On 2010-10-07 04:11, Joe Neeman wrote:
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 1:26 AM, Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com
mailto:markpole...@yahoo.com wrote:
Joe Neeman wrote:
I would argue that the baseline is more natural then the
bottom. Moreover, using the baseline as a reference point
Mark Polesky wrote Tuesday, October 05, 2010 7:09 PM
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-10/msg00070.html
Let me know what you guys think; it would be nice to achieve
consensus on this one.
I'm with Carl on this. I agree with all his comments.
Further to my suggestion to
Well, so many extensive replies to respond to! It's great,
but it makes for a long post, and I do hope the thread
participants read to the end; there's a lot of relevant
stuff for everyone here. Thanks.
* * * * * * * * * *
Joe Neeman wrote:
I would argue that the baseline is more natural then
Mark Polesky:
Personally, I think we should add a new variable to
control the spacing between a markup and the bottom
margin. We could call it bottom-markup-spacing for now,
but see this post for my proposed variable renaming:
Joe Neeman:
This is easy enough to add (and the naming seems
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 08:50:20AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Further to my suggestion to leave the renaming to GLISS,
so far there have been only comments supporting the
renaming, even from Joe. Since no discussion seems
to be necessary, do you think it might be better to
change the
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 1:26 AM, Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com wrote:
Well, so many extensive replies to respond to! It's great,
but it makes for a long post, and I do hope the thread
participants read to the end; there's a lot of relevant
stuff for everyone here. Thanks.
* * * * * *
On 10/5/10 12:09 PM, Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com wrote:
WRT the flexible vertical spacing dimensions, the upper
attachment points for 'space and 'minimum-distance currently
align with the Y-coordinate of the origin (0,0) of the upper
item. For systems this is the middle line of the
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com wrote:
WRT the flexible vertical spacing dimensions, the upper
attachment points for 'space and 'minimum-distance currently
align with the Y-coordinate of the origin (0,0) of the upper
item. For systems this is the middle
On 2010-10-05 21:53, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 10/5/10 12:09 PM, Mark Poleskymarkpole...@yahoo.com wrote:
Of the three, bottom-system-spacing is slightly more
complicated, since it currently controls the spacing below
systems *and* markups, when either is the last on a page.
So the natural
