> Lately, building lilypond, I have occationally encountered a strange
> error-massage:
>
> ERROR: Please install required programs: /usr/local/bin/fontforge >=
> 20110222 (installed: 3ec845c4fe718af4908ce2dc25b66d0594930)
>
> BUT: There IS installed a version of fontforge (with the quoted hash,
For information: I compile both lilypond-dev and fontforge from git
sources, situated in /usr/local/src and the executables in
/usr/local/bin/ - (in debian testing, not ubuntu).
Lately, building lilypond, I have occationally encountered a strange
error-massage:
ERROR: Please install required
> On 4 Nov 2014, at 19:52, Marc Hohl wrote:
>
> Am 04.11.2014 um 15:18 schrieb Hans Aberg:
>>
>>> On 4 Nov 2014, at 10:49, Marc Hohl wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 04.11.2014 um 07:48 schrieb David Kastrup:
Dan Eble writes:
> If the simple-fraction components of a compound time signature r
Am 04.11.2014 um 12:55 schrieb Dan Eble:
2 + 32 + 3 4
- + C vs.- + -
44 4
Undesirable in my book.
I overlooked the fact that the denominators are the same, so
either
[…]
I'd rather not use the C symbol in these cases.
Am 04.11.2014 um 15:18 schrieb Hans Aberg:
On 4 Nov 2014, at 10:49, Marc Hohl wrote:
Am 04.11.2014 um 07:48 schrieb David Kastrup:
Dan Eble writes:
If the simple-fraction components of a compound time signature respected the
time signature style, would that qualify as useful or as undesi
> On 4 Nov 2014, at 10:49, Marc Hohl wrote:
>
> Am 04.11.2014 um 07:48 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Dan Eble writes:
>>
>>> If the simple-fraction components of a compound time signature respected
>>> the time signature style, would that qualify as useful or as undesirable?
>>> For example,
>>
>>>2 + 32 + 3 4
>>>- + C vs.- + -
>>> 44 4
>>
>> Undesirable in my book.
>>
>
> I overlooked the fact that the denominators are the same, so
> either
[…]
>
> I'd rather not use the C symbol in these cases.
Bad example. Wha
Am 04.11.2014 um 07:48 schrieb David Kastrup:
Dan Eble writes:
If the simple-fraction components of a compound time signature respected the
time signature style, would that qualify as useful or as undesirable? For
example,
2 + 32 + 3 4
- + C vs.- +
> I don’t recall that anybody so far has been able to explain how they know a
> piece is in 4/2 when it is denoted cut-C. Can you?
as well as knowing whether a customary C (cut or uncut) signals 2/2 or
4/4 (or 1/1, see below).
I maintain that the second Kyrie from Bach's Mass in B minor is in
4
Dan Eble writes:
> If the simple-fraction components of a compound time signature respected the
> time signature style, would that qualify as useful or as undesirable? For
> example,
>
>2 + 32 + 3 4
>- + C vs.- + -
> 44 4
10 matches
Mail list logo
