On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 20:06, David Nalesnik wrote:
>
> I'm getting some spurious characters at
> http://lilypond.org/manuals.html. Screenshot attached.
looks python2 vs python3 related: b'' is how python3 prints byte
strings (which were the default string type in python2, but not in
python3).
I'm getting some spurious characters at
http://lilypond.org/manuals.html. Screenshot attached.
Here's some of the page source:
b’Learning’:
a “must-read” gentle introduction to LilyPond.
(details of Learning)
Thanks,
David
Graham Percival writes:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 10:18:23AM -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>> > Who is GNU_LilyPond anyway? I thought it was, but I might be mistaken.
>>
>> I mean: I thought it was Jan.
>
> yeah, it's Jan.
yes, /cur
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 10:18:23AM -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> > Who is GNU_LilyPond anyway? I thought it was, but I might be mistaken.
>
> I mean: I thought it was Jan.
yeah, it's Jan.
- Graham
_
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Who is GNU_LilyPond anyway? I thought it was, but I might be mistaken.
I mean: I thought it was Jan.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - han...@xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel
Who is GNU_LilyPond anyway? I thought it was, but I might be mistaken.
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 09:19:55AM -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>> Is it possilble to display the contents of the twitter #lilypond
>> hashtag and/or @lilypond twitt
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 09:19:55AM -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Is it possilble to display the contents of the twitter #lilypond
> hashtag and/or @lilypond twitter account in an iframe instead? If we
> use actual twitter, we would get some publicity on twitter.com too.
It's certainly possible,
Totally off the wall idea here:
Is it possilble to display the contents of the twitter #lilypond
hashtag and/or @lilypond twitter account in an iframe instead? If we
use actual twitter, we would get some publicity on twitter.com too.
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 4:52 AM, wrote:
> Hmm...it looks like
On 27 avr. 2012, at 10:55, David Kastrup wrote:
> gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
>
>> LGTM, one minor question but it's ok with me.
>>
>>
>> http://codereview.appspot.com/6068045/diff/13001/Documentation/web.texi
>> File Documentation/web.texi (right):
>>
>> http://codereview.appspot.com/60
gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
> LGTM, one minor question but it's ok with me.
>
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/6068045/diff/13001/Documentation/web.texi
> File Documentation/web.texi (right):
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/6068045/diff/13001/Documentation/web.texi#newcode172
> Documentati
On 2012/04/27 07:58:50, mike7 wrote:
> Have you tried adding it to line 26 of git-cl ?
mimetypes.add_type("application/xml", ".xml")
But to no avail :(
ok, fair enough. It's a small, new, file, and can see the entire thing
by following the "download" link next to the filename in rietveld.
On 2012/04/27 07:55:54, Graham Percival wrote:
LGTM, one minor question but it's ok with me.
http://codereview.appspot.com/6068045/diff/13001/Documentation/web.texi
File Documentation/web.texi (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6068045/diff/13001/Documentation/web.texi#newcode172
Docu
On 2012/04/27 07:53:06, Graham Percival wrote:
On 2012/04/27 07:49:30, mike7 wrote:
> I also just realized that git-cl does not know how to play nicely
with the
.xml
> extension, so the patch can't be tested. I'll investigate...
Have you tried adding it to line 26 of git-cl ?
I added:
mi
LGTM, one minor question but it's ok with me.
http://codereview.appspot.com/6068045/diff/13001/Documentation/web.texi
File Documentation/web.texi (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6068045/diff/13001/Documentation/web.texi#newcode172
Documentation/web.texi:172: xhttp=new
ActiveXObject("Micr
On 2012/04/27 07:49:30, mike7 wrote:
I also just realized that git-cl does not know how to play nicely with
the .xml
extension, so the patch can't be tested. I'll investigate...
Have you tried adding it to line 26 of git-cl ?
http://codereview.appspot.com/6068045/
_
Hmm...it looks like the xml mime type is defined, so I'm short on ideas
for why it's not uploading to Rietveld correctly.
Below are the contents of tweets.xml:
The Ensemble 101 is going on a European tour where they'll sing music
typeset using LilyPond. Click Re: Add announcements to the upper right corner of the website (issue 6068045)
I also just realized that git-cl does not know how to play nicely with
the .xml extension, so the patch can't be tested. I'll investigate...
http://codereview.appspot.com/6068045/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gn
Hey all,
The new patchset puts the tweets in a separate xml file. I use xml
instead of txt to avoid parsing annoyances. The only problem is that,
because the xml is in a DOM structure, the individual tweets can't
contain sub-nodes, which means that if someone wants to use anchor tags
or whateve
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 07:25:20PM +, julien.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
> Documentation writers: Is it correct to say as a general rule that if a
> file has a .itexi extension, it does not contain @nodes?
No, not at all -- virtually all of our docs are in .itexi (or
.itely) files containing nodes.
On 2011/12/20 19:25:20, Julien Rioux wrote:
Documentation writers: Is it correct to say as a general rule that if
a file has
a .itexi extension, it does not contain @nodes?
OK, that's not a general rule, but it happens to be true for itexi files
generated from bib files.
http://codereview.ap
Documentation writers: Is it correct to say as a general rule that if a
file has a .itexi extension, it does not contain @nodes?
http://codereview.appspot.com/5493074/diff/1/make/website.make
File make/website.make (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5493074/diff/1/make/website.make#newcode1
LGTM
http://codereview.appspot.com/5493074/diff/1/make/website.make
File make/website.make (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5493074/diff/1/make/website.make#newcode189
make/website.make:189: website-xrefs: website-version website-bibs
$(OUT) $(xref-files)
Do the xrefs really depend on web
Reviewers: ,
Description:
Build: Dependencies for make website (issue 2027).
Please review this at http://codereview.appspot.com/5493074/
Affected files:
M make/website.make
Index: make/website.make
diff --git a/make/website.make b/make/website.make
index
23 matches
Mail list logo
