Re: official GNU LilyPond maintainer

2016-12-27 6:25 GMT+01:00 Graham Percival : > With David stepping down, LilyPond is left without an official GNU > maintanier. Does anybody want to do fill this role? The relevant > documentation is: > https://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/index.html >

Re: [PATCH [uploaded to Rietveld]] Automatic lyric extenders

On 2016-12-27 21:25, Trevor Daniels wrote: Alexander Kobel wrote Monday, December 26, 2016 1:00 AM Oh well, it's late. I didn't spot measure 7, with the 8( 8) in alto. Same there. And, of course, you should have an extender there in the second verse, and you should have extenders in measure 1

Re: Free alternatives to Rietveld?

Thanks for the heads-up on previous discussions, now I know more about the pitfalls. Also I see now that the ultimate free alternative would likely be the one Jan N. brought up in that old discussion, namely exchanging patches via e-mail only. Which makes sense with git’s design, however the

Re: Automatic LyricExtenders (issue 313240043 by perpeduumimmob...@gmail.com)

Am 27.12.2016 um 03:01 schrieb perpeduumimmob...@gmail.com: On 2016/12/26 19:14:00, pkx166h wrote: On 2016/12/25 21:53:55, akobel wrote: > Bottom line: I withdraw both proposals. Can you then re-submit a new patch or delete the one(s) that are invalid? Sorry, I'm a bit drawn up between my

Re: Delete new LSR-snippet?

Knut Petersen wrote Friday, December 23, 2016 11:53 PM Harm, would this be a better snippet for the LSR? >> I seem to remember a post or maybe an LSR entry for placing >> divisi arrows at the end of a staff. Maybe this could be >> adapted to achieve the same effect more reliably? >> >> Found

Re: [PATCH [uploaded to Rietveld]] Automatic lyric extenders

Alexander Kobel wrote Monday, December 26, 2016 1:00 AM > Oh well, it's late. I didn't spot measure 7, with the 8( 8) in alto. > Same there. > And, of course, you should have an extender there in the second verse, > and you should have extenders in measure 1 (was/was/shall) an measure 9 >

Re: Offer to help development: Convert MIDI to Lilypond

On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 08:43:34AM +0100, k...@aspodata.se wrote: > Graham: > > That is correct; the python midi2ly conversion is quite > > independent of the rest of LilyPond. As a result, it is an > > excellent place to begin! :) > > So I propose that a better course of action would be to

Re: Free alternatives to Rietveld?

On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 02:39:09PM +, James wrote: > On Tue, 27 Dec 2016 13:33:11 +0100 > Simon Albrecht wrote: > > > Whatever the reason for this weirdness, I think it would really be > > better if we had a code review tool which didn’t rely on external > > login

Re: Arrow-glyphs in Feta (was: \arrow markup command)

Hi, Simon! On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Simon Albrecht-2 [via Lilypond] < ml-node+s1069038n198583...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > On 23.12.2016 22:34, Simon Albrecht wrote: > > Why does the Feta font have one glyph for each of the 4 directions in > > which an arrow head generated with \arrow-head

Arrow-glyphs in Feta (was: \arrow markup command)

On 23.12.2016 22:34, Simon Albrecht wrote: Why does the Feta font have one glyph for each of the 4 directions in which an arrow head generated with \arrow-head can point? Why not simply rotate one glyph in the first place? (I’m sure the Metafont code does just that, though it would strike me

Re: Free alternatives to Rietveld?

On Tue, 27 Dec 2016 13:33:11 +0100 Simon Albrecht wrote: > Hello everybody, > > just now I tried to login with Google in order to close my two recent > Rietveld reviews. However, Google decided that despite entering a > verification code from e-mail it couldn’t confirm

Re: Free alternatives to Rietveld?

On 27.12.2016 14:09, Urs Liska wrote: While we're at it: is there really no tool that integrates with Git directly? I find it pretty inconvenient and partly unreliable that the author is responsible himself that what is pushed actually is what has been reviewed. Well, I had a brief look at

Re: Free alternatives to Rietveld?

Am 27. Dezember 2016 13:33:11 MEZ, schrieb Simon Albrecht : >Hello everybody, > >just now I tried to login with Google in order to close my two recent >Rietveld reviews. However, Google decided that despite entering a >verification code from e-mail it couldn’t confirm

Re: Free alternatives to Rietveld?

Hi Simon, 2016-12-27 13:33 GMT+01:00 Simon Albrecht : > Hello everybody, > > just now I tried to login with Google in order to close my two recent > Rietveld reviews. However, Google decided that despite entering a > verification code from e-mail it couldn’t confirm me

Free alternatives to Rietveld?

Hello everybody, just now I tried to login with Google in order to close my two recent Rietveld reviews. However, Google decided that despite entering a verification code from e-mail it couldn’t confirm me being authorised to login. So I’m currently out. Maybe they want to force me to give a

PATCHES - Countdown for December 27th

Hello, Here is the current patch countdown list. The next countdown will be on December 30th. A quick synopsis of all patches currently in the review process can be found here: http://philholmes.net/lilypond/allura/ Push: 5016 Web: minor improvements to the ‘Bug reports’ page - Simon

PATCHES - Countdown for December 27th

Hello, Here is the current patch countdown list. The next countdown will be on December 30th. A quick synopsis of all patches currently in the review process can be found here: http://philholmes.net/lilypond/allura/ Push: 5016 Web: minor improvements to the ‘Bug reports’ page - Simon