- Original Message -
From: "Karlin High"
However, I'd like to hear from David Kastrup and James Lowe first. To
me, their opposition registered as the strongest.
I remain strongly opposed to a CoC.
--
Phil Holmes
of managing commercial developments (1,500
developers, over $200M annual budget).
Every now and then HR would tell us we needed things like this, and force us
all onto training courses. It just wasted time. The best solution is
always understanding and taking things easy.
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To: "Federico Bruni"
Cc: ; ; "Phil Holmes"
Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2020 10:54 PM
Subject: Re: 2.20.0 release coordination with translation. Other
showstoppers?
Federico Bruni writes:
Il giorno sab
strup
I think it needs to point to documentation that actually exists, since we
won't be building for the development version. There's no reason not to
launch a 2.21 fairly soon afterwards, and the problem you're citing would
then go away.
--
Phil Holmes
I've just put an update in staging.
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: "Trevor"
To: "Lily-Devel List"
Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2020 11:10 PM
Subject: Missing link
Congratulations to all involved in getting 2.20 out the door!
This is a big step for
If you're ever desperate to get a pull request accepted into GUB, and are
sure it's OK, please email me. I normally only pull them when I'm about to
make a build
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: "Jonas Hahnfeld"
To: "Han-Wen Nienhuys&quo
section is automagically managed by GUB and I do
the builds and upload the updates.
--
Phil Holmes
I ought to be able to scp them to the downloads directory and then we could put
an appropriate link into the docs that build the website. How big is the file?
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: Marnen Laibow-Koser
To: Phil Holmes
Cc: LilyPond ; pkx1...@posteo.net
transfer site?
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: Marnen Laibow-Koser
To: Phil Holmes
Cc: LilyPond ; pkx1...@posteo.net
Sent: Sunday, March 08, 2020 4:28 PM
Subject: Re: Linking 64-bit Mac builds from website
On Sun, Mar 8, 2020 at 12:14 PM Phil Holmes
;s not already on the website as a 64-bit Mac build, it will be a dead
link. So we would need a system to synchronise GUB builds and 64-bit Mac
builds.
At present, you can't upload to lilypond.org. Han Wen could change that if
necessary.
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
Yep.
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/lilypond.git/commit/?id=ed1c70f3a7704253cf93c5c031d6f9ce5408f26c
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From:
To: "Trevor" ; "Lily-Devel List"
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2020 1:49 PM
Subject: Re: Missing link
Hello
On 01/0
7;s an obscure automatic process. I
built 2.20 with GUB, uploaded it with GUB and it automatically created the
"stable" docs and opposed to the unstable ones.
--
Phil Holmes
mport to synchronize
documentation with snippets.
I think that's standard as part of the release procedure?
--
David Kastrup
Probably should be, but isn't. I'll try to remember when we have the go
ahead.
--
Phil Holmes
Probably expected. The website text updates automatically - it pulls git
and does a "make website" every hour. However, documents and functionality
only get updated with a new build via GUB.
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: "Davide Liessi"
To: "lilypond-devel"
Cc: "Phil Holmes"
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2020 1:16 PM
Subject: Re: 2.21.0 and announcements
Il giorno mar 31 mar 2020 alle ore 12:15 Phil Holmes
ha scritto:
Probably expec
hich I was
avoiding while I still had a working installation.
--
Phil Holmes
I bit the bullet and started the upgrade to 16.04. I check that's OK then
consider 18.04 later. Upgrading via the GUI software updater.
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas Morley"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "David Kastrup" ; "Deve
- Original Message -
From: "Phil Holmes"
To: "Thomas Morley"
Cc: "David Kastrup" ; "Devel"
Sent: Monday, April 06, 2020 5:02 PM
Subject: Re: GUB failure
I bit the bullet and started the upgrade to 16.04. I check that's OK then
consider
If I type python-gdbm at the terminal I get "command not found". a) is this
the right way to check? b) I'd appreciate guidance on how best to install
it if I don't have it.
Thanks.
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: "Jonas Hahnfeld"
To: &qu
ystemFailed (m)
SystemFailed: Command barfed: cd
/home/gub/NewGub/gub/target/darwin-ppc/build/lilypond-git.sv.gnu.org--lilypond.git-release-unstable
&& make -j16 TARGET_PYTHON="/usr/bin/env python2"
--
Phil Holmes
Thanks. Sorry - I forgot the pull request. Now merged, but it still fails
trying to build darwin-ppc. AFAIR gub automatically updates itself from
github, so I don't think I need to pull it. Could you offer any further
advice, please?
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
nux-64/build/lilypond-git.sv.gnu.org--lilypond.git-release-unstable
&& make TARGET_PYTHON=/usr/bin/python3
DESTDIR=/home/gub/NewGub/gub/target/linux-64/install/lilypond-2.21.0-root
install
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: "Jonas Hahnfeld"
To: "Phil Holmes" ; "Devel"
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2020 1:36 PM
Subject: Re: Latest GUB error
- Original Message -
From: "Jonas Hahnfeld"
To: "Phil Holmes" ; "Devel"
Cc: "David Kastrup" ; "Han-Wen Nienhuys"
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2020 3:55 PM
Subject: Re: Latest GUB error
Okay, so this is finally the foreseen problem in c
install/lilypond-2.21.0-root/usr/share/lilypond/*/python/*
/home/gub/NewGub/gub/target/mingw/install/lilypond-2.21.0-root/usr/bin
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: "Jonas Hahnfeld"
To: "Phil Holmes" ; "Devel"
Cc: "David Kastrup" ; "Han-Wen Nienhuys"
Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2020 10:36 AM
Subject: Re: Latest GUB error
I've pushed a very minor update to staging and release/unstable because a
missing version was breaking GUB. Thanks to much help from Jonas, I'm
hoping that will be the last road block.
--
Phil Holmes
As it says.
Many, many thanks to Jonas for helping to make this possible. It took 4
days for us to collaborate to get a successful release.
--
Phil Holmes
Good catch thanks. Correct VERSION now in staging.
Getting a bit rusty at doing releases
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: "Jonas Hahnfeld"
To: "lilypond-devel"
Cc: "Phil Holmes"
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2020 10:03 AM
Subject: Re: bump VERSION in staging
I've updated the scripts on the website, but it looks like make website is
not sensitive to a changed Python file and so does not rebuild the web
pages. A possibility to force a rebuild would be to touch VERSION, but that
would make the website out of step with master.
--
Phil H
There you go. Fixed :-)
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: "Jonas Hahnfeld"
To: "Phil Holmes" ; "Han-Wen Nienhuys"
; "David Kastrup"
Cc: "lilypond-devel"
Sent: Sunday, April 12, 2020 3:57 PM
Subject: Re: What's up with the broken web pages?
-2011-NoPython-D.
Library based on sources from 13:48 GMT 22-Feb-2011.
make: *** [all] Error 2
Command barfed: cd
/home/gub/NewGub/gub/target/linux-64/build/lilypond-git.sv.gnu.org--lilypond.git-release-unstable
&& make -j16 TARGET_PYTHON=/usr/bin/python3
--
Phil Holmes
path -Wl,/home/gub/NewGub/gub/target/tools/root/usr/lib '
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: "Jonas Hahnfeld"
To: "Phil Holmes" ; "Devel"
Sent: Sunday, April 26, 2020 12:18 PM
Subject: Re: Today's GUB failure
LDFLAGS='-L/home/gub/NewGub/gub/target/tools/root/usr/lib -Wl,-rpath
-Wl,\$$ORIGIN/../lib
-Wl,-rpath -Wl,/home/gub/NewGub/gub/target/tools/root/usr/lib '
Should I just add the "--without-libuninameslist" option to the fontforge
command line in GUB?
--
Phil Holmes
t;, line 557, in file_sub
s = open (name).read ()
IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory:
'/home/gub/NewGub/gub/target/linux-x86/build/lilypond-git.sv.gnu.org--lilypond.git-release-unstable/scripts/build/out/xetex-with-options'
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: "
lypond-git//Documentation/hu/ -I out-website -o
out-website --split=node
/home/graham/lilypond/lilypond-git//Documentation/hu/web.texi
make: *** No rule to make target
'/home/graham/lilypond/lilypond-git//Documentation/it/web/news-headlines.itexi',
needed by 'out-website/web.it.xref-map'. Stop.
--
Phil Holmes
We are pleased to announce the release of Lilypond 2.21.1. This is a
development release and contains a number of updates from 2.21.0.
--
Phil Holmes
ep on how to do this?
Thanks.
--
Phil Holmes
foret shows clearly that it doesn't. Trawling through my
collection of Lilypond executable, it look like it changed between 2.17.26
and .28.
I've not grasped the current process well enough to do a patch for review,
but this looks trivial enough for a simple push/merge request. Co
- Original Message -
From: "Phil Holmes"
To: "Devel"
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 11:42 AM
Subject: Markup vertical alignment
Have a look at
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.21/Documentation/notation/formatting-text#text-alignment -
the bit starting "Vertica
- Original Message -
From: "Valentin Villenave"
To: "Jonas Hahnfeld"
Cc: "lilypond-devel"
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2020 7:59 AM
Subject: Re: remove merged branches & branches with tags
On 5/26/20, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
Is this OK with everyone?
OK. First question. Should I switch completely to GitLab for doing all the
updating of news, VERSION, etc? That is - pretty much stop using Savannah
for anything except GUB builds using my GUB user.
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: "Jonas Hahnfeld"
To: "
Just checking here. The process for pushing to release/unstable hasn't
changed when using GitLab?
What about synchronising release/unstable with master once the build has
completed?
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: "Jonas Hahnfeld"
To: "Phil Holme
this be a manual step now?
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: "Jonas Hahnfeld"
To: "Phil Holmes" ; "lilypond-devel"
Sent: Sunday, June 21, 2020 11:21 AM
Subject: Re: releasing 2.21.2
Looks like the tag command is hardwired in around line 185 of upload.py in
test-lily.
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: "Jonas Hahnfeld"
To: "Phil Holmes" ; "lilypond-devel"
Sent: Sunday, June 21, 2020 1:02 PM
Subject: Re: releasing 2.21.2
Merge request added. GitLab automatically added the labels Patch New. Does
that need changing to get it into master?
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: "Jonas Hahnfeld"
To: "Phil Holmes" ; "lilypond-devel"
Sent: Sunday, June 21, 2020 1:02 PM
Subject: Re: releasing 2.21.2
.py
/home/graham/lilypond/lilypond-git/ > out-website/weblinks.itexi
make: *** No rule to make target
'/home/graham/lilypond/lilypond-git//Documentation/hu/learning/preface.itely',
needed by 'out-website/learning.hu.xref-map'. Stop.
Any ideas?
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: "Federico Bruni"
To: "Jonas Hahnfeld"
Cc: "Phil Holmes" ; "lilypond-devel"
Sent: Sunday, June 21, 2020 3:05 PM
Subject: Re: releasing 2.21.2
Phil, while rebasing a local branch I noticed that you forgot
We are happy to announce the release of LilyPond 2.21.2. This is a
development version, but these are usually reliable. If you want to use the
latest stable version of LilyPond, we recommend using the 2.20.0 version.
--
Phil Holmes
nce_scm() const [with T = const Book*; bool
allow_mutation = true; ly_scm_iterator_t::private_scm =
scm_unused_struct*]' without object
make[1]: *** [out/book.o] Error 1
--
Phil Holmes
Seems to be proceeding. I repeat my view that you are a miracle worker :-)
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: "Jonas Hahnfeld"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Devel"
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020 3:09 PM
Subject: Re: GUB failing
Thanks. I've now pulled your GUB update so that bit should be OK next time.
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: "Jonas Hahnfeld"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Devel"
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020 5:34 PM
Subject: Re: GUB failing
simple example) - they're certainly not presented correctly. Could
anyone say what has gone wrong and what needs to be done to fix it?
--
Phil Holmes
ux-x86/build/lilypond-git.sv.gnu.org--lilypond.git-release-unstable/out/lybook-db/snippet-names-bcc309d5e1e5a6301f36814c1d4d872c.ly'
returned non-zero exit status 1.
make[2]: *** [out-www/notation.texi] Error 1
make[2]: *** Deleting file `out-www/notation.texi'
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
make[1]: *** [WWW-1] Error 2
make: *** [doc-stage-1] Error 2
--
Phil Holmes
entioned. If I get me act together, I plan to do a release every couple of
weeks anyway.
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: "Jonas Hahnfeld"
To: "Phil Holmes" ; "Devel"
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2020 4:09 PM
Subject: Re: Today's problem with GUB build
<>
Here's the logfile and the ly file.
Once we understand the issue, I'll wait until you say "go" for 21.4.
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: "Jonas Hahnfeld"
To: "Phil Holmes" ; "Devel"
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2020 4
'inode'
make[4]: Leaving directory
`/home/gub/NewGub/gub/target/linux-x86/build/lilypond-git.sv.gnu.org--lilypond.git-release-unstable'
And that's where it stops doing anything.
Anyone any ideas?
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: "Jonas Hahnfeld"
To: "Dan Eble"
Cc: "Phil Holmes" ; "Devel"
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020 8:09 AM
Subject: Re: GUB failing
tus
make[1]: *** [out/lilypond] Error 1
--
Phil Holmes
I did not start completely from scratch. I deleted /uploads and ran the
rm -rf as documented in the CG. Do you have a recipe for a complete fresh
build (other than be prepared for a decent wait..)
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: "Jonas Hahnfeld"
To: &q
Deleted target, but the build failed at the same spot with the same error.
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: "Jonas Hahnfeld"
To: "Phil Holmes" ; "Devel"
Sent: Sunday, July 26, 2020 12:18 PM
Subject: Re: GUB - today's problem
Today we released build 2.21.4, the next development release of LilyPond.
Amongst other updates, this corrects the problems with the documentation in
the previous release.
--
Phil Holmes
We are pleased to announce the release of the latest development build of
LilyPond, 2.21.5.
--
Phil Holmes
If I go to http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.21/Documentation/notation/index.html
and click any of the links, I get a page in Spanish, which I'm not.
Anyone know why?
--
Phil Holmes
I can't work out whether there was consensus on the next released build.
Are we going with 2.21.6 and a release announcement that this is an initial
pre-release for a new stable 2.22.0? Or perhaps go for 2.21.80 as a clearer
sign that it's a pre-release?
--
Phil Holmes
Looks like I edited the wrong version level in my final change for
yesterday's update. Think I need to edit VERSION again, push to
release/unstable, create a merge request to merge into master and then a new
pipeline to rebuild the web site. Everyone OK with that?
Apologies.
--
Phil Holmes
at. So we simply check the patch was pushed into the
claimed build. If it's clear that it was, we mark the status as Verified.
That was the original intention of verifying issues.
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: "Jonas Hahnfeld"
To: "Michael Käppler&quo
stable release
to add back the erroneously removed messages and give the translators a
chance to localize the other warnings and errors. Shall we short-track
the fix and the above MR?
Phil, would you be available to release 2.21.7 once merged?
Regards
Jonas
No problem. Let me know when to go.
--
Phil Holmes
nce (commits
to translation can of course continue).
Regards
Jonas
--
Phil Holmes
run a build on stable/2.22? I will
stop picking fixes into the branch to avoid any interference (commits
to translation can of course continue).
Regards
Jonas
--
Phil Holmes
I see your confusion. My eyes obviously need testing :-(
On 31/10/2020 13:31, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
Am Samstag, den 31.10.2020, 13:23 + schrieb Phil Holmes:
Looking at this now. I see that in the 2.22 branch VERSION numbers are stable
2.22.0 and devel will be 2.21.80. I've never r
2.22 looks good from what I can tell.
So, I think we're ready for a first release candidate.
Phil, if you have time, could you run a build on stable/2.22? I will
stop picking fixes into the branch to avoid any interference (commits
to translation can of course continue).
Regards
Jonas
--
Phil Holmes
Nuked the build directory and redid configur, etc., and all now looks good,
thanks.
On 31/10/2020 15:16, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
Am Samstag, den 31.10.2020, 15:08 + schrieb Phil Holmes:
Fails trying to do the PO make:
phil@ubuntu12:~/lilypond-git$ make -C $LILYPOND_BUILD_DIR po-replace
Slur.positions = #'(2.5 . 4.5)
a'8 \( ( a''16 ) a'' \)
%
% end ly snippet
%
}
On 31/10/2020 15:16, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
Am Samstag, den 31.10.2020, 15:08 + schrieb Phil
n progress
- is that correct?
On 31/10/2020 19:13, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
Am Samstag, den 31.10.2020, 17:55 +0100 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld:
Am Samstag, den 31.10.2020, 16:43 +0000 schrieb Phil Holmes:
GUB now almost completes, but fails making one of the German docs. It looks
like this is
On 01/11/2020 12:30, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 01.11.2020, 12:02 + schrieb Phil Holmes:
Thanks. Now uploaded.
Thanks to you for staying with us while we resolve such things!
We do need to get the latest/correct VERSION into master, as well as updating
the news details
.
--
Phil Holmes
.
Thanks in advance.
--
Phil Holmes
We released Lilypond 2.21.82 yesterday. This has a few bug fixes and
documentation updates from 2.21.81 and is the latest release candidate for
stable release 2.22.0. We encourage users and developers to download, use and
test it.
--
Phil Holmes
at all.
That's another hour or so of my life gone.
--
Phil Holmes
bsite: www.kierenmacmillan.info
‣ email: kie...@kierenmacmillan.info
--
Phil Holmes
ion/changes>Behind the scenes, this
release switches to Python 3 and includes a number of performance improvements that
should be noticeable for larger scores.
--
Phil Holmes
We are happy to announce the release of LilyPond 2.23.0. This is a development
version, but these are usually reliable. If you want to use the latest stable
version of LilyPond, we recommend using the 2.20.0 version.
--
Phil Holmes
Apologies. The current stable version is 2.22.0.
On 25/01/2021 08:26, Phil Holmes wrote:
We are happy to announce the release of LilyPond 2.23.0. This is a development
version, but these are usually reliable. If you want to use the latest stable
version of LilyPond, we recommend using the
We are happy to announce the release of LilyPond 2.23.1. This is a development
version, but these are usually reliable. If you want to use the latest stable
version of LilyPond, we recommend using the 2.20.0 version.
--
Phil Holmes
Correction. The current stable version is 2.22.0.
On 24/03/2021 09:07, Phil Holmes wrote:
We are happy to announce the release of LilyPond 2.23.1. This is a development
version, but these are usually reliable. If you want to use the latest stable
version of LilyPond, we recommend using the
We are happy to announce the release of LilyPond 2.23.2. This is termed a
development release, but these are usually reliable. If you want to use the
current stable version of LilyPond, we recommend using the 2.22.0 version.
--
Phil Holmes
We are proud to announce the release of GNU LilyPond 2.22.1.
This version includes improvements and fixes since the release of the previous
stable release 2.22.0, in January 2021.
--
Phil Holmes
We are happy to announce the release of LilyPond 2.23.3. This is termed a
development release, but these are usually reliable. If you want to use the
current stable version of LilyPond, we recommend using the 2.22.1 version.
--
Phil Holmes
On 22/11/2021 19:07, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
Le 22/11/2021 à 20:05, Jean Abou Samra a écrit :
Note that I don't intend to make it a public
lilypond-book option for users, simply because it
would require adding Pygments in the build process,
which may be complicated (I don't know) and is in
my opi
On 27/11/2021 17:30, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
Am Samstag, dem 27.11.2021 um 11:13 +0100 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld via
Discussions on LilyPond development:
Am Mittwoch, dem 24.11.2021 um 20:13 +0100 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld via
Discussions on LilyPond development:
I'd like to propose that we release 2.2
I'm trying to kick of a GUB build, but accessing my Ubuntu build machine
via a different route, because of problems I had earlier with my Windows
machine crashing. I'm using a Remote Desktop Connection from my Windows
machine. The user interface looks fairly different, but everything
seems to
On 28/11/2021 13:04, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
Am Sonntag, dem 28.11.2021 um 12:57 + schrieb Phil Holmes:
I'm trying to kick of a GUB build, but accessing my Ubuntu build machine
via a different route, because of problems I had earlier with my Windows
machine crashing. I'm usin
We are happy to announce the release of LilyPond 2.23.5. This is termed
a development release, but these are usually reliable. If you want to
use the current stable version of LilyPond, we recommend using the
2.22.1 version.
rfed: cd /home/gub/NewGub/gub/target/tools/build/ghostscript-9.21
&& make CC=cc CCAUX=cc C_INCLUDE_PATH= CFLAGS= CPPFLAGS= GCFLAGS=
LIBRARY_PATH= obj/aux/genconf obj/aux/echogs obj/aux/genarch obj/arch.h
Please advise.
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: "Masami
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Sent: Sunday, June 25, 2017 12:13 PM
Subject: Re: GUB Ghostscript 9.21
Phil Holmes:
...
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lfreetype
...
ld cannot find libfreetype.so
Do you have it installed ?
Try this:
$ locate libfreetype.so
...
/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu
make automatically only re-compiles files that depend on changed files. Do
you have a multi-core computer, and if so are you using the -jN option?
How long does it take to run make from scratch on your machine?
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Winston"
into the stable branch until the stable
branch gets released.
--
David Kastrup
No objections from me towards aiming for a 2.20 stable release.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- Original Message -
From: "Étienne Beaulé"
To:
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 2:51 AM
Subject: Issues write access
Hello. May I be granted write access on our issue tracker? My username is
ebe123. Thank you!
Could you tell us what you plan to contribute, please?
--
P
nfo on required
version numbers and the branch you want built from.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Done.
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: "Benkő Pál"
To: "James"
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2017 9:30 PM
Subject: Re: add some rarely used mensural clefs (issue 330120043
bybenko@gmail.com)
2017-09-05 22:17 GMT+02:00 Benkő Pál :
Please
you've used in the appendix. This is because mensural notes would not be
used in Gregorian music, so the appendix needs updating to use the same note
types as the existing table in the Gregorian clef section of the NR.
Hope this is useful and please shout if you want further information
l, should I add you?
Trevor
Might make sense. You'd have to give me a hint about what it involves,
though
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
1 - 100 of 2094 matches
Mail list logo
