Re: anybody understand the instrumentCueName docs?

2010-11-10 Thread Trevor Daniels
Trevor Daniels wrote Tuesday, October 19, 2010 8:34 PM Keith E OHara wrote Monday, October 18, 2010 11:40 PM I suggest (diff attached) removing the part about instrumentCueName in favor of a fuller example for \killCues. The manual teaches markup elsewhere; the challenge with cue-note

Re: anybody understand the instrumentCueName docs?

2010-10-19 Thread James
Hello, On 18/10/2010 23:40, Keith E OHara wrote: On mailing list lilypond-user, Trevor Daniels wrote: Keith E OHara wrote Wednesday, October 06, 2010 9:40 AM I no longer see any reason to use instrumentCueName for the labels that identify the instrument playing cue notes. OK. I'll see

Re: anybody understand the instrumentCueName docs?

2010-10-19 Thread Trevor Daniels
Keith E OHara wrote Monday, October 18, 2010 11:40 PM I suggest (diff attached) removing the part about instrumentCueName in favor of a fuller example for \killCues. The manual teaches markup elsewhere; the challenge with cue-note labels is to let the label appear with the cue notes in

Re: anybody understand the instrumentCueName docs?

2010-10-19 Thread Trevor Daniels
Keith E OHara wrote Tuesday, October 19, 2010 12:21 AM One thing worth discussing is that I use the verb to cue differently from the original author. I believe that to cue is to *give* a signal for someone else to begin action. So the instrument playing just before the singer begins is

Re: anybody understand the instrumentCueName docs?

2010-10-19 Thread Keith E OHara
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 13:34:05 -0700, Trevor Daniels wrote: If no one objects soon I shall push it. James Lowe made comments that you might not have seen yet. I see where he is coming from, but I hope my answer explained the purpose of the changes well enough. (For future reference, please

Re: anybody understand the instrumentCueName docs?

2010-10-19 Thread Trevor Daniels
Trevor Daniels wrote Tuesday, October 19, 2010 9:35 PM Keith E OHara wrote Tuesday, October 19, 2010 12:21 AM Suggestions attached as a diff, I'm happy to push this as is. Many thanks Keith. Pushed to git pretty well as you suggested, Keith, and snippet updated in git. Changed

Re: anybody understand the instrumentCueName docs?

2010-10-19 Thread Trevor Daniels
Keith E OHara wrote Tuesday, October 19, 2010 10:34 PM On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 13:34:05 -0700, Trevor Daniels wrote: If no one objects soon I shall push it. James Lowe made comments that you might not have seen yet. I see where he is coming from, but I hope my answer explained the purpose of

Re: anybody understand the instrumentCueName docs?

2010-10-19 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer
Am Dienstag, 19. Oktober 2010, um 23:34:52 schrieb Keith E OHara: On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 13:34:05 -0700, Trevor Daniels wrote: 2) Two pieces of instruction were a bit vague : [ . . . ] [...] when cue notes end, the name of the original instrument2 should be printed, and any other changes

Re: anybody understand the instrumentCueName docs?

2010-10-18 Thread Keith E OHara
On mailing list lilypond-user, Trevor Daniels wrote: Keith E OHara wrote Wednesday, October 06, 2010 9:40 AM I no longer see any reason to use instrumentCueName for the labels that identify the instrument playing cue notes. OK. I'll see what you suggest. I suggest (diff attached)

Re: anybody understand the instrumentCueName docs?

2010-10-18 Thread Keith E OHara
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 15:40:54 -0700, Keith E OHara wrote: Corresponding suggestions for vocal.itely will follow shortly. One thing worth discussing is that I use the verb to cue differently from the original author. I believe that to cue is to *give* a signal for someone else to begin