Keith OHara oco.net> writes:
> Phil Holmes philholmes.net> writes:
>
> > >> > With ragged-bottom set and annotate spacing, on one of my scores
17.19
> > >> > shows 49.07 space left and the next system having an extent of 44.7.
> The next system extent is (-44.70, 4.34) which is a height of 49
Keith OHara writes:
> Phil Holmes philholmes.net> writes:
>
>> >> > With ragged-bottom set and annotate spacing, on one of my scores 17.19
>> >> > shows 49.07 space left and the next system having an extent of 44.7.
>
> The "space left" shown is after the lines have been laid out and
> skylines
Phil Holmes philholmes.net> writes:
> >> > With ragged-bottom set and annotate spacing, on one of my scores 17.19
> >> > shows 49.07 space left and the next system having an extent of 44.7.
The "space left" shown is after the lines have been laid out and
skylines drawn. While choosing page-brea
"Keith OHara" writes:
> On Sat, 21 Sep 2013 13:14:24 -0700, Phil Holmes wrote:
>
>> From: "Keith OHara"
>>> Is it possible to minimize an example, so we see if the old behavior
>>> is something we want? (as opposed to something that did what you
>>> wanted but for mysterious reasons.)
>>
>> I
On Sat, 21 Sep 2013 13:14:24 -0700, Phil Holmes wrote:
From: "Keith OHara"
Is it possible to minimize an example, so we see if the old behavior
is something we want? (as opposed to something that did what you
wanted but for mysterious reasons.)
I can provide a non-minimised example (Mikado
2013/9/21 Phil Holmes :
> FWIW, I find my build machine on Ubuntu is much faster.
I've noticed that compiling LilyPond scores is 2-3 times faster on my
Ubuntu 12.04 than on Windows 7. Interesting.
Janek
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@g
- Original Message -
From: "Keith OHara"
To:
Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2013 8:38 PM
Subject: Re: Lilypond benchmarking
Phil Holmes philholmes.net> writes:
> I've done quite a bit of work trying to see what's going on and have
> discovered that so
- Original Message -
From: "Keith OHara"
To:
Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2013 8:49 PM
Subject: Re: Lilypond benchmarking
Phil Holmes philholmes.net> writes:
Summary: 2.12 was very slow and unreliable on large scores. 2.14, 2.16
and
2.17.26 are similar: it look
Phil Holmes philholmes.net> writes:
> Summary: 2.12 was very slow and unreliable on large scores. 2.14, 2.16 and
> 2.17.26 are similar: it look like current devel is slower where there's a
> lot of interleaving of notes and dynamics to be done, which is probably to
> be expected with the more
Phil Holmes philholmes.net> writes:
> > I've done quite a bit of work trying to see what's going on and have
> > discovered that something introduced between (I think) 2.17.18 and
2.17.19
> > has affected how lily determines whether it can fit another system in.
> > With ragged-bottom set and
- Original Message -
From: "Phil Holmes"
To: "David Kastrup"
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2013 4:37 PM
Subject: Re: Lilypond benchmarking
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "James" ;
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "James" ;
Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2013 2:12 PM
Subject: Re: Lilypond benchmarking
"Phil Holmes" writes:
2.12 - 162 pages; 2.14 - 147; 2.16 - 142; 2.17.26 - 158pp. 2.
"Phil Holmes" writes:
> 2.12 - 162 pages; 2.14 - 147; 2.16 - 142; 2.17.26 - 158pp. 2.17 is
> noticeably looser, but I concluded I'd adjust some of the spacing
> controls to fit more to a page.
That's actually a real problem. Now 2.17.27 will have some padding
significantly reduced (halved?) if
"Phil Holmes" writes:
> - Original Message -
> From: "David Kastrup"
> To:
> Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2013 1:37 PM
> Subject: Re: Lilypond benchmarking
>
>
>> "Phil Holmes" writes:
>>
>>> David made t
er 21, 2013 1:37 PM
Subject: Re: Lilypond benchmarking
On 21/09/13 13:31, Phil Holmes wrote:
David made the comment that we'd no information on the performance of the
latest development release on large project, so I thought I'd do a little
benchmarking. This has been done on windo
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To:
Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2013 1:37 PM
Subject: Re: Lilypond benchmarking
"Phil Holmes" writes:
David made the comment that we'd no information on the performance of
the latest development release on la
"Phil Holmes" writes:
> David made the comment that we'd no information on the performance of
> the latest development release on large project, so I thought I'd do a
> little benchmarking. This has been done on windows vista 64 bit.
>
> I've used 4 benchmarking tests: a) \repeat unfold xx c''4;
On 21/09/13 13:31, Phil Holmes wrote:
David made the comment that we'd no information on the performance of
the latest development release on large project, so I thought I'd do a
little benchmarking. This has been done on windows vista 64 bit.
I've used 4 benchmarking tests: a) \repeat unfold
David made the comment that we'd no information on the performance of the
latest development release on large project, so I thought I'd do a little
benchmarking. This has been done on windows vista 64 bit.
I've used 4 benchmarking tests: a) \repeat unfold xx c''4; b) \repeat unfold
500 { c''4
19 matches
Mail list logo
