Hey all,
My website build crashes with:
mikesol@mikesol-laptop:~/lilypond-git$ sudo make
LILYPOND_WEB_MEDIA_GIT=/home/mikesol/lilypond-extra website
make --no-builtin-rules config_make=./config.make \
top-src-dir=/home/mikesol/lilypond-git \
-f
Hey Janek!
Congrats again on getting accepted for GSoC. Reading the mentoring guide,
there are a lot of getting to know you and the project bits that we've
already done, so we can more or less get right to work. A few things:
1) Could you send me the finalized version of your timeline?
2)
Hey all,
I've received a couple e-mails from colleagues and one nudge from Valentin
about:
http://concours.afim-asso.org/
I've been reticent about applying because the development community is rather
diffuse and there isn't any good way to accept the prize money if we win.
However, after
On 29 avr. 2012, at 17:09, Janek Warchoł wrote:
I've thought about what needs to be done and i have an outline (and
some questions); it would be definitely great to have a long meeting
to check that my ideas are correct and how should i approach some
problems, in particular horizontal
On 29 avr. 2012, at 17:37, Janek Warchoł wrote:
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 5:20 PM, m...@mikesolomon.org
m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
On 29 avr. 2012, at 17:09, Janek Warchoł wrote:
I've thought about what needs to be done and i have an outline (and
some questions); it would be definitely
On 7 mai 2012, at 19:17, lilypond.patchy.jl...@gmail.com wrote:
Begin LilyPond compile, commit: 9f408c3d2cfe0e3bbe0a683ff52422bd784459b8
*** FAILED STEP ***
merge from staging
maybe somebody pushed a commit directly to master?
Crap that might have been me with
Begin forwarded message:
From: Thierry Coduys thierry.cod...@le-hub.org
Subject: LoMus 2012
Date: 12 mai 2012 12:15:03 HAEC
To: m...@mikesolomon.org
Dear Mike,
The jury wishes to congratulate you on your LilyPond open source software,
that won the First Prize at the LoMus 2012 contest
On 17 mai 2012, at 09:21, lilyp...@googlecode.com wrote:
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: -Patch-countdown fixed2_15_39
Comment #20 on issue 2527 by k-ohara5...@oco.net: Finger-flag collision
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2527
Comment 10 showed the
On 22 mai 2012, at 22:15, David Nalesnik wrote:
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 2:10 PM, m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org
wrote:
On 22 mai 2012, at 21:01, David Nalesnik wrote:
Hi Mike,
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 1:20 PM, m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org
wrote:
Hey David
message from Mike Solomon m...@mikesolomon.org -
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2012 06:56:30 + (UTC)
From: Mike Solomon m...@mikesolomon.org
To: bug-lilyp...@gnu.org
Subject: cyclic dependency for slurred notes with articulations
I'm not top posting
\relative {
\tempo foo
f4---( e8
On 4 juin 2012, at 15:22, Graham Percival wrote:
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 06:58:23AM +0200, m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
Question regarding programming errors of this ilk - if a programming error
shows up only in current master w/ optimizing disabled (meaning it'd never
show up in a release
Hey all,
If I have a header file with stuff like:
class MyClass {
typedef int (*happy)(int a, int b, int c);
happy foo
happy bar;
happy baz;
}
Is there a way to define foo, bar, and baz with the same typedef in the c++
file or do I have to enumerate all the arguments for the function
Hey all,
John and I went to the Maison des Sciences de l'Homme today to get the LilyPond
server up and running. We'll be doing a few modifications over the next few
days and, once it's ready to be used by the devel team, we'll let you guys
know. Just a quick note now, though, to let you know
Hey all,
I'm getting the following when compiling a local branch based off of master:
LILYPOND_VERSION=2.15.41 /usr/bin/python
/home/mikesol/lilypond-git/scripts/lilypond-book.py -I
/home/mikesol/lilypond-git/Documentation/ -I ./out -I
/home/mikesol/lilypond-git/input -I
On 30 juin 2012, at 12:04, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: m...@mikesolomon.org
To: Devel Dev lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2012 9:01 AM
Subject: screech-and-boink.ly
Hey all,
I'm getting the following when compiling a local branch based off
Hey all,
Once the most recent critical issues are squashed, are people up for forking
off a stable branch from 2.15? Administratively we'd go into cherrypick mode
like we did for 2.13 where we institute a moratorium on pushing to the stable
branch and have a cherrypick Czar (like Carl was a
Hey all,
Running the regtests on a patch set, make check fails:
Dissecting...
Writing snippets...
Processing...
Processing
/home/mikesol/lilypond-git/build/out/lybook-testdb/snippet-names--1465161827.ly
command failed: /home/mikesol/lilypond-git/build/out/bin/lilypond -I
On 4 août 2012, at 09:28, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
On 2012/08/01 06:45:22, MikeSol wrote:
Avoid measuring extents when engraving is happening because they could
be
dependent on other callbacks which could trigger many layout decisions
before
engraving is finished.
This is a case
On 6 août 2012, at 23:23, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 08:36:05AM +0100, Ramana Kumar wrote:
In this message on users
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2012-08/msg00094.html
Mike mentioned the possibility of generating cache files to
On 7 août 2012, at 04:41, Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 4:36 AM, Ramana Kumar ram...@member.fsf.org wrote:
In this message on users
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2012-08/msg00094.html
Mike mentioned the possibility of generating cache files
On 9 août 2012, at 11:05, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
Not much discussion after the mid-way point. I'm not certain if
this means that everybody agrees, or they just think I'm
completely wrong and it's not worth even discussing it (as
happened with the first proposal for
On 12 août 2012, at 16:31, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
[lilypond commit 1dedaf12]
Mike,
is the problem `start and end points of slurs and ties don't fall
together' supposed to be fixed? This snippet
\version 2.17.0
\paper {
ragged-right = ##f
}
\relative
On 13 août 2012, at 02:44, Ian Hulin i...@hulin.org.uk wrote:
Dear all, (especially David and Graham)
Contrary to all indications, I have actually been slowly (very slowly)
chugging away on this, developing on my netbook.
In order to achieve this, we'll need produce a series of patches.
On 12 août 2012, at 22:05, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
Odd...I'll look into it.
Thanks!
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Hey Werner,
Had a
On 13 août 2012, at 11:14, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 09:38:15AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
3. Where there are significant changes to component .scm files for
guile V2, these will also be converted into a shim
On 14 août 2012, at 08:37, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
Had a chance to look into it.
Thanks.
Hey Werner,
I'll explain more below.
The too-closeness is registering, so the issue is either one of:
1) The details list for slurs needs different values.
Try stuff like
\override
On 17 août 2012, at 07:19, joenee...@gmail.com wrote:http://codereview.appspot.com/5626052/diff/106004/lily/axis-group-interface.ccFile lily/axis-group-interface.cc (right):http://codereview.appspot.com/5626052/diff/106004/lily/axis-group-interface.cc#newcode651lily/axis-group-interface.cc:651:
On 17 août 2012, at 10:21, m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
On 17 août 2012, at 07:19, joenee...@gmail.com wrote:
http://codereview.appspot.com/5626052/diff/106004/lily/axis-group-interface.cc
File lily/axis-group-interface.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com
Has to do with my loop question from before - I am sure now that there is an
infinite loop but I'm not sure in what file it's being triggered.
Cheers,
MS
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
On 17 août 2012, at 16:57, Joe Neeman joenee...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 5:34 AM, Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 10:16:25 -0700, mts...@gmail.com wrote:
http://codereview.appspot.com/5626052/diff/106004/lily/axis-group-interface.cc#newcode780
Hey all,
I recently compiled LilyPond from source on my Mac and got this message:
Fontconfig warning:
/usr/local/Cellar/fontconfig/2.10.1/etc/fonts/conf.d/50-user.conf, line 9:
reading configurations from ~/.fonts.conf is deprecated.
Has anyone else seen this?
Cheers,
MS
Hey all,
In the Mac OS X build I did of the LilyPond source LilyPond cannot find the
Century fonts. I put them in the mf/out directory so that they are installed
correctly (in theory) but LilyPond can't find them. Is there a way I can check
how LilyPond is handling paths for looking for
On 18 août 2012, at 19:59, John Mandereau john.mander...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Mike,
Il giorno sab, 18/08/2012 alle 19.38 -0400, m...@mikesolomon.org ha
scritto:
In the Mac OS X build I did of the LilyPond source LilyPond cannot
find the Century fonts.
Did configure or make all failed
On 18 août 2012, at 23:40, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
Is there a way I can check how LilyPond is handling paths for looking
for fonts?
Try iosnoop.
Werner
501 87297 W 840990920 221184 lilypond ??/bidouillage/bar.ps
501 87298 W 840991352 32768 gs
On 19 août 2012, at 01:30, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org writes:
On 18 août 2012, at 19:59, John Mandereau john.mander...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Mike,
Il giorno sab, 18/08/2012 alle 19.38 -0400, m...@mikesolomon.org ha
scritto:
In the Mac OS X
On 19 août 2012, at 09:26, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
501 87297 W 840990920 221184 lilypond ??/bidouillage/bar.ps
501 87298 W 840991352 32768 gs ??/bidouillage/bar.pdf
501 87298 W 840991432 28672 gs ??/T/gs_Rm4DT4
501 87298 W 840991432 32768 gs
On 19 août 2012, at 20:58, John Mandereau john.mander...@gmail.com wrote:
Il giorno dom, 19/08/2012 alle 20.28 -0400, m...@mikesolomon.org ha
scritto:
Nothing to do with iosnoop, but I did some snooping in the code base and I
can't figure out why LilyPond wouldn't raise an error
On 19 août 2012, at 21:20, m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
On 19 août 2012, at 20:58, John Mandereau john.mander...@gmail.com wrote:
Il giorno dom, 19/08/2012 alle 20.28 -0400, m...@mikesolomon.org ha
scritto:
Nothing to do with iosnoop, but I did some snooping in the code base and I
can't
On 20 août 2012, at 05:13, m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
On 19 août 2012, at 21:20, m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
On 19 août 2012, at 20:58, John Mandereau john.mander...@gmail.com wrote:
Il giorno dom, 19/08/2012 alle 20.28 -0400, m...@mikesolomon.org ha
scritto:
Nothing to do
On 21 août 2012, at 03:42, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
On 2012/08/18 10:12:00, MikeSol wrote:
\relative c'' {
\override TupletBracket #'outside-staff-priority = #1
\override TupletNumber #'font-size = #5
\times 2/3 { a4\trill a\trill^foo a\trill }
}
I added this as a regtest.
On 22 août 2012, at 20:24, Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de wrote:
Am 19.08.2012 22:29, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 3:02 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Details are still somewhat fuzzy since I don't have all that much
feedback concerning who will arrive when and leave, but
Question - with the demerit in this function, on line 436 (the initialization
of demerit), why are we multiplying by dy? I would have thought that if the
span of dy were larger, we would want the demerit to be smaller so that the
slur was less bound to the edges.
Cheers,
MS
On 28 août 2012, at 06:08, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
Still works well, still the same speed, and now the code makes much more
sense.
The 25% extra time required to set a short score goes down if I
\override Accidental #'vertical-skylines = #'()
\override TextScript
Hey all,
With --disable-optimisation passed to configure, Janek's score at:
www.mikesolomon.org/tota-pulchra.zip
fails with the assertion failure on line 252 of the current grob-property.cc
assert (value == SCM_EOL || value == marker);
I started a git bisect but have no clue when the first
On 29 août 2012, at 06:18, Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 01:00:39 -0700, m...@mikesolomon.org
m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
On 28 août 2012, at 06:08, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
\override Accidental #'vertical-skylines = #'()
...
(you should set them
Hey all,
Could someone well-versed in guile try running primitive-load-path on the
attached file with and without the last line commented. Without the last line
commented, on my machine, I get:
guile (primitive-load-path /home/mikesol/pleasework.lyaux)
Backtrace:
In standard input:
1: 0*
On 29 août 2012, at 18:58, Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net wrote:
I've just spent a happy few moments looking at around 900 regtest differences
- most of the ones between 2.17.0 and 17.1. It's not a big deal except for
my sanity - we did know there would be a lot. I've not checked them
On 30 août 2012, at 00:44, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org writes:
The regtest that worries me most is les-nereides.ly.
There is a comment starting on line 827 of axis-group-engraver.cc from
Joe (vintage 2008) that describes this scenario. It's
On 30 août 2012, at 02:21, Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
Phil Holmes email at philholmes.net writes:
Anyway, I found a number that concern me. See them at
http://www.philholmes.net/lilypond/regtestresults/2.17.1/.
I think all the concerns are covered by your tracker items, or
On 31 août 2012, at 08:35, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
I'm averaging about a 7% speed up
but it's not statistically significant.
What types of scores get slower ?
http://codereview.appspot.com/6498053/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
On 31 août 2012, at 20:47, Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org wrote:
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
That is a testament to the regtest's usefulness, and it was certainly
intended to be like that.
Ha, yes. It indeed helps keeping things perfectly the same [even if
they are obviously wrong],
On 3 sept. 2012, at 07:33, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
Hi John,
i remember that you are investigating whether we could be using Gerrit
for Lily work. I may've asked this question already, but i don't
remember whether there was a
On 3 sept. 2012, at 11:45, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org writes:
As a frequent producer of uncommented code that pushes into a code
base with uncommented code, I am more than willing to put comments.
However, I'll say that a lack of comments
Hey all,
While running regtests, I ran into a crash and got a whole heap of files to
check (I've put the command below).
They all compile clean when I run them individually, so I was wondering if
someone knew where the logfiles for these things were stashed so I can see how
they're failing?
On 3 sept. 2012, at 12:53, m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
Hey all,
While running regtests, I ran into a crash and got a whole heap of files to
check (I've put the command below).
They all compile clean when I run them individually, so I was wondering if
someone knew where the logfiles
On 3 sept. 2012, at 13:05, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
- Original Message - From: m...@mikesolomon.org
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2012 11:53 AM
Subject: Regtest checking
Hey all,
While running regtests, I ran into a crash and got a whole
On 3 sept. 2012, at 07:07, mts...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012/09/02 20:38:28, Keith wrote:
On 2012/09/02 06:25:58, MikeSol wrote:
It's not a copy of the original slur because it is using
pure heights and offsets.
I saw you interrogating SlurStub regarding its purity, but did not
notice
On 3 sept. 2012, at 17:34, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
I think that any time that a LilyPond developer complains that
the code is too hard to understand,
On 4 sept. 2012, at 09:45, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
Works for me. 16% slower than master.
(I'll try make clean and make.)
It makes no change for the Chopin; can you give an example where it
helps?
In the Chopin, ragged-bottom is false so the difference can't really be seen.
The piece
On 4 sept. 2012, at 07:36, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
I can't get it to work for the script at the start of the tie.
\relative c''' { r2. c4~- | c- r2. }
The reason is because ties are announced at a timestep (maybe several) after
their creation. This makes it very difficult to account for
On 4 sept. 2012, at 10:13, Rodolfo Zitellini xhero...@gmail.com wrote:
However, I still don't understand the utility of more comments in these two
files after all of this. Note that I am not calling into question what
David is saying about comments - I'm sure he is right. It's my failing
On 4 sept. 2012, at 17:45, joenee...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012/09/02 06:25:58, MikeSol wrote:
On 2012/09/01 23:58:37, Keith wrote:
I might have a test case for you at
http://www.mutopiaproject.org/cgibin/piece-info.cgi?id=1776
It seems you copy each slur into a slur-stub, and from those
On 5 sept. 2012, at 00:33, m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
On 4 sept. 2012, at 17:45, joenee...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012/09/02 06:25:58, MikeSol wrote:
On 2012/09/01 23:58:37, Keith wrote:
I might have a test case for you at
http://www.mutopiaproject.org/cgibin/piece-info.cgi?id=1776
On 6 sept. 2012, at 10:06, janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
Patchset 2 screws everything up, LOL!
It was one of my more colossal breakings of LilyPond - I'll add it to the top
10.
http://lilypond-stuff.1065243.n5.nabble.com/file/n5705606/accidental-spacing-pairs_patchset2.pdf
In previous
On 7 sept. 2012, at 09:34, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
On 2012/09/04 08:09:21, mike7 wrote:
On 4 sept. 2012, at 09:45, mailto:k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
It makes no change for the Chopin; can you give an
example where it helps?
In the Chopin, ragged-bottom is false so the difference
On 7 sept. 2012, at 10:11, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
The output looks very nice, even with half-sharps, reverse flats, etc.
The patch makes compilation take 6% longer (depending on accidental
density).
The reverse flats don't get any extra space around their stems, but I
haven't find a
On 8 sept. 2012, at 08:46, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
On 2012/09/08 05:28:02, Keith wrote:
now I measure it 2% /faster/ than master.
Of course that makes no sense. I got confused of which executable I had
when switching between patches. This patch is still about 6% slower
than master,
On 8 sept. 2012, at 09:06, Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
On Fri, 07 Sep 2012 09:23:08 -0700, m...@mikesolomon.org
m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
On 7 sept. 2012, at 09:34, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
Having the invisible Grobs taking up space will confuse the innocent.
I tried
On 8 sept. 2012, at 18:43, m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
On 8 sept. 2012, at 09:06, Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
On Fri, 07 Sep 2012 09:23:08 -0700, m...@mikesolomon.org
m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
On 7 sept. 2012, at 09:34, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
Having the invisible
On 10 sept. 2012, at 11:12, lilyp...@googlecode.com wrote:
Updates:
Status: Started
Comment #32 on issue 2801 by d...@gnu.org: Patch: Approximates cross-staff
slurs in VerticalAxisGroup vertical-skylines.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2801
Mike, I just
On 10 sept. 2012, at 23:26, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
On 2012/09/07 16:23:21, mike7 wrote:
On 7 sept. 2012, at 09:34, mailto:k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
Do you still think it possible to use just the real Slurs ?...
1) setting tentative control points using pre-line-breaking
estimates
Hey all,
To further debug 2801, I am looking for a way to not have to run the regtests
every time to make the bug appear. I am hoping that it'll crop up if I just
keep running it and I can compare the way the program behaves from one
compilation to the next. Is there a way to do something
On 11 sept. 2012, at 17:48, Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de wrote:
Hello list,
for my work on the volta bracket inclusion for the new bar line interface,
I need to know how the bars are ordered in (ly:grob-object grob 'bars).
Please see the attached file.
For the \musOne, I get a grob array
On 11 sept. 2012, at 22:29, Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de wrote:
Are you certain that every vertical axis group will always contain the same
number of bar lines? If not, it's possible that the matrix you're talking
about may not have complete rows, in which case it's difficult to know how
On 12 sept. 2012, at 14:05, d...@gnu.org wrote:
http://codereview.appspot.com/6496085/diff/1/lily/chord-name-engraver.cc
File lily/chord-name-engraver.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6496085/diff/1/lily/chord-name-engraver.cc#newcode149
lily/chord-name-engraver.cc:149:
http://codereview.appspot.com/6496085/diff/1/lily/chord-name-engraver.cc#newcode87
lily/chord-name-engraver.cc:87: {
On 2012/09/06 08:50:40, dak wrote:
What kind of contorted logic and guessing game is that?
if (make_markup)
{
[old code ending in setting text]
}
Please don't
On 12 sept. 2012, at 19:16, d...@gnu.org wrote:
On 2012/09/12 16:11:05, dak wrote:
when it should rather have the form
if (rest_event_)
{
- SCM no_chord_markup = get_property (noChordSymbol);
- if (!Text_interface::is_markup (no_chord_markup))
...
+ if
On 12 sept. 2012, at 15:54, Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net wrote:
Results from my pixel comparator. Some good, some in need of consideration:
http://philholmes.net/lilypond/regtestresults/2.17.2/
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel
On 13 sept. 2012, at 08:31, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org writes:
On 12 sept. 2012, at 15:54, Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net wrote:
Results from my pixel comparator. Some good, some in need of consideration:
http://philholmes.net
On 13 sept. 2012, at 10:17, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org writes:
On 13 sept. 2012, at 08:31, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org writes:
Just a note that Les Nereides will go back to its old state w
Hey all,
In the past couple days I've been getting changes in laissez-vibrer-tie-beam.ly
almost every time I run the regtests on at least two different seemingly
unrelated patch sets. Can anyone confirm this behavior?
Cheers,
MS
___
lilypond-devel
On 14 sept. 2012, at 11:42, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
- Original Message - From: m...@mikesolomon.org
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 7:01 AM
Subject: laissez-vibrer-tie-beam.ly
Hey all,
In the past couple days I've been getting changes
On 14 sept. 2012, at 19:56, Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net wrote:
OK - so there's been a lot of discussion of pre- and post-fix, and a load of
other stuff I don't understand.So I had a think about what it is about
lilypond syntax that p**s me off. And I concluded that it's nothing to do
On 26 sept. 2012, at 11:01, Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de wrote:
Can anyone with more knowledge than me give me a hint what's wrong?
IIUC correctly, lilypond draws a bar line at the beginning of each line,
but in most cases, this is an invisible one.
If you look at the results of
On 26 sept. 2012, at 12:07, Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de wrote:
Am 26.09.2012 11:47, schrieb m...@mikesolomon.org:
On 26 sept. 2012, at 11:01, Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de wrote:
Can anyone with more knowledge than me give me a hint what's wrong?
IIUC correctly, lilypond draws a bar line
On 26 sept. 2012, at 12:46, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
I've no idea if this will help, so feel free to ignore it. However, my
recollection is that running lily with -ddump-signatures gives information
on extents in the output file?
This is a great idea - you can get a lot of
Hey all,
As was the case in a few of my previous projects, before I start something new
I make architecture changes that facilitate my work. Working on 2801, I've
realized that any multi-pass algorithm for the spacing of grobs is difficult
because results of callback calculations are always
On 26 sept. 2012, at 13:39, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org writes:
As was the case in a few of my previous projects, before I start
something new I make architecture changes that facilitate my work.
Working on 2801, I've realized that any multi
On 26 sept. 2012, at 14:13, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
What we need to arrive at is a situation where somebody without a clue
starting to write stuff will more likely than not get a whole lot of
things working right without realizing it, rather than getting a whole
lot of things
On 26 sept. 2012, at 17:38, Joe Neeman joenee...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 4:15 AM, m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org
wrote:
Hey all,
As was the case in a few of my previous projects, before I start something
new I make architecture changes that facilitate my work
On 26 sept. 2012, at 21:51, Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 9:17 PM, m...@mikesolomon.org
m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
Another way to think of this is that, in general, we'd try to eliminate
grobs like NoteColumn, ScriptColumn, DynamicLineSpanner, etc
On 27 sept. 2012, at 13:56, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 5:43 PM, m...@mikesolomon.org
m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
OK - I'll be able to fix all the broken stuff on Monday
On 29 sept. 2012, at 10:59, Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 10:40 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com writes:
In order to do cache invalidation, you will have to construct the
reverse graph. If A.x depends on B.y, now A
On 29 sept. 2012, at 18:34, Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
Han-Wen Nienhuys hanwenn at gmail.com writes:
I think it is a much clearer abstraction to decide that each property
can only be evaluated once, and that everything should be driven by
callbacks. In fact, one thing I would
On 29 sept. 2012, at 19:53, Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 10:30:32 -0700, m...@mikesolomon.org
m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
The way you're using tentative is almost exactly how pure properties are
used in LilyPond.
Specifically, 'pure-height being
On 29 sept. 2012, at 19:54, m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
On 29 sept. 2012, at 19:53, Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 10:30:32 -0700, m...@mikesolomon.org
m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
The way you're using tentative is almost exactly how pure properties
On 30 sept. 2012, at 10:25, Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de wrote:
Am 30.09.2012 04:11, schrieb k-ohara5...@oco.net:
Now looking at the log files, I do get undead errors for our
regression test 'bar-line-define-bar-glyph.ly' but not from any other
files that I tried. (I don't know why the scripts
On 30 sept. 2012, at 11:39, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org writes:
On 29 sept. 2012, at 19:54, m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
On 29 sept. 2012, at 19:53, Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net
wrote
On 30 sept. 2012, at 14:16, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
interesting discussion, i learn a lot.
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:39 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Basically, a grob says I want to have this and that information for
making my positioning and LilyPond
On 30 sept. 2012, at 14:29, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org writes:
On 30 sept. 2012, at 14:16, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
interesting discussion, i learn a lot.
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:39 AM, David Kastrup d
1 - 100 of 308 matches
Mail list logo
