/python/book_latex.py b/python/book_la

Re: Doc: NR Section on Upbeats made clearer (issue 5520056)

http://codereview.appspot.com/5520056/diff/1/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely File Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/5520056/diff/1/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely#newcode1350 Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely:1350: partial measure @emph{befo

Fix .dep file from lilypond-book when include paths are involved. (issue 5486064)

Reviewers: , Message: Remove the use of absolute paths in lilypond-book. Please review. Description: Fix .dep file from lilypond-book when include paths are involved. Don't rewrite include paths; use relative paths whenever possible. Similar to http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id

Re: separate narrowed accidentals (issue 5527049)

According to suggestions, narrow natural was made a bit wider. New example files attached to tracker issue http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2203 http://codereview.appspot.com/5527049/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu

Re: suggestion - increase default beam thickness

Hi Pavel, 2012/1/9 Pavel Roskin : > Comparing scanned data to internal numbers is not a fair comparison. > When scanning, the lines can get blurred and then they are converted to > black-and-white based on the darkness settings.  Lines can get thicker > or thinner. > > The most fair comparison wou

Re: Let \footnote do the job of \footnote, \footnoteGrob, \autoFootnote and \autoFootnoteGrob (issue 5527058)

"m...@apollinemike.com" writes: > On Jan 10, 2012, at 4:46 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > >> footnote-auto-numbering is present in the _code_. This is not just a >> question of the doc string. There _is_ user-level documentation in >> the notation manual (as a warning) mentioning, something like on

Re: Let \footnote do the job of \footnote, \footnoteGrob, \autoFootnote and \autoFootnoteGrob (issue 5527058)

On Jan 10, 2012, at 4:46 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > "m...@apollinemike.com" writes: > >> On Jan 10, 2012, at 3:23 PM, David Kastrup wrote: >> >>> What's that? auto-numbering will only be active if >>> footnote-auto-numbering is set in the layout? Which it isn't by >>> default? And where the

Re: Let \footnote do the job of \footnote, \footnoteGrob, \autoFootnote and \autoFootnoteGrob (issue 5527058)

"m...@apollinemike.com" writes: > On Jan 10, 2012, at 3:23 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > >> What's that? auto-numbering will only be active if >> footnote-auto-numbering is set in the layout? Which it isn't by >> default? And where there is no documentation around explaining how and >> why you sh

Re: Let \footnote do the job of \footnote, \footnoteGrob, \autoFootnote and \autoFootnoteGrob (issue 5527058)

On Jan 10, 2012, at 3:23 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > David Kastrup writes: > >> Well, scanning for \markup ... will be quite more of a challenge. >> Another problem I see is coordinating the change with the equally-named >> \footnote markup command. I have to see how that is defined. >> >> On t

music font

Hi you all, i'm a (typo)graphic designer from Italy and i'm about to finish my dissertation about typography inside musical notation. I would like to apply my result inside lilypond like it was for the gonville font ( http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/gonville/ ). The problem is that

Re: Let \footnote do the job of \footnote, \footnoteGrob, \autoFootnote and \autoFootnoteGrob (issue 5527058)

David Kastrup writes: > Well, scanning for \markup ... will be quite more of a challenge. > Another problem I see is coordinating the change with the equally-named > \footnote markup command. I have to see how that is defined. > > On the plus side, most user files will likely be using \autoFootn

Re: Let \footnote do the job of \footnote, \footnoteGrob, \autoFootnote and \autoFootnoteGrob (issue 5527058)

m...@apollinemike.com writes: >> Actually, one could juggle the order of arguments around such that >> the optional arguments can't be confused with the next argument. >> Like putting the footnote mark first, position next, Grob spec next, >> footnote text last. In that manner, you could leave of

Re: Let \footnote do the job of \footnote, \footnoteGrob, \autoFootnote and \autoFootnoteGrob (issue 5527058)

On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 13:28:46 +, d...@gnu.org wrote: On 2012/01/10 13:18:03, dak wrote: On 2012/01/10 12:59:21, Reinhold wrote: > LGTM. > > From a lazy user's POV, I don't like that I now have to use \default for > auto-numbering (which is th typical case)... It is the same as with \mar

Re: Sketch of not remaking html files (issue 5498093)

Checking the file timestamps will be a good thing. It might be better to just replace the whole www_post script by make rules, but in the current implementation this is a good improvement. Just a style thing, in general I notice that you use "function(arg)" while the rest of python source code in

Re: Let \footnote do the job of \footnote, \footnoteGrob, \autoFootnote and \autoFootnoteGrob (issue 5527058)

On 2012/01/10 13:18:03, dak wrote: On 2012/01/10 12:59:21, Reinhold wrote: > LGTM. > > From a lazy user's POV, I don't like that I now have to use \default for > auto-numbering (which is th typical case)... It is the same as with \mark (we don't have \autoMark either). One might consider

Re: Let \footnote do the job of \footnote, \footnoteGrob, \autoFootnote and \autoFootnoteGrob (issue 5527058)

On 2012/01/10 12:59:21, Reinhold wrote: LGTM. From a lazy user's POV, I don't like that I now have to use \default for auto-numbering (which is th typical case)... It is the same as with \mark (we don't have \autoMark either). One might consider moving the footnote mark argument to last

Re: Let \footnote do the job of \footnote, \footnoteGrob, \autoFootnote and \autoFootnoteGrob (issue 5527058)

LGTM. From a lazy user's POV, I don't like that I now have to use \default for auto-numbering (which is th typical case)... But then, one can always define one's own music function that takes care of that. So no objection from my side. http://codereview.appspot.com/5527058/diff/1/Documentation/

Re: Regtests for 2.15.24

- Original Message - From: To: Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 12:08 PM Subject: Re: Regtests for 2.15.24 On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 11:07:35 -, Phil Holmes wrote: A large number of changes in tests with slurs: see lyric-extender-completion.png for example. Assume these are Mike's ch

Re: Regtests for 2.15.24

On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 11:07:35 -, Phil Holmes wrote: A large number of changes in tests with slurs: see lyric-extender-completion.png for example. Assume these are Mike's changes to make slur bounding boxes lass rectangular. Are there any changes that result in collisions? The gamble with

Re: Let \footnote do the job of \footnote, \footnoteGrob, \autoFootnote and \autoFootnoteGrob (issue 5527058)

On 2012/01/10 07:08:29, MikeSol wrote: LGTM. Good work! The only think I'd ask is that you change the markup syntax before pushing the patch. I think that, if the distinction between footnote and auto-footnote is going to be eliminated, it needs to be categorical. Optional arguments ar

Re: Let \footnote do the job of \footnote, \footnoteGrob, \autoFootnote and \autoFootnoteGrob (issue 5527058)

On 2012/01/09 20:42:30, J_lowe wrote: Does this do anything to the \auto-footnote command as well? No. http://codereview.appspot.com/5527058/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-d

Re: Let \footnote do the job of \footnote, \footnoteGrob, \autoFootnote and \autoFootnoteGrob (issue 5527058)

Reviewers: J_lowe, carl.d.sorensen_gmail.com, lemzwerg, MikeSol, Message: On 2012/01/10 06:29:57, lemzwerg wrote: http://codereview.appspot.com/5527058/diff/1/python/convertrules.py File python/convertrules.py (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/5527058/diff/1/python/convertrules.py#newcod

Build help

Hey all, I'm trying to design a regtest for the DOM-id property. Ideally, I'd like to generate an svg file that is then checked by a python script to make sure that the property has been correctly set. I have sketches of the files in question (see attached) and I'm wondering how I could des