Francisco Vila wrote Monday, December 29, 2008 10:49 AM
2008/12/29 Stefan Waler :
BTW, the term "accidental style" appears twice in the documentation with
a
completely different meaning:
- in 1.1.3, meaning the way how to display and reset accidentals
In the detailed explanation they are n
Graham Percival wrote Sunday, January 04, 2009 10:10 AM
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 10:00:58AM -, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Graham, you wrote Saturday, January 03, 2009 11:19 PM
Oh, one idea: since the templates are available in the Snippet
List, and since we assume that users have all pdfs
Carl D. Sorensen wrote Friday, January 02, 2009 7:56 PM
I'd be in favor of a policy that says the equivalent of the following:
"Each chapter has a defined section structure.
The structure consists of chapter, section, and subsection.
If subsubsections are desired, they should be unnumbered,
Graham Percival wrote Saturday, January 03, 2009 2:40 AM
How much oversight should the Frog patches receive? These patches
have been reviewed by Carl. They compile cleanly, adhere to our
code standards (to the extent that Carl understands them), and
appear to fix the bug.
I see three proposa
Graham Percival Saturday, January 03, 2009 4:01 AM
On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 12:56:18PM -0700, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
On 1/2/09 12:30 PM, "Trevor Daniels" wrote:
> I agree; that's why it is important to set out the standards
> clearly and to ensure they are consisten
ssage -
From: "Carl D. Sorensen"
To: "Trevor Daniels" ; "Graham Percival"
Cc: "lily-devel"
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2009 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: Reorganization of Docs
Trevor wrote:
I agree with Graham. \displayLilyMusic has nothing to
do with the
Carl D. Sorensen wrote Friday, January 02, 2009 1:44 PM
On 1/2/09 2:32 AM, "Trevor Daniels" wrote:
Carl D. Sorensen wrote Thursday, January 01, 2009 10:52 PM
On 1/1/09 11:25 AM, "Trevor Daniels" wrote:
I think we already have clear standards for revision under
Graham Percival wrote Thursday, January 01, 2009 9:26 PM
Much of the LM was written before this policy was instated,
so other forms tend to be used there, like @subsubheading
and others which just use a @bo...@italic{..} one line
paragraph, and as the LM hasn't yet been revised these
non-stand
Carl D. Sorensen wrote Thursday, January 01, 2009 10:52 PM
On 1/1/09 11:25 AM, "Trevor Daniels" wrote:
Graham
During GDP we experimented with various headings for
the levels below @subsection and I thought we had
standardised on @unnumberedsubsubsec with @node and
a menu entry.
Carl
I agree with Graham. \displayLilyMusic has nothing to
do with the internal representation of music. It simply
shows the effect of \transpose.
Are you thinking of \displayMusic maybe, which is already in
NR 6?
Trevor
Carl D. Sorensen wrote Friday, January 02, 2009 6:14 AM
On 1/1/09 9:5
Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Trevor Daniels"
Cc: "Reinhold Kainhofer" ;
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2008 1:04 AM
Subject: Re: Learning Manual TOC missing subsubsubsections
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 11:45:38AM -, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Graham Perciva
Graham Percival Thursday, January 01, 2009 12:19 AM
On Thu, Jan 01, 2009 at 09:23:24AM +1100, Joe Neeman wrote:
Towards the bottom of the page, we have the sentences "(The location of
this
directory is installation-dependent - see of information Other sources of
information)." and "Alternati
Stefan Waler wrote Monday, December 29, 2008 12:31 PM
I'm just wondering what the actual requirements are for running lilypond
with mingw on windows platforms. Is there any list for that?
AFAIK no one has seriously tried to compile LP under
mingw on a Windows platform. It may be possible, b
Reinhold Kainhofer wrote Monday, December 29, 2008 12:47 AM
Am Montag, 29. Dezember 2008 01:32:17 schrieb Bertalan Fodor:
Reinhold Kainhofer írta:
> Am Montag, 29. Dezember 2008 01:01:14 schrieb Bertalan Fodor:
>> The subsubsubsections are not present in LM toc.
>
> Which subsubsubsections are
Graham Percival wrote Monday, December 29, 2008 12:31 AM
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 01:25:37AM +0100, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 29. Dezember 2008 01:01:14 schrieb Bertalan Fodor:
> The subsubsubsections are not present in LM toc.
Which
At present the MensuralVoice context sets the NoteHead style to 'petrucci,
but does not set the style for rests. I know nothing of ancient music, but
it seems to me that rests should be set to 'mensural style? Advice please,
from anyone who understands ancient music.
Trevor
John Mandereau wrote Friday, December 26, 2008 8:18 PM
Le jeudi 25 décembre 2008 à 21:03 -0800, Graham Percival a écrit :
I currently see four options:
1) Build the website with texinfo and texi2html. With sufficient
stylesheets and texi2html hacking, I think this is /possible/, but
I don'
Neil Puttock wrote Wednesday, December 24, 2008 3:36 PM
Should tick barlines be the same thickness as nornal barlines?
Currently they get their width from line-thickness which makes them
slightly lighter; it also makes it impossible to tweak their
appearance without altering the look of the who
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote Monday, December 22, 2008 6:22 PM
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Graham Percival
wrote:
Does this mean you do not want to make any difference between odd and
even versions?
No. .13 would be the "devel" version, where syntax changes are
introduced, and any major
Reinhold Kainhofer wrote Monday, December 22, 2008 4:22 PM
Am Montag, 22. Dezember 2008 schrieb Trevor Daniels:
Reinhold's short example works here, but I see from your
attached jpg that you've incorporated it in some more
extensive code.
He sent me the whole file and the cu
Graham Percival wrote Monday, December 22, 2008 5:40 AM
Once 2.12 is out and we've succeeded in setting up GUB3 on
kainhofer, I'll become the Release Manager. I have two ideas on
how to change things:
1) Move to a linux kernel type of releases: instead of having
separate devel and stable br
Danalute wrote Tuesday, December 16, 2008 10:26 PM
Appendix G has entries for /: and /+ , used in \chordmode { }
There is no entry for \chordmode
There is no entry for the symbols '<' and '>'
discussion of the < notelist> convention (an alternate way to
enter chords in a note stream)
Mark Polesky wrote Monday, December 15, 2008 8:02 AM
NR 2.1.2 "Entering lyrics: Lyrics explained"
states...
Similarly, a period which follows an alphabetic sequence is
included in the resulting string. As a consequence, spaces
must be inserted around property commands: do not write
\ov
Reinhold, you wrote Sunday, December 14, 2008 1:46 PM
Where in the docs do the flag styles belong?
There is a selected snippet in 1.2.4 Beams entitled
"Flat flags and beam nibs" which shows flags derived
from beamlets. A new snippet showing straight flags
in the two built-in styles could be
Reinhold Kainhofer wrote Saturday, December 13, 2008 2:14 AM
Am Samstag, 13. Dezember 2008 02:48:14 schrieb dem...@suffolk.lib.ny.us:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008, Reinhold Kainhofer said:
> Should we change \bar "." to create a single
> thick barline for reasons of consistency and instead add a new
Graham Breed wrote Thursday, December 11, 2008 1:01 AM
I can demonstrate the bug with that file though. Here's an example:
\version "2.11.65"
\include "arabic.ly"
melody = \relative {
\key re \bayati
do re mi fa sol la si do
}
\score {
\new Staff \melody
\layout { }
\midi { }
}
It fa
Graham Percival wrote Wednesday, December 10, 2008 2:04 PM
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 08:01:08PM +0800, Graham Breed wrote:
I've checked the documentation for key signatures and see no
indication that \key b \bayati could possible work though.
Say what?
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.11/Documentati
Francisco Vila wrote Tuesday, December 09, 2008 10:08 AM
2008/12/8 Jean-Charles Malahieude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I think a warning would be useful, even for the English users, mentioning
that this use of the autochange command *needs* the staves to be called
"up"
and "down".
I agree.
Ther
Thanks Mark. You're right to point out the duplication, but when I looked
at this the section really needs quite an extensive overhaul. So I've
placed it on the TODO list for later, as other things take precedence at the
moment.
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Polesky" <[EM
Reinhold Kainhofer wrote Sunday, November 30, 2008 3:02 PM
The documentation of the non-standard key signature feature (in the
selected
snippets section of the Key Signatures section) gives an example of such a
key:
http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/user/lilypond/Displaying-
pitche
Neil Puttock wrote Saturday, November 29, 2008 3:15 PM
2008/11/29 Trevor Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
The only thing not mentioned so far is, did Rune's latest
patches ever get applied? I don't think they did. Was there
a reason for not applying them?
The only outstandi
Graham Percival wrote Saturday, November 29, 2008 12:10 PM
Subject: Re: holdups for 2.12
We worked on the release text a few months ago; I believe it made
it's way to the wiki. Trevor will post a link here soon, I'm
sure. :)
Not sure about a wiki link, but the final version of the
text is
Graham Percival wrote Saturday, November 29, 2008 1:39 AM
We now have experienced lilypond contributors thinking about
adding a "read the 2.11 docs" to the main web page. That's
totally the wrong solution, especially since 2.12 is so (?) close.
What are the remaining issues before we release
Neil
Thanks for this. I can't vouch for the code, but the intention looks good!
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: "Neil Puttock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Valentin Villenave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Valentin Villenave wrote Thursday, November 27, 2008 8:41 AM
2008/11/27 Neil Puttock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
How about \left-brace and (rotated) \right-brace? This would make it
much simpler to embed them within text that has font-name overrides.
Great idea!
I agree.
... either two comma
AFAICS the only fonts immediately available to \lookup which are not more
easily accessible via \musicglyph are the myriad of braces of different
sizes. The Internal Reference suggests that font-encoding may be set to
fetaMusic, fetaNumber, TeX-text, TeX-math, fetaBraces, fetaDynamic, but the
Valentin, you wrote Sunday, November 23, 2008 3:26 PM
2008/11/23 Trevor Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I've just reviewed text.itely. I think this is mainly your work and very
impressive it is! I made only three minor changes, of which only one is
significant. If you can find
Valentin
I've just reviewed text.itely. I think this is mainly your work and very
impressive it is! I made only three minor changes, of which only one is
significant. If you can find a couple of minutes perhaps you could check
these out to be sure I've not screwed anything up.
There are o
Notation Reference Section 1.6 Staff notation has now been reviewed twice
and is ready to be released for translation, although I see Till and
Francisco have already translated it to German and Spanish pretty well
completely!
Trevor
___
lilypond-d
Graham Percival wrote Saturday, November 22, 2008 9:52 AM
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 09:27:18AM -, Trevor Daniels wrote:
The description of the contents of the Function index states that it
"lists all the LilyPond
commands and keywords". \foo is a command and foo is a keyword, s
Werner, Patrick
Originally I opposed the @funindex foo form as being both redundant and
misleading,
but was out-voted (3 to 1). But on thinking about it again I have changed
my mind, for
the following reason.
The description of the contents of the Function index states that it "lists
all th
LGTM
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: "Patrick McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Reinhold Kainhofer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: ; "Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
"till Rettig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, Nov
Werner LEMBERG wrote Wednesday, November 19, 2008 11:47 PM
> I think it is even ok to insert them everywhere -- we have also
> @ignore and @end ignore.
I'm not opposed to this in principle, but you'll have to find
someone else to go through all the .itely files and insert them. I
don't even
till Rettig wrote Thursday, November 20, 2008 7:25 AM
Hi,
nice work! I like the new green navigation bar! But again, I prefer ther
warmer beige of the old contents box. :-)
I agree with both these comments, but I prefer the tighter spacing of the
contents list in the new one.
Trevor
Gr
Till Rettig wrote Wednesday, November 19, 2008 5:43 PM
Subject: Re: ugly @predefined sections in PDF
Trevor Daniels schrieb:
Werner LEMBERG wrote Wednesday, November 19, 2008 2:48 PM
There are only a couple of instances where this looks particularly
bad. Could we instead change just
Werner LEMBERG wrote Wednesday, November 19, 2008 2:48 PM
There are only a couple of instances where this looks particularly
bad. Could we instead change just those instances so each of
predefined commands is on a separate line? Is this possible? It
would certainly be easier!
It's not cle
Werner LEMBERG wrote Wednesday, November 19, 2008 2:50 PM
I vote for the easiest - let's lose the blank line.
I vote for
@seealso
...
@endseealso
IMHO, it's far too error prone to rely on the editors that @seealso is
never followed by a blank line, given that not doing so causes no
warn
I vote for the easiest - let's lose the blank line.
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: "Werner LEMBERG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 8:53 AM
Subject: ugly @seealso output
Currently, @seealso is defined as follows
@macro seealso
@noindent
@subsubhea
Werner
There are only a couple of instances where this looks particularly bad.
Could we instead change just those instances so each of predefined commands
is on a separate line? Is this possible? It would certainly be easier!
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: "Werner LEMBERG" <[EM
hen I have more time a a few days. As I
have not had need to run convert-ly for I long time I
hadn't noticed this.
Sorry to raise a false alert :(
Trevor
Trevor Daniels wrote Friday, November 14, 2008 5:14 PM>
Jan, you wrote Thursday, November 13, 2008 1:51 PM
Op donderdag 13-11-2008
Jan, you wrote Thursday, November 13, 2008 1:51 PM
Op donderdag 13-11-2008 om 11:51 uur [tijdzone +], schreef Trevor
Daniels:
Hi Trevor,
OK, that problem's fixed.
But running convert-ly.py gives:
sh.exe": /c/Program Files/LilyPond/usr/bin/convert-ly.py:
/home/janneke/vc/g
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote Wednesday, November 12, 2008 8:20 PM
Op woensdag 12-11-2008 om 09:12 uur [tijdzone +], schreef Trevor
Daniels:
Hi Trevor,
"This application has failed to start because pthreadGC2.dll was not
found."
Ah, yes. That's what you get when you
Hi Jan
The Windows binary appeared to install without error in Windows Vista Home
Premium and LilyPond itself works fine, but running any python program gives
the error:
"This application has failed to start because pthreadGC2.dll was not found."
followed by "python.exe has stopped working".
John Williams wrote Monday, November 10, 2008 2:50 AM
I think it would be extremely helpful for people attempting to tweak
lilypond,
if there were examples in the documentation whenever a tweak is mentioned.
This
is already the case for most of the beginner's documentation, but when we
get i
Neil Puttock wrote Monday, November 10, 2008 12:33 AM
2008/11/9 Trevor Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I'll hold off tackling this bit, which needs to be added to the Spanner
section,
for a while in case this change is approved.
Is it OK for me to do a bit of work on the l
Neil Puttock wrote Sunday, November 09, 2008 4:14 PM
We currently have the following syntax for reverting properties,
\revert Grob #'(list of nested props)
which is rather convenient when using bound-details.
Now we've recently had a few complaints about how cumbersome
overriding properties
Francisco Vila wrote Saturday, November 08, 2008 10:50 AM
2008/11/7 Trevor Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
so, as \addlyrics is the principal
technique introduced in the Learning Manual, I'll change it
as you suggest.
I've seen it. Why to omit hyphenation such as twin -- kle
Mark Polesky wrote Friday, November 07, 2008 8:08 AM
The lyrics in the "twinkle" example are left-aligned instead
of centered because the example uses \lyricmode instead of
\addlyrics. This is the first example using lyrics in the
Learning Manual, and I think it should look better than this.
Carl
I'm partly through editing NR 5 but I broke off to try to complete NR 1.2
and other sections in NR 1 and NR 2, which I see as needing to be finished
before 2.12. No one has yet touched NR 6, apart from perhaps dumping things
in here from elsewhere. It would be really great if you could
Carl, you wrote Monday, October 27, 2008 12:03 AM
On 10/26/08 4:44 PM, "Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Carl D. Sorensen Sunday, October 26, 2008 9:30 PM
In fact, it may be
possible to greatly reduce (or even eliminate) explicit settings in
scm/auto-beam.scm and r
Neil, you wrote Sunday, November 02, 2008 2:33 PM
If you add a file to input/new, you must wait for an LSR update before
referencing the snippet in the docs, since @lilypondfile looks in
input/lsr for the generated file.
Sorry Neil - mea culpa. I knew what I should do, and placed the
@lilyp
Eyolf
More comments on Ancient now seem unlikely. There have not been many, but
that's par for the course when editing manuals :( Are you intending to
complete the transformation of Ancient sometime soon? If you could finish
off all the music-related stuff I'd be happy (well, "willing" woul
Graham, you wrote Friday, October 31, 2008 3:00 PM
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 02:02:42PM +0100, John Mandereau wrote:
On 2008/10/30 15:51 +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> rhythms-headword.ly (in section 1.2) is fine for HTML but too wide for
> the PDF. In other words, we should add some code to r
Mats Bengtsson wrote Thursday, October 30, 2008 9:03 AM
Valentin Villenave wrote:
2008/10/29 Reinhold Kainhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
\decresc ... Starts a text decrescendo
This one wasn't available earlier, but can of course easily be added if
there's consensus
about it. For the macros tha
Werner LEMBERG wrote Thursday, October 30, 2008 7:59 AM
Could you see if you think this has made an improvement.
Much better, thanks. However, it still exposes a severe bug in the
used version of texi2html: There is absolutely no reason why there are
two empty lines between each item. Th
Werner
I've just pushed some changes to improve these tables.
The notename/accidental table has been split into two
to avoid overrunning the right margin, and @quotation
is used instead of @example. I've also used @file{}
for the filenames.
Could you see if you think this has made an improvemen
Werner
Setting out these tables has caused several of us considerable
grief!
I think maybe it might be best to split the first table into
two - one dealing with the pitches and one with the accidentals
- and maybe even the second one as well. That at least would
avoid the tables running off the
ld do that this side of 2.12.
Trevor
Carl D. Sorensen wrote Monday, October 27, 2008 12:03 AM
On 10/26/08 4:44 PM, "Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Carl D. Sorensen Sunday, October 26, 2008 9:30 PM
On 10/26/08 4:00 AM, "Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PR
Francisco Vila Monday, October 27, 2008 11:03 AM
2008/10/27 Trevor Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Sometimes there is another commit in between and therefore I cannot
fast forward, but I deal with it by preparing a patch, resetting, and
applying it afterwards.
I think cherry-pick w
Francisco Vila Monday, October 27, 2008 9:42 AM
2008/10/27 John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 2008/10/26 23:32 +0100, Francisco Vila wrote:
I'm sure you have noticed that I do a merge of master into
lilypond/translation every few days. I am sorry if this is considered
a pollution of the
Valentin Villenave Monday, October 27, 2008 9:32 AM
2008/10/27 Trevor Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
The thread started by this mail of yours (suggesting applying Rune's
patch
to permit contexts to be nested and those confusing Inner contexts to be
junked) was high-jacked by
Neil
The thread started by this mail of yours (suggesting applying Rune's patch
to permit contexts to be nested and those confusing Inner contexts to be
junked) was high-jacked by a separate suggestion to junk PianoStaff, which
was later abandoned for reasons which did not apply to Rune's patch.
Trevor, you wrote Thursday, October 23, 2008 11:26 PM
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 4:27 PM, Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please don't change c[ ]!
Do you really mean that you've used, say,
a b[] c
within your score? Currently, this is an undocumented feature, so you
are use so
Hi Ralph
I actually quite like properties indexed in a different way to other things,
but for consistency maybe we should remove
the @code{ }. Just to be sure though I'll copy to -dev for comment.
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: "Ralph Palmer" <[EMAIL PROTEC
Francisco, you wrote Monday, October 20, 2008 7:42 PM
2008/10/20 Valentin Villenave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
2008/10/20 Till Rettig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Great work, thank you! I like both ;-)... maybe the first a bit more...
I'd go for the first one too (though I like the end so much...)
beca
hat detail.
-David
Trevor Daniels wrote:
Thanks David
I think the words you quote are from the 2.10 docs.
The wording in the 2.11 docs will be:
"If any unexpected beam behavior occurs, check the default automatic
beam settings in ‘scm/auto-beam.scm’ for possible interference,
because t
" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Lilypond-User List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Lily-Devel List"
Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2008 10:16 AM
Subject: Re: Autobeaming overrides
I don't have an answer to your questi
I'm putting the finishing touches to the Rhythm section of the Notation
Reference and would like some help.
The usual override for modifying the automatic beaming rhythm specifies the
ending beat of the beam:
#(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * 6 8) 4 8)
It is also possible to specify the
, 2008 9:39 PM
Subject: Re: Release text (was Re: Lilypond code/feature freeze for 2.12)
Hi,
I haven't heard anything anymore: is this the final release text? I would
translate it now, if there are no changes coming.
Till
Trevor Daniels wrote:
I've folded in this and all the o
ginal Message -
From: "Jonathan Kulp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 12:08 AM
Subject: Re: Moving guitar fingering orientations
Thanks, Trevor. I do think the warning is a good idea even though the
text a
Reinhold, you wrote Friday, October 17, 2008 1:29 PM
Am Freitag, 17. Oktober 2008 schrieb Trevor Daniels:
There's (at least) one more, nested in an @warning.
Where exactly is this so I can check it, too?
Sorry, I should have said. It's in LM 2.3.1, immediately
before Simultan
Trevor Daniels wrote Thursday, October 16, 2008 9:25 AM
Trevor Daniels wrote Wednesday, October 15, 2008 10:59 PM
Reinhold Kainhofer wrote Wednesday, October 15, 2008 5:33 PM
Am Mittwoch, 15. Oktober 2008 schrieb Jonathan Kulp:
Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> It seems that texi2pdf replaces
Trevor Daniels wrote Wednesday, October 15, 2008 10:59 PM
Reinhold Kainhofer wrote Wednesday, October 15, 2008 5:33 PM
Am Mittwoch, 15. Oktober 2008 schrieb Jonathan Kulp:
Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> It seems that texi2pdf replaces all single quotes by a smart right
> quote.
> Ev
Reinhold Kainhofer wrote Wednesday, October 15, 2008 5:33 PM
Am Mittwoch, 15. Oktober 2008 schrieb Jonathan Kulp:
Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> It seems that texi2pdf replaces all single quotes by a smart right
> quote.
> Even if you use it inside @code{c'}, you'll not get a ' but a curved
> on
Eyolf, you wrote
I have pushed a new reordering for 2.1 "Vocal music"; please tell me
what you think about it.
I don't like it.
Is Trevor beginning to sound like Graham...? :)
Mao, yes; I thought Valentin would be missing him
by now ;)
Trevor
__
Carl, you wrote Monday, October 13, 2008 1:31 PM
Trevor,
I'm swamped. I'd be delighted to have you tidy up Rhythms.
I think there's still a bit of work to go on this section, but right now
I'm
not going to be able to get to it.
OK. I'll do some minimal tidying up.
Jon, if you have an
arate sections on style-specific stuff at the end.
More comments below ...
You wrote Monday, October 13, 2008 11:41 AM
2008/10/13 Trevor Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
That's because you've put all the different style stuff
where it doesn't belong, in "Common notation"
Carl, Jon
I see Carl pushed the latest edits for Rhythms a few days ago. Do you have
anything still planned for this section or can we release it for review now?
I notice there are some TODOs still visible, though. If you are busy
perhaps I could tidy these up?
Trevor
After extensive work by Francisco, several reviews and lots of comments, I'm
happy to announce NR 1.5 Simultaneous notes is now ready for translation.
Thanks to all.
Trevor
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org
Valentin, you wrote Sunday, October 12, 2008 12:38 PM
2008/10/3 Trevor Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
This is good. I'm very happy with this.
Greetings Trevor,
I have pushed a new reordering for 2.1 "Vocal music"; please tell me
what you think about it.
I
Section 1.3 Expressive marks in expressive.itely seems to be in pretty good
shape, and can now be safely translated (although I see the French, Spanish
and German translations are already pretty well complete).
Trevor
___
lilypond-devel mailing lis
Valentin, you wrote Wednesday, October 08, 2008 2:52 PM
2008/10/8 Trevor Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
This has quite a potential to muck things up in the docs, but if we want
to
make the change this is what will need to be done.
Well, I have done everything I could to fix things (e
Valentin
This has quite a potential to muck things up in the docs, but if we want to
make the change this is what will need to be done.
The global change which you have done does not work if both PianoStaff and
GrandStaff appear in the same sentence or even paragraph. One example I
spotted
Valentin Villenave wrote Monday, October 06, 2008 10:42 AM
\bigger and \larger are two markup commands that act exactly the same;
which one do we want do keep?
Graham: "\bigger sounds better when opposed to \smaller"
I don't agree with this - I think large is the correct
opposite to small, e
Valentin, you wrote Friday, October 03, 2008 8:42 AM
2008/10/2 Trevor Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I wish we could have a "common notation" section that would deal with
the voice as an instrument (for instance, the parlato notehead example
is quite good; we could a
Valentin, you wrote Thursday, October 02, 2008 5:43 PM
2008/10/2 Trevor Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
OK. Below is one possible layout which seems to
work. Most of the stuff is under "Common", as
all the lyrics-specific notation is common. The
differences arise in ho
Valentin, you wrote Thursday, October 02, 2008 7:41 AM
2008/10/2 Trevor Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I agree it does not belong within any section, yet
at present it appears within 2.1.1 Entering lyrics.
As the only references we have so far identified
are one to the Learning Manual a
Patrick McCarty wrote Thursday, October 02, 2008 8:41 AM
Subject: Re: NR 1.5 and 1.6 reviewed
On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 09:14:25AM +0200, Valentin Villenave wrote:
2008/10/2 Andrew Hawryluk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> In the third musical example under "Instrument names" (.itely lines
> 963–977), wh
Valentin, you wrote Wednesday, October 01, 2008 7:40 PM
2008/10/1 Trevor Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
There will not be many References for vocal music, as pretty well all of
it
is going to be in this section, but there should be one to
@rlearning{Songs}, which gives a gentle introd
headword. Let's put it up and have a
look.
I've not pushed this, as I know nothing of translations, but I'm happy to do
so if John says it's OK.
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: "Valentin Villenave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Trevor Daniels
1301 - 1400 of 1600 matches
Mail list logo
