Re: partcombine for more than two parts?

2003-06-19 Thread Jeremy
NP> Does anyone know if it's possible to combine more than two voices with NP> \partcombine (or something else :-)? I'd like to be able to print, say, a NP> single staff containing all four trumpet parts so I can easily see the NP> chord voicings, and also be able to print the individual par

partcombine for more than two parts?

2003-06-19 Thread Niki Pantelias
Hi everyone, Does anyone know if it's possible to combine more than two voices with \partcombine (or something else :-)? I'd like to be able to print, say, a single staff containing all four trumpet parts so I can easily see the chord voicings, and also be able to print the individual par

Re: Soon 1.8 release?

2003-06-19 Thread Graham Percival
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003 02:53:19 +0200 J <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As I understand that you have fast plans to release the next > stable version, Dr. Han-Wen & Mr. Nieuwenhuizen, I'm wondering > if I am allowed to do a round of complaining (all in good fun > of course) on the current state of things

Soon 1.8 release?

2003-06-19 Thread Jérémie Lumbroso
Hello, As I understand that you have fast plans to release the next stable version, Dr. Han-Wen & Mr. Nieuwenhuizen, I'm wondering if I am allowed to do a round of complaining (all in good fun of course) on the current state of things? Jérémie. ___

Re: riff notation

2003-06-19 Thread Graham Percival
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003 14:55:52 + Amelie Zapf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > riff = { here go the notes } That should be: riff = \notes{ here go the notes} > guitarVoice = \notes { \riff \riff \riff } Or, to have a complete example: riff= \notes{a8 a a a} \score { \notes{ \riff \riff }} Cheers,

Re: Augmented chord, was: Re: excessive chord

2003-06-19 Thread Amelie Zapf
Hi Jan, > If I write f.e. c:7.5+ I now get "C7+", but that was not ment; this chord > should be called "C7#5" as it was called before. Yeah, the 5th gets post-fixed. Sorry, I did not think of that. > Is it also possible to get the augmented chord as a "single chord", so that > the other one is n

Re: Augmented chord, was: Re: excessive chord

2003-06-19 Thread Jan Kohnert
Thank you for the correct word; so I finally know what to look for. So far your suggestion works Thank you once more :+)). I have still a small problem: If I write f.e. c:7.5+ I now get "C7+", but that was not ment; this chord should be called "C7#5" as it was called before. Is it also possible to

excessive chord

2003-06-19 Thread Jan Kohnert
One more question from me: How do I express a such called "excessive chord" (Hope I got the right translation; in C it would be < c e gis > ) The only thing I found, is to write c:5+, that is of course the right chord, but in the layout I would like to have "C+" (that is I think it's called in G

Re: riff notation

2003-06-19 Thread Amelie Zapf
Hi Jan, this is explained in detail in the Tutorial. Look there. Basically: riff = { here go the notes } guitarVoice = \notes { \riff \riff \riff } Alternative: \repeat "unfold" 200 { here go the notes } within the voice. If you have a one or two bar riff, \repeat "percent" 200 { here go the

riff notation

2003-06-19 Thread Jan Kohnert
I'd like to write a piece and there I have a "guitar riff" f.e.: < a4 e' a' c'' e'' a'' > \times 2/3 { < a16 e' a' c'' e'' a'' > ~ < a e' a' c'' e'' a'' > r r r r r r < gis gis' c'' e'' gis'' > r r r < gis gis' c'' e'' gis'' > ~ < gis gis' c'' e'' gis'' > < gis gis' c'' e'' gis'' > r r r } and

more with hebrew

2003-06-19 Thread Aaron
Hi all I am now trying to get it to work where would I put this in the lilypond doc?? Inside the lyrics? at the beginning of the doc? where?? \usepackage[english,hebrew]{babel} Do I quote each piece of text? Must I declare the font??? and how?? Thanks Aaron __

Re: Design suggestion -- was: Re: more stupid questions

2003-06-19 Thread Tobias Schlemmer
Am Die, 17. Jun 2003 11:47:31 +0200, schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys: > \once \property Lyrics.LyricText \set #'X-extent = #(cons A B) > "\\someWierdText" > > where A B are the dimensions of the object, and might be computed > through a latex run. Am Don, 19. Jun 2003 02:05:22 +0300, schrieb Aaron: