On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 06:20:34PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
URL:http://codereview.appspot.com/4311041
Please improve/discuss. This looks totally insane but does not actually
change the existing absurd realities for single-digit unsigned numbers.
Thanks added as
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 12:48:21PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Perhaps i'll aim for obliterating DIGIT altogether.
I certainly can't think of any case in which we actually need/want
a DIGIT. I see that DIGIT was added in release/0.1.49, back
On 3/22/11 11:20 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 12:48:21PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Perhaps i'll aim for obliterating DIGIT altogether.
I certainly can't think of any case in which we actually need/want
a
On 22 March 2011 17:20, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
This.
URL:http://codereview.appspot.com/4311041
Please improve/discuss. This looks totally insane but does not actually
change the existing absurd realities for single-digit unsigned numbers.
I'm afraid I can't even get as far as
Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com writes:
On 22 March 2011 17:20, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
This.
URL:http://codereview.appspot.com/4311041
Please improve/discuss. This looks totally insane but does not actually
change the existing absurd realities for single-digit unsigned
