I'm not top posting.
In the mentioned chapter 4.5.3 of the LM the music example (LilyPond 2.13.27)
there is an ugly problem that shouldn't be there - especially not on this page.
I'm talking about the right hand phrasingSlur spanning from the first c'' to the
last g'. Which crosses the notes of
On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 19:38:10 -0400
Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote:
Hi Shane,
one would think that might cause more difficult
programming necessitating the keeping tracking of various R values
through out the piece as defined by a time signature as opposed to us
Am Mittwoch, den 15.05.2013, 06:03 -0400 schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
Hi Urs,
I don't know if it's the _best_ and _most flexible_ structure, but it
definitely looks like a _good_ and _flexible_ structure.
I probably can't ask for any more at this stage. ;)
Exactly.
You should take that
Am Sonntag, den 12.05.2013, 21:51 -0400 schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
Hello all,
I'm working on putting together some house style stylesheets, and wanted to
see if I had the best structure…
As one example, I'm tweaking up a Henle piano score stylesheet (e.g.
Beethoven Piano Sonatas Urtext,
Am 06.06.2013 00:09, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
Hi,
from the previous discussion it seems that hosting our blog (currently
lilypondblog.wordpress.com) on the same server as our website would be
a bad idea and could lead to problems. I stand corrected.
However, there seems to be another way of
Am 06.06.2013 16:21, schrieb Phil Holmes:
- Original Message - From: Janek Warchoł
janek.lilyp...@gmail.com
To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org; Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca; LilyPond Developmet Team
lilypond-devel@gnu.org; Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org
Sent: Wednesday
Am 06.06.2013 18:46, schrieb Jan Nieuwenhuizen:
Can't we just use lilypond.org/blog and/or use iframes to include it into our
home page?
Greetings, Jan
Would that mean that www.lilypond.org/blog.html would be a static HTML
page containing nothing than a full-page frame that points to
Am 06.06.2013 19:00, schrieb Urs Liska:
Am 06.06.2013 18:46, schrieb Jan Nieuwenhuizen:
Can't we just use lilypond.org/blog and/or use iframes to include it
into our home page?
Greetings, Jan
Would that mean that www.lilypond.org/blog.html would be a static HTML
page containing nothing than
Am 06.06.2013 22:44, schrieb Jan Nieuwenhuizen:
Urs Liska writes:
Would that mean thatwww.lilypond.org/blog.html would be a static HTML
page containing nothing than a full-page frame that points to wherever the
blog is hosted?
Something like that. Possibly we want
Am 06.06.2013 22:57, schrieb Jan Nieuwenhuizen:
Urs Liska writes:
(- a minor issue is that I don't know how to define the iframe yet. I had to
manually set a height in pixels, which obviously isn't good.)
Oh, I have been using something like this. Problem is possibly
CORS, no problem if you
Am 06.06.2013 23:01, schrieb Michel Villeneuve:
- Whoever is the admin of lilypond.org would have to:
- register/set up the subdomain blog.lilypond.org
- edit the nameserver (A-Record) for that subdomain to point to my
provider's IP
- Then my server would transparently serve the blog as
Am 07.06.2013 08:22, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
Hi,
2013/6/6 Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org:
Am 06.06.2013 19:00, schrieb Urs Liska:
I can try that with an arbitrary iframe page on my server.
You can have a look at http://test.ursliska.de/test.html
It works partially:
- One can see everything
Am 07.06.2013 09:00, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
2013/6/7 Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org:
But I have yet another idea that could be elegant if the technical
requirements are met.
If the server hosting lilypond.org is capable of running WordPress, i.e. has
- PHP = 5.2.4
- MySQL = 5.0
available, we
One thing I'd definitely support about this is making LSR somewhat version
independent to allow one to have snippets requiring new lily versions.
Maybe providing several lily versions (not necessarily _all_ of course) and use
an appropriate one to compile the snippets. This would also allow us
One thing I'd definitely support about this is making LSR somewhat version
independent to allow one to have snippets requiring new lily versions.
Maybe providing several lily versions (not necessarily _all_ of course) and use
an appropriate one to compile the snippets. This would also allow us
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com schrieb:
Hi,
2013/8/20 Frédéric Bron frederic.b...@m4x.org:
For the programmers, i'd like to ask you to look at the branch
dev/tie-crusade/comments
and read the comments we've added to the code together with Franek.
Just in case some would need, we
I'm very sorry, but I currently can't afford neither the time nor the money for
the trip.
Best
Urs
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com schrieb:
Hi,
2013/9/14 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
This is a reminder that next weekend, Sept 20th to 24th, there will
be a
LilyPond developer and user
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org schrieb:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:49:42AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
What's wrong with GitHub, anyway?
It requires separate accounts and credentials (much more likely to
be a
target for attacks), has its own
Am 17.09.2013 18:21, schrieb David Kastrup:
Janek Warchołjanek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
2013/9/16 David Kastrupd...@gnu.org:
So the question is what we should be telling the Savannah operators
to make working on GNU projects using Git more feasible.
Here you go:
A web interface with
Am 18.09.2013 09:46, schrieb David Kastrup:
Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org writes:
Urs Liska writes:
You are doing code reviews through a web interface already, isn't it?
And this is because that's a quite natural way to communicate, comment
on code etc. You can't do _that_ with plain Git
Am 18.09.2013 14:28, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
2013/9/18 Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com:
2013/9/17 Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org:
But as far as I've understood, code doesn't get into upstream master that
way anyway, there is the Rietveld code review stage in between?
How do commits (from
Am 16.09.2013 12:50, schrieb David Kastrup:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:49:42AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
What's wrong with GitHub, anyway?
It requires separate accounts and credentials (much more likely to be a
target for attacks), has its
Am 23.09.2013 02:55, schrieb Graham Percival:
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 02:57:42PM +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 16.09.2013 12:50, schrieb David Kastrup:
So the question is what we should be telling the Savannah operators to
make working on GNU projects using Git more feasible.
What about asking
Peter Bjuhr peterbj...@gmail.com schrieb:
On 11/14/2013 09:16 AM, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
Hi,
The lilypond output that is produced from musicxml2ly uses another
indentation style than I see in my own scores when using for example
Vim or Frescobaldi, or in all examples in the Lilypond
Hi all,
I would like to suggest an enhancement in the handling of line breaks
that is useful for copying scores from existing models.
Currently LilyPond can decide about breaks herself or we can manually
force or prevent breaks.
But when copying from or proof-reading against an existing score
Am 27.11.2013 11:55, schrieb Trevor Daniels:
Urs Liska wrote Wednesday, November 27, 2013 10:30 AM
I would like to suggest an enhancement in the handling of line breaks
that is useful for copying scores from existing models.
I suggest a command line option -dkeep-original-breaks
Am 27.11.2013 11:48, schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes:
I would like to suggest an enhancement in the handling of line breaks
that is useful for copying scores from existing models.
Currently LilyPond can decide about breaks herself or we can manually
force
Am 27.11.2013 12:25, schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes:
Of course I can achieve the same with tags. But there will be many
instances where I don't need them anyway because I don't really
care about the state of the original score except for this
simplification while
Am 27.11.2013 14:54, schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes:
What I actually want is to add that behaviour as an option to
Frescobaldi's Layout Control Mode.
So what?
I know you don't care about usability features involving graphical tools
such as Frescobaldi, Denemo
Am 27.11.2013 15:01, schrieb David Kastrup:
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
I see nothing wrong with giving a command line option for setting
tags. That sounds useful, and it would most certainly encompass your
use case. It would also fit into LilyPond's current tool set, and
consequently
Am 27.11.2013 16:25, schrieb Carl Sorensen:
On 11/27/13 8:04 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes:
But also in this case I would come back and suggest including functions
like
originalBreak =
#(define-music-function (parser location)()
( #{ \tag
Am 27.11.2013 16:36, schrieb Carl Sorensen:
On 11/27/13 8:32 AM, Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org wrote:
For me this sounds good.
Requiring to write \include original-breaks.ly is significantly better
than requiring to define the commands.
But it would still need a separate switch, presumably
Am 27.11.2013 16:52, schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes:
Am 27.11.2013 16:36, schrieb Carl Sorensen:
On 11/27/13 8:32 AM, Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org wrote:
For me this sounds good.
Requiring to write \include original-breaks.ly is significantly better
than
Am 27.11.2013 15:52, schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes:
Am 27.11.2013 14:54, schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes:
What I actually want is to add that behaviour as an option to
Frescobaldi's Layout Control Mode.
So what?
I know you don't
I am willing to look at improving the Windows experience, although this
would need to wait until my degree finishes next Summer. However,
there's
one thing I don't know: what should happen when you double-click a .ly
file
in Explorer: open an editor or compile the file? And if the former,
Hi all,
[I have sent a message a few hours ago, but from a different email
account.
If this first email should go through nevertheless, the email you
are reading
now is the only relevant version.]
as should be known by now I'm currently reviewing the content of
lilypond.org to make
Am 11.12.2013 15:31, schrieb James:
Urs,
On 11/12/13 14:14, David Kastrup wrote:
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes:
I have discussed with Carl (Peterson) that it would be good to proceed
with the following steps:
- get the proposed _content_ changes into a shape for a formal review
Am 11.12.2013 15:59, schrieb James:
Urs,
On 11/12/13 14:36, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 11.12.2013 15:31, schrieb James:
Urs,
On 11/12/13 14:14, David Kastrup wrote:
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes:
I have discussed with Carl (Peterson) that it would be good to
proceed
with the following
Am 11.12.2013 15:14, schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes:
I have discussed with Carl (Peterson) that it would be good to proceed
with the following steps:
- get the proposed _content_ changes into a shape for a formal review.
(Do this informally and incrementally so
Am 11.12.2013 12:29, schrieb openLilyLib:
Hi all,
as should be known by now I'm reviewing the content of lilypond.org to
make it more accessible to new users.
Actually I intended to clarify the command-line-enhanced-editor issue
to avoid the double-click-on-lilypond.exe-doesn't-open-program
Am 12.12.2013 05:26, schrieb Carl Peterson:
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:35 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca mailto:gra...@percival-music.ca wrote
Fixing this doesn't require a reorganization. It requires
deleting the two incorrect bits, dumping a @ref{Submitting a
Am 12.12.2013 09:42, schrieb Urs Liska:
One particular question I have could be answered in this thread.
If I'm not completely wrong the CG insists on installing and using
git-cl for uploading patches.
But if I'm not mistaken hardly anyone currently uses it.
So _if_ there is a way to upload
Am 12.12.2013 10:02, schrieb David Kastrup:
This is exactly the kind of information I'd need now too. (And being
in that situation I can't offer doing anything about it.)
One particular question I have could be answered in this thread.
If I'm not completely wrong the CG insists on installing and
Am 12.12.2013 04:19, schrieb Graham Percival:
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 02:21:28PM +0100, Urs Liska wrote:
- I changed Easier editing to Editing.
ok. I also like the applicances tab, although I agree with you
that the name might be ideal (but I also can't think of a better
name right now
Am 12.12.2013 11:00, schrieb Urs Liska:
Then I should base a patch on current master, upload it and - assuming
it will be accepted - mail the patch to someone (?) for pushing it?
OK, I've now uploaded my first two patches (one about the content and
one addressing in the CG a problem I
The page GSoC 2012 is obviously outdated.
What should be done with it?
Immediate reaction: Put it on the attic.
But: Would it be useful to write a summary of what of it actually happened?
If yes: Is there something willing and able to do that?
Urs
Am 12.12.2013 14:10, schrieb Mike Solomon:
On Dec 12, 2013, at 3:06 PM, Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org wrote:
The page GSoC 2012 is obviously outdated.
What should be done with it?
Immediate reaction: Put it on the attic.
But: Would it be useful to write a summary of what of it actually
Am 12.12.2013 16:39, schrieb Paul Morris:
Urs Liska wrote
Am 12.12.2013 14:10, schrieb Mike Solomon:
On Dec 12, 2013, at 3:06 PM, Urs Liska lt;
ul@
gt; wrote:
The page GSoC 2012 is obviously outdated.
What should be done with it?
What about just changing it to GSoC (dropping the 2012
Am 12.12.2013 16:51, schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes:
Am 12.12.2013 16:39, schrieb Paul Morris:
Urs Liska wrote
Am 12.12.2013 14:10, schrieb Mike Solomon:
On Dec 12, 2013, at 3:06 PM, Urs Liska lt;
ul@
gt; wrote:
The page GSoC 2012 is obviously outdated.
What
Am 12.12.2013 17:09, schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes:
Am 12.12.2013 16:51, schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes:
Am 12.12.2013 16:39, schrieb Paul Morris:
Urs Liska wrote
Am 12.12.2013 14:10, schrieb Mike Solomon:
On Dec 12, 2013, at 3
Am 12.12.2013 18:36, schrieb Trevor Daniels:
Urs Liska wrote Thursday, December 12, 2013 1:27 PM
Question: Should the ideas on that page be preserved as ideas for
future development?
This could be on the tracker or on some other page.
Most if not all of Janek's work is preserved
I've raised this issue already, but I think it needs to be considered in
its own thread:
What to do with Manuals-Web?
When I go there I can download the whole website as a PDF. OK, this
makes sense.
Getting it as one big HTML page also makes sense.
[but where can I get it in info format?)
Am 14.12.2013 04:53, schrieb Graham Percival:
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 02:06:38PM +0100, Urs Liska wrote:
The page GSoC 2012 is obviously outdated.
What should be done with it?
I suggest deleting it. There's no evidence that the proposed
mentors are still available or interested, and those
Am 14.12.2013 05:01, schrieb Graham Percival:
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 03:40:03PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
I _think_ the odd place of web in the manuals hierarchy is down to
it being the only part of the documentation that built using make
website - it has something of a split personality
Am 14.12.2013 04:57, schrieb Graham Percival:
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 09:34:28PM +0100, Urs Liska wrote:
When I go there I can download the whole website as a PDF. OK, this
makes sense.
Getting it as one big HTML page also makes sense.
[but where can I get it in info format?)
We don't provide
Am 14.12.2013 11:04, schrieb David Kastrup:
t's not totally clear whether it has other
functions at the moment that could disrupt the regular operations when
removed.
Would be removing it (locally), making a full make website (and make
doc?) and walking through the whole site manually be
Am 15.12.2013 06:47, schrieb Graham Percival:
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 09:46:54AM +, lilyli...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 2013/12/14 03:51:33, Graham Percival wrote:
Umm, isn't the whole point of this to be a warning? Why are you
removing the
warning CSS tag?
It's the whole point of
Am 15.12.2013 15:06, schrieb Phil Holmes:
My only issue with the pondings is it looked like there was some more
'syntax' I had to learn for the xml stuff. I can handle tags but the
other special character stuff looked tiresome.
I think you have to escape special characters: for example.
Am 15.12.2013 14:14, schrieb James:
Urs,
On 15/12/13 12:23, Urs Liska wrote:
I'm worried about the opposition even my first modest suggestions raise.
There will be patches with more involved changes to come. And if each
tiny bit is discussed to death from exactly the developer's
perspective
Am 16.12.2013 04:35, schrieb David Kastrup:
I'd
lean towards applications. Basically, it seems to be LilyPond as a
building block but that's too long for a tab name.
That's the problem: All suggestions that hit the spot need phrases and
not single words.
But IISC Applications it the term
Am 16.12.2013 04:15, schrieb Graham Percival:
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 01:57:23PM +0100, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 12.12.2013 04:19, schrieb Graham Percival:
ok. I also like the applicances tab, although I agree with you
that the name might be ideal (but I also can't think of a better
name right now
Am 16.12.2013 04:31, schrieb Graham Percival:
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 11:29:44AM +0800, Graham Percival wrote:
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes:
I don't want to imagine what happens if I propose my rewrite of the
Features page (http://www.openlilylib.org/lilyweb/features.html
Am 16.12.2013 11:11, schrieb David Kastrup:
As said in another reply I have the impression that Applications is
what the majority of commenters would suggest. Although I've got two
votes for Other uses, which might also be quite telling when seen
as a menu item.
It's more like Internal Use.
Am 16.12.2013 10:25, schrieb David Kastrup:
Just thinking out loud here...would it be worth looking into tweaking the
.htaccess file to do OS-based redirection on the download page, like many
sites do? That way, if someone requests download.html, they are redirected
to download-win.html if the
Am 15.12.2013 19:48, schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes:
...
Viewed from the very narrow perspective of the actual patch there
isn't much I can argue against People should read Text Input and if
they don't we can't help them/we should help them find that page
Am 16.12.2013 04:29, schrieb Graham Percival:
I don't want to imagine what happens if I propose my rewrite of the
Features page (http://www.openlilylib.org/lilyweb/features.html).
A rewrite of a single page has less impact than changing the
intended flow of a new reader through the website.
Am 16.12.2013 06:15, schrieb Graham Percival:
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 01:23:51PM +0100, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 15.12.2013 06:47, schrieb Graham Percival:
2) they noticed the existing, read the text input page, but were
still confused. Solution: improve the text input page.
I think the only
Am 16.12.2013 07:46, schrieb Paul Morris:
Graham Percival-3 wrote
Maybe another whole page about sample
usage, or something like that?
Maybe this should even be split: One dedicated page explaining the
concept of IDEs, similar to the Text Input page but less elaborate,
and another page that
Am 16.12.2013 07:53, schrieb David Kastrup:
Paul Morris p...@paulwmorris.com writes:
Here's how I would reword the warning to make it as concrete and simple as
possible:
Note: With LilyPond you write and edit music by typing text with your
keyboard, not by dragging notes around with a mouse.
Am 14.12.2013 12:20, schrieb Phil Holmes:
- lilypond.org/web/ : the old website
What is this old stuff good for?
Confusing search engines into misleading people there seems to be its
main purpose nowadays. It's not totally clear whether it has other
functions at the moment that could
Am 14.12.2013 08:56, schrieb James:
On 14/12/13 07:14, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 14.12.2013 04:53, schrieb Graham Percival:
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 02:06:38PM +0100, Urs Liska wrote:
The page GSoC 2012 is obviously outdated.
What should be done with it?
I suggest deleting it. There's no evidence
Am 16.12.2013 21:26, schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
and Janek (who is on sabbatical” due to physical problems)
Just to clarify: Janek is on sabbatical because sometimes he has to
follow the demands of a life beyond LilyPond (concretely a two month
internship).
His physical problems are rather
Am 16.12.2013 22:28, schrieb James:
Hello,
I'd like to add our Turkish Professor's book to the Publications and am
unsure about the syntax/format of the syntax.
So for example one entry that exists is:
@inproceedings{reinhold01,
title = {OrchestralLily: A Package for Professional Music
Am 18.12.2013 11:33, schrieb Graham Percival:
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 01:27:05PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Maybe interactive is a useful term? Like
LilyPond is not an interactive program: its sole task is translating
a textual description of music into typeset music. For creating that
Am 19.12.2013 11:32, schrieb lilyp...@googlecode.com:
Updates:
Labels: -Patch-countdown Patch-push
Comment #4 on issue 3718 by pkx166h: Patch: Web: Reword contactUsAbout
macro
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3718
Patch counted down - please push
What should I do now?
Am 20.12.2013 10:45, schrieb Trevor Daniels:
3)
What to do if my branch contains more than one commit?
Should I squash them so the patch is one (big) commit? I wouldn't like
that, for example because I would separate commits that move stuff (e.g.
to other website nodes) from commits that change
if anyone can push it for
you.
Would someone please push the attached patch?
TIA
Urs
From 0680efed127eea46ed01e60fc7689625c9cf86b4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Urs Liska g...@ursliska.de
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 11:16:10 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Web: Reword contactUsAbout macro
Providing
Thanks for the explanations.
Basically everything is like I would have expected, but I think I will
try to add some explanations to CG when I've time.
Urs
Am 20.12.2013 11:00, schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes:
Am 19.12.2013 11:32, schrieb lilyp
Am 20.12.2013 11:12, schrieb David Kastrup:
As the typical victims for pushers are often able to grant push access,
you'll probably not have to go through this very often before they beg
you to accept push access.
I think I will do that soon.
Some time in the past I would have considered it a
Am 20.12.2013 11:25, schrieb David Kastrup:
Would you suggest to put such a series in a separate thread (by a
merge no-ff) or not.
Usually not. But some of that might be pulled into a single commit.
OK, thanks.
Urs
___
lilypond-devel mailing
I'm somewhat confused about the organization of the CG chapters about
Git and patch review.
First:
3.2.2 Git for the impatient and
3.3 Basic Git procedures
share some information, and this in a somewhat confusing way.
Is there a _short_ explanation what these two chapters are intended for?
Am 22.12.2013 10:29, schrieb Trevor Daniels:
Urs, you wrote Sunday, December 22, 2013 8:55 AM
Subject: CG organization (Git)
I'm somewhat confused about the organization of the CG chapters about
Git and patch review.
The CG has never been properly revised and reorganised, with
many
updates.
From 0dd769ee4ec5befa5497548fadfcd972fc7a1926 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Urs Liska g...@ursliska.de
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 12:06:39 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Issue 3719: CG: Add comment about git-cl editor
git-cl fires either the editor specified by the
EDITOR environment variable
Am 22.12.2013 10:54, schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes:
Would somebody please be so kind and push the attached patch.
I rebased on origin/master and ran ct-section source-code.
make doc gave an error, but this pointed to
fatal error: failed files: 60/lily-338514d2
Original-Nachricht
Betreff: Re: Fwd: Re: Issue 3719 in lilypond: Patch: CG: Add comment
about git-cl editor
Datum: Sun, 22 Dec 2013 13:13:54 +0100
Von: Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org
An: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
Am 22.12.2013 11:59, schrieb Urs Liska:
I don't see
Am 22.12.2013 12:06, schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes:
Am 22.12.2013 10:54, schrieb David Kastrup:
I see that you used @code{vi} and @code{git-cl} rather than @command{vi}
and @command{git-cl}: any particular reason for that?
I was suggested to use
Am 23.12.2013 13:02, schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes:
Am 23.12.2013 12:45, schrieb Urs Liska:
Attached is an updated patch using @command instead of @code.
Rebased patch passes make doc (issues in other subthread solved).
Thanks for pushing
Urs
Sorry, found
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org schrieb:
Carl Peterson carlopeter...@gmail.com writes:
Trying to upload a follow-up patch for my notehead change.
When I try to run git cl upload origin/master, I get
fatal: ref HEAD is not a symbolic ref
Command git symbolic-ref HEAD failed
What am I doing
2001
From: Urs Liska g...@ursliska.de
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 12:53:06 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Issue 3732: Web: Features: Modify outline
This doesn't modify the content, although I have a clear idea about it.
So some contents don't seem to fit to the headings.
---
Documentation/web
I keep getting these messages although David has pushed the patch. How can I
(or someone) make the tracker aware of the push?
Urs
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: lilyp...@googlecode.com
Gesendet: Sat Dec 28 09:48:40 MEZ 2013
An: lilyli...@googlemail.com
Betreff: Re: Issue 3719
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org schrieb:
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes:
I keep getting these messages although David has pushed the patch.
How
can I (or someone) make the tracker aware of the push?
Usually the state should be updated by the pusher. If you are aware of
an inconsistency
Am 01.01.2014 15:47, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
2014/1/1 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 06:35:36PM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote:
2013/12/12 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
Sorry, this awoke Grumpy Graham.
I should have expected that.
Yes, you should
I see the need to modify the Our Goal box on Introduction, but I
wouldn't want to do that on my own because it would feel like modifying
someone else's tune instead of only adding a figured bass to it.
So I'd like to get some feedback here and propose a patch only then.
Here are my thoughts:
Am 01.01.2014 18:02, schrieb Phil Holmes:
- Original Message - From: Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 01, 2014 4:41 PM
Subject: Re: contributing instructions are misleading!
That's a point I'd like to say something about.
The CG's
Am 01.01.2014 18:34, schrieb Phil Holmes:
- Original Message - From: Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org
To: LilyPond Development Team lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 01, 2014 5:03 PM
Subject: Content of Introduction-Our Goal
[snip]
I think the sentence could be:
The result
image there.
Good point. Maybe that can easily be made clear through the text. I'll consider
this when I'm at that text anyway.
I'd be happy to keep that image on introduction - it's so beautyful.
Urs
- Graham
--
Urs Liska
openlilylib.org
image there.
Good point. Maybe that can easily be made clear through the text. I'll consider
this when I'm at that text anyway.
I'd be happy to keep that image on introduction - it's so beautyful.
Urs
- Graham
--
Urs Liska
openlilylib.org
--
Urs Liska
openlilylib.org
Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca schrieb:
Hello all,
Now that 2.18 has been released (kudos, by the way!!!), when is the
unstable branch going to be updated?
I like to be on the bleeding edge… ;)
Then you should build your own LilyPonds ;-)
--
Urs Liska
openlilylib.org
.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-u...@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
--
Urs Liska
openlilylib.org
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman
. But it would be
nice to have a local doc (like the doc tarball) but English only.
Anyway, I just realized that I don't need to download these huge tarballs
anymore since I can build the docs myself from Git :-)
Urs
--
Urs Liska
openlilylib.org
1 - 100 of 713 matches
Mail list logo
