Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu writes:
On May 5, 2012, at 8:16 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
But what about \footnote: that does not have this problem.
In fact, isn't generally prettier than s1*0? Should we be using it
in code and documentation rather than s1*0?
What a
There is a drawback, though. q is changed. Now q is implemented as
but with the current duration on it. Which would mean that the
total moment of
{ c4 q }
would likely change when q gets expanded. While c _is_ considered
for q for consistency's sake, perhaps should be made to
Pavel Roskin pro...@gnu.org writes:
Quoting David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
We can probably use yes:400600[0-2]) here: 4.6.3 is supposed to contain
the fix.
Thank you for opening a separate ticket for it (2514) and reviewing my
ticket (2513)!
Well, it means that my ticket goes through
David Kastrup wrote Sunday, May 06, 2012 2:57 AM
In fact, isn't generally prettier than s1*0? Should we be using it
in code and documentation rather than s1*0?
Definitely prettier, but maybe not so transparent as s1*0.
It is not intuitively obvious that an empty chord takes no
time and
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 08:58:11AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
David Kastrup wrote Sunday, May 06, 2012 2:57 AM
In fact, isn't generally prettier than s1*0? Should we be using it
in code and documentation rather than s1*0?
Definitely prettier, but maybe not so transparent as s1*0.
+1
Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk writes:
David Kastrup wrote Sunday, May 06, 2012 2:57 AM
In fact, isn't generally prettier than s1*0? Should we be using it
in code and documentation rather than s1*0?
Definitely prettier, but maybe not so transparent as s1*0.
I disagree.
Quick: tell
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 08:58:11AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
David Kastrup wrote Sunday, May 06, 2012 2:57 AM
In fact, isn't generally prettier than s1*0? Should we be using it
in code and documentation rather than s1*0?
Definitely
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 08:58:11AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
David Kastrup wrote Sunday, May 06, 2012 2:57 AM
In fact, isn't generally prettier than s1*0? Should we be using it
in code and
Is s*0 valid? It would not change default duration of next note. Cannot
test right now, sorry.
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Reviewers: Graham Percival, J_lowe,
Message:
Please review
Description:
Some notes on how to set up a GUB build environment.
Please review this at http://codereview.appspot.com/6199045/
Affected files:
M Documentation/contributor/build-notes.itexi
Index:
great start; a few notes for you or James to investigate.
http://codereview.appspot.com/6199045/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/build-notes.itexi
File Documentation/contributor/build-notes.itexi (right):
Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com writes:
Is s*0 valid?
No. *0 is part of the duration, not some magical repeat count.
It would not change default duration of next note.
It should, if it were allowed.
--
David Kastrup
___
lilypond-devel
Quoting Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 08:58:11AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
David Kastrup wrote Sunday, May 06, 2012 2:57 AM
In fact, isn't generally prettier than s1*0? Should we be using it
in code and documentation rather than s1*0?
Definitely
On 2012/05/06 11:27:47, Graham Percival wrote:
great start; a few notes for you or James to investigate.
http://codereview.appspot.com/6199045/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/build-notes.itexi
File Documentation/contributor/build-notes.itexi (right):
On 2012/05/06 13:06:09, PhilEHolmes wrote:
The filesystem I created was 64 Gigs, and it shows 36.8 free - so 30
gigs is the
bare minimum. My GUB directory is about 12 Gigs, and my total file
size is
around 17 Gigs,
ah, that makes sense. I was only looking at the directory, but of
course
Pavel Roskin pro...@gnu.org writes:
Quoting Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 08:58:11AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
David Kastrup wrote Sunday, May 06, 2012 2:57 AM
In fact, isn't generally prettier than s1*0? Should we be using it
in code and
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 05:15:59AM -0400, John Darrington wrote:
Thank you for your very comprehensive reply, which inspired me to
look at the lilypond website. It is indeed very elaborate and
certainly gives a very professional impression. (There are however
a few terminology issues which I
I'm putting -devel in CC.
Sorry for pushing, I'm in a hurry: I'd like to send the patches within
tonight.
Il 06/05/2012 15:53, Federico Bruni ha scritto:
Hi,
I have to remove the .texidoc file of a snippet which has been removed:
diff --git
David Kastrup wrote Sunday, May 06, 2012 9:34 AM
Quick: tell me what you would expect without too much thinking (imagine
you are a naive user) from the following:
\new Staff
\relative c'' { c4 d e f s1*0-\markup Oops c d e f g1 } \\
\relative c' { c4 d e f -\markup Wow c d e f g1 }
That's
Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk writes:
David Kastrup wrote Sunday, May 06, 2012 9:34 AM
Quick: tell me what you would expect without too much thinking (imagine
you are a naive user) from the following:
\new Staff
\relative c'' { c4 d e f s1*0-\markup Oops c d e f g1 } \\
Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk writes:
David Kastrup wrote Sunday, May 06, 2012 9:34 AM
Quick: tell me what you would expect without too much thinking (imagine
you are a naive user) from the following:
\new Staff
\relative c'' { c4 d e f s1*0-\markup Oops c d e f g1 } \\
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
In fact, isn't generally prettier than s1*0? Should we be using
it in code and documentation rather than s1*0?
What a great idea! No notes generated; the duration doesn't
Hi Jan and Graham,
Since I got a problem the last time I notified the Free Translation
Project of a new lilypond.pot, I'd like to have it updated during the
releasing process.
What you'll find in the enclosed patch is an attempt to adapt
'make po-replace' in order to have an automatically
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 05:32:08PM +0200, Federico Bruni wrote:
I made a try:
$ git rm
Documentation/it/texidocs/piano-template-with-centered-dynamics.texidoc
error:
'Documentation/it/texidocs/piano-template-with-centered-dynamics.texidoc'
has local modifications
(use --cached to keep
I have a bit more information about the terminology problems.
Although the English website is relatively ok (I remember
specifically thinking about free software vs. open source while
writing it -- but Janek should still fix the little bits I
missed), some translations are wrong.
For example,
On
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 06:19:42PM +0200, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote:
What you'll find in the enclosed patch is an attempt to adapt
'make po-replace' in order to have an automatically well-formed .pot
included in 'make dist'.
Please upload patches to rietveld with git-cl, as specified here:
Le 06/05/2012 18:31, Graham Percival disait :
I have a bit more information about the terminology problems.
Although the English website is relatively ok (I remember
specifically thinking about free software vs. open source while
writing it -- but Janek should still fix the little bits I
this patch makes staff_radius work in cases when line-positions is
overridden.
so long staff_radius assumed overriding at most line-count.
sorry, I forgot to mention that
- staff-radius behaved incorrectly also when staff-space is overridden
- there's one slight difference in the regression
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 07:02:20PM +0200, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote:
Just two instances in GSoC node that I'm not sure they should be
transformed:
fr (translation)]$ git grep -n 'open source'
web/community.itexi:930:étudiants pour écrire du code au bénéfice de
projets @emph{open
2012/5/6 Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com:
I'm putting -devel in CC.
Sorry for pushing, I'm in a hurry: I'd like to send the patches within
tonight.
Il 06/05/2012 15:53, Federico Bruni ha scritto:
Hi,
I have to remove the .texidoc file of a snippet which has been removed:
diff --git
2012/5/6 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 07:02:20PM +0200, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote:
Just two instances in GSoC node that I'm not sure they should be
transformed:
fr (translation)]$ git grep -n 'open source'
web/community.itexi:930:étudiants pour
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 09:36:38PM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
2012/5/6 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
So I guess those shouldn't be changed, and if that's it in the
French translation then I guess you're fine.
We have in English
http://lilypond.org/freedom.html
“Gift
David Kastrup wrote Sunday, May 06, 2012 4:44 PM
Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk writes:
Actually, I don't think s1*0 appears in the docs.
Documentation/notation/vocal.itely: s1*0^\markup { \right-align { \tiny
Flute } }
Documentation/notation/vocal.itely: s1*0_\markup {
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 10:17:05PM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
I've no objection to the docs being changed to use an empty chord
but its semantics will need to be introduced somewhere. The best place
is probably the LM, in 2.2.4 Combining notes into chords.
I'm still not happy with an
Graham Percival wrote Sunday, May 06, 2012 10:24 PM
I'm still not happy with an empty chord, especially in the
Learning Manual. I think it leads to the perlization of
lilypond, where we end up looking like a ridiculous language like
Haskell.
My point really is that exists now, so there
Hi Jean-Charles,
I spotted a typo in your README text,
On 06/05/12 17:19, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote:
+2) updating lilypond.pot: run 'make po-replace' at toplevel,
commit +lilypond.pot to Git, roll a tarball with 'make dist',
upload it +somewhere on the web (or wait for the release), and
For 20:00 MDT Tuesday May 8
Enhancement:
Issue 2513
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2513: Patch: Build:
add -fno-tree-vrp to CXXFLAGS for gcc 4.7.0 - R6191048
http://codereview.appspot.com/6191048/ (s/b reviewed, pushed before 2514)
Issue 2514
Warning! This is an off-topic e-mail.
I think it leads to the perlization of lilypond, where we end up
looking like a ridiculous language like Haskell.
What exactly is `ridiculous' in Haskell? Personally, I find this
language quite fascinating.
Werner
Trevor Daniels t.daniels at treda.co.uk writes:
My point really is that exists now, so there ought to
be a short note in the section where chords are introduced
to say that an empty chord takes no time, whatever the
current duration happens to be.
I agree with Trevor. And with David in
39 matches
Mail list logo
