On 13 Sep 2011, at 00:19, Nick Payne wrote:
On 13/09/11 04:55, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
Am Montag, 12. September 2011, 19:21:02 schrieb Helge Kruse:
But when I try to
send the PDF to my printer I get the messages
Das Dokument konnte nicht gedruckt werden.
(The document could be
If nothing else works, there is this (for command-line buffs possibly
dissatisfactory) option of online conversion at, e.g.,
http://docupub.com/pdfconvert/
This worked for me, anyway.
Nice work, Reinhold, and thanks for sharing!
On Tuesday, September 13, 2011 10:34 AM, Damian leGassick
is there an easily way to do this ?
(see attached picture http://old.nabble.com/file/p32456219/test2.png
test2.png )
maybe i'm blind, but i could only find a solution with a supplemental
context.
thanks
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
Hi Eluze,
is there an easily way to do this ?
maybe i'm blind, but i could only find a solution with a supplemental context.
I'm not sure what you mean by supplemental context… but why not just two
\score blocks with different spacing settings?
Cheers,
Kieren.
Great work.
Thank you!
When you have the time, fill in the second side of the page. we need to
save trees O:-)
Thank you
alberto
On 12/09/2011 10:56, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
Dear all,
Sometimes it can be very useful -- in particular for new and not so
experienced users -- to have the
Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Eluze,
is there an easily way to do this ?
maybe i'm blind, but i could only find a solution with a supplemental
context.
I'm not sure what you mean by supplemental context… but why not just two
\score blocks with different spacing settings?
hi Kieren
Any idea? Thank's!
\version 2.15.10
csr = \change Staff = right
csl = \change Staff = left
sn=\stemNeutral
su=\stemUp
sd=\stemDown
tn=\tieNeutral
suon = \sustainOn
suof = \sustainOff
tempoMark = {
\once \override Score.RehearsalMark #'self-alignment-X = #LEFT
\once \override
There's too much music here to work out your problem. Could you a) say what
you believe is wrong, and b) cut the music down to a tiny example showing your
problem.
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: Mario Moles
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 13,
On 13 September 2011 17:07, Mario Moles mario-mo...@libero.it wrote:
Any idea? Thank's!
[code]
That's because you use the \\ construct, which implicitly
creates voices 1 and 2 in *both* staves.
Please use explicitly instantiated voices instead and it should work
fine. See the modified
I'd really like to know if my trusty PowerBook G4, running OS 10.5.8, is now
fated to only run earlier versions of Lilypond. 2.15.11 won't run; 2.15.8 does.
This is a second post as a copy of the original never arrived in my mailbox.
Stan
___
On 13 September 2011 18:05, Stan Sanderson stans...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd really like to know if my trusty PowerBook G4, running OS 10.5.8,
is now fated to only run earlier versions of Lilypond. 2.15.11 won't
run; 2.15.8 does.
This is a second post as a copy of the original never arrived in
Thanks. I will recheck the list setting.
Looks like Bugreports will see this twice!
Stan
On Sep 13, 2011, at 11:21 AM, Xavier Scheuer x.sche...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 September 2011 18:05, Stan Sanderson stans...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd really like to know if my trusty PowerBook G4, running
Thanks. I'm a newcomer to command-line. I've tried emacs and other editors,
but LyX is closer to the way I'm used to doing things. I may end up doing
just what you recommend, but for the moment I'd just like to know what a
lilypond book latex package IS and how to get it. I'm lost.
Ben Luo-3
I have v2.0.0. From what you've said in response to my query, I gather that
v2.0.1 already has a lilypond-book latex package. If that's not so, do you
know where I can find it? Thanks!
Nick Payne-3 wrote:
On 13/09/11 09:02, Pablo Zumarán wrote:
I need some basic help will lilypond-latex
In data martedì 13 settembre 2011 17:14:37, hai scritto:
There's too much music here to work out your problem. Could you a) say
what you believe is wrong, and b) cut the music down to a tiny example
showing your problem.
--
Phil Holmes
Right! I'm sorry!
In the bar 2, leftOne: 2° g is not
In data martedì 13 settembre 2011 17:24:49, hai scritto:
On 13 September 2011 17:07, Mario Moles mario-mo...@libero.it wrote:
Any idea? Thank's!
[code]
Ok! Great! Thank you!
That's because you use the \\ construct, which implicitly
creates voices 1 and 2 in *both* staves.
Please
When I experimented with this, it seemed that LyX required a
sufficiently recent minimum version of Lilypond. If the version of
Ubuntu you're using has an outdated version of Lilypond, LyX won't use
it.
Make sure you have lilypond version 2.14.x or greater as well as Lyx 2.0.x.
--Josiah
-Eluze wrote:
Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Eluze,
is there an easily way to do this ?
maybe i'm blind, but i could only find a solution with a supplemental
context.
I'm not sure what you mean by supplemental context… but why not just
two \score blocks with different spacing
Hello,
tiny example:
\relative c' f2. \\ c2. { c2 g4 }
question: the c2 is noted without a stem, it does however touch the stem of the
c2. note. Is this mirror-image ok notationwise? I am asking because an older
music sheet shows a situation similar to c2. and c2 as separate notes.
Hi Eluze,
is there an easier way?
Here's a hacky way:
\version 2.14.0
\language english
theNotes = \relative c' {
\repeat unfold 20 { c4 d e f }
}
\score {
\new Staff \theNotes
}
\score {
\new Staff \theNotes
\layout {
\context {
\Score
\override Clef #'Y-extent =
Hi,
2011/9/13 Klaus Föhl klaus.fo...@uni-giessen.de:
Hello,
tiny example:
\relative c' f2. \\ c2. { c2 g4 }
question: the c2 is noted without a stem, it does however touch the stem of
the
c2. note. Is this mirror-image ok notationwise?
I think it's not good. In particular the dots
On 13/09/2011 7:43 PM, Josiah Boothby wrote:
When I experimented with this, it seemed that LyX required a
sufficiently recent minimum version of Lilypond. If the version of
Ubuntu you're using has an outdated version of Lilypond, LyX won't use
it.
Make sure you have lilypond version 2.14.x or
Thank you! I've got it running now!
There's only a little snag, though. Some times, the preview doesn't work; it
just shows the code in the default document font (not the code font).
However, all I have to do is select ToolsReconfigure again and restart.
It's not much bother, and I wouldn't have
On 13/09/2011 10:38 PM, Pablo Zumarán wrote:
Thank you! I've got it running now!
There's only a little snag, though. Some times, the preview doesn't work; it
just shows the code in the default document font (not the code font).
However, all I have to do is select ToolsReconfigure again and
Hello,
\new Staff
\new Voice { \voiceOne f'2. }
\new Voice { \voiceTwo c'2. }
\new Voice { \voiceFour c'2 ( g4 ) }
One needs both \new Voice and \voiceFour to make it work.
\relative c' f2. \\ c2. \new Voice { \voiceFour c2( g4) }
In reality the music is longer, hence I only
Hi,
I'm using horizontal brackets in some sketches I'm doing right now. (And the
fact that the brackets nest is proving very useful indeed.)
A simplified example looks like this:
%%% BEGIN %%%
\version 2.15.11
\layout { ragged-right = ##t }
\new Voice \with {
\consists
2011/9/13 Klaus Föhl klaus.fo...@uni-giessen.de:
I'd also consider writing this in the following manner:
\new Staff
\new Voice { \voiceOne f'2. }
\new Voice { \voiceFour c'2~ ( c' g4 ) }
Which is the alternative I did not want to use, or similar in notation
\relative c' f2. \\ {
I have a score that I last worked on with 2.13.58, when it built without
error. Without having made any changes to the ly source, I just ran it
through 2.15.11 convert-ly, which didn't report any errors, and then
built it with 2.15.11. The PDF output looks fine, but the console log
contains a
2011/9/13 Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net:
I have a score that I last worked on with 2.13.58, when it built without
error. Without having made any changes to the ly source, I just ran it
through 2.15.11 convert-ly, which didn't report any errors, and then built
it with 2.15.11. The PDF
On 14/09/11 02:39, Pablo Zumarán wrote:
I have v2.0.0. From what you've said in response to my query, I gather that
v2.0.1 already has a lilypond-book latex package. If that's not so, do you
know where I can find it? Thanks!
Nick Payne-3 wrote:
On 13/09/11 09:02, Pablo Zumarán wrote:
I need
On 14/09/11 07:55, Janek Warchoł wrote:
2011/9/13 Nick Paynenick.pa...@internode.on.net:
I have a score that I last worked on with 2.13.58, when it built without
error. Without having made any changes to the ly source, I just ran it
through 2.15.11 convert-ly, which didn't report any errors,
Nick Payne wrote Tuesday, September 13, 2011 11:25 PM
The problem is that the score is quite large, and the log gives no
indication at all about where the error is coming from. I guess I
can try commenting out different sections to see if I can isolate
where the error is happening.
Nick, if
Trevor Bača-2 wrote:
Hi,
I'm using horizontal brackets in some sketches I'm doing right now. (And
the
fact that the brackets nest is proving very useful indeed.)
A simplified example looks like this:
%%% BEGIN %%%
\version 2.15.11
\layout { ragged-right = ##t }
\new Voice
On 6 September 2011 11:25, Hilary Snaden h...@newearth.demon.co.uk wrote:
Can anyone confirm that the alignment of dynamics attached to skips has been
fixed in 2.15.9?
The alignment of DynamicTextSpanner and Hairpin have been fixed with
#620, but not the alignment of DynamicText (aka dynamics,
On 14/09/11 08:34, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Nick Payne wrote Tuesday, September 13, 2011 11:25 PM
The problem is that the score is quite large, and the log gives no
indication at all about where the error is coming from. I guess I can
try commenting out different sections to see if I can isolate
On 11-09-13 09:29 PM, Nick Payne wrote:
Ok, the following small example reproduces the error on my system with
2.15.11:
%==
\version 2.15.11
\language english
fingering = {
\set fingeringOrientations = #'(left)
\set strokeFingerOrientations =
On 11-09-13 10:29 AM, Stan Sanderson wrote:
Thanks. I will recheck the list setting.
Looks like Bugreports will see this twice!
Stan
On Sep 13, 2011, at 11:21 AM, Xavier Scheuerx.sche...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 September 2011 18:05, Stan Sandersonstans...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd really like
37 matches
Mail list logo
