Ralph Little wrote:
install-info: menu item `musedata2ly' already exists, for file
fixed.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman
as a sponsored feature, or lay-out a framework for you to put
complex positioning rules in.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo
-axis group, it should work.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
don't work on 2.2 or
earlier. I recall lots of problems with the re module.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo
.
The real complaint is not the spacing but the line-breaking.
I agree that it's unexpected; what happens is that one cramped line is
less ugly than the ugliness of all other (slightly stretched) lines
added together.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
]-extent.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
to the
garamond copy on your homepage?
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
($arg0-mutable_property_alist_)
print ly_display_scm($arg0-immutable_property_alist_)
end
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo
doesn't have a 'foo' rehearsal mark as I
would expect.
Is this a problem, or are my expectations somewhat misguided ;-)?
Yes.
:-)
don't use marks at the start of a score.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
delete-file in expression (f (car ls)):
/usr/share/guile/1.6/srfi/srfi-1.scm:634:24: No such file or directory
lilypond-book.py: warning: `lilypond' failed (status 2) (ignored)
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
networking is sufficiently different from
Unix networking that it doesn't work on windows. You might have better
luck with Cygwin, though.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond
)
Han-Wen, can this be applied?
yes.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
in the .scm files (scm/* wherever
lilypond's data files are), rather than the online docs. The .scm files
sometimes contain additional hints.
So you're arguing against documenting the system?
No, against inferring how things work from the docs, I guess.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED
in the .scm files (scm/* wherever
lilypond's data files are), rather than the online docs. The .scm files
sometimes contain additional hints.
So you're arguing against documenting the system?
No, against inferring who things work from the docs, I guess.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED
David Bobroff
After getting this doing 'make all' would exit with a few lines of
output mentioning something about 'too many files open'. I would have
strange. I have never seen this. Maybe you have zombie processes which
hold open files?
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http
lilypond-book.py: warning: `lilypond' failed (status 2) (ignored)
why do you think it's non-fatal? This should halt the doc compilation.
The rest is just fallout from this. Do you have the ttf file patch for
GS (mentioned in INSTALL)?
Can you run utf-8.ly standalone?
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys
Erlend Aasland wrote:
Hi Han-Wen
I noticed this error while browsing through the new tie code. I guess
this patch is correct. Patch is against CVS.
Regards
Erlend Aasland
Thanks, fixed!
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
will not accept gratuitous ifdefs all
over the code. Complain with the fink maintainers for shipping a broken
flex.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http
Graham Percival
We don't need to change the existing fink patch; I'll just add portions
of the fink patch to that file so that people can use it if they wish.
go ahead.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
Graham Percival wrote:
On 13-Dec-05, at 11:04 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Graham Percival wrote:
/sw/share/guile/1.6/srfi/srfi-1.scm:634:24: No such file or directory
lilypond-book.py: warning: `lilypond' failed (status 2) (ignored)
why do you think it's non-fatal? This should halt
-offset = #10
--
Sven Axelsson
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Sven Axelsson wrote:
On 25/12/05, Han-Wen Nienhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sven Axelsson wrote:
This hack for putting volta brackets at a fixed y-position doesn't
work anymore. What is the current incantation?
\override Staff.VoltaBracket #'Y-offset-callbacks = #(list
{ .. }
DURATION_IDENTIFIER
foo = #(ly:make-duration ... )
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
with how to print it. Then, you can define the
input that you need for that as a standard.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman
this will come very soon after
I fix this issue.
This is meant for displaying something readable for lily-47382973.ly
when there is an error.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
thanks. Applied.
Erlend Aasland wrote:
Hello Han-Wen,
I just came in a janitor mood and cleaned up some Scheme magical
constants (mainly directions). Are these kind of patches wanted, or is
it a waste of time?
Regards,
Erlend Aasland
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http
=ps foo.ly fails. Yes, I know that -b=ps should work
exactly like having no arguments. Any ideas? I've got gdb installed,
try -b ps
we don't have a =ps backend.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
. It currently isn't explained in the manual, so we don't
really have to worry about confusing people with the name... but I
_should_ add it at some point.
I think \sourcefilename is thet better one. I've changed it to that.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
:
?: 4* blablalblah
unnamed port: In expression blablalblah:
unnamed port: Unbound variable: blablalblah
opps, some debugging code crept in :-)
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
I do not have any experience with fontconfig, but this path should be
queried, right?
yes. Question is: how.
the easiest is probably to do
locate c059033l.pfb
in configure.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 2 Jan 2006, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
I do not have any experience with fontconfig, but this path should be
queried, right?
yes. Question is: how.
the easiest is probably to do
locate c059033l.pfb
in configure.
Sorry
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
BTW: Why are the TTFs generated? Does this fix something?
Pango 1.12 will be able to do kerning ligatures with TTF files.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel
to make it extract all of the headers. See
(define-public (output-scopes scopes fields basename)
in backend-library.scm
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http
Christian Hitz wrote:
Hi all,
Am 07.01.2006 um 20:55 schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys:
the MacOS X release has been uploaded, other platforms are still
brewing.
(On Mac OS X)
How would one call lilypond-book (or convert-ly) in this version?
thanks. I fixed this; please wait for the next
/)
--batch no interaction
--tarball extract tar file for archive
--help this help
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http
the files at the cvs branches (like lilypond_2_6 and so on).
Yes, and ping me to upload the new web doc to lilypond.org ; We've
stopped updating 2.4 and earlier because getting make web to run is
too much hassle, though.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
Nicolas Sceaux wrote:
Han-Wen Nienhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nicolas Sceaux wrote:
--
parallelMusic = #(def-music-function (parser location voice-number
music) (number? ly:music?)
it's hack, but it's a cool one. With a little
to the following error:
should be fixed in cvs.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Nicolas Sceaux wrote:
Han-Wen Nienhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why not do
\parMusic #'(A B C) { c | e | g | d | f | a}
which expands to { }, and defines the following vars in the parser
A = { c d }
B = { e f }
C = { g a }
then, the user can decide for himself how to structure
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
A very critical point of view w.r.t. Python is here:
http://plan99.net/autopackage/Linux_Problems
I wasn't aware of this problem at all...
this page is wrongly named. It should say Please avoid us. We Are
Clueless.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http
Graham Percival wrote:
Hi all,
Older versions of the lilypond app contained some vim files in
LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/share/lilypond/current/vim/
Could we add those back in?
done.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
Nicolas Sceaux wrote:
Han-Wen Nienhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As final finish, something should be added to the
process-toplevel-music hook so that you can make it ignore the result
of \parallelMusic. Maybe set a #'void property in the returned value,
and
ignore a music expression
)
developers an official goodbye notice.
Jan.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Nicolas Sceaux wrote:
Han-Wen Nienhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As final finish, something should be added to the
process-toplevel-music hook so that you can make it ignore the result
of \parallelMusic. Maybe set a #'void property in the returned value,
and
ignore a music expression
are add /usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/ to my
$PATH or manually create those links as well. I'm happy doing this, but
I could imagine there are others who wouldn't understand this.
Or am I missing something?
no, dealing with this is on the TODO list.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http
Graham Percival wrote:
I've added two new doc sections to putting.itely. It probably won't
compile, since I can't test it. Sorry about that.
Hi,
the latest GUB release should work with CVS lilypond, if you use the
LILYPOND_EXTERNAL_BINARY setting.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL
Graham Percival wrote:
On 23-Jan-06, at 4:23 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Graham Percival wrote:
I've added two new doc sections to putting.itely. It probably won't
compile, since I can't test it. Sorry about that.
the latest GUB release should work with CVS lilypond, if you use
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
-#ifdef __MINGW32__
- file_name.substitute ('\\', '/');
- file_name.substitute (//, /);
+ replace_all (file_name, '\\', '/');
+ replace_all (file_name, std::String (//), /);
Ha, dank - moet wel std::string. Waarom #ifdef weg, dat
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Ha, dank - moet wel std::string. Waarom #ifdef weg, dat breekt namen
op loes waar \ in zit?
alleen de definitie is niet meer ifdef.
Whoops, excuse us!
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
in Scribus's mantis bugtracker.
For reasons of space saving, the
lily-XX-Y.eps
files don't embed fonts. They are not meant to be imported directly,
but rather, to be used by LaTeX
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
specifies a fixed vertical distance just for one or more
lines?
No, that's completely infeasible.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org
June - Nov 2004.
Turning No into a special N* thing should be an option, _not_ the
default.
I've been unable to duplicate this for my local builds (I use CVS
Pango), so I hope that this will be fixed in the next GUB build, which
will use a newer Pango.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED
to create,
together with the first few levels of a backtrace.
thanks, should be fixed in CVS.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman
would write it,
but that's why I am the hacker, and you're the documentation editor :)
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo
of .ly, and we
won't be able to handle this through convert-ly.
How would you deal with
\addquote #violin \viol
\parallelMusic #'(a b c) \bla
\a
Yes, \addquote is not a music function, but it should be.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
toplevel-music-functions does not seem very elegant to me.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
/pfx2ttf.fontforge: line 8
make[1]: *** [out/CenturySchL- Ital.ttf] Error 1
make: *** [all] Error 2
try a newer fontforge.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http
, not the return value, of a function.
the problem I have with this is that every other construct (eg. \times,
\transpose) works directly. We can have delayed evaluation of music
functions, but then every other construct needs to be done lazily too.
Can you see a way to achieve that?
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys
in
the near future.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
(or rather, to a wrapper
around that function).
just for the record, I think that this will be post 2.8 stuff. I have
some plans for reorganizing the input format, and this would also fit
nicely for the 3.0 release.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
Erlend Aasland wrote:
Hi
On 1/31/06, *Han-Wen Nienhuys* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apparently, there are multiple versions of c0590xxx floating around. We
should probably check whether afii61352 exists. Patch, anyone?
I've got two versions of the font
also soft-code the
definition of \lyrics, \lyricsto, \figures, etc.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
#(define foo 1)
\markup {
\raise \foo bla
}
?
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Don Blaheta wrote:
ideas? And presumably you need a workaround for people who aren't
we use gcc 4.0 to build the GUB binaries.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond
file.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
. With the
GUB versions I have D/L'd it is a script which at least has a double /
which seems wrong but even when I correct that I get the same error.
This is all on two different machines both running Debian sid.
Hmmm... what does
ldd /usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond say ?
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys
while still typesetting lyrics nicely,
then it is at least a low-priority far-future bug.
Maybe I should just move the bug to the future branch?
yes.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel mailing
Paul Scott wrote:
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Paul Scott wrote:
With GUB (i386) versions 2.7.30-1 and 2.7.31-2 invoking lilypond
(/usr/local/bin/lilypond) gives:
/usr/local/bin/lilypond: line 3: 8611 Illegal instruction
/usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond $@
With the CVS version /usr
found no
documentation. What should I be reading?
the easiest way to currently communicate with lily is through Scheme
sexps, by reading and writing those. Try
\displayMusic { c4 d8 }
to see what I mean.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
]
* (for max_brk, start_brk_idx_[start_idx] is the beginning
* of the piece; the smallest value we should ever see here is
* start_brk_idx_[start_idx] + 1) */
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
not. For the case of
the note head, the stem attachment would be wrong if the parens were
included.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org
to happen after the
number of systems is decided, I attach a patch that will delay
Gourlay_breaking until/unless ly:paper-book-systems is called.
I guess I have to see the page breaker patch before I can see the full
picture.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
\new Foo = bar, but have it be an error
if a bar context already existed? I think that would actually help
I think that's a good idea . I agree with Graham that mixing \new and
\context looks a bit odd.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
hassle.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
\new
Voice=alto)
Almost none.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
to automating the current page break tweaking hassle.
You mean a Constrained_page_breaker without the
Constrained_line_breaker? I think this still leaves a couple problems.
No, with both: allow the user to set both a number of systems and a
number of pages, separately.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL
,
cross fingers) and render the slur totally wrong. Is this me not
understanding what Bar_engraver is supposed to be doing, or is it a bug?
thanks. Fixed.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel
your approach still works.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Erlend Aasland wrote:
Hi
When building latest CVS, compilation stops in lily/relocate.cc. The
attached one-liner patch should fix the problem.
Regards,
Erlend Aasland
thanks.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
, and
refactor things on the input side, to put System_spec in as a part of
the input grammar.
- In the meantime, would it be worthwhile to setup some kind of
infrastructure so work on the page breaker can proceed in parallel?
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
algorithms are actually two instances of the same problem, and if we can
unify their code, I'm all for it.If we do that, adding a
restrained breaker would give us restrained page-breaking for free :)
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
will lead to conflicts more easily
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
this?
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
personally prefer boxed marks instead of circled ones, but I've seen
circled ones quite a bit. Han-Wen, can we commit this?
yes.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel
? b) (blab b) #f))
...
)
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
of
the same code as this breaker. It could get the typeset systems, put a
potential page turn at the end of each system, and run those systems
through the new page breaker.
Yes, but what problem would that solve?
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
as possible, since that one should
be the best among the configurations with no specially good page breaks.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org
this weighting automatically.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
-music. LilyPond will interpret fis as
a short for fis4, a note (technically: an EventChord)
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman
/~hanwen/gub/README
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
bass alignments. I'll see if I
can reinstate it.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Erik Sandberg wrote:
Han-Wen: In 2.6 there used to be a warning message for this (warning:
vertical alignment called before line-breaking. Only do cross-staff
spanners with PianoStaff.) Is there particular reason that this was
removed, or should we
it was also
.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
-define! mod 'dimension-variables
'(pt mm cm in staff-height staff-space
+ system-height
I thought it wasn't a real-world dim anymore.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel
***
Aborted
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
resolution.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
function. Normally, a music function takes a music
argument, like \compressMusic, but Erik's doesn't take any.
My solution just directly calls the Scheme nopc function.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond
remove the whitespace, alignment with
other staves gets messed up. If you need cropped images, crop them
manually.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
the resulting eps file has a few centimeters of whitespace to the left
of the score. This did not happen in 2.6.
It's a bug, not a feature;
I mean, em,
it's a feature, not a bug!
:)
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
to the separate score.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
701 - 800 of 3768 matches
Mail list logo
