2018-09-16 21:28 GMT+02:00 Dan Eble :
>> Real
>> Page_breaking::page_height (int page_num, bool last) const
>> {
>> // The caches allow us to store the page heights for any
>> // non-negative page numbers. We use a negative value in the
>> // cache to signal that that position has not yet
Never mind. I only focused on half the comments.
Sorry for the noise.
Carl
Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S®6 active, an AT 4G LTE smartphone
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Isnt this talking about negative page heights, not negative page numbers?
Carl
Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S®6 active, an AT 4G LTE smartphone
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Am 16. September 2018 21:28:26 MESZ schrieb Dan Eble :
>> Real
>> Page_breaking::page_height (int page_num, bool last) const
>> {
>> // The caches allow us to store the page heights for any
>> // non-negative page numbers. We use a negative value in the
>> // cache to signal that that
> Real
> Page_breaking::page_height (int page_num, bool last) const
> {
> // The caches allow us to store the page heights for any
> // non-negative page numbers. We use a negative value in the
> // cache to signal that that position has not yet been initialized.
> // This means that we
2018-09-16 19:36 GMT+02:00 Lukas-Fabian Moser :
> Hi Harm,
>
> thanks much for the ideas and pointers to old discussions!
>
>> So my first suggestion would be to drop the boolean argument for
>> 'whiteout.
>> Instead let the user decide. Providing a number shouldn't be too hard.
>> Dropping the
Hi Dan,
> Are you guys looking for an effect like “outside stroke?”
Yes, at least as far as I can see.
Thanks,
Kieren.
Kieren MacMillan, composer
‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info
‣ email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info
Hi Lukas,
> @Kieren et al.: Is there really a use-case for 'outline whiteout with
> changing thickness dependent on the angle?
I whiteout my time signatures. Where they are whiteout-ed, I want them to be
'outline whiteout-ed. Optimally, I’d like a 2-3 point horizontal outline (so
that there’s
Lukas-Fabian Moser writes:
> This is exactly what I implemented (tried to implement).
>
>
>> A pair-list like '((1 . 2)(3 . 4)) would extent the whiteout-amount in
>> x-axis with the values of the first pair, in y-axis with the values of
>> the second pair.
>>
>
> Good idea! But wouldn't it be
Hi Harm,
thanks much for the ideas and pointers to old discussions!
So my first suggestion would be to drop the boolean argument for 'whiteout.
> Instead let the user decide. Providing a number shouldn't be too hard.
> Dropping the boolean was already disussed here:
>
On Sep 16, 2018, at 12:34, Malte Meyn wrote:
>
> Do I understand correctly, that instead of making a sort of elliptic whiteout
> you would stick to rectangles and ♦ (a diamond) would have an octogonal
> whiteout instead of something like a diamond with rounded corners?
Are you guys looking
Kieren MacMillan writes:
> Hi David,
>
>> I don't see what the point in that would be. You put a white rectangle
>> on every point of the shape. That's all. The outline will be traced by
>> pieces parallel to the original outline, with some handover when the
>> baton of the outermost shape
Hi David,
> I don't see what the point in that would be. You put a white rectangle
> on every point of the shape. That's all. The outline will be traced by
> pieces parallel to the original outline, with some handover when the
> baton of the outermost shape passes between corners of the
Am 16.09.18 um 18:17 schrieb David Kastrup:
Kieren MacMillan writes:
Hi Urs,
Am I getting something wrong here: why are you asking about
intermediate points? Aren't we only interested in the whiteout around
the outer edges?
Consider the letter O, with 'outline #'(5 . 0). It’s easy to
Kieren MacMillan writes:
> Hi Urs,
>
>> Am I getting something wrong here: why are you asking about
> intermediate points? Aren't we only interested in the whiteout around
> the outer edges?
>
> Consider the letter O, with 'outline #'(5 . 0). It’s easy to see that
> the thickness on top (at the
Am 16.09.18 um 16:18 schrieb Thomas Morley:
The disadvantage of this approach is obvious as soon as thickness is increased.
That’s true but the function stencil-whiteout-outline (from
scm/stencil.scm) takes not only a thickness argument but also three
other arguments called color,
Hello,
Here is the current patch countdown list. The next countdown will be on
19th September.
A quick synopsis of all patches currently in the review process can be
found here:
http://philholmes.net/lilypond/allura/
Push:
5415 Fix type-conversion warnings in parser and lexer - Dan
2018-09-16 15:57 GMT+02:00 Urs Liska :
>
>
> Am 16.09.2018 um 15:44 schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
>>
>> Hi Urs,
>>
>>> Am I getting something wrong here: why are you asking about intermediate
>>> points? Aren't we only interested in the whiteout around the outer edges?
>>
>> Consider the letter O,
Am 16.09.2018 um 15:44 schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
Hi Urs,
Am I getting something wrong here: why are you asking about intermediate
points? Aren't we only interested in the whiteout around the outer edges?
Consider the letter O, with 'outline #'(5 . 0). It’s easy to see that the thickness on
Hi Urs,
> Am I getting something wrong here: why are you asking about intermediate
> points? Aren't we only interested in the whiteout around the outer edges?
Consider the letter O, with 'outline #'(5 . 0). It’s easy to see that the
thickness on top (at the "N" compass point) is 5 units, and
Am 16.09.2018 um 15:19 schrieb Malte Meyn:
Am 16.09.18 um 15:16 schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
3. at any other point on the grob, the whiteout should extend
[horizontally and vertically] by an interpolated amount.
How to interpolate? Maybe in such a way that a point or circle gets an
Am 16.09.18 um 15:16 schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
3. at any other point on the grob, the whiteout should extend
[horizontally and vertically] by an interpolated amount.
How to interpolate? Maybe in such a way that a point or circle gets an
elliptical whiteout?
Hi Harm (et al.),
> Providing a pair or a pair-list will not work for 'outline ofcourse, I
> don't have a good thought how to deal with this style, though.
Why (conceptually) can’t a pair work in that case?
Given 'outline #'(5 . 0), I think we could reasonably interpret that as saying:
1.
2018-09-13 23:56 GMT+02:00 Lukas-Fabian Moser :
> Addendum: Of course, "quadratic" is not the right word. What I mean by it is
> that the horizontal and vertical protrusions of the whiteout box around the
> actual rectangular hull of the object are equal. For, e.g., noteheads, this
> /does /lead
24 matches
Mail list logo
