Re: FW: [LilyPond] Your organization application has been rejected.

2012-03-26 Thread Janek Warchoł
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:19 PM, Julien Rioux jri...@physics.utoronto.ca wrote: On 16/03/2012 4:45 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote: On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Carl Sorensenc_soren...@byu.edu  wrote: On 3/16/12 11:44 AM, no-re...@google-melange.appspotmail.com

Re: FW: [LilyPond] Your organization application has been rejected.

2012-03-21 Thread Janek Warchoł
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 3:49 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com wrote: 2012/3/20 Łukasz Czerwiński milimet...@gmail.com: Can you share your thoughts? Lilypond would never be useful for Google products. There is absolutely no point for Google to pay for code that would never be useful for

Re: FW: [LilyPond] Your organization application has been rejected.

2012-03-21 Thread David Kastrup
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes: On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 3:49 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com wrote: 2012/3/20 Łukasz Czerwiński milimet...@gmail.com: Can you share your thoughts? Lilypond would never be useful for Google products. There is absolutely no point for

Re: FW: [LilyPond] Your organization application has been rejected.

2012-03-20 Thread Łukasz Czerwiński
On 16 March 2012 21:45, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote: Can you share your thoughts? Lilypond would never be useful for Google products. There is absolutely no point for Google to pay for code that would never be useful for them. Łukasz

Re: FW: [LilyPond] Your organization application has been rejected.

2012-03-20 Thread David Kastrup
Łukasz Czerwiński milimet...@gmail.com writes: On 16 March 2012 21:45, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote: Can you share your thoughts? Lilypond would never be useful for Google products. There is absolutely no point for Google to pay for code that would never be

Re: FW: [LilyPond] Your organization application has been rejected.

2012-03-20 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
2012/3/20 Łukasz Czerwiński milimet...@gmail.com: Can you share your thoughts? Lilypond would never be useful for Google products. There is absolutely no point for Google to pay for code that would never be useful for them. The point of GSOC is not to improve google products. See also:

Re: FW: [LilyPond] Your organization application has been rejected.

2012-03-17 Thread David Kastrup
Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu writes: On 3/16/12 11:44 AM, no-re...@google-melange.appspotmail.com no-re...@google-melange.appspotmail.com wrote: Thank you for submitting LilyPond organization application to Google Summer of Code 2012. Unfortunately, we were unable to accept your

Re: FW: [LilyPond] Your organization application has been rejected.

2012-03-17 Thread Janek Warchoł
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:39 PM, Julien Rioux jri...@physics.utoronto.ca wrote: On 16/03/2012 5:16 PM, Julien Rioux wrote: There are a few organisations interesting for lilypond hackers: inkscape (to learn about svg), closure (to learn a scheme-like language), buildbot (could be helpful but

Re: FW: [LilyPond] Your organization application has been rejected.

2012-03-16 Thread Graham Percival
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 05:53:57PM +, Carl Sorensen wrote: On 3/16/12 11:44 AM, no-re...@google-melange.appspotmail.com no-re...@google-melange.appspotmail.com wrote: Unfortunately, we were unable to accept your organization's application at this time. If we are serious about doing this

Re: FW: [LilyPond] Your organization application has been rejected.

2012-03-16 Thread Janek Warchoł
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote: On 3/16/12 11:44 AM, no-re...@google-melange.appspotmail.com no-re...@google-melange.appspotmail.com wrote: Thank you for submitting LilyPond organization application to Google Summer of Code 2012. Unfortunately, we were

Re: FW: [LilyPond] Your organization application has been rejected.

2012-03-16 Thread Graham Percival
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 09:45:05PM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote: On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote: If we are serious about doing this next year, I think we need to develop a stronger website around GSOC.  As I read the requirements, it appears to me that

Re: FW: [LilyPond] Your organization application has been rejected.

2012-03-16 Thread Julien Rioux
On 16/03/2012 4:54 PM, Graham Percival wrote: On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote: It might be good to wait a week to see what projects were accepted, http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/accepted_orgs/google/gsoc2012 ? Somebody on another venue

Re: FW: [LilyPond] Your organization application has been rejected.

2012-03-16 Thread Julien Rioux
On 16/03/2012 4:45 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote: On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Carl Sorensenc_soren...@byu.edu wrote: On 3/16/12 11:44 AM, no-re...@google-melange.appspotmail.com no-re...@google-melange.appspotmail.com wrote: Thank you for submitting LilyPond organization application to

Re: FW: [LilyPond] Your organization application has been rejected.

2012-03-16 Thread Janek Warchoł
Carl, On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:19 PM, Julien Rioux jri...@physics.utoronto.ca wrote: There should be a possibility to email/chat with them about the application process and how they come to this decision. who shall do this - you or me? Janek ___

Re: FW: [LilyPond] Your organization application has been rejected.

2012-03-16 Thread Julien Rioux
On 16/03/2012 5:16 PM, Julien Rioux wrote: There are a few organisations interesting for lilypond hackers: inkscape (to learn about svg), closure (to learn a scheme-like language), buildbot (could be helpful but we already have the gran unified builder). libreoffice (improve the lilypond