verbosity of `make doc'

2012-04-07 Thread Werner LEMBERG
Folks, I really appreciate that `make doc' doesn't flood the console. However, right now I see a long line calling lilypond-book.py which sits there for already more than 15 minutes without any progress indicator at all. This is perhaps too extreme and suitable only to the supercomputers some

Re: verbosity of `make doc'

2012-04-07 Thread Graham Percival
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 08:56:15AM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote: Wouldn't it be possible, similar to automake, that the name of the currently processed file gets written to stdout, and that this behaviour is the default? In case the names are meaningless, a simple No, because what's taking

Re: verbosity of `make doc'

2012-04-07 Thread Werner LEMBERG
We're saving stdout and sterr to log files so we can keep the output. Any additional info that lilypond-book prints would just be saved to a file instead of screen. There are more streams available than stderr and stdout, so it would be actually possible to save stderr and stdout from

Re: verbosity of `make doc'

2012-04-07 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org Sent: Saturday, April 07, 2012 7:56 AM Subject: verbosity of `make doc' Folks, I really appreciate that `make doc' doesn't flood the console. However, right now I see a long line calling lilypond