Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net writes:
David Kastrup dak at gnu.org writes:
One really ugly problem is interpreting things like 4.. Looks like a
duration, but then we have
input/regression/dynamics-broken-hairpin.ly: line-width = 4.\cm
The parser chooses among (too) many different
Message du 25/07/12 00:08
De : Trevor Daniels
A : Graham Percival , John Mandereau
Copie à : lilypond-devel
Objet : Re: Using MSH Paris Nord server
Graham Percival wrote Tuesday, July 24, 2012 10:55 PM
grenouille.lilynet.net.
I like it. Definitely better than crapaud which has
Lilyfan lily...@orange.fr writes:
Message du 25/07/12 00:08
De : Trevor Daniels
A : Graham Percival , John Mandereau
Copie à : lilypond-devel
Objet : Re: Using MSH Paris Nord server
Graham Percival wrote Tuesday, July 24, 2012 10:55 PM
grenouille.lilynet.net.
I like it.
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
Of course, it is almost inevitable for those versed in both the American
as well as the French language to think of John Longhorn's (aka Mark
Twain)
Uh oh. Of course his real name is _Samuel_ Longhorn Clemens. The
things you remember after hitting C-c C-c
- Original Message -
From: Frédéric Bron frederic.b...@m4x.org
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 5:51 AM
Subject: Re: Issue 2401 in lilypond: NR 1.2.4 - Not working snippet
I proposed a patch for issue 2401 (see tracker).
Now in codereview:
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 10:04:12AM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: Frédéric Bron
frederic.b...@m4x.org
got this message:
WARNING: could not change issue labels;
please email lilypond-devel with the issue number: 2401
Frédéric
Looks like it has successfully
- Original Message -
From: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Cc: Frédéric Bron frederic.b...@m4x.org; lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 10:16 AM
Subject: Re: Issue 2401 in lilypond: NR 1.2.4 - Not working snippet
Nope, it
Updates from comments.
http://codereview.appspot.com/6432063/diff/1/Documentation/notation/keyboards.itely
File Documentation/notation/keyboards.itely (left):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6432063/diff/1/Documentation/notation/keyboards.itely#oldcode457
Thanks for all the comments in the patch! That should make it much
easier for the next person who looks at this code.
http://codereview.appspot.com/6420058/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
LGTM
http://codereview.appspot.com/6438043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
2012/7/24 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
convert-ly can't work reliably since it does not understand the
structure of LilyPond files.
(...)
Reliable conversions need to understand structure. You can do them on
XML. LilyPond is too complex.
(...)
Right, so a perfect convert-ly would solve all
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:33:30PM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
Speaking of, another stupid idea I once had, was to establish big
ranges of music Lily can do, for example All J.S.Bach and try to
find counter-examples that break this set. If we find them, _that_
would be a good source of ideas
Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com writes:
2012/7/24 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
convert-ly can't work reliably since it does not understand the
structure of LilyPond files.
(...)
Reliable conversions need to understand structure. You can do them on
XML. LilyPond is too complex.
(...)
10:35:11 (UTC) Begin LilyPond compile, previous commit at
f7085cf9b2ff111b7d30c8a59e367c771a7e3c52
10:35:13 Merged staging, now at:1ec92395c0ac0f8aa26cf4e2472ef21d9c620b32
10:35:16Success:./autogen.sh --noconfigure
10:35:49Success:
lilypond-a...@mandereau.net writes:
10:35:11 (UTC) Begin LilyPond compile, previous commit at
f7085cf9b2ff111b7d30c8a59e367c771a7e3c52
10:35:13 Merged staging, now at:
1ec92395c0ac0f8aa26cf4e2472ef21d9c620b32
10:35:16 Success:./autogen.sh --noconfigure
10:35:49
- Original Message -
From: lilypond-a...@mandereau.net
To: lilypond-a...@gnu.org
Cc: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 1:09 PM
Subject: Patchy email
10:35:11 (UTC) Begin LilyPond compile, previous commit at
f7085cf9b2ff111b7d30c8a59e367c771a7e3c52
10:35:13 Merged
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
- Original Message -
From: lilypond-a...@mandereau.net
To: lilypond-a...@gnu.org
Cc: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 1:09 PM
Subject: Patchy email
10:35:11 (UTC) Begin LilyPond compile, previous commit at
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 04:58:57AM +, Keith OHara wrote:
Graham Percival graham at percival-music.ca writes:
2. Define a subset of input as being stable for the 3.x branch.
We add regression tests for that subset of notation and
forbid running convert-ly on those files.
Hi,
I am getting increasingly annoyed at the abuse of pairs and Moment for
denoting rational numbers, and the Rational C++ type has no interfaces
of its own to Scheme.
Does LilyPond have a history where Guile did not support rational
numbers?
I am currently trying to do some cleanup in the
Issue 2696 does not appear in the list of open issues (and consequently
is invisible to test-patches). If you enter 2696 in the search box,
however, it does appear just fine.
Anybody has an idea what's wrong here?
--
David Kastrup
___
Phil Holmes wrote Tuesday, July 24, 2012 4:28 PM
I'd like to look at fixing 766. Could someone suggest the best way to go
about this, please? One option would seem to be to calculate the length of
the text of the instrument names, and set the indent on the score equal to
that plus a bit. Is
- Original Message -
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 5:09 PM
Subject: What's wrong with issue 2696?
Issue 2696 does not appear in the list of open issues (and consequently
is invisible to test-patches). If you enter 2696 in
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
- Original Message -
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 5:09 PM
Subject: What's wrong with issue 2696?
Issue 2696 does not appear in the list of open issues (and consequently
is
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
- Original Message -
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 5:09 PM
Subject: What's wrong with issue 2696?
Issue 2696 does not appear in the list of
- Original Message -
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 5:40 PM
Subject: Re: What's wrong with issue 2696?
am I now a persona non grata?
Who said that?
--
Phil Holmes
___
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
- Original Message -
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 5:40 PM
Subject: Re: What's wrong with issue 2696?
am I now a persona non grata?
Who said that?
Well, my recent issues
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
- Original Message -
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 5:40 PM
Subject: Re: What's wrong with issue 2696?
am I now a persona non grata?
Who
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
Well, my recent issues don't get listed in the tracker searches.
Neither in the LilyPond tracker, nor in the GoogleCode tracker. I
suspect that other people are not better off, but since the followup
issue numbers have
regtests reorganized and explanations added
http://codereview.appspot.com/6419064/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 6:31 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Hi,
I am getting increasingly annoyed at the abuse of pairs and Moment for
denoting rational numbers, and the Rational C++ type has no interfaces
of its own to Scheme.
Does LilyPond have a history where Guile did not
Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 6:31 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Hi,
I am getting increasingly annoyed at the abuse of pairs and Moment for
denoting rational numbers, and the Rational C++ type has no interfaces
of its own to Scheme.
Does
David Kastrup dak at gnu.org writes:
One problem I currently struggle with is supporting something like
\tempo 4. = 200
Your patch to re-allow \tempo in midi blocks will also need to restore
mention of the extra-space-trick \tempo 4 . = 90 in the docs, and in
your convert-ly rule.
Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net writes:
David Kastrup dak at gnu.org writes:
One problem I currently struggle with is supporting something like
\tempo 4. = 200
Your patch to re-allow \tempo in midi blocks will also need to restore
mention of the extra-space-trick \tempo 4 . = 90 in the
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
\cm _is_ a user variable. You can write
\layout { m = 100\cm
paper-width = 0.5\m
}
Make that \paper instead of \layout, or \cm is undefined.
--
David Kastrup
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
Oh, I don't know. It's only mildly annoying, but I don't see what good
it does. What else could .3 be besides a number ?
http://www.mutopiaproject.org/cgibin/piece-info.cgi?id=921
chp-28-04-a4.ly:45:18: error: syntax error, unexpected '.'
bottom-margin =
.6\cm
David Kastrup dak at gnu.org writes:
\midi{\tempo 4. = 90}
\tempo can just switch lexing modes.
Oh. That would be nice.
Then we could continue to let 4. and .4 be valid where LilyPond
can accept a decimal number.
___
lilypond-devel mailing
Reviewers: Keith,
Message:
On 2012/07/26 02:37:19, Keith wrote:
Oh, I don't know. It's only mildly annoying, but I don't see what
good it does.
What else could .3 be besides a number ?
A chord step. But chordmode is pretty awful anyway. I agree that
syntactically 4. is quite the more
Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net writes:
David Kastrup dak at gnu.org writes:
\midi{\tempo 4. = 90}
\tempo can just switch lexing modes.
Oh. That would be nice.
Then we could continue to let 4. and .4 be valid where LilyPond
can accept a decimal number.
Does not actually work.
38 matches
Mail list logo
