Re: GUB fail

> I've had my last 2 tries to compile a GUB build today fail with the > same error. The last relevant part of the log is: Would you show me the whole log file? ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org

Re: cross-voice spanners

Hi Francisco, David Kastrup gave me some feedback on the code I wrote for the project, which needs to be revised/better documented. I haven't had much time to do that, although I am hoping to start the revision after I finish my final examinations. At the moment, I can't give any ETA, but I

Re: New LilyPond website

On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 07:50:50PM +0100, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote: > I've already given it a try, but get stopped by some errors I don't know how > to resolve (I've no knowledge about perl). Three patches are available for > anybody willing to help me… I can compile the English version,

Re: Is Anyone Working on a Better Tablature Algorithm?

I've been coding this up, on and off for the past three weeks, and I have a workable program. This should probably be called chTab 0.1. (ch either stands for Chuanjun He (who developed the algorithm) or Christopher Heckman (who implemented it in Scheme/Lilypond) ... Take your pick.) It does not

Re: Stepping up, contributor mentoring

On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 11:34:01AM +, James Lowe wrote: > I have created > > https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5006/ > > For the 'CSS change' Rietveld that I see you uploaded on behalf of Mr. > Roper just so it gets on my radar (and the countdown, including the URL > that Phil

GUB fail

I've had my last 2 tries to compile a GUB build today fail with the same error. The last relevant part of the log is: invoking gs -sDEVICE=png16m -dGraphicsAlphaBits=4 -dTextAlphaBits=4 -slilypond-datadir=v2.19.51-1/share/lilypond/current -r101

Re: unfoldRepeats can be restricted to certain repeat-types (issue 318890043 by thomasmorle...@gmail.com)

On 2016/12/03 11:34:48, dak wrote: mailto:thomasmorle...@gmail.com writes: > On 2016/12/03 11:28:24, dak wrote: >> mailto:thomasmorle...@gmail.com writes: > >> > On 2016/12/02 19:45:02, dak wrote: >> >> However, people might get surprised by >> > >> >> #(unfoldRepeats 'tremolo m) >> > >> >>

Re: unfoldRepeats can be restricted to certain repeat-types (issue 318890043 by thomasmorle...@gmail.com)

On 2016/12/03 11:33:15, dak wrote: David Kastrup writes: > As a user interface, that sounds very much desirable. I don't like > converting symbols to strings, putting stuff on them, and converting > them back again. > > But it's probably the lesser evil. Actually,

Re: unfoldRepeats can be restricted to certain repeat-types (issue 318890043 by thomasmorle...@gmail.com)

thomasmorle...@gmail.com writes: > On 2016/12/03 11:28:24, dak wrote: >> mailto:thomasmorle...@gmail.com writes: > >> > On 2016/12/02 19:45:02, dak wrote: >> >> However, people might get surprised by >> > >> >> #(unfoldRepeats 'tremolo m) >> > >> >> not working. >> > >> > Btw, it turned out the

Re: Stepping up, contributor mentoring

Graham, On 02/12/16 18:34, Graham Percival wrote: > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 11:37:04PM -, Trevor Daniels wrote: >> Graham Percival wrote Tuesday, November 29, 2016 11:11 PM >> >>> So, are there any vacancies on the Bug Squad? I've signed up for >>> sourceforge (username: gperciva). >> I've

Re: unfoldRepeats can be restricted to certain repeat-types (issue 318890043 by thomasmorle...@gmail.com)

David Kastrup writes: > As a user interface, that sounds very much desirable. I don't like > converting symbols to strings, putting stuff on them, and converting > them back again. > > But it's probably the lesser evil. Actually, use an alist or a hash internally for mapping

Re: unfoldRepeats can be restricted to certain repeat-types (issue 318890043 by thomasmorle...@gmail.com)

On 2016/12/03 11:28:24, dak wrote: mailto:thomasmorle...@gmail.com writes: > On 2016/12/02 19:45:02, dak wrote: >> However, people might get surprised by > >> #(unfoldRepeats 'tremolo m) > >> not working. > > Btw, it turned out the previous unfold-repeats destructively changed the >

Re: unfoldRepeats can be restricted to certain repeat-types (issue 318890043 by thomasmorle...@gmail.com)

thomasmorle...@gmail.com writes: > On 2016/12/02 19:45:02, dak wrote: >> However, people might get surprised by > >> #(unfoldRepeats 'tremolo m) > >> not working. > > Btw, it turned out the previous unfold-repeats destructively changed the > music-argument, if called directly. That's common for

Fix MusicXML reg tests that have both Lyrics and Chords (issue 316950043 by pkx1...@gmail.com)

Reviewers: , Message: Passes make, make check and a full make doc. Description: Fix MusicXML reg tests that have both Lyrics and Chords As commented in the patch I did not find any documentation if a chord element can contain multiple lyrics, so I just assumed that the first note of the chord

Re: unfoldRepeats can be restricted to certain repeat-types (issue 318890043 by thomasmorle...@gmail.com)

On 2016/12/02 19:45:02, dak wrote: However, people might get surprised by #(unfoldRepeats 'tremolo m) not working. Btw, it turned out the previous unfold-repeats destructively changed the music-argument, if called directly. See: \version "2.19.51" m = \repeat volta 2 {

Re: unfoldRepeats can be restricted to certain repeat-types (issue 318890043 by thomasmorle...@gmail.com)

On 2016/12/01 22:42:38, simon.albrecht wrote: Hi Harm, thanks for the patch. As for the user-interface, I’d prefer something like \unfoldRepeats tremolo \m \unfoldRepeats volta,tremolo \m Done. Thanks for review. https://codereview.appspot.com/318890043/