On 15 May 2012 17:06, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
However, I must admit that I'm not certain how you did this (even
though I read the code!). What should Joseph answer to the git-cl
questions? If you could help him write something for the CG about
this, that would be
On 9 May 2012 10:35, Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk wrote:
Łukasz Czerwiński wrote Sunday, April 29, 2012 12:18 PM
Thanks all three of you for your immediate reply! :) I didn't know
about the glossary. One problem with it is that for musical
terms, except for notes and rests
On 3 May 2012 13:07, m...@apollinemike.com m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
*2460* is more or less impossible.
Why? I don know the details of Lilypond's internals, but a white-out is a
rather simple idea, isn't it?
Łukasz
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
On 3 May 2012 04:18, Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
On Wed, 02 May 2012 17:12:33 -0700, Łukasz Czerwiński
milimet...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 April 2012 13:28, Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com wrote:
this also looks a little suspect:
Real total_head_length
On 4 May 2012 01:08, m...@apollinemike.com m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
On 4 mai 2012, at 00:37, Łukasz Czerwiński wrote:
On 3 May 2012 13:07, m...@apollinemike.com m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
*2460* is more or less impossible.
Why? I don know the details of Lilypond's internals
On 22 April 2012 13:28, Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Łukasz Czerwiński milimet...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I have spotted a strange loop in lily/ledger-line-spanner.cc (lines
46-69):
Direction d = UP;
do
Hi,
Recently my Polish speaking friend told me that it's a problem for him to
look something in Lilypond documentation, because first of all he must
translate the musical term he needs to English, which is quite a hard task,
because there are several words that might express the same musical
On 29 April 2012 13:04, Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com wrote:
Il 29/04/2012 12:55, Łukasz Czerwiński ha scritto:
Hi,
Recently my Polish speaking friend told me that it's a problem for him
to look something in Lilypond documentation, because first of all he
must translate the musical
On 28 April 2012 10:30, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
As long as I'm not personally playing nursemaid for people
who don't run the basic tests
It seems that the whole talk about running tests is only because of me not
running them before uploading my first patches because I
Could you please change the mails' subject? :) I've started a thread: Lilypond
patchy and other Lilypond problems for this discussion. Could you move
there?
Łukasz
On 27 April 2012 19:43, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
- Original Message - From: James pkx1...@gmail.com
To:
On 26 April 2012 20:41, Łukasz Czerwiński milimet...@gmail.com wrote:
Mike, Graham and David wrote about more or less automatic running of tests
and presenting only the results, possibly on an unused computer.
I realised that I have a server on Dreamhost that probably could
Musical contest? Great! :) +1
On 27 April 2012 07:29, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
I suggest that *you* are the person receiving the money, acting as a
representative and contact person for this contest. In due course it
is up to you how to distribute the money within the lilypond
On 27 April 2012 08:07, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
*sigh*
I'll rehash an old email.
I know that some of us would like to get paid for lilypond work.
But I'm leery of jumping into this topic for a few reasons:
1) lilypond survives because of volunteer work. I think
Wooow, a lot of emails were posted in the last 24 hours :) I'll try to
comment all your important thoughts, but it's possible that I miss one or
two... Anyway:
On 26 April 2012 07:28, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
Some people encourage new contributors. I encourage new
Hello,
On 26 April 2012 21:38, James pkx1...@gmail.com wrote:
No problem, but it doesn't mean that you can just do some code and
throw it up for review without ANY basic testing your side, it should
apply to current tree and it should also pass a basic 'make'.
Yes, before uploading a patch
On 25 April 2012 11:57, d...@gnu.org wrote:
It would appear that you ignored
http://permalink.gmane.org/**gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.auto/**465http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.auto/465
,
I know that this is not a very positive message, but I am trying
to save you yet more anguish. The lilypond project currently does
not even function smoothly between senior developers with more
than 100 commits each; there is very little chance for a new
contributor to have a smooth and
On 25 April 2012 14:52, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
(...)
To me, that does not look like you particularly value getting a review.
You have not fixed a single thing I pointed out. You have not checked
your submission yourself for the problems.
I didn't notice that comment. I'm not
On 25 April 2012 17:06, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Łukasz Czerwiński milimet...@gmail.com writes:
I have never ever get an email from Google Code. I have just checked
that triple. That's the reason for ignoring your comments. I'm sorry
that my new patch made you run your tests
On 22 April 2012 13:16, Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com wrote:
sorry for the delay; I was on holidays
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Łukasz Czerwiński
milimet...@gmail.com wrote:
Could you please say, if there was a reason for using
do {
} while(flip(d));
instead of my macro
Hi,
I have spotted a strange loop in lily/ledger-line-spanner.cc (lines 46-69):
Direction d = UP;
do
{
.
}
while (flip (d) != DOWN);
*It will be executed only once - with d set to UP.* To be executed for d =
UP and then d = DOWN, it should be:
while (flip (d) !=
Ok,
Could we sum up the discussion?
As I understand: for (UP_and_DOWN(d))
{
}
is ok, right? I will wait for two OKs and then make changes and produce and
upload a patch.
Łukasz
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
On 14 April 2012 21:12, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
Splitting the function in two doesn't make it any easier for me to
understand, but I had figured it out before.
On 2012/03/21 18:56:08, Milimetr88 wrote:
What I was taught at the university is to write short
and simple functions that do
On 14 April 2012 18:06, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Is this supposed to declare d itself or not?
Yes, it will declare d as a variable visible only in for loop (I'm using a
new way of handling variables declared in for() clause - those variables
will no longer be visible outside the
On 15 April 2012 16:49, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Łukasz Czerwiński milimet...@gmail.com writes:
I'd like to write code, that will make Lilypond better or easier to be
used
Not necessarily the same as the C++ way.
Right :) No iterators needed here :)
and it's not my goal
WARNING: could not change issue labels;
please email lilypond-devel with the issue number: 2310
Tracker issue done
Some days ago the same error occured.
Łukasz
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
On 1 April 2012 08:26, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 06:12:27AM +, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
On 2012/04/01 05:00:25, Graham Percival wrote:
it would be much nicer if there was a macro for this.
It is better to define macros for just the part
On 14 April 2012 16:25, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
If you don't know, what I am talking about, take a quick look at:
http://codereview.appspot.com/5975054/diff/1/flower/include/direction.hh(lines
75-90).
tldr summary: we use these for direction loops:
for
On 14 April 2012 16:52, d...@gnu.org wrote:
Without wanting to rain on your parade: what is all this about? I
actually had been planning to fix this collision stuff: there are
several fundamental shortcomings. The code can't deal sensibly with
different noteheads (harmonics, mixed duration
Both done - closing issues on Rietveld and adding 2310 to Rietveld's title.
On 3 April 2012 04:00, Colin Campbell c...@shaw.ca wrote:
Tools which we have written for the purpose are aware of the two
unconnected sources of information about patches and have been modified to
allow you to refer
On 4 April 2012 13:06, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
How did you like the colorful Credo example posted in the LilyPond
Report #25 (
http://news.lilynet.net/?The-LilyPond-Report-25lang=en#the_game_of_the_month
)?
*The Credo file is not colorful. It's just black and white,
On 4 April 2012 15:05, Łukasz Czerwiński milimet...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 April 2012 13:06, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
How did you like the colorful Credo example posted in the LilyPond
Report #25 (
http://news.lilynet.net/?The-LilyPond-Report-25lang=en
Well, I must say that I don't understand what I'm expected to do. Could you
please explain me once more and say also what Apparently replaced by R
5975074, pls add issue nbr to summary means? Especially add issue
*nbr*to summary.
Łukasz
On 2 April 2012 03:53, Colin Campbell c...@shaw.ca wrote:
Thanku you, Janek and James.
Wouldn't it be nicer for git cl to ask for an issue number in case it is
unknown? Default value (e.g. 0) could mean a new issue, but the programmer
would have an opportunity to type the right issue number.
Łukasz
On 31 March 2012 22:46, James pkx1...@gmail.com
On 22 March 2012 15:43, julien.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
Are the changes to .gitignore intentional?
http://codereview.appspot.com/**5862052/http://codereview.appspot.com/5862052/
Ooops, changes - yes, placing them in the patch - of course no.
Łukasz
On 22 March 2012 09:05, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
www.anonstorage.net/PStorage/621.skyline-integrals-teeth-marked.pdf
I like this one - sounds for me like a good solution :)
Łukasz
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
On 16 March 2012 21:45, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you share your thoughts?
Lilypond would never be useful for Google products. There is absolutely no
point for Google to pay for code that would never be useful for them.
Łukasz
On 6 March 2012 21:36, James pkx1...@gmail.com wrote:
Francisco,
On 5 March 2012 23:41, Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com wrote:
2012/3/5 James pkx1...@gmail.com:
Hello,
Just in case anyone was interested. Thanks to whoever sorted this out
- it used to be 2.11 or even 2.10 not so
On 28 February 2012 22:50, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
Mentors may or may not receive money, but they will surely win Eternal
Glory (and maybe a Graham's Kiss, who knows?). Please declare which
project(s) you are willing to mentor (remember that not all projects
will be
Janek,
From my experience of work with you, I think you are a great mentor :D
Of course you don't know the whole Lilypond, but it's not so important - in
such case you know who you could ask (Graham, Mike etc.).
The most important is that thanks to your tips and guidance new
contributors would
2012/2/16 Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com
What steps will you take to encourage students to interact with your
project's community before, during and after the program?
Before: we assing them a person (not necessarily the mentor) who
will give them a short tour. we also invite them
The list can be quite long. We don't have to limit it to 2 projects :)
Łukasz
On 13 February 2012 12:51, Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
SUMMARY: in order to participate in Google Summer of
2012/2/10 David Kastrup address@hidden:
* Don't get me wrong: it is probably quite enough work for getting someone*
* started. I'm just not sure whether it will be easy to sell it off. The*
* largest part of the work would realistically consist in digging oneself*
* into sparsely documented
Thanks for all answers.
On 8 January 2012 23:47, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
W dniu 8 stycznia 2012 10:11 użytkownik James pkx1...@gmail.com napisał:
Start by looking here:
that no one is a self-appointed janitor, because there is
always someone, who keeps an eye on some guidelines of a quality of a
Lilypond code.
Hoping to read soon your answers to my questions,
Łukasz Czerwiński
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel
On 3 January 2012 21:47, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
I am a TeX specialist, system programmer, Emacs specialist, the GNU
maintainer (and a rather pitiful one) for AUCTeX (lytex and itexi
anybody? preview-latex for Lilypond?)
Mmm... Preview for Lilypond? Sounds like a
46 matches
Mail list logo
