Carl,
2012/2/11 Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu:
I'm trying to see if it's possible to keep support for OSX 10.4, and at
the same time, have the proper version of lilypond shown in the About box.
You are _amazing_! You do everything and help everyone.
In order to try to track this down,
m...@apollinemike.com m...@apollinemike.com writes:
On Feb 10, 2012, at 7:35 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
m...@apollinemike.com m...@apollinemike.com writes:
The problem is that the Pango API does not allow multiplication
between two arbitrary matrices.
Hm? What's wrong with
Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu writes:
On 2/10/12 12:52 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Sure thing. When this will be going on countdown, I was also going to
copy it to the user list. I also plan on mentioning it in the next
LilyPond Report (no idea about when I'll be working
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
2012/2/9 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
Does anybody feel like submitting a proposal to google summer of
code? IIRC students must be registered at a school, so this isn't
something that would help any senior developer, but it's still
carl.d.soren...@gmail.com writes:
Thanks for taking this on, Janek.
I don't know what the response will be to for_UP_and_DOWN(d). The last
time somebody proposed a change, it was resisted because the do{}
flip(d)!=UP idiom seemed simple enough to be acceptable.
But I think the new idiom
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
2012/2/10 Pavel Roskin pro...@gnu.org:
Hello!
There is a strange suggestion in Documentation/notation/spacing.itely:
@item ragged-last-bottom
@funindex ragged-last-bottom
If set to false, systems will spread vertically down the
2012/2/10 David Kastrup address@hidden:
* Don't get me wrong: it is probably quite enough work for getting someone*
* started. I'm just not sure whether it will be easy to sell it off. The*
* largest part of the work would realistically consist in digging oneself*
* into sparsely documented
On 2012/02/10 23:49:24, Carl wrote:
Thanks for taking this on, Janek.
I don't know what the response will be to for_UP_and_DOWN(d). The
last time
somebody proposed a change, it was resisted because the do{}
flip(d)!=UP idiom
seemed simple enough to be acceptable.
It took us a while to
Forgot about one thing, sorry
http://codereview.appspot.com/5651069/diff/1/lily/note-collision.cc
File lily/note-collision.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5651069/diff/1/lily/note-collision.cc#newcode552
lily/note-collision.cc:552: for_UP_and_DOWN (d) // please, make a
comment to
Łukasz Czerwiński milimet...@gmail.com writes:
2012/2/10 David Kastrup address@hidden:
Don't get me wrong: it is probably quite enough work for getting someone
started. I'm just not sure whether it will be easy to sell it off. The
largest part of the work would realistically consist in
2012/2/11 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Łukasz Czerwiński milimet...@gmail.com writes:
2012/2/10 David Kastrup address@hidden:
Don't get me wrong: it is probably quite enough work for getting someone
started. I'm just not sure whether it will be easy to sell it off. The
largest part of the
Am 09.02.2012 um 17:26 schrieb Phil Holmes:
- Original Message - From: Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com
To: Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu
C) Development of score_ocr2ly, which would take a score pdf and turn it
into .ly files matching the lilypond scoring standard
Heh.
- Original Message -
From: pls p.l.schm...@gmx.de
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
There are a number of commercial products that, given a perfect
representation of a score, convert it to perfect musicXML - so it can't
be that hard.
Hm, could you name some, please? I haven't
http://codereview.appspot.com/5651069/diff/1/lily/accidental-placement.cc
File lily/accidental-placement.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5651069/diff/1/lily/accidental-placement.cc#newcode211
lily/accidental-placement.cc:211: * @return A vector of
Accidental_placement_entrys
Do you
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 09:32:11AM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote:
2012/2/11 Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu:
In order to try to track this down, I'd like to have a git history to see
how things have changed. [...]
Can anybody tell me where I might find an up-to-date repository?
new patch set uploaded, please review.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5651069/diff/1/lily/note-collision.cc
File lily/note-collision.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5651069/diff/1/lily/note-collision.cc#newcode588
lily/note-collision.cc:588: {
On 2012/02/11 12:32:57, Milimetr88 wrote:
W dniu 11 lutego 2012 13:33 użytkownik Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca napisał:
Time+effort required to write a proposal. Would you be happy
delaying the 2.16 for, say, a month, while we spend effort writing
that proposal (which may or may not be accepted) ? When all's
said and
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 02:32:31PM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote:
W dniu 11 lutego 2012 13:33 użytkownik Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca napisał:
Time+effort required to write a proposal. Would you be happy
delaying the 2.16 for, say, a month, while we spend effort writing
that
Please see commit:
6c6f97dcb49afb3aaa9480eece124d11a6c48975
This changes the words around an illustration of the syntax of printing
woodwind key lists, replacing an inline snippet with text. The benefit of
this is that the snippet is no longer run during a make doc, and therefore
the key
W dniu 11 lutego 2012 13:30 użytkownik Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca napisał:
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 09:32:11AM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote:
I think this is a lesson for us all.
Yes, and that lesson is when Graham tries to off-load mundane
administrative tasks, somebody do it,
Reviewers: dak, Graham Percival, Julien Rioux,
Message:
Latest GOP 9 make doc reduction - please review.
Description:
I've opened a new issue to avoid confusion. AFAICS this redirects all
the output from texi2pdf, makeinfo and tex2html to logfiles. I've used
Julien and David's suggestion of
philehol...@googlemail.com writes:
Reviewers: dak, Graham Percival, Julien Rioux,
Message:
Latest GOP 9 make doc reduction - please review.
Description:
I've opened a new issue to avoid confusion. AFAICS this redirects all
the output from texi2pdf, makeinfo and tex2html to logfiles.
- Original Message -
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: philehol...@googlemail.com
Cc: re...@codereview-hr.appspotmail.com; julien.ri...@gmail.com;
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2012 5:20 PM
Subject: Re: Final redirection of texi output (issue 5650064)
On 2011/10/24 09:47:45, Reinhold wrote:
LGTM.
Hi,
I know it's only a one-liner but it still fixes a bus error. Is there
any specific reason why this patch has never been pushed?
Thanks
patrick
http://codereview.appspot.com/5303063/
___
On 2012/02/11 20:55:34, pl_s wrote:
I know it's only a one-liner but it still fixes a bus error. Is there
any
specific reason why this patch has never been pushed?
It was pushed a week ago?
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1985
You're the only person that can close this
On 2012/02/11 21:01:04, Graham Percival wrote:
On 2012/02/11 20:55:34, pl_s wrote:
I know it's only a one-liner but it still fixes a bus error. Is
there any
specific reason why this patch has never been pushed?
It was pushed a week ago?
2012/2/11 Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net:
Please see commit:
6c6f97dcb49afb3aaa9480eece124d11a6c48975
This changes the words around an illustration of the syntax of printing
woodwind key lists, replacing an inline snippet with text. The benefit of
this is that the snippet is no longer
On Feb 11, 2012, at 9:49 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
m...@apollinemike.com m...@apollinemike.com writes:
On Feb 10, 2012, at 7:35 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
m...@apollinemike.com m...@apollinemike.com writes:
The problem is that the Pango API does not allow multiplication
between two
http://codereview.appspot.com/5651069/diff/5002/lily/note-collision.cc
File lily/note-collision.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5651069/diff/5002/lily/note-collision.cc#newcode191
lily/note-collision.cc:191: */
Protect the comment formatting with a column of '*'s
Otherwise, someone
29 matches
Mail list logo
