On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 07:18:58PM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
>> It's nice, but i'd go farther: what about adding an
>> "editorial" property to objects?
>
> Isn't that doable with a custom editorials.ly file, which would
> contain a bunch
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 07:18:58PM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> It's nice, but i'd go farther: what about adding an
> "editorial" property to objects? User could mark some items as
> editorial and LilyPond would take care of the rest: she would put the
> editorial dynamics in brackets, make edito
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 02:14:27PM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
>> what changes in the LilyPond design should we make to make
>> LilyPond a more efficient and easy to use tool.
>
> LilyPond itself will remain as a command-line "compiler".
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 3:04 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> "m...@apollinemike.com" writes:
>>
>> > One idea I've been a fan of for a long time is some type of aux file
>> > system in LilyPond. That is, if we can come up with a file format
>> > that stores loads of d
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 3:04 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> "m...@apollinemike.com" writes:
>
> > One idea I've been a fan of for a long time is some type of aux file
> > system in LilyPond. That is, if we can come up with a file format
> > that stores loads of data from previous runs of a score a
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 09:52:32AM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
> On 14/05/12 07:37, Graham Percival wrote:
> >No. LilyPond is a command-line "compiler". That's something that
> >would happen in an alternate program.
>
> I'm not disputing that, or suggesting that you go into GUI/IDE
> t
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 01:51:42PM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
> On 14/05/12 11:47, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
> >This is very hard because of the butterfly effect - an A-flat in an
> >already-crammed line could lead to new line breaking, which means new
> >vertical spacing etc..
>
>
On 14/05/12 14:36, David Kastrup wrote:
It is not like the graphical frontends are not mentioned in LilyPond's
documentation. Have you checked
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/web/easier-editing#Score_002c-tab-and-MIDI-editors_003a>?
Personally I'm a Frescobaldi fan. MuseScore is a
Joseph Rushton Wakeling writes:
> On 14/05/12 11:47, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
>> This is very hard because of the butterfly effect - an A-flat in an
>> already-crammed line could lead to new line breaking, which means
>> new vertical spacing etc..
>
> I don't assume it would be easy! But ena
On 14/05/12 11:47, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
This is very hard because of the butterfly effect - an A-flat in an
already-crammed line could lead to new line breaking, which means new vertical
spacing etc..
I don't assume it would be easy! But enabling GUI/IDE developers to build
function
Joseph Rushton Wakeling writes:
> On 14/05/12 09:56, David Kastrup wrote:
>> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/source/Documentation/notation/skipping-corrected-music>
>
> Yes, but that wasn't the use-case I had in mind. The sort of thing I
> was thinking of was:
>
> (i) I have a fu
On 14 mai 2012, at 11:22, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
> On 14/05/12 09:56, David Kastrup wrote:
>> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/source/Documentation/notation/skipping-corrected-music>
>
> Yes, but that wasn't the use-case I had in mind. The sort of thing I was
> thinking of wa
On 14/05/12 09:56, David Kastrup wrote:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/source/Documentation/notation/skipping-corrected-music>
Yes, but that wasn't the use-case I had in mind. The sort of thing I was
thinking of was:
(i) I have a full, complete score, which I have compiled.
Joseph Rushton Wakeling writes:
> On 14/05/12 07:37, Graham Percival wrote:
>> No. LilyPond is a command-line "compiler". That's something that
>> would happen in an alternate program.
>
> I'm not disputing that, or suggesting that you go into GUI/IDE
> territory directly -- what I'm suggesting
On 14/05/12 07:37, Graham Percival wrote:
No. LilyPond is a command-line "compiler". That's something that
would happen in an alternate program.
I'm not disputing that, or suggesting that you go into GUI/IDE territory
directly -- what I'm suggesting is that consideration be given to what mig
David Kastrup writes:
>> No. LilyPond is a command-line "compiler". That's something that
>> would happen in an alternate program.
Possibly Something like Ikebana or Schikkers List
> LilyPond, as opposed to TeX, is a living project and one does not need
> to think of everything in advance.
Ri
On 14 mai 2012, at 08:04, David Kastrup wrote:
> "m...@apollinemike.com" writes:
>
>> One idea I've been a fan of for a long time is some type of aux file
>> system in LilyPond. That is, if we can come up with a file format
>> that stores loads of data from previous runs of a score and then can
"m...@apollinemike.com" writes:
> One idea I've been a fan of for a long time is some type of aux file
> system in LilyPond. That is, if we can come up with a file format
> that stores loads of data from previous runs of a score and then can
> somehow compare it to a parsed file, it could cut co
Graham Percival writes:
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:51:45AM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
>> On 13/05/12 23:34, Graham Percival wrote:
>> >LilyPond itself will remain as a command-line "compiler". So this
>> >question can be split into two separate ones:
>> >- what capabilities should a
On 14 mai 2012, at 07:37, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:51:45AM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
>> On 13/05/12 23:34, Graham Percival wrote:
>>> LilyPond itself will remain as a command-line "compiler". So this
>>> question can be split into two separate ones:
>>> - wh
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:51:45AM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
> On 13/05/12 23:34, Graham Percival wrote:
> >LilyPond itself will remain as a command-line "compiler". So this
> >question can be split into two separate ones:
> >- what capabilities should alternate programs (i.e. frescoba
On 13/05/12 23:34, Graham Percival wrote:
LilyPond itself will remain as a command-line "compiler". So this
question can be split into two separate ones:
- what capabilities should alternate programs (i.e. frescobaldi)
have?
- what should the input syntax be?
When considering these question
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 02:14:27PM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> I think it's about the big picture stuff and general design. At the
> moment, i don't see any vision that we - The LilyPond Development Team
> - have about how the future of the project should look like,
oh, I definitely have a visi
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> However, I am opposed to any "official" (GOP or GLISS) proposals
> being decided at such a venue.
Decided, absolutely not.
Discussed, definitely.
> Similarly, we could have informal discussions about GOP or GLISS
> issues, to find out wha
Jean-Charles Malahieude writes:
> May I propose a workaround, just in order to mix business with
> pleasure:
>
> Why not trying to have one "meeting" per continent at the same time,
> with a daily hour on IRC with everybody?
Well, IRC is not the best medium for making a joint performance of "Non
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 08:20:57PM +0200, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote:
> May I propose a workaround, just in order to mix business with pleasure:
>
> Why not trying to have one "meeting" per continent at the same time,
> with a daily hour on IRC with everybody?
We tried that almost a year ago:
Le 11/05/2012 19:44, Graham Percival disait :
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 09:59:49AM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 9:19 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
Janek Warchoł writes:
What about a real-life meeting? There will be a GNU conference in
Dusseldorf (west Germany) in second hal
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 01:57:08AM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> i suggest to discuss some communication guidelines, for example "don't
> say until there's more than 1 day of discussion
> and not all concerns have been addressed, even if you think that the
> decision is obvious".
I think last yea
On 11 mai 2012, at 19:44, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 09:59:49AM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
>> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 9:19 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> Janek Warchoł writes:
>>>
What about a real-life meeting? There will be a GNU conference in
Dusseldorf (west
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 09:59:49AM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 9:19 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> > Janek Warchoł writes:
> >
> >> What about a real-life meeting? There will be a GNU conference in
> >> Dusseldorf (west Germany) in second half of July, maybe we could meet
>
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 9:19 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Janek Warchoł writes:
>
>> What about a real-life meeting? There will be a GNU conference in
>> Dusseldorf (west Germany) in second half of July, maybe we could meet
>> there for a couple of days and sort out some big picture stuff? I
>> t
>> What about a real-life meeting? There will be a GNU conference in
>> Dusseldorf (west Germany) in second half of July, maybe we could
>> meet there for a couple of days and sort out some big picture
>> stuff?
Sounds great!
> There is a piano here as well, but its tuning is sort of rural, too
Janek Warchoł writes:
> What about a real-life meeting? There will be a GNU conference in
> Dusseldorf (west Germany) in second half of July, maybe we could meet
> there for a couple of days and sort out some big picture stuff? I
> think that discussing LilyPond live for one day will give us be
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> Spent yesterday wandering around Kloten, the "old town" part of
> Zurich, and looking at stain-glass windows. Spent this morning
> walking along Uetliberg, a series of hills right next to the city.
> Travel advice: skip the city and cultur
Spent yesterday wandering around Kloten, the "old town" part of
Zurich, and looking at stain-glass windows. Spent this morning
walking along Uetliberg, a series of hills right next to the city.
Travel advice: skip the city and culture, just go straight to the
Alps. Ok, maybe Uetliberg isn't high
35 matches
Mail list logo
