Re: shortened flags affair, part 4 - downstem 8th flag

2011-03-06 Thread Trevor Daniels
Janek Warchoł wrote Sunday, March 06, 2011 1:54 AM I was curious too, so i wrote it down. Indeed it looks like he used non-default layout (by default Lily uses 3 systems), but i won't call it non-optimal. In my opinion fitting this music in two systems is perfectly reasonable here (and

Re: shortened flags affair, part 4 - downstem 8th flag

2011-03-06 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 3/6/11 2:44 AM, Janek Warchoł lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/3/6 Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu: bars 8,9,11: ugly slurs, bad placement in bar 8 I agree with 9 and 11 having ugly slurs -- too sharply peaked. I've changed the slur scoring so that it doesn't try to

Re: shortened flags affair, part 4 - downstem 8th flag

2011-03-05 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 3/5/11 4:12 PM, Janek Warchoł lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Short question: do you agree to make downstem 8th flag shorter, as in single downstem proposed.png? This way it won't blend into notehead. This would be consistent with looks of other flags, see gaps.png. I

Re: shortened flags affair, part 4 - downstem 8th flag

2011-03-05 Thread Werner LEMBERG
Short question: do you agree to make downstem 8th flag shorter, as in single downstem proposed.png? I must admit that I don't have a real opinion here, contrary to the stem length issue. Looking at the issue from a `classical' printing point of view, I think that the flags with the gaps are