Hi Nick,
IIRC #-6 is the default for fingering numbers. Have you tried e.g. #-
8?
Works here!
Thomas
P.S.:
OT: Shouldn't this dance be notated in 2/2 (Alla breve)? It is quite
slow in your version.
:-)
___
lilypond-user mailing list
2008/11/10 Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I forgot about that. Look at my second email in that thread.
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2008-10/msg00681.html
Thanks for the pointer. After a couple hours' tweaking I came up with
these. I ruthlessly exploited your
Risto, Graham
These functions will work fine for any time signature
and beam duration for which there are no beam-ending
rules defined in scm/auto-beam.scm. But if beam-ending
rules exist they take priority over beatGrouping. This
is why you find 12/8 grouping is messed up, Risto.
(Although a
See this thread in the archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/lilypond-user@gnu.org/msg22584.html
The default for fingerings is not 0 but -5 (at least it was in 2006 when
that thread came up). If you change it to -8, for example, you'll see a
difference.
Jon
Nick Payne wrote:
I have been
I have just general questions bout building the documentation,
texi2html or otherwise. I've been successfully building lilypond for a
while for OSX 10.5, but I've never been able to build the
documentation. It isn't a really big deal for me, I just disable the
documentation in my configure
Nick
The default font-size for Fingering is -5 (see the IR), so 0
will be almost twice as large, as you have found. To reduce
it, try -7 or -8. (You'd hardly notice the difference at -6.)
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: Nick Payne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent:
I have been trying to slightly reduce the font size for guitar fingering, as
the default size of number touch when adjacent notes in a chord have
fingering, as in the attached file.
However, I can't get the numbers any smaller than the default. If I use
\override Fingering #'font-size = #0
Then
As an experiment, I wanted to create a simple troff document that
would include the EPS output from lilypond. [...]
I use the following command to make the test.eps file:
lilypond -dbackend=eps \
-dno-gs-load-fonts \
-dinclude-eps-fonts
Thanks, you're right. For some reason, I had the idea that I was limited to
using values between 6 and -6. Going back and reading the doc again there's
no mention of that, so I don't know why or where I get it from.
As for 2/2, the couple of publications I've seen it in have notated it as
4/4,
On Nov 10, 2008, at 10:04 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
As an experiment, I wanted to create a simple troff document that
would include the EPS output from lilypond. [...]
I use the following command to make the test.eps file:
lilypond -dbackend=eps \
-dno-gs-load-fonts \
On Nov 10, 2008, at 10:31 AM, Kim Shrier wrote:
On Nov 10, 2008, at 10:04 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
As an experiment, I wanted to create a simple troff document that
would include the EPS output from lilypond. [...]
I use the following command to make the test.eps file:
lilypond
Thanks! With the FretBoards context, I was able to get everything I wanted.
-Glen
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 3:02 PM, Carl D. Sorensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/9/08 1:37 PM, Glen Hein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Glen,
You should get the current development version of LilyPond (2.11.6x).
Well, I've found that if I reverse the order in which the pitches appear in
the chord, the problem is solved. i.e. in bar 6 of the treble voice in my
score, if I have
a-3 cs-4 e
then the fingering indication for A is obscured by the c-sharp accidental,
whereas if I have
e cs-4 a-3
then there
I don't know if this made it before (I don't see it in the archive)
I have the following piece in 12/8:
hh8 r8 hh8 hh8 r8 hh8 hh8 r8 hh8 hh8 r8 hh8
In drum notation this is traditionally grouped with bars as this:
____
| | | | | | | |
x r
OK, I'm replying to myself...
I was able to make it work, by putting the beams in manually:
hh8[ r hh] hh[ r hh] hh[ r hh] hh[ r hh]
Is there any way to make beams like this automatically?
Roberto Leibman
Roberto Leibman wrote:
I don't know if this made it before (I don't see it in the
Hi,
I'm finally trying lilypond-book (on Windows XP),
coming up against some frustrations. For some reason,
the documentation has left me confused, but I
think I'm figuring stuff out anyway. Problem is, I
currently have both LilyPond 2.10.33 AND LilyPond
2.11.63 on my system, and when I run
Mark
Have you tried temporarily renaming the LilyPond 2.10.33 directory in
Program Files?
I have several versions of LilyPond installed on Windows Vista (and I used
to have several on XP before). I select which one I want to use by
renaming - only one is called LilyPond at any one time of
Roberto,
Sadly,
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.11/Documentation/user/lilypond/Beams#Manual-beams
says: The autobeamer will not put beams
over rests...
However, you can funnel two different
music
expressions into one context, explained here:
Roberto Leibman wrote Tuesday, November 11, 2008 1:19 AM
OK, I'm replying to myself...
I was able to make it work, by putting the beams in manually:
hh8[ r hh] hh[ r hh] hh[ r hh] hh[ r hh]
Is there any way to make beams like this automatically?
Afraid not, AFAIK. As you have found,
Trevor Daniels wrote:
Have you tried temporarily renaming the LilyPond
2.10.33 directory in
Program Files?
I already had my directories set up that way.
my 2.11.63 has always been: C:\Program Files\LilyPond
my 2.10.33 has always been: C:\Program Files\LilyPond_2_10_33
I thought that would
This accidental/fingering collision appears to be a bug, so I'm copying to
the bug list. I can't find a similar bug in the bug DB.
The collision occurs only when the chord is the first chord/note in the bar,
and the fingered note precedes the sharpened note in that chord. Here's a
short
21 matches
Mail list logo
