Anyone object if I push a patch that adds -q to the call to bib2texi direct
to staging? I've tested it and make doc runs fine - it gets rid of some
clutter in the output of make doc.
--
Phil Holmes
0002-Quietens-bibtex-in-make-doc.patch
Description: Binary data
- Original Message -
From: John Mandereau john.mander...@gmail.com
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Cc: Lily devel lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2012 4:20 PM
Subject: Re: Reduces langdefs.py warnings in doc build (issue 6487046)
2012/8/27 Phil Holmes m
.
My wife said that everyone looks like geeks. There are 3 exceptions.
Is it compulsory to have a pony tail?
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- Original Message -
From: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Cc: lilypond-devel@gnu.org; David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2012 10:13 PM
Subject: Re: The currently still assembled part of the team in Waltrop
On Mon, Aug 27
- Original Message -
From: m...@mikesolomon.org
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
My wife said that everyone looks like geeks. There are 3 exceptions.
You can't leave us hanging like that!! I hope I wasn't in the
exceptions!!!
Cheers,
MS
No. 2 were 4-legged and one
, rather than a
change we've made.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
James and I will have about the same bandwidth - that's typical DSL speed.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
(maybe 10.04?).
James
Yep. 10.04 32 bit - I couldn't get it running on 64 bit, so I'm using a VM
with a 32 bit OS - in fact, it's a lilydev machine.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org
- Original Message -
From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Cc: James pkx1...@gmail.com; Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com;
LilyPond Developmet Team lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 1:40 PM
Subject: Re: successful GUB build
-2.17.1-1.freebsd-64.sh
test result does not exist for lilypond-2.17.1-1.mingw.exe
chgrp -R lilypond uploads/lilypond*
chgrp: invalid group: `lilypond'
Any ideas?
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org
- Original Message -
From: John Mandereau john.mander...@gmail.com
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Cc: Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org; LilyPond Developmet Team
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 3:31 PM
Subject: Re: successful GUB build on my LilyDev (2.6
Don't know what the problem was, but I ran test-patchy-staging to find out,
and all was well. As of now, master==staging.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- Original Message -
From: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
To: Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net
Cc: Devel lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 7:15 PM
Subject: Re: GUB upload error
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 03:43:40PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
gub@gub
- Original Message -
From: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Cc: Devel lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 10:25 AM
Subject: Re: GUB upload error
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 10:16:18AM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
For reference
comparison is against 2.15.38, because of the
vagaries of my initial GUB build. This is spectacularly useless I'll
look at the regtests with my pixel comparator as soon as the upload of
2.17.1 has completed (so far, 4 hours and counting...)
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com
To: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
Cc: Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net; Devel lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 2:52 PM
Subject: Re: Regtests
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Graham
that this is because GUB is trying to log in as you to the git
repo and failing, because it has my key? a) is that right? b) should I
find the gpercival@git bit and change this to my git username and c) what
does this command do?
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 3:21 PM
Subject: Re: Gub upload failure
Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net writes:
OK - so it looks like I've now rsynched a few 100 MB of updates. I
get this failure
- Original Message -
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Cc: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 3:39 PM
Subject: Re: Gub upload failure
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
- Original Message -
From: David Kastrup d
'...
-
+ Converting to PNG...
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- Original Message -
From: m...@mikesolomon.org
To: Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net
Cc: Devel lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 7:34 PM
Subject: Re: 2.17.1 regtests
Thanks Phil!
The regtest that worries me most is les-nereides.ly.
There is a comment starting
Can I just say that this is the first release I've build and uploaded?
Fingers crossed.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Fixed_2_17_1 which have to be changed to Fixed_2_17_2 since they
missed the proper time to actually make it into 2.17.1.
--
David Kastrup
This implies that I should update VERSION soon after I start a GUB run.
@John/GP - is that correct?
--
Phil Holmes
had not admitted the problematic change into 2.16.0, so
while we certainly do need 2.16.1 in due time, it is not because of this
issue.
I deleted it as soon as I realised it was wrong...
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel
not have root as the cause, the last element of
ly:engraver-make-grob? That would make the stem span tweakable.
http://codereview.appspot.com/6344092/
This patch has been approved, pushed and the Rietveld closed. If you want
to propose changes, it should be a new patch.
--
Phil Holmes
and
it's a further step in reducing the cruft from make doc.
Any objections?
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
anything, or merely
echoes information to the terminal. Could a make-guru explain, and propose
an alternative syntax which does the same thing without the terminal output?
TIA
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https
to staging
http://codereview.appspot.com/6499068/
Unfortunately it breaks make test. Apologies - I was sure I'd tested it
with make doc, but must have omitted it with this one. Is the best option
to revert the commit in staging, or is there a better way?
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Cc: philehol...@googlemail.com; lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2012 4:56 PM
Subject: Re: Reduce output from scripts during make doc (issue 6499068)
On Sat, Sep
actually only works
properly on 2.16. Using the LSR and on my own machine with 2.14 I get no
numerals over the normal staff, and little zeros on the tabstaff. If you
know how to fix that, please let me know.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel
forks a number of jobs, it puts the output into some logfiles
something like multirun-0.log. If you cab find those, multirun-5 should
help.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo
clean when I run them individually, so I was wondering if
someone knew where the logfiles for these things were stashed so I can see
how they're failing?
Cheers,
MS
Is this with make test?
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond
- Original Message -
From: m...@mikesolomon.org
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Cc: m...@mikesolomon.org; lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2012 12:23 PM
Subject: Re: Regtest checking
Is this with make test?
--
Phil Holmes
No, make check.
Should I be using
is
not guaranteed to find all changes :-(
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
(issue 6496074)
LGTM, but why is this Rietveld issue still open whereas the patch has
been pushed?
http://codereview.appspot.com/6496074/
Looks closed to me.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org
of pain - the next release (2.17.2) will
be next Sunday, the 16th (or will possibly start on the 15th).
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
the original clef made it arbitrarily symmetrical, with no
justification, so changing this needs no other justification.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
it? Do you
think that an asymmetrical clef looks better, coming nearer to
hand-written originals? Then document it. Or is it an artifact of
your first MF tries? Then fix it :-)
OK. OK. Just to be sure. You want me to fix it :-)
--
Phil Holmes
is Monday and Thursday.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
to get them installed there
correctly...
Thanks so much,
David
I suspect this might be relevant:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2742
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman
continuing.
I'm 99.9% sure I'm correct here, but just to be _really_ sure. This doesn't
have to be on the GUB machine, right? It can be any machine with push
ability, because GUB will pull the changed files before doing the build. If
this is true, OK if I update the CG?
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: John Mandereau john.mander...@gmail.com
To: Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net
Cc: Devel lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 3:59 PM
Subject: Re: Minor release checklist
Il giorno lun, 10/09/2012 alle 15.08 +0100, Phil Holmes ha scritto
- Original Message -
From: John Mandereau john.mander...@gmail.com
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Cc: Devel lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 4:28 PM
Subject: Re: Minor release checklist
Il giorno lun, 10/09/2012 alle 16.12 +0100, Phil Holmes ha scritto
is to kick GUB off from a clean state:
rm -rf uploads
rm -rf target
And try again? If so, I'll probably re-run GUB when I'm rehearsing tomorrow
and push the upload overnight.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
- Original Message -
From: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Cc: John Mandereau john.mander...@gmail.com; Devel
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 9:46 PM
Subject: Re: Minor release checklist
Yes. Did you get your
- Original Message -
From: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Cc: John Mandereau john.mander...@gmail.com; Devel
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 1:05 AM
Subject: Re: Minor release checklist
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11
voice and spacer rests, but it's not
too clever.
As mentioned by me earlier in the week, it makes automatically generating
code a bit odd, too, since you need to store the post events up until you've
written the note.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond
- Original Message -
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 1:22 PM
Subject: Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
I've always thought that the post-event nature
- Original Message -
From: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Cc: John Mandereau john.mander...@gmail.com; Devel
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 5:12 PM
Subject: Re: Minor release checklist
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 12
We are happy to announce the release of LilyPond 2.17.2. This
release contains the usual number of bugfixes. It is strongly
recommended that normal users do not use this release, and instead
use the stable 2.16 version.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond
on this mailing list. If it's really contraversial,
running a review would be advisable.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Results from my pixel comparator. Some good, some in need of consideration:
http://philholmes.net/lilypond/regtestresults/2.17.2/
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond
- Original Message -
From: Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 6:23 PM
Subject: Re: 2.17.2 regtests
Phil Holmes email at philholmes.net writes:
Results from my pixel comparator. Some good, some in need of
consideration
- Original Message -
From: Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org; Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 3:14 AM
Subject: Re: 2.17.2 regtests
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 12:59:25 -0700, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
wrote:
From: Keith
this and
if it's OK supply a patch?
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
on at
least two different seemingly unrelated patch sets. Can anyone confirm
this behavior?
Cheers,
Which patch sets, what changes?
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo
because it was
at the voice context and should have been at staff?
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- Original Message -
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2012 9:20 AM
Subject: Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint
Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net writes:
And getting rid of case-sensitivity in a lot of this?
You need
-insensivity.
And I and others are for it. Could you state your reasoning, please? I've
already stated mine.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
discussion and drop
GLISS.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
I won't be pushing 2823 at this point - we've agreed that the clef needs
changing completely. I have a copy of the metafont book being delivered
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: Colin Campbell
To: Devel
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 3:59 AM
Subject: PATCH
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
this as a
method, or is it just an alternative that's perfectly OK?
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
that you don't want me to delete.
(See Chapter 27 of The METAFONTbook for an example.)
=
Any idea what I'm doing wrong?
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https
looking at the build log?
--
David Kastrup
As James says:
Error trapped by lilypond-book
Please see
/build/buildd/lilypond-2.16.0/out/lybook-db/snippet-names--4642696709202227756.logTo
debug it, we need access to that logfile.--Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2012 5:18 AM
Subject: Re: Apparently the amd64 build of LilyPond 2.16.0 failed on Ubuntu
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
- Original Message -
From: David
, unexpected identifier
make[1]: *** [out/parser.hh] Error 1
I'll have another go once this is fixed.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- Original Message -
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net
Cc: Devel lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2012 4:56 PM
Subject: Re: GUB failure in parser.yy
Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net writes:
I'm trying to build 2.17.3. I get
- Original Message -
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Cc: Devel lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2012 6:38 PM
Subject: Re: GUB failure in parser.yy
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
My preference _right now_ would
, it will be uploaded tonight and
then the website updated tomorrow morning. Uploading it during the day
kills my internet access.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- Original Message -
From: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
To: Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net
Cc: Devel lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2012 8:03 PM
Subject: Re: GUB commands not running
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 11:55:51AM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote
(it is
needed for setting baseMoment and figuring out measureLength): that way
the chance for users to mess up once they have LilyPond stop complaining
is minimized.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https
this.
Not necessarily. An alternative would be:
\beaming { 8 [ 8 8 8 ] 8 [ 8 8 8 8 8 ] }
\beaming { 8 [ 8 8 8 ] 8 [ 8 8 8 ] }
which would set the beam patterns for both the current time signatures.
--
Phil Holmes
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
://codereview.appspot.com/6503091/
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
with
what I now have, but will remember this for the future.
http://codereview.appspot.com/6503091/
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
suggested doing prints
to the command line for extents (both X and Y).
I've no idea if this will help, so feel free to ignore it. However, my
recollection is that running lily with -ddump-signatures gives information
on extents in the output file?
--
Phil Holmes
it in the tracker.
Done.
Thanks,
Janek
http://codereview.appspot.com/6568055/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
--
Phil Holmes
cpu. They should be the most recent of the logfiles,
and so one should show the error.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- Original Message -
From: Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Cc: philehol...@googlemail.com; lemzw...@googlemail.com;
gra...@percival-music.ca; d...@gnu.org; lilypond-devel@gnu.org;
re...@codereview-hr.appspotmail.com
Sent: Thursday, September
, obviously.
The console says:
[snip]
Did you look for lilypond-multi-run*.log, like I suggested?
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
timing to b4/lily-1ce78b89.profile...Processing b4/lily-1ce78b89
Compiling utf-8.ly with the patch works without problems.
A brute force method is to find the most recent log file ...
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel
to try this out).
Thanks and sorry.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- Original Message -
From: Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Cc: philehol...@googlemail.com; lemzw...@googlemail.com;
gra...@percival-music.ca; d...@gnu.org; lilypond-devel@gnu.org;
re...@codereview-hr.appspotmail.com
Sent: Friday, September 28
- Original Message -
From: James pkx1...@gmail.com
To: Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net
Cc: d...@gnu.org; re...@codereview-hr.appspotmail.com;
lemzw...@googlemail.com; philehol...@googlemail.com;
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 3:38 PM
Subject: Re: Adds tick
- Original Message -
From: Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Cc: James pkx1...@gmail.com; lilypond-devel@gnu.org; d...@gnu.org;
lemzw...@googlemail.com; re...@codereview-hr.appspotmail.com;
philehol...@googlemail.com
Sent: Saturday, September
string or music, found ((-0.5 .
1.5) (-3 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0))
\shape Slur
#'((-0.5 . 1.5) (-3 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0))
Interpreting music...
[snip]
fatal error: failed files: 61/lily-1564b6f0.ly
I presume 220f439edbd95266113248a984ebe6c4b97dcf14 is the culprit.
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 4:55 PM
Subject: Re: Patchy email from PhilH
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
- Original Message -
From: philehol...@googlemail.com
To: gra...@percival
include convenience/safety checks before pushing to master
(introduced in commit 054d8101e7bcd54bc8db40092b617bb8b2220b84), please
update.
I am. Willdo.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org
I'm currently building 2.17.4 and plan to upload it tonight and have it
available tomorrow. Please use 2.17.5 for claiming fixes on the issues list
from now.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https
the code test suite is relevant to documentation. But
I'm sorry if I've overlooked something here.
Unfortunately, testing that docs compile cleanly takes about 15 times as
long as code, so it's not for the underpowered or faint hearted. Used to be
2 3/4 hours on my virtual machine.
--
Phil
- Original Message -
From: Joseph Rushton Wakeling joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Cc: James pkx1...@gmail.com; lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2012 4:32 PM
Subject: Re: [talk] why it'd be great to have web interface
- Original Message -
From: Joseph Rushton Wakeling joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Cc: James pkx1...@gmail.com; lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2012 5:26 PM
Subject: Re: [talk] why it'd be great to have web interface
only users who are
willing to risk crashes or unexpected behaviour should download and install
it. Those who require a stable version should continue to use the 2.16
version.
?
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel
- Original Message -
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Cc: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2012 12:22 PM
Subject: Re: LilyPond 2.17.4 released
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
it is strongly recommended that only experienced
.
-
+1
I think most can get behind this wording. Now where do we record it for
the sake of the next release announcement?
In my brain. Unless I have a fade, I'll use this.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
a
visible hyphen in in-nocent, and this disappears with 17.4.
--
Phil Holmes
attachment: markup-special-characters.png___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- Original Message -
From: Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 6:44 PM
Subject: Re: 2.17.4 regtests
Phil Holmes email at philholmes.net writes:
The one I don't understand is markup-special-characters.ly. I've
attached
with
unix/python skills look at the issue and propose a solution? Until that
happens, I don't see there being any new lilypond releases.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo
:01 AM
I guess it's time to make it official: I'm stepping down as
project manager.
That's a real blow. You've made an immense contribution to
LilyPond over the years. It won't be the same without you!
+1
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing
pop-push would seem to be that if
you do something like (pseudo code):
{\override Flag style = mensural c8 c c c \override Flag color = red c c c
c}
Then you'd revert the mensural style when you change the color? That would
be wholly unexpected to me.
--
Phil Holmes
401 - 500 of 2023 matches
Mail list logo
