or
> running a server that can maintain a bit of state to provide quick response.
>
> Any suggestions? Thoughts? Places to look? Other people to ask? :)
See thread.
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2012-02/msg2.html
Trevor Dixon has recently written a nice web-based
tay.
>
> If this is ok, can someone add this in a next Lilypond release ?
>
Added as
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2365
--
--
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
vement), and he lacks processing power to do this more often.
> I think Patchy could be improved a bit to be more user-friendly
> (that's just my personal opinion), thus allowing James (for example)
> to run it more easily. I want to get back to work on Patchy, but i'm
>
> \key c \major
> \cadenzaOn
> fis4 g a b
> \cadenzaOff
> \bar "|"
> f
> }
> %%%
>
> Is this a bug?
>
Could be..
If you use
%%%
\version "2.14.2"
\relative c'
{
\key c \major
\cadenzaOn
fis4 g a
b
\cadenzaOff
\bar "|"
Hello,
On 3 March 2012 09:03, David Kastrup wrote:
> James writes:
>
>> I'd saw that David and Graham and (i think) Phil and Janek (?) had
>> been running patchy so figured it was now covered
>
> There is staging-patchy. It does not require manual work, just
&g
Graham,
2012/3/3 Graham Percival :
> On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 09:56:33AM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 9:16 AM, James wrote:
>> > I still have some fundamental questions about the scripts.
>
> Have you read
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Docum
tchy-staging.py' as often as
people want me to. Any specific schedule?
James
--
--
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
David,
On 4 March 2012 08:20, David Kastrup wrote:
> James writes:
>
>> I don't really understand why I still had the same issues as I had
>> before - git would complain about shallow repositories (I did look it
>> up but it didn't shed any light)
>
> I a
lopment list to see if anyone has any comment or suggestions.
--
--
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Phil,
On 4 March 2012 10:55, Phil Holmes wrote:
> - Original Message - From: "James"
>
>
>> I'm not sure if Phil wants to leave his machine running during his day
>> (I know it's too noisy during the evening) but I'll let him tell me
>&
Hello,
On 4 March 2012 11:10, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 08:10:59AM +0000, James wrote:
>> Anyway, I'm back at home this evening and will have a few more test
>> runs (with cron just to make sure I can leave it unattended) and then
>> by Monday I s
Hello,
On 4 March 2012 11:10, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 08:10:59AM +0000, James wrote:
>> Anyway, I'm back at home this evening and will have a few more test
>> runs (with cron just to make sure I can leave it unattended) and then
>> by Monday I s
ke me. While I can run CLI
in terminal.app, getting another editor to work with pointAndClick was
fruitless and frustrating (at least for 2.12 and 2.13.x when I had my
mac).
So I'm with Graham on this one.
--
--
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Hello,
On 5 March 2012 09:41, David Kastrup wrote:
> James writes:
>>
>> I cant seem to get cron jobs to run on my LilyDev - I've done all the
>> cron.allow etc. I was wondering (if anyone knows immediately) if
>> stating the command in cron requir
Hello,
On 5 March 2012 10:32, David Kastrup wrote:
> James writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 5 March 2012 09:41, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> James writes:
>>
>>>>
>>>> I cant seem to get cron jobs to run on my LilyDev - I'v
Francisco
On 5 March 2012 10:57, Francisco Vila wrote:
> 2012/3/5 James :
>>> What is your complete cron line? You are aware that the PATH variable
>>> is set to a quite basic path?
>>
>> It was
>>
>> 15 * * * * cd /home/james/lilypond-git &a
and run it then fill in your name and email
and 'get source'. Wait until that all downloads.
6. when I run ../configure I get:
--snip--
checking build system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking host system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking Package... LILYPOND
checking builddir...
Hello,
2012/3/6 Janek Warchoł :
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 8:25 PM, James wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've just been seeing if Ubuntu 12.04 is going to cause any
>> significant problems for the next major LilyDev upgrade.
>> [...]
>> make and make doc work fi
Francisco,
On 5 March 2012 23:41, Francisco Vila wrote:
> 2012/3/5 James :
>> Hello,
>>
>> Just in case anyone was interested. Thanks to whoever sorted this out
>> - it used to be 2.11 or even 2.10 not so many months ago.
>
> 330.7 MB to download, 905.2 MB when
gt;> have.
>
> What does Ctrl+Alt+T do?
;)
Bingo!
James
--
--
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
st enough, and
> somebody ran the staging-merge on the bad translation merge. Now master
> is borked.
I won't be home until at least another patchy run (scheduled around
18:00 BST) and perhaps the one at midnight - depending when I get
back.
If it helps Graham (or someone) could disab
mess more with their repositories than necessary. I
>> suppose I'll push that thing shortly and hope for the best.
>
> I pushed both the translation branch as well as staging. The fixed
> translation branch is merged into staging, but I have not merged staging
> (hopefully
hello,
On 8 March 2012 00:04, David Kastrup wrote:
> James writes:
>
>> On 7 March 2012 23:42, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> David Kastrup writes:
>>>
>>>> Well, "somebody" will likely be me, of course. Sleep is overrated.
>>>> mak
mote branch staging from origin.
Initialized empty Git repository in /home/james/lilypond-git/build/.git/
Updating 9d1520b..2944a83
Fast-forward
Documentation/contributor/introduction.itexi |4 +-
Documentation/contributor/lsr-work.itexi | 25 +++
Documentation/de/notation/
: pushed to master
---
Next merge in 6 hours.
Have a nice day!
--
--
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
n written. And when things go wrong, they go wrong in smaller
> portions, and fewer stuff needs to get verified after cleaning up.
Is this something 'we' could add easily to patchy? Then I could be
doing that as part of what I am do
unicode
Just a quick glance shows me we mention 'stuff' in Changes around 2.10.x
--
--
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Patchy is re-running now. I lost internet connection so it missed the 6pm merge.
--
--
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
saw that a new doc commit was merged this morning by you
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=commitdiff;h=d11dbf277719c0179c5520154c925839d969a535
I might have missed this but did this have a tracker/patchy test?
James
___
lilypond
Previous good commit: d11dbf277719c0179c5520154c925839d969a535
Current broken commit: c6a925ecd742196979038804b02846faad7f2cc9
--
--
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond
Hello,
On 14 March 2012 20:04, David Kastrup wrote:
> "Phil Holmes" writes:
>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "David Kastrup"
>> To:
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 7:16 PM
>> Subject: Re: Failed make doc for Patchy
&g
d building stuff from scratch,
>> which leaves a large window of work on the build system and fonts.
>
>
>
> Is this with a straight "make" ? I ran it yesterday and didn't see a
> slowdown, and I always check the time it takes.
I did a make on my
(I believe).
Thanks for taking the time to suggest this.
--
--
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
>https://github.com/gperciva/lilypond-extra
>>
>> No?
>> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/patchy#Installing-patchy
>
> oh, huh. My eyes skipped over it because it wasn't blue.
>
> Anybody feel like wrapping that in a @uref{} ? If so, ple
reported in the first
place) the devs have nothing to work on (so to speak). We already know
that devs hate the 'admin' :) and the idea of the bug-squad is to make
the dev's life easier.
It isn't perfect but if anything we should give this a try.
--
--
James
___
gering #'script-priority = #-100
>
> }
>
I've updated https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2182
with this new example.
--
--
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
; I have another patch waiting, that depends on the first.
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
I've offered to shepherd this new patch.
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
ew if
someone can articulate what they want in text form I can do the
texinfo 'stuff' to get it in the doc.
I'm not sure if the NR is the correct place as opposed to a new @node
(or similar) in Extending or whatever.
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Hello
On 25 March 2012 14:10, Phil Holmes wrote:
> In Notation/wind.itely, please could the following be changed:
>
> Die Liste aller möglichen Löcher und Einstellungen eines bestimmten
> Instruments kann auf der Kommandozeile oder in einer Log-Datei
> angezeigt werden, auch wenn man sie nicht in
code to apply the patch to then check it.
Either you need to change the permissions somewhere (probably
unlikely) or you need to edit the files further to make sure that the
scripts are trying to 'fetch' the most up to date branch to the
correct place.
If you can let us know if you
1. Edi
for play with...
>
> Marek
I reset one of mine on the countdown
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2216
Try that.
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Rietveld for users to look at.
Reg tests can get large,
For example
http://lilypond-stuff.1065243.n5.nabble.com/Tracker-issue-2051-24-November-td4986583.html
Might be easier.
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
;s a quote-of-the-month!
> Janek :D
>
Having just read his thread I was hoping more for ..
"jetzt Runter von meinem Rasen!"
;)
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
ic wand that will let us offer you an
> option other than those three. (unless I've forgotten about
> something, which is possible given my mental state these days.
> James: I have not forgotten about your recent work on lilydev, but
> I stand behind my pessimistic estimate)
I'
he big build box.
>
Oh good. I thought you only used a phys machine.
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
ust reset
git-cl and then either let git-cl create my new issue number or I find
my rietveld issue and then run git-cl issue where is the
rietveld number. Then I know I am good to go.
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
can see in master
or staging since yesterday. So this is probably just an internet
connection glitch.
James
-- Forwarded message --
From:
Date: 3 April 2012 17:31
Subject: Staging/Master Merge - James' Patchy
To: lilypond-a...@gnu.org, pkx1...@gmail.com
Cc: pkx1...@gm
and I can push it for you.
>
> OK here it is.
>
Thanks, pushed as
author Peter Chubb
Wed, 14 Mar 2012 22:48:52 + (09:48 +1100)
committer James Lowe
Wed, 4 Apr 2012 08:12:52 + (09:12 +0100)
commit 42ca3ff037c8ca7a7c65bf3
sh access, and as part of my bug shift
(on Saturdays if I remember) because I am aware of this, I'll skim
'push' labeled trackers or 'review' labeled trackers and assign them
owners if I can.
Not saying that should be another bug squad duty, but that's what I do
when I rememb
SR-files)
>
>
>
> I've updated the LSR with all the new files - i.e. I've added them to docs
> and approved them.
We should know 2 hours from now when Patchy does it's thing and tries
to merge staging and master.
:)
James
___
- seemingly unfinished patch
http://codereview.appspot.com/5697059/
And see
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2011-12/msg00025.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2011-11/msg00280.html
This will give you an idea of the current issues and
mmit:
>>
>> Current broken commit: e045a8a796ea14ac04838af850e89da3a9343bb0
>
>
>
> This is my LSR update. It was OK on my machine, but I'll run patchy myself
> and see what's going on.
>
Thanks. I have been poking about with my Patchy VM today and thought
f the way to compare and share
information in Rietveld.
regards
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Helge,
On 11 April 2012 13:02, Helge Kruse wrote:
> Am 11.04.2012 19:24, schrieb James:
>>
>> Well it requires that any changes I do in the English document are
>> picked up and translated by the trasnaltors. The assumption is that
>> those that do the German Translati
taff.
>
> What do you think about it?
I think 'user' isn't the email list you really need to send this to
but dev. Also I see have already updated the Tracker.
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
that if no one else has. I am building a latest version at
the moment of 2.15.x
However reading the tracker again just now, are the comments from this
morning a 'new' issue or an 'enhancement' if so, we need a new
tracker.
Could Federico or Marc clarify please?
James
Hello,
On 15 April 2012 07:13, Federico Bruni wrote:
> Il 14/04/2012 21:09, James ha scritto:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 14 April 2012 15:47, Marc Hohl wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 14.04.2012 11:57, schrieb Federico Bruni:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>&
Hello,
While trying to run makelsr.py at the top level of the tree I get this error.
--snip--
james@jameslilydev2:~/lilypond-git$ ./scripts/auxiliar/makelsr.py
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./scripts/auxiliar/makelsr.py", line 56, in
TAGS = os.listdir (in_dir)
OSErr
Graham,
On 15 April 2012 22:24, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 10:18:41PM +0100, James wrote:
>> james@jameslilydev2:~/lilypond-git$ ./scripts/auxiliar/makelsr.py
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>> File "./scripts/auxiliar/makelsr.py&
Hello,
I've noticed an problem on my git when I tried to checkout staging and
then git pull -r.
--snip--
james@jameslilydev2:~/lilypond-git$ git status
# On branch master
nothing to commit (working directory clean)
james@jameslilydev2:~/lilypond-git$ git checkout staging
error: failed to
No - but I appreciate the suggestions - it's something else I forgot
to do WRT, editing my .git/config, configuring ssh etc.
There are always a few things I forget to do when I clear out my dev
env and 'start again'. I'll look at the CG when I have a few minutes
and put some mo
n my case) if you jump right in and
follow the CG and then try to get patchy running.
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
CATION
>>
>> On a personal note, I'm off to Europe from May 8 to 24, seeing Zurich,
>> Munich, Salzburg, Vienna, Prague, and Germany (in that order).
>
> It will be interesting to hear how you manage to visit Munich as
inal
footnote document in earlier versions of 2.15. We did re-write much of
the examples and obviously missed this.
Before I create a tracker, I'll wait for a confirmation from
David/Mike that this is technically correct.
James
___
lilypond-devel mai
anslate the snippet 'text' in the manual like we
do for everything else. Wouldn't that be easier long term?
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
velopment is
> not to touch anything, ever. Better safe than sorry.
Gosh! Talk about taking something out of context.
No one said 'ever' - you said that, consider this a moment of
'reflection', if you want an analogy.
James
__
nfirmation that this is a documentation error or an
unexpected/inconsistent behaviour in the code.
I haven't seen a case for either yet.
james
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
the world in the first place?
>
God Loves Git
Now there's a rallying cry/T-shirt slogan if ever I've heard one!
James
PS For all those who are not British, I don't think I can convey the
absolute simple pleasure that I (at least, perhaps others) get from
having a DVCS called &#
lypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/patchy
Specifically - test-patches.py:
I already run lilypond-patchy-staging.py on my machine, you don't need
to worry about that so much.
Graham calls it all 'patchy' - I like to think of them as Brother and Sister. ;)
Patchy and Patc
offee most mornings now I know what is involved.
I'll also look at updating the CG instructions because while it is
relatively simple, a non-dev like me always has trouble, initially,
getting all my ducks in a row with regard to setting up LP source
code, getting patchy downloaded and configured
Mike,
On 26 April 2012 08:51, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
> On 26 avr. 2012, at 09:05, James wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 26 April 2012 07:55, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
>>>
>>> On 26 avr. 2012, at 07:28, Graham Percival wrote:
>>>
&
Hello,
2012/4/26 Łukasz Czerwiński :
...
>
> On 26 April 2012 09:05, James wrote:
>>
>>
>> I've run patchy-test just now for the three patches outstanding this
>> morning. It's no a big deal, I've just never got round to running the
>> pa
Hello,
2012/4/26 Łukasz Czerwiński :
>
> Well, LilyDev won't help me - on the server exists an already installed
> system (Linux).
>
> As for Virtualbox, I believe, that without having admin rights I can't
> install it - correct me if I'm wrong.
Well I'm not a *NIX admin - I do have to use 'sudo
gt;
>
> Problem solved - need to build from separate directory.
If it's not obvious in the CG (I am not going to assume you didn't
RTFM) can you make an adjustment in it? This saves the next person
(could be me) having the same issue but less smarts (would be me) than
yourself.
Thanks
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
multiple machines even if in reality one or more VMs are
not doing much. KVM will spread the load (so to speak) better and I
often forget and run 3 VMs using theoretically using 21 Virtual CPUs!
I only notice when I do a make -j7 and am working on one of the other
VMs..it does kind
do this. I would want to hand over bug duties - but Colin H
> is well-placed to take over as Meister and we would just need a volunteer
> for Sunday. I would want to schedule my work so that it could generally be
> done on a Sunday.
>
> James is the other obvious possibility, but I
This can cause hunk failures or make problems (where someone has
changed a file but not added it to their commit).
This doesn't mean they didn't run tests, necessarily, but it means
they didn't run tests against current master.
James
___
a day
> will they be run?
You can run them as many times as you like.
You need one reg test per patch-new tracker item.
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
etail?id=2397. It's marked as
> fixed, but it seems to me that there is still a bug there if collision
> avoidance for a TupletBracket is still being performed when the
> TupletBracket stencil has been turned off.
>
Can't comment on that, Mike Solomon made the patch for this, maybe he can.
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Hello,
On 1 May 2012 08:31, Nick Payne wrote:
> On 01/05/12 17:06, James wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 1 May 2012 06:12, Nick Payne wrote:
>>>
>>> On 01/05/12 14:32, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In th
Hello,
On 1 May 2012 08:52, James wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 1 May 2012 08:31, Nick Payne wrote:
>> On 01/05/12 17:06, James wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On 1 May 2012 06:12, Nick Payne wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 01/05/12 14:32,
Hello,
On 1 May 2012 22:06, Thomas Morley wrote:
...
>
> Hi James,
>
> together with Marc I'm working on a completely new approach to
> barlines, making available custom-barlines of all kind.
> If success (not sure) it would be a major change to lilypond.
> Currently t
Hello,
On 5 May 2012 03:57, Michael Pozhidaev wrote:
> Hello!
>
> After the last announce I have tried the linux x86_64 binary package of
> lilypond-2.15.38 to see what is going to be in 2.16. It works but I met
> some regressions in midi output comparing with 2.14.2 currently I am
> working with
ving the former default duration unchanged makes
> it more generally useful:
> { <>\mf \motif c4 d e f <>\p^"softer now" \motif g f e d}
> So <> is a more helpful example for users than s1*0 was,
> if the special case of its duration is noted in NR 1.5.1
>
> Giving it a notation like 'n' for aesthetic purposes would
> be putting lipstick on a pig.
Also isn't this a really a GLISS topic?
Regards
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Hello,
On 7 May 2012 18:21, m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
> On 7 mai 2012, at 19:17, lilypond.patchy.jl...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Begin LilyPond compile, commit: 9f408c3d2cfe0e3bbe0a683ff52422bd784459b8
>>
>> *** FAILED STEP ***
>>
>> merge from staging
>>
>> maybe somebody pushed a comm
Hello
On 7 May 2012 18:55, m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
> On 7 mai 2012, at 19:54, James wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 7 May 2012 18:21, m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
>>> On 7 mai 2012, at 19:17, lilypond.patchy.jl...@gmail.com wrote:
>&g
I've never used it, don't even know why I would or if I
could or when I shoul. Or maybe I have but didn't know it?
The point is I do get that some change is good and useful internally
or for those scheme-fu-ers but what about the rest of us?
It's a principle.
Let ME quote Montes
s from some of
the devs explaining why it was better and instruction on how to revert
and build my own version if I wanted to use the old clef - I still
disagreed that it looks better but I appreciated the gesture. So I am
more than used to being in the minority.
Here there has been no discussion at all. It's been 'stomp stomp
stomp', right now lets get down and put it in the code.
Now David thinks he is the focus of ire and has lost necessary sleep
over it. That is unfortunate (and wrong).
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
ributor/compiling-with-lilydev
and although this is for specifically using the Ubuntu based iso we
have available, the same principles apply.
I've found it makes this so much more easier especially when you have
a slower machine where make doc can take an age.
James
___
hello,
On 12 May 2012 14:24, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
wrote:
> On 12/05/12 14:29, James wrote:
>>
>> Assuming you are building from current master then make doc does
>> compile as all new checkins go to staging tree first and sit there
>> while a script runs (as it h
Hello,
On 12 May 2012 16:41, Graham Percival wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> Thanks for the report!
>
> James: could you either make this change yourself (after
> double-checking the details), or add a tracker item for it?
> I think you can push this directly.
Thanks Marc.
This h
cussion now.
What I would say though Mike is think small first, find the spec and
get patchy-merge working, see how much that uses in 'real life' in
terms of cycles and go from there. I'd give priority to automatic
build then 'websitey' things before dev SSH access. Just because those
are easily controlled.
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
ugly next to those that don't. At least to my eyes
and I am not sure what the convention is with diacritics over capital
letters for other cultures (the 'French' French don't generally
approve of it but the 'French' Canadians do for instance).
James
_
time
so if you can keep it an hour either side of 18:00 BST to NOT compile
we won't hit each other.
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
at dev wants feedback.
ALso I am not sure if testing your own patches and changing them to
patch-review is 'good form' and I am not available during the day to
test patches (weekends accepted) so..
I saw (USA?) Colin had started to test patches as well and there is Mr
Phil too. So I t
hello,
On 15 May 2012 04:09, Colin Campbell wrote:
> On 12-05-14 10:00 AM, James wrote:
>>
>> ALso I am not sure if testing your own patches and changing them to
>> patch-review is 'good form'
>
>
> +1 from a Controller!
>
>
>> I saw (USA?) Col
y
zip it first so that the email doesn't muck up any internal
characters).
if your *.ly file is truly plain text it will work on any platform. I
do it all the time.
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
; questions? If you could help him write something for the CG about
>> this, that would be awesome.
>
>
> I have neither time, nor idea what is ViewVC URL for. Sorry...
http://code.google.com/p/rietveld/wiki/UploadPyUsage
Does this help?
James
__
Colin did you use a lilydev? If so was it v.2.6?
--
--
James
On 16 May 2012, at 19:26, Colin Hall wrote:
>
> Just to report that GUB is working on a VM here:
>
> $ git clone git://github.com/gperciva/gub.git && cd gub
> $ make bootstrap
> $ bin/gub lilypon
cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/*checkout*/texinfo/doc/texinfo.tex?revision=1.365&root=texinfo
>
I get an error
attached error log
James
snippets.texi2pdf.log
Description: Binary data
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists
801 - 900 of 2329 matches
Mail list logo
