On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 04:55:12PM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 10/28/10 4:50 PM, Valentin Villenave valen...@villenave.net wrote:
How about basic regrouping all engravers-related Scheme definitions in
a `define-scheme-engravers.scm' file, and then document it just like
LGTM.
(for clarity: none of the comments made so far will force a second
draft, so if nobody has a complaint in the next 5 hours, you're good to
push it)
http://codereview.appspot.com/2791041/diff/1/ly/predefined-guitar-fretboards.ly
File ly/predefined-guitar-fretboards.ly (right):
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 02:54:05PM +0100, James wrote:
warning: couldn't fit music on page: overflow is 3.626405
I don't know if this is significant but as we have made changes to
both this file and the spacing code it might matter or affect some
of our docs.
There's a bunch of warnings in
http://codereview.appspot.com/2642043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/spacing.itely
File Documentation/notation/spacing.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/2642043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/spacing.itely#newcode1501
Documentation/notation/spacing.itely:1501: @item @emph{staff-like
OK, will push.
http://codereview.appspot.com/2791041/diff/1/ly/predefined-guitar-fretboards.ly
File ly/predefined-guitar-fretboards.ly (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/2791041/diff/1/ly/predefined-guitar-fretboards.ly#newcode20
ly/predefined-guitar-fretboards.ly:20: #(set! pitchnames
On 29/10/10 05:12, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
http://codereview.appspot.com/2642043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/spacing.itely
File Documentation/notation/spacing.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/2642043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/spacing.itely#newcode1509
lilypond -dcheck-internal-types input/regression/slur-tuplet.ly
It appears that there is some internal error in LilyPond that is
causing -dcheck-internal-types not to work properly.
Yep.
I'm afraid this is over my head, although I'll look around a bit
more at it.
I did a bit of
On 29 October 2010 09:18, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
in file lily-guile.cc; for the above lilypond call it gets passed a
value of 0x204 for `val'.[1] This is obviously a special constant,
however, I haven't found out what guile symbol this corresponds to due
to the extremely cryptic
On 28 October 2010 23:55, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
Well, as far as I can see, Scheme engravers are really engravers, so they
ought to be documented in the IR along with the C++ engravers, not in an
appendix of the NR along with Scheme functions.
Although the approach you
Am 28.10.2010 14:53, schrieb carl.d.soren...@gmail.com:
LGTM.
However, I'm a bit nervous about putting bends as well into the
Tab_tie_follow_engraver. Not that the engraver won't work, but that the
Tab_tie_follow_engraver won't be part of the documentation.
Currently, I view Scheme engravers
http://codereview.appspot.com/2791041/diff/1/ly/predefined-guitar-fretboards.ly
File ly/predefined-guitar-fretboards.ly (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/2791041/diff/1/ly/predefined-guitar-fretboards.ly#newcode20
ly/predefined-guitar-fretboards.ly:20: #(set! pitchnames
default-language)
Reviewers: ,
Message:
Greetings,
new patch.
Description:
Doc: move non-Western languages to world.itely
Please review this at http://codereview.appspot.com/2735044/
Affected files:
M Documentation/de/notation/pitches.itely
M Documentation/de/notation/world.itely
M
Looks fine generally, but some editorial changes are needed.
Trevor
http://codereview.appspot.com/2735044/diff/1/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely
File Documentation/notation/pitches.itely (right):
Generally ok, but I don't know why you're changing the translations
before the English docs are done.
http://codereview.appspot.com/2735044/diff/1/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely
File Documentation/notation/pitches.itely (right):
Yeah, it uses python only if convert-ly command (in PluginsPlugin
properties) is set to convert-ly.py (It looks for the py extension)
If you change that to just convert-ly that should work (at least that's the
intention, though I don't have linux so I can't test that.)
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at
Are there good reasons left for not allowing music functions to take
pitches as arguments? That would allow implementing something like
\transpose as a music function. The alternative, letting it take a
music event and not checking its duration and hoping that it is a single
note, seems quite
2010/10/29 Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) lilypondt...@organum.hu:
Yeah, it uses python only if convert-ly command (in PluginsPlugin
properties) is set to convert-ly.py (It looks for the py extension)
If you change that to just convert-ly that should work (at least that's the
intention, though
Hi guys,
here's a new patch set. In case that wasn't clear, this commit is
mainly intended as a structural change (hence the de/es/fr docs update):
as suggested by Graham, the new subsection in world.itely was blindly
copied from pitches.itely and hasn't been adapted *at all* yet.
LGTM. My nitpick doesn't require a new draft version; if there are no
other complaints, go ahead and push in 23 hours.
I still don't like seeing TODOs, and in a few months we'll be going
through and removing all TODOs from the code... but since these TODOs
weren't yours, I can't blame you for
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 12:46 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Are there good reasons left for not allowing music functions to take
pitches as arguments? That would allow implementing something like
\transpose as a music function. The alternative, letting it take a
music event and not
OK, it's an improvement so go ahead and push, but musics grates so
much I'd definitely have removed it as part of this patch.
http://codereview.appspot.com/2735044/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
LGTM, but I have an organization question.
Carl
http://codereview.appspot.com/2735044/diff/8001/Documentation/notation/world.itely
File Documentation/notation/world.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/2735044/diff/8001/Documentation/notation/world.itely#newcode42
http://codereview.appspot.com/2735044/diff/8001/Documentation/music-glossary.tely
File Documentation/music-glossary.tely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/2735044/diff/8001/Documentation/music-glossary.tely#newcode2008
Documentation/music-glossary.tely:2008:
dear lilypond-developers,
Is there a way to have point-click-behavoir or any semantic
meta-information about the correspondending postion in
the .ly-file in SVGs that a generated with the SVG-Backend (like in PDFs?).
thank you and regards
Christoph
On 2010/10/29 13:12:13, Trevor Daniels wrote:
OK, it's an improvement so go ahead and push, but musics grates so
much I'd
definitely have removed it as part of this patch.
Musics grates on me, too, but I have found it as an accepted use, e.g.
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 3:12 PM, tdanielsmu...@googlemail.com wrote:
OK, it's an improvement so go ahead and push,
Thanks. Will do.
but musics grates so
much I'd definitely have removed it as part of this patch.
I hear you. This will be part of my next patch, which I'm preparing right now.
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 01:12:13PM +, tdanielsmu...@googlemail.com wrote:
OK, it's an improvement so go ahead and push, but musics grates so
much I'd definitely have removed it as part of this patch.
:)
Ok, we're agreed. We *all* hate the material which is moving into
world.itely, but
Valentin Villenave valen...@villenave.net writes:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 12:46 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Are there good reasons left for not allowing music functions to take
pitches as arguments? That would allow implementing something like
\transpose as a music function. The
Allow music identifiers in \addlyrics (no need for braces any more)
In particular, so far the following did not work:
\new Staff { \m \addlyrics \l }
Instead, one had to use braces around \m and \l:
\new Staff { {\m} \addlyrics {\l} }
This patch extends the parser to allow music
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 01:17:00 -0700, Ian Hulin i...@hulin.org.uk wrote:
On 29/10/10 05:12, Keith wrote:
Documentation/notation/spacing.itely:1513: * Inter-system spacing
properties::
Within-system
You said: inter = between, intra = within [...]
or do you mean the original Inter-system
Guys,
Here are my proposals for renaming the properties related to
Vertical spacing inside systems.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
I've thought about it, and I think I slightly favor the term
loose line over non-staff line; the word loose is
distinctive and much less likely to get tangled up
Is it true that some \paper variables can be set in a
\layout block without a problem, and vice versa? Are there
any variables that will only work in a \paper block? Are
there any that only work in a \layout block? If so, what
are they? Is there a system to this?
Thanks.
- Mark
Mark Polesky wrote Friday, October 29, 2010 11:27 PM
Here are my proposals for renaming the properties related to
Vertical spacing inside systems.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
I've thought about it, and I think I slightly favor the term
loose line over non-staff line; the word loose is
On 10/29/10 4:27 PM, Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com wrote:
Guys,
Here are my proposals for renaming the properties related to
Vertical spacing inside systems.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
I've thought about it, and I think I slightly favor the term
loose line over non-staff
Hello all,
this is to ask if anyone, besides me, has noticed that rextend macro
sometimes prints a repeated word before the link, and the word is the
last of the phrase argument. It's so strange!
e.g. @rextend{Tutorial de Scheme} produces 'Scheme Tutorial de Scheme' in HTML.
My rextend macro
2010/10/30 Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com:
Hello all,
this is to ask if anyone, besides me, has noticed that rextend macro
sometimes prints a repeated word before the link, and the word is the
last of the phrase argument. It's so strange!
e.g. @rextend{Tutorial de Scheme} produces
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 05:13:03 -0700, lilypond-devel-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
There is now a small set of over-rides is posted on -user, vertical spacing
only so far, hopefully to be tried out by others over the weekend :
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-10/msg00692.html
On
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 05:13:03 -0700, lilypond-devel-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
There is now a small set of over-rides is posted on -user, vertical spacing
only so far, hopefully to be tried out by others over the weekend :
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-10/msg00692.html
On
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 5:32 AM, Christoph s...@smurky.de wrote:
Is there a way to have point-click-behavoir or any semantic
meta-information about the correspondending postion in
the .ly-file in SVGs that a generated with the SVG-Backend (like in PDFs?).
Not currently, but it should be
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 01:51:14AM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
2010/10/30 Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com:
this is to ask if anyone, besides me, has noticed that rextend macro
sometimes prints a repeated word before the link, and the word is the
last of the phrase argument.
Yes, back
40 matches
Mail list logo
