Since \partial is already taken, what about \cut? The
spanner gets cut a bit, right?
I can even imagine to use to commands, \start and \end to get, say,
`\start(' or `\end\'. Who knows, maybe this destinction is
advantageous sometime in the future.
Werner
I can even imagine to use to commands, \start and \end to get, say,
`\start(' or `\end\'. Who knows, maybe this destinction is
advantageous sometime in the future.
Maybe even better \startOf and \endOf.
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
On 20 mars 2013, at 07:25, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
I can even imagine to use to commands, \start and \end to get, say,
`\start(' or `\end\'. Who knows, maybe this destinction is
advantageous sometime in the future.
Maybe even better \startOf and \endOf.
Werner
The
m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org writes:
On 20 mars 2013, at 06:07, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org writes:
Trying to put myself in the shoes of the average user, \fake would
not mean a function that uses a fake post event, but rather a
On 20 mars 2013, at 07:50, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org writes:
On 20 mars 2013, at 06:07, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org writes:
Trying to put myself in the shoes of the average user, \fake
Am 20.03.2013 02:16, schrieb David Kastrup:
Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca writes:
Hi Shane,
What happens when we need an awkward length R like R1*12/8*14?
I'm not sure what you mean by awkward length…
I'm suggesting that R (with no duration given) should give you a
m...@mikesolomon.org
I completely agree. It's just that fake in English means false or
counterfeit. It needs another word, just don't know what yet. unchained?
free?
At the risk of prolonging the bike-shedding, here's my take. For me, the key
consideration is to provide an easily
m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org writes:
On 20 mars 2013, at 07:50, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org writes:
The word fake still doesn't sit right with me... There is nothing
fake about the slur:
{ a \fake ( b c d ) }
Mike, that
Jan-Peter Voigt jp.vo...@gmx.de writes:
[...]
(ly:make-duration (inexact-exact (/ (log den)(log 2))) ...
That's a terribly broken thing to do. inexact-exact does not change
the value one bit, only its interpretation. A number considered to be
_approximated_ by integer*2^power is now
Am 20.03.2013 09:55, schrieb David Kastrup:
Jan-Peter Voigt jp.vo...@gmx.de writes:
[...]
(ly:make-duration (inexact-exact (/ (log den)(log 2))) ...
That's a terribly broken thing to do. inexact-exact does not change
the value one bit, only its interpretation. A number considered to
\fake and \broken are concise but feel wrong, implying something's
wrong with something else but the name doesn't describe it.
I think a function name where we've got to resort to being clever maybe
indicate we're trying to solve the wrong problem: we're trying to make
the name short at the
On 20 March 2013 12:35, ianhuli...@gmail.com wrote:
\fake and \broken are concise but feel wrong, implying something's
wrong with something else but the name doesn't describe it.
I think a function name where we've got to resort to being clever maybe
indicate we're trying to solve the wrong
On 2013/03/20 12:35:37, Ian Hulin (gmail) wrote:
\fake and \broken are concise but feel wrong, implying something's
wrong with something else but the name doesn't describe it.
Without pointing out what makes you think they feel wrong, that's not
helpful.
I think a function name where we've
Yet another possibility would be \inner but that implies a hierarchy.
More accurate would be \continued.
https://codereview.appspot.com/7424049/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
If the design needs it at both ends of the repeated block you could
consider a single keyword parameter for the function,
o \slurInRepeat #'begin - to appear at the end of the block and
indicate you're starting a new, partial slur and
o \slurInRepeat #'complete - to appear at the
And yet another would be \silent as a sort of negative variant of
\visual.
https://codereview.appspot.com/7424049/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
More accurate would be \continued.
https://codereview.appspot.com/7424049/
I like \interrupted
I can live with both \continued and \interrupted.
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Hello
On 20 March 2013 13:40, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
More accurate would be \continued.
https://codereview.appspot.com/7424049/
I like \interrupted
I can live with both \continued and \interrupted.
Is that with two 'r's or two 'p's or both?
...
are you sure?
James
m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org writes:
On 20 mars 2013, at 14:26, d...@gnu.org wrote:
Yet another possibility would be \inner but that implies a hierarchy.
More accurate would be \continued.
https://codereview.appspot.com/7424049/
I like \interrupted
I considered that but
Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org writes:
If the design needs it at both ends of the repeated block you could
consider a single keyword parameter for the function,
o \slurInRepeat #'begin - to appear at the end of the block and
indicate you're starting a new, partial slur and
o \slurInRepeat
James pkx1...@gmail.com writes:
Hello
On 20 March 2013 13:40, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
More accurate would be \continued.
https://codereview.appspot.com/7424049/
I like \interrupted
I can live with both \continued and \interrupted.
Is that
On 20 mars 2013, at 14:52, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org writes:
On 20 mars 2013, at 14:26, d...@gnu.org wrote:
Yet another possibility would be \inner but that implies a hierarchy.
More accurate would be \continued.
I think any further proposals should _definitely_ explain how to write
the given example
g f e d(
\repeat { c d) e f ( }
\alternatives {
{ g) a b( a \fake) }
{ \fake( e) d c( d \fake) }
{ \fake( d) c d( e }
}
d c) d c
Hmm. It's not clear to me why lilypond can't handle this
On 20 March 2013 15:01, m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
I don't completely follow what you're saying above - could you say it
another way?
I don't follow this whole developers discussion about choosing the best
command name for the users.
Please correct me if I'm wrong.
1.
Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org writes:
I think any further proposals should _definitely_ explain how to write
the given example
g f e d(
\repeat { c d) e f ( }
\alternatives {
{ g) a b( a \fake) }
{ \fake( e) d c( d \fake) }
{ \fake( d) c d( e }
}
d c) d c
Hmm. It's not clear
On 20 mars 2013, at 14:26, d...@gnu.org wrote:
Yet another possibility would be \inner but that implies a hierarchy.
More accurate would be \continued.
https://codereview.appspot.com/7424049/
I like \interrupted
Cheers,
MS
___
lilypond-devel
Sent from my iPhone
On 20 mars 2013, at 16:38, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org writes:
I think any further proposals should _definitely_ explain how to write
the given example
g f e d(
\repeat { c d) e f ( }
\alternatives {
{ g) a b( a \fake) }
{
On 20 mars 2013, at 18:25, m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
On 20 mars 2013, at 16:38, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org writes:
I think any further proposals should _definitely_ explain how to write
the given example
g
But TeX is separate enough from LilyPond that I actually like
\phantom rather well for this purpose.
Anything like phantom, fake and co doesn't sit right in
English. [...]
But there are millions of TeX users who are used to \phantom. And I
believe that a lot of Lilypond users are TeX
m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org writes:
Even better, how about:
\anderston
The Anderston pedestrian bridge is a real life example of what we're
talking about.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/M8_Bridge_to_Nowhere#section_3
I'm totally for this - it would be fantastic if people
Am 20.03.2013 19:10, schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
But there are millions of TeX users who are used to \phantom. And I
believe that a lot of Lilypond users are TeX users also. This means
that those users are already acquainted with this command and can
easily deduce what it does.
I think knowing
On 20 mars 2013, at 09:26, Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk wrote:
m...@mikesolomon.org
I completely agree. It's just that fake in English means false or
counterfeit. It needs another word, just don't know what yet. unchained?
free?
At the risk of prolonging the
Hello,
*Countdown – March 23th 2013 – 19:00 GMT* *
* *
* *
* *
*
3238http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3238q=label%3APatch-countdownsort=patchcolspec=ID%20Type%20Status%20Stars%20Owner%20Patch%20Summary%20Modified
Build Julien Rioux Push Patch: Fixup default prefix
Even better, how about:
\anderston
Uhmm, no. :-)
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Hey all,
Following up to my comment on the tracker, I'd like to not push this
until everyone has had a chance to think through David's e-mails about
2.18. I anticipate this needing 2-3 months of user testing to catch and
fix any bugs. Given that this is my first big patch since August, it'll
Hi hackers,
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 8:46 PM, James pkx1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
3259http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3259q=label%3APatch-reviewsort=patchcolspec=ID%20Type%20Status%20Stars%20Owner%20Patch%20Needs%20Summary%20Modified
Janek Warchol Patch: report a
Hi all,
after some thinking i've come to a conclusion that we should keep this
patch as is - just a simple rewrite of self-alignment-interface, without
lots of new features and generalizations: they should be done in another
patch. Doing so should make git history more logical: there will be a
m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org writes:
On 20 mars 2013, at 09:26, Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk wrote:
m...@mikesolomon.org
I completely agree. It's just that fake in English means false
or counterfeit. It needs another word, just don't know what yet.
unchained?
David Kastrup wrote Wednesday, March 20, 2013 10:38 PM
m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org writes:
On 20 mars 2013, at 09:26, Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk wrote:
At the risk of prolonging the bike-shedding, here's my take. For
me, the key consideration is to provide an
Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk writes:
David Kastrup wrote Wednesday, March 20, 2013 10:38 PM
m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org writes:
On 20 mars 2013, at 09:26, Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk wrote:
At the risk of prolonging the bike-shedding, here's my take. For
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk writes:
What kind of word would people pick when describing a score on the
phone? For a single occurence, interrupted is likely a good
candidate, but five times in a row something catchier would likely
win. Probably
LGTM as long as that Paris typo is fixed.
https://codereview.appspot.com/7497046/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
LGTM
https://codereview.appspot.com/7678047/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
43 matches
Mail list logo
