Re: Syntax: lyric_mode_music might be a MUSIC_FUNCTION (issue 343820043 by knup...@gmail.com)

2018-04-25 Thread David Kastrup
carl.d.soren...@gmail.com writes: > On 2018/04/25 12:22:18, knupero wrote: > > >> @Everyone: I won't bother you here any longer. > > Knut, > > It's not a bother. > > But it's important to recognize that the parser is a difficult system to > work with, and we've had lots of problems over the years

Re: Syntax: lyric_mode_music might be a MUSIC_FUNCTION (issue 343820043 by knup...@gmail.com)

2018-04-25 Thread Carl . D . Sorensen
On 2018/04/25 12:22:18, knupero wrote: @Everyone: I won't bother you here any longer. Knut, It's not a bother. But it's important to recognize that the parser is a difficult system to work with, and we've had lots of problems over the years with lookahead not being handled properly. So the

Re: Syntax: lyric_mode_music might be a MUSIC_FUNCTION (issue 343820043 by knup...@gmail.com)

2018-04-25 Thread dak
On 2018/04/25 12:22:18, knupero wrote: > I don't see the point in starting a formal review after this has already been > discussed on the mailing list. I was hoping, apparently in vain, that the formal process would lead to a more reasonable discussion. You make it appear like "reasonabl

Re: Syntax: lyric_mode_music might be a MUSIC_FUNCTION (issue 343820043 by knup...@gmail.com)

2018-04-25 Thread knupero
I don't see the point in starting a formal review after this has already been discussed on the mailing list. I was hoping, apparently in vain, that the formal process would lead to a more reasonable discussion. Apparently, however, this process also invites speculation about the amount of work

Re: Syntax: lyric_mode_music might be a MUSIC_FUNCTION (issue 343820043 by knup...@gmail.com)

2018-04-25 Thread dak
On 2018/04/25 08:36:05, dak wrote: We don't state "please don't use that syntax in the following way or LilyPond will be silently confused into producing nonsense" in other respects so it is irrelevant that LilyPond can parse _some_ input correctly with that change and will "only" get conf

Re: Syntax: lyric_mode_music might be a MUSIC_FUNCTION (issue 343820043 by knup...@gmail.com)

2018-04-25 Thread dak
On 2018/04/25 06:33:19, knupero wrote: Please test & review the proposed syntax change. I don't see the point in starting a formal review after this has already been discussed on the mailing list. In particular since this differs from your originally proposed patch (where you did not switch to

Syntax: lyric_mode_music might be a MUSIC_FUNCTION (issue 343820043 by knup...@gmail.com)

2018-04-24 Thread knupero
Reviewers: , Message: Please test & review the proposed syntax change. Description: Syntax: lyric_mode_music might be a MUSIC_FUNCTION With this patch, all four scores in the lilypond source below use a valid syntax and produce correct output. Without this patch only the first two scores use a