On 9/7/11 4:29 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
Please take a look; I may have missed something.
LGTM
Carl
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On 9/6/11 11:25 AM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Graham Percival [mailto:gra...@percival-music.ca]
Sent: 06 September 2011 18:20
To: Phil Holmes
Cc: 'Trevor Daniels'; lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories
On Tue, Sep
On 8/28/11 3:29 AM, m...@apollinemike.com m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
As for the convert-ly rule, I was under the impression that these rules were
pushed on a version-to-version basis, and all syntax changes were written as
one rule before the rolling of the next version. The last time I
On 8/28/11 3:52 AM, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
W dniu 27 sierpnia 2011 15:51 użytkownik Carl Sorensen
c_soren...@byu.edu napisał:
The a to b beam would have a slope of 1 ss per eighth note.
The c to f beam would have a slope of 3 ss per eighth note.
the a to f beam
On 8/27/11 6:45 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org wrote:
Janek Warchoł writes:
However, almost always it is Much Better (TM) to use the benchmarking
approach: find how the great masters solved the situation and program
LilyPond to do that. Is this documented somewhere, by the way?
On 8/27/11 7:44 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu writes:
On 8/27/11 7:21 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
I wonder if this solution would yield good results: keep beam slope
before and after
On 8/27/11 4:41 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
Previously #{ ... #} created only sequential music. This changes it to
accept everything an assignment accepts. Incompatibility to before:
#{ #} returns a void music expression, #{ music #} does not
On 8/24/11 5:31 PM, Michael Ellis michael.f.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Kieren MacMillan
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote:
Hi all,
In short, the only way to make it extendable for the future (so
that one day we can also export the layout) is to handle
On 8/24/11 6:00 PM, Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca
wrote:
Hi Carl,
My question is this: In what format is the final, typeset music stream such
that extracting the music information only would be massively easier than
extracting the music and layout information?
I don't
2: Is there a way to get the result code and see if the command succeded?
Uh, have you even looked up system in the guile documentation?
Yes I have ... but I typed my question a bit to fast ... the question
should have been, why does '(if (not (system ...' not act, like I would
expect. But
On 8/23/11 12:21 PM, ianhuli...@gmail.com ianhuli...@gmail.com wrote:
LGTM
Maybe we should have some GOP rules for C++ about this?
Only have multiple exit points from routines if you absolutely have to.
Multiple exit points is a standard idiom of the LilyPond code. Basically,
the idiom is
On 8/21/11 1:45 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu writes:
On 8/19/11 2:57 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu writes:
On 8/19/11 10:15 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
With this architecture, I don't think
On 8/21/11 3:01 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu writes:
On 8/21/11 1:45 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
My suggestion
would be
\set x = 4 ; setting the default
\override x = 5 ; context set has 5
\override x = 2
For several weeks now, I've been working in fits and starts, with lots of
dead ends, on the oldest bug in the LilyPond issue tracker -- issue #11
Beamlet on wrong side of tuplet sixteenth.
The good news is, I think I have a fix for that bug (and it's only 5 years
old).
But before I push a
On 8/20/11 4:16 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
Hmm. I still have no clue about the difference between #t and
#foo, which certainly emphasizes that there *is* confusion.
#t is a Scheme value, as is foo
##t is a lilypond input value to get the scheme value #t
#foo is a
On 8/20/11 3:40 PM, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
What about
O. O O. O
|| ||
| -| | -|
++--++
Does this work correctly also?
Yes. See attached PNG.
On 8/20/11 2:53 PM, Mike Solomon mike...@ufl.edu wrote:
Can you send a test case without
On 8/19/11 2:57 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu writes:
On 8/19/11 10:15 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Up to now, \once \revert is not really documented nor used. I have not
yet dug through the existing code in order to figure out what
On 8/19/11 10:15 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Up to now, \once \revert is not really documented nor used. I have not
yet dug through the existing code in order to figure out what it does if
anything (most likely ignoring \once, but not sure).
I would expect that \once \revert would
On 8/19/11 4:35 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 06:04:38PM +, carl.d.soren...@gmail.com wrote:
I have some comments about the docs. I think they're too tutorial, and
I think the exhaustive lists are unwieldy and should be eliminated. THe
On 8/17/11 11:32 PM, Dan Eble d...@faithful.be wrote:
Backing upS I believe the compiler will initialize the bits in the
aforementioned variables to zero, but is zero a desirable default for SCM
variables in general, and these in particular?
Yes. In this case, if we were to initialize it,
On 8/17/11 10:41 PM, Dan Eble d...@faithful.be wrote:
Carl Sorensen c_sorensen at byu.edu writes:
Do you have more information about the segfault that you'd be willing to
share with us?
What I have so far is a backtrace:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2011-08/msg00494
On 8/17/11 5:35 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
So it would seem like another worthwhile frog task to get rid of
SCM_CDRLOC in the source tree when feasible (when the list is being
consulted front-to-back while it is in the process of being created,
this would not be possible.
\On 8/16/11 10:25 PM, Dan Eble d...@faithful.be wrote:
Is there a reason that these variables in lily/profile.cc don't need to be
initialized? I don't have experience with guile, but it looks dangerous.
SCM context_property_lookup_table;
SCM grob_property_lookup_table;
SCM
On 8/16/11 11:15 PM, Dan Eble d...@faithful.be wrote:
I think the following code should check that ev is not null before
dereferencing it. This might be a factor in a segfault I saw. (Sorry to be
so vague, but I am not going to build lilypond to test the theory. It would
take a credible
LGTM.
Carl
From: lilypond-devel-bounces+c_sorensen=byu@gnu.org
[lilypond-devel-bounces+c_sorensen=byu@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Graham
Percival [gra...@percival-music.ca]
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2011 10:51 PM
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Subject:
On 8/16/11 4:31 AM, Ian Hulin i...@hulin.org.uk wrote:
On 16/08/11 08:51, Trevor Daniels wrote:
LGTM
Graham Percival wrote Tuesday, August 16, 2011 5:53 AM
There seems to be general happiness with Carl's work; a few minor
tweaks here and there may still be necessary, but hopefully
On 8/13/11 9:44 AM, Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 August 2011 01:44, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
Yep. Here it is, along with the change to /usr/bin/env guile.
I had to change this to
/usr/bin/guile
to get the script to work:
/usr/bin/env: guile -s
On 8/12/11 9:32 AM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 02:53:56PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
I understand it's been discussed before, but I am wondering whether
it's worth thinking the unthinkable and considering moving away from
make.
Budget 2000 hours.
On 8/12/11 5:39 AM, Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com wrote:
Do you know anything about the license?
Thanks for this reminder. I've renamed the file to guileindent.scm, making
it clear that it's a derivative work, rather than just a copy.
I've sent an email to Dorai asking if it's
Here is the permission from Dorai to distribute as GPL 3+.
Thanks,
Carl
-- Forwarded Message
From: Dorai Sitaram ds26...@yahoo.com
Reply-To: Dorai Sitaram ds26...@yahoo.com
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 17:59:02 -0600
To: Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu
Conversation: Derivative work
Having spent more time than I thought it would be necessary, I finally found
something that could work as a stand-alone script for indenting scheme
files.
It appears to follow standard Scheme indenting rules, which means that it
changes the indentation we have in lily.scm where the
On 8/11/11 6:07 PM, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
Having spent more time than I thought it would be necessary, I finally found
something that could work as a stand-alone script for indenting scheme
files.
It appears to follow standard Scheme indenting rules, which means
On 8/11/11 6:17 PM, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
On 8/11/11 6:07 PM, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
Oops -- I have now found a problem with it. The else part of an if doesn't
line up with the then part. More work to do, I guess.
New version fixes that problem.
BTW
On 8/11/11 6:32 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 06:28:09PM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 8/11/11 6:17 PM, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
BTW, usage is
./scmindent.scm input-file output-file
Could we get that in a comment at the top
On 8/10/11 10:46 AM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
I'm feeling pretty good about this one, with the exception of
whether we should have a Type-ignorance or not.
In case you're wondering: yes, I am serious proposing that we
elminiate priorities completely, and this is
On 8/9/11 9:34 AM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Wols Lists antli...@youngman.org.uk
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 4:26 PM
Subject: Re: GOP-PROP 5: build system output (final)
On 09/08/11 11:07, Phil Holmes wrote:
On 8/9/11 2:04 PM, Wols Lists antli...@youngman.org.uk wrote:
On 09/08/11 20:44, Neil Puttock wrote:
On 9 August 2011 20:21, Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com wrote:
So having only 9 warnings in our codebase (four of which are in the
lexer/parser, which hardly anyone of us really
On 8/8/11 6:07 AM, Aleksandr Andreev aleksandr.andr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jan,
Thanks for your comments.
In case of noteheads, i suppose that everything would be best defined in
staff_space. For stems (as i understand there are special characters for
stems) stafflinethickness will be
On 7/31/11 4:17 PM, Wols Lists antli...@youngman.org.uk wrote:
On 31/07/11 22:00, Janek Warchoł wrote:
2011/7/31 Wols Lists antli...@youngman.org.uk:
Assuming that it's okay and is applied, I've redone my docu patch.
Uploaded to Rietveld. I see one trailing whitespace (after By
default
On 7/31/11 11:41 AM, bordage.bertr...@gmail.com
bordage.bertr...@gmail.com wrote:
I updated the patch.
There's now a list of special characters and a \replace command for
markups.
The escape character is now '§'. It's the only one that works great
with lyrics. And it isn't used
On 7/30/11 10:07 AM, Janek Warchoł lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com
wrote:
2011/7/29 Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com:
then again, if the barline is horizontally aligned, it may not be a
problem. I think the problem may still occur if you stop/start staves
half-way the page, but we may
On 7/30/11 9:33 AM, Jan Warchoł lemniskata.bernoulli...@gmail.com wrote:
I see...
The more i think about it, the more i feel it would be good to merge
\set, \override and \tweak into one thingy. Doing so would make music
functions like above one quite simpler.
While I could see that
On 7/30/11 2:19 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Hi,
music_list in parser.yy temporarily maintains an awkward
half-self-referential data structure in order to have fast append. It
makes more sense in my opinion to use prepend and reverse afterwards.
Fast append in theory may show
On 7/30/11 3:35 PM, pkx1...@gmail.com pkx1...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2011/07/30 16:15:39, c_sorensen_byu.edu wrote:
I think that the stop/start staves is currently exactly what it should
do.
It stops the staff at a location, and starts the staff at the same
location.
It reflects the
On 7/30/11 5:15 PM, Wols Lists antli...@youngman.org.uk wrote:
On 30/07/11 23:52, Wols Lists wrote:
On 30/07/11 22:49, pkx1...@gmail.com wrote:
Doesn't pass a make check.
I get an error on
regression/fret-diagrams-string-thickness.ly
log file shows:
Renaming input to:
On 7/30/11 5:26 PM, James Lowe james.l...@datacore.com wrote:
OK I see (although I think we got off topic there) so why not make stop\start,
as an explicit command, rounded; and whatever you call 'end of barlines' that
are either \break-ed or whatever LP does when it starts a 'new line'
On 7/30/11 5:34 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
We have somebody willing to work on this stuff. He's twiddling
his thumbs until we get the basic guidelines down. Of course
there will be technical implementation problems to work out later,
but I'm really hoping that he
On 7/30/11 4:37 PM, Jan Warchoł lemniskata.bernoulli...@gmail.com wrote:
W dniu 30 lipca 2011 18:18 użytkownik Carl Sorensen
c_soren...@byu.edu napisał:
On 7/30/11 9:33 AM, Jan Warchoł lemniskata.bernoulli...@gmail.com wrote:
I see...
The more i think about it, the more i feel
On 7/30/11 5:56 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu writes:
The principles:
\tweak comes immediately before the object to be modified.
Except when not.
\tweak ... c
does not work, you need to do
\tweak ... c
\tweak still comes
On 7/30/11 8:38 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 12:40:27AM +, James Lowe wrote:
/home/jlowe/lilypond-git/build/out/lybook-db/snippet-names--1673544600.ly
Child returned 1
make[4]: *** [out-www/papersize-docs.texi] Error 1
Looks like it
On 7/30/11 9:03 PM, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
On 7/30/11 8:38 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 12:40:27AM +, James Lowe wrote:
/home/jlowe/lilypond-git/build/out/lybook-db/snippet-names--1673544600.ly
Child returned 1
make[4
On 7/27/11 9:53 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
incompatible-stem-warning.log: lots of changed lines: a sample:
-/main/src/gub/target/linux-x86/src/lilypond-git.sv.gnu.org--lilypond.git-rel
I found the same thing, patched it, built docs, and pushed it.
Thanks,
Carl
On 7/22/11 4:49 AM, Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com wrote:
2011/7/22 Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com:
I have found a probable cause in anglican-psalm-template.ly which has
remains of HEAD conflict marks
On 7/20/11 10:41 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 09:40:01PM -0700, Graham Percival wrote:
Can somebody check if
make test
works on stable/2.14, and if not, fix it? The GUB build died,
apparently on
input/regression/rest-polyphonic-2.ly
I am traveling in Korea over the next week and may have limited email
access.
Thanks,
Carl
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On 7/18/11 8:44 PM, Colin Campbell c...@shaw.ca wrote:
New today, for 21:00 MST Wednesday July 20 (Where were you 42 years ago
that day?)
I was watching Neil Armstrong step on the moon in my living room, IIRC.
Issue 1752 http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1752 :
On 7/18/11 8:44 PM, Colin Campbell c...@shaw.ca wrote:
Countdown done, but still open/not fixed:
21:00 MST Monday July 18
Issue 1695 http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1695 :
Clef change placed outside score - Rietveld - 4683043
On 7/18/11 9:48 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 08:44:13PM -0600, Colin Campbell wrote:
Countdown done, but still open/not fixed:
All those should be marked patch-needs_work. When a new version
of the patch is available, James will check that
On 7/16/11 10:38 AM, Bertrand Bordage bordage.bertr...@gmail.com wrote:
Would it be possible to make upload.py sent multiple commits? For
casual contributors, a single commit is fine, but serious
developers like Mike require the ability to upload multiple
commits for a single issue.
Yes,
On 7/16/11 5:00 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 04:53:15PM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
Why are we trying to eliminate git-cl? What is the problem it causes?
git-cl isn't the problem.
The problem is that when I click on download raw patch set
On 7/16/11 5:37 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 05:13:29PM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
IMO, we should be aiming at one commit per Rietveld issue, rather than a
series of commits per Rietveld issue.
That's beside the point, at least as far as I
On 7/16/11 4:55 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 08:34:56PM +0200, Jan Warchoł wrote:
2011/7/16 Bertrand Bordage bordage.bertr...@gmail.com:
Furthermore, there's something we should solve : upload.py is just uploading
diffs instead of full git
On 7/14/11 8:20 AM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 07:12:09PM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
Could you prepare a 2.14.2 release?
Nope, sorry. I see 3 open Critical issues. Each one of those
blocks a stable release.
As I see it, all of those
Graham,
Could you prepare a 2.14.2 release?
I've verified that I get a clean make and make doc with stable/2.14.
All of the bugfixes that can be backported have been backported, as far as I
can see.
I've applied all the translation work that Francisco asked for.
Thanks,
Carl
On 7/10/11 3:09 PM, Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 July 2011 23:22, carl.d.soren...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2011/07/07 16:12:08, Neil Puttock wrote:
LGTM, though the regtest is still a bit messy.
What do you consider messy about the regtest?
Just a few nitpicks:
+\score{
On 7/10/11 4:41 PM, Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10 July 2011 23:34, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
Ahh, thanks. Fixed now:
{
\new Voice \with {
\consists Ambitus_engraver
\consists Mensural_ligature_engraver
Heh, you didn't have to do this; I meant
No problem. I was waiting for a notification that the countdown is over.
pushed with 15f4f4c7c1d0e8c2f904981586145f478a31b65
Issue 1709 marked fixed
Rietveld issue http://codereview.appspot.com/4654084/ closed
Thanks,
Carl
On 7/9/11 1:02 PM, lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com
On 7/9/11 7:55 PM, colinpkcampb...@gmail.com colinpkcampb...@gmail.com
wrote:
This has had a 48-hour countdown, and can be pushed and closed, please.
Issue 1715 issue marked fixed; Rietveld issue closed
Commit: 4fd0de625eba203265241fca20c504724013f534
Thanks,
Carl
On 7/9/11 8:43 PM, Colin Campbell c...@shaw.ca wrote:
21:00 MST Monday
A paltry pile of patches presented, presumably prior patches (of which there
are a metric shedload marked for review) preoccupying people.
Issue 1735 http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1735 :
On 7/8/11 2:48 AM, m...@apollinemike.com m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
On Jul 7, 2011, at 6:38 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 4:19 AM, mts...@gmail.com wrote:
Reviewers: ,
Message:
I tried this with my local branch and I noticed no slow-down (I'm sure
there is one,
On 7/7/11 7:30 AM, m...@apollinemike.com m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
Mmmm...
Do we have generic procedures for combine markup and stack markup?
If not, there'll be a flurry of frog emails as I try and write them :-)
(note to self - ly:stencil-combine-at-edge)
line and column
(see
On 7/7/11 12:26 PM, Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 July 2011 19:09, Wols Lists antli...@youngman.org.uk wrote:
Which I probably didn't understand :-) BUT from what I remember did you
think that feeding a chord of, say, C into the formatter should chuck
out A as its result?
On 7/7/11 6:58 PM, Wols Lists antli...@youngman.org.uk wrote:
On 08/07/11 00:23, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 7/7/11 12:26 PM, Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 July 2011 19:09, Wols Lists antli...@youngman.org.uk wrote:
Which I probably didn't understand :-) BUT from what I
On 7/6/11 1:43 PM, Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jul 2011 00:18:21 -0700, Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk
wrote:
Carl Sorensen wrote Tuesday, July 05, 2011 7:12 AM
long_variable_name = (first_term
+ second_term);
I prefer
On 7/4/11 11:32 PM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org wrote:
Also, I tried to make the output of the modified fixcc+asytle pass
unchanged through emacs, but the very many cases of line-broken
asssignments will be different.
That's a problem.
long_variable_name = first_term
+
On 7/5/11 10:27 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Hi, I have the following file (with outcommented usage examples at the
end) flying around, and I think it is a reasonably workable approach to
typesetting accordion register symbols. It should also be a good
starting point for making
On 7/4/11 7:14 AM, Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 July 2011 13:53, m...@apollinemike.com m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
I didn't realize this was the real issue :)
Any tips as to how one would go about fixing this? Anything that happens
before engravers kick in (dispatchers,
On 7/4/11 3:28 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org wrote:
Trevor Daniels writes:
I agree. This is a big improvement, and would
give us control over the layout style ourselves
(rather than what emacs does).
While the work being done here is possibly a good thing, let me remind
you
As far as I can see, all bugfixes from the 2.15 branch are now backported to
stable/2.14
I plan to ask Graham to release a new version on Saturday, July 9.
There have been only minor documentation changes since 2.14.1, IIUC, but I
would invite the translators to check to see if there is any work
On 7/4/11 2:30 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 01:57:54PM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
I plan to ask Graham to release a new version on Saturday, July 9.
May or may not happen. That's the last day of the conference;
I'll probably be in the Venice
On 7/4/11 7:23 PM, Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com wrote:
2011/7/4 Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu:
As far as I can see, all bugfixes from the 2.15 branch are now backported to
stable/2.14
I plan to ask Graham to release a new version on Saturday, July 9.
There have been only minor
On 7/4/11 7:26 PM, Harmath Dénes harmathde...@gmail.com wrote:
9780d79af0855706354029509cbb11464a63d901 is intended to be backported to
stable, 71cea6af77bf3d639dcfd8ad09fd235aab22c5f7 is not.
backported
Thanks,
Carl
___
lilypond-devel mailing
On 7/3/11 5:49 AM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 01:43:40AM -0700, Keith OHara wrote:
On Sat, 02 Jul 2011 19:41:15 -0700, carl.d.soren...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you make it possible for us to see the diff caused by applying this
script to the files
On 7/1/11 2:12 PM, m...@apollinemike.com m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
I am a proponent of using mixed integer linear programming to solve these
issues. I believe that 100% of LilyPond's spacing could be rewritten as
constraints in a linear program, in which case the vertical and horizontal
In commit 4ff3911fee47369023e0588043d24f7bbd86cd86, a link to a pdf copy of
the METAFONTbook was added to the CG.
I believe that this link is a link to an unauthorized copy of the book.
At ctan.org, which is the official archive for all things TeX, the mfbook
package page (
On 6/30/11 9:21 AM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:17:36AM -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
We should examine other reasons for the delay of the 1st candidate
appearing, and the delay between the 1st and last release candidate,
and figure out if there
On 6/29/11 6:01 PM, Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
Graham Percival graham at percival-music.ca writes:
At the moment I'm leaning towards using astyle+postprocessing.
By coincidence, I just finished looking over astyle alone.
The options you first proposed aren't enough for me,
On 6/28/11 9:48 AM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
I was discussing LSR with Phil, and it occurred to me that I
should raise the question here. What do we want from LSR?
As far as I'm concerned, no I don't care about LSR; the people who
wanted it in the first place aren't
On 6/28/11 11:16 AM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:45:36AM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 6/28/11 9:48 AM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
...snip various LSR discussion...
I'm not sure I agree with this.
I'm not certain
On 6/28/11 12:30 PM, Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com wrote:
My question is here:
http://lilypond-translations.3384276.n2.nabble.com/snippets-in-LM-td6518251.ht
ml
Looking at this more closely, I think the instructions (in CG 5.8.2) say
that you open the snippet (in Documentation/snippets)
I'm trying to get ready for release 2.14.2. In general, I'd like bugfixes
from 2.15.x to show up in 2.14.2.
To do this, I'm searching the issues, looking for fixed_2_15_1,
fixed_2_15_2, fixed_2_15_3. If I can backport, I do so, then mark the issue
fixed_2_14_2. This system seems to work pretty
On 6/27/11 7:22 PM, Colin Campbell c...@shaw.ca wrote:
Wednesday 19:30 MST
http://codereview.appspot.com/4662055/ Issue 1709 Add feta-flags to
build system
There were some suggestions that have not yet been dealt with, so this isn't
yet ready to push. It should be moved to patch-needs
On 6/27/11 3:26 PM, Nicolas Sceaux nicolas.sce...@free.fr wrote:
Le 27 juin 2011 à 21:23, Giso Grimm a écrit :
How can I create ornaments like those in the attached example?
I tried \markup with creating a path, however, this is always placed
outside the staff. The desired ornament
On 6/22/11 10:09 AM, Jan Warchoł lemniskata.bernoulli...@gmail.com
wrote:
2011/6/22 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 04:06:17PM +0200, Jan Warchoł wrote:
Problem 1: a Frog tries to modify wind diagrams code and experiences
some difficulties. (S)he sends an
On 6/22/11 3:53 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 01:34:42PM +0200, Jan Warchoł wrote:
2011/6/22 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
There are plenty of differences. If you get the git diff command
to work, you'll see.
It still doesn't work.
On 6/17/11 5:48 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 07:46:43AM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
I'm not looking for somebody to say I'll take one person and
then have me assign them somebody at random. Right now, I'm just
looking for a best-case
On 6/19/11 10:18 AM, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
On 6/17/11 5:48 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 07:46:43AM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
I'm not looking for somebody to say I'll take one person and
then have me assign them somebody
On 6/16/11 4:05 AM, Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 15. Juni 2011, 22:08:21 schrieben Sie:
I think there's another problem with this. If I run
lilypond test.ly 1 test.log
it should redirect non-error output to the file, and errors should appear
in the
On 6/16/11 8:48 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu writes:
David Kastrup feels pretty strongly that progress messages belong on
stderr along with warning/error messages, since ther are not the
output of the program.
Actually, I feel progress messages
On 6/16/11 2:57 PM, Janek Warchoł lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com
wrote:
2011/6/14 Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de:
Am 13.06.2011 22:16, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
2011/6/13 Janek Warchołlemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com:
Bad news: it doesn't work (the flags are squashed)
An idea came to my
601 - 700 of 1841 matches
Mail list logo
