Re: Experimental Web-based Lilypond Editor

2012-02-03 Thread Markus W. Kropp
works on my debian-squeeze with iceweasel 3.5.16 (with a very short testing time). very nice tool!!! Am Wed, 1 Feb 2012 11:06:06 +0100 schrieb Nils l...@nilsgey.de: Very good! I think this will benefit many people. I always wanted to quickly share some notes with other people. Like

Re: Using other NoteHeads with \harmonicByFret?

2012-02-03 Thread Thomas Morley
Hi Peter, 2012/2/3 Peter Crighton petecrigh...@googlemail.com: Thanks, that fixed the issue with the accidentals, but it's now harmonic again and not harmonic-mixed… the \override NoteHead line seems to just be ignored. (I also don't see how overriding after-line-breaking should alter the

polychords: a working solution

2012-02-03 Thread Jean-Alexis Montignies
Hi, For those interested, I've came to a satisfactory solution for me to display polychords. Here's a working code, though to be complete, it would require adding all the possibilities in the exceptions. I'll add the specific chords as I'll need them. As you can see you have to set two

Re: Using other NoteHeads with \harmonicByFret?

2012-02-03 Thread Marc Hohl
Am 03.02.2012 10:13, schrieb Thomas Morley: Hi Peter, 2012/2/3 Peter Crightonpetecrigh...@googlemail.com: Thanks, that fixed the issue with the accidentals, but it's now harmonic again and not harmonic-mixed… the \override NoteHead line seems to just be ignored. (I also don't see how

Roadblock MacOSX 10.4 for release of LilyPond 2.16

2012-02-03 Thread David Kastrup
Hi, in the list of critical issues the recent issue 2271 URL:http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2271 is the only one I see without an obvious path forward. One serious option is ending the support for MacOSX 10.4. If you are a user that would be affected by such a step, or a

Re: Roadblock MacOSX 10.4 for release of LilyPond 2.16

2012-02-03 Thread Jean-Alexis Montignies
Hi, It looks from the trace that it's the UI that's not working. May be the command line tool is still working, and may be the command line tool built from Fink (a package manager on MacOS) is working as well. (MacPorts requires MacOS 10.6). So there might be workarounds. My opinion is that

Re: Experimental Web-based Lilypond Editor

2012-02-03 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi all, This is a pretty amazing prototype! Congratulations and thanks to all involved. Has anyone tested this on an iPad or other tablet? Just curious. Cheers, Kieren. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: Experimental Web-based Lilypond Editor

2012-02-03 Thread Christ van Willegen
On Feb 3, 2012 2:29 PM, Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote: Has anyone tested this on an iPad or other tablet? Just curious. Works on my Adam w/ Adamcomb rom. Christ van Willegen ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: Experimental Web-based Lilypond Editor

2012-02-03 Thread Robert Schmaus
It works on an iPhone, so I guess it also will on an iPad. On an iPhone it's no fun using it, really. And a problem is that I don't see a way (yet) how to save the source file (except by copy-pasting into a mail body) or download the pdf - that could be the same issue on an iPad, given Apple's iOS

Re: Experimental Web-based Lilypond Editor

2012-02-03 Thread -Eluze
-Eluze wrote: does not work with opera 11.61 on windows(7), though Eluze now it seems to work on Opera but a bit buggish: code starts only at col ~80, after inserting a newline line numbers moved to the right (see attached file). would be nice if these little things could be fixed

Re: Experimental Web-based Lilypond Editor

2012-02-03 Thread Stan Sanderson
On Feb 3, 2012, at 7:28 AM, Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote: Hi all, This is a pretty amazing prototype! Congratulations and thanks to all involved. Has anyone tested this on an iPad or other tablet? Just curious. Cheers, Kieren.

Re: Roadblock MacOSX 10.4 for release of LilyPond 2.16

2012-02-03 Thread Klaus Föhl
Hello, Working (also) with a MacMini Intel Core Duo under 10.4.x and would like to be able to use 2.16 as well. If it were a question of UI, would be quite happy to use the tool unix-style from the terminal. Best regards Klaus P.S. would it help if I test MacOS X x86: LilyPond 2.15.27-1

Re: Roadblock MacOSX 10.4 for release of LilyPond 2.16

2012-02-03 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: Klaus Föhl klaus.fo...@uni-giessen.de To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 3:10 PM Subject: Re: Roadblock MacOSX 10.4 for release of LilyPond 2.16 Hello, Working (also) with a MacMini Intel Core Duo under 10.4.x and would like to be

Re: Roadblock MacOSX 10.4 for release of LilyPond 2.16

2012-02-03 Thread David Kastrup
Klaus Föhl klaus.fo...@uni-giessen.de writes: Hello, Working (also) with a MacMini Intel Core Duo under 10.4.x and would like to be able to use 2.16 as well. If it were a question of UI, would be quite happy to use the tool unix-style from the terminal. Best regards Klaus P.S. would it

Re: Roadblock MacOSX 10.4 for release of LilyPond 2.16

2012-02-03 Thread Tim McNamara
On Feb 3, 2012, at 4:56 AM, David Kastrup wrote: Hi, in the list of critical issues the recent issue 2271 URL:http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2271 is the only one I see without an obvious path forward. One serious option is ending the support for MacOSX 10.4. If

Tremolos between two whole notes

2012-02-03 Thread Brent Annable
Hello everyone, I have a question, and perhaps a suggestion. I just typeset the following tremolo between two whole notes: \score { \relative c'' { \repeat tremolo 16 { gis32 b } } } and was quite disappointed by the fact that Lilypond places the tremolo beams horizontally and above the

Re: Roadblock MacOSX 10.4 for release of LilyPond 2.16

2012-02-03 Thread David Kastrup
Tim McNamara tim...@bitstream.net writes: Eventually legacy system support gets broken in every project. PPC-based Mac users (of which I am one, we have three PPC based Macs that continue to run fine) mostly can update to 10.5. How expensive is that step? If the sum is nontrivial, I'd rather

Re: Roadblock MacOSX 10.4 for release of LilyPond 2.16

2012-02-03 Thread James Worlton
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 10:05 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: Tim McNamara tim...@bitstream.net writes: Eventually legacy system support gets broken in every project. PPC-based Mac users (of which I am one, we have three PPC based Macs that continue to run fine) mostly can update to

Re: Roadblock MacOSX 10.4 for release of LilyPond 2.16

2012-02-03 Thread David Kastrup
James Worlton jworl...@gmail.com writes: On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 10:05 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: Tim McNamara tim...@bitstream.net writes: Eventually legacy system support gets broken in every project. PPC-based Mac users (of which I am one, we have three PPC based Macs that

Re: Experimental Web-based Lilypond Editor

2012-02-03 Thread Neil Thornock
Way-hay awesome. Firefox 4, works great... On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Stan Sanderson stans...@gmail.com wrote: On Feb 3, 2012, at 7:28 AM, Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote: Hi all, This is a pretty amazing prototype! Congratulations and thanks to all involved.

Re: Roadblock MacOSX 10.4 for release of LilyPond 2.16

2012-02-03 Thread Hans Aberg
On 3 Feb 2012, at 17:30, James Worlton wrote: Quick search shows 10.5 for between $200-300. Definite ouch, especially for a dead-end OS, IMO. Since it seems to have been discontinued, there is no way to ensure that was is sold is legal. As for 10.7, one can create an install DVD - just net

Re: Roadblock MacOSX 10.4 for release of LilyPond 2.16

2012-02-03 Thread James Worlton
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Hans Aberg haber...@telia.com wrote: On 3 Feb 2012, at 17:30, James Worlton wrote: Quick search shows 10.5 for between $200-300. Definite ouch, especially for a dead-end OS, IMO. Since it seems to have been discontinued, there is no way to ensure that was

Re: Experimental Web-based Lilypond Editor

2012-02-03 Thread GRAEME F ST CLAIR
Odd result here - I use a browser-based e-mail system (for the moment), and clicking on Stan's link produces a new tab in IE 9.0.4, but with no content. Cutting pasting the link into a separate Chrome works fine. Also when accessing the e-mail system via Chrome, clicking on the link works

Re: Roadblock MacOSX 10.4 for release of LilyPond 2.16

2012-02-03 Thread James
Hello, On 3 February 2012 18:54, James Worlton jworl...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Hans Aberg haber...@telia.com wrote: On 3 Feb 2012, at 17:30, James Worlton wrote: Quick search shows 10.5 for between $200-300. Definite ouch, especially for a dead-end OS, IMO. Since

Re: Experimental Web-based Lilypond Editor

2012-02-03 Thread James
On 3 February 2012 19:01, GRAEME F ST CLAIR graeme_st_cl...@atlanticbb.net wrote: Odd result here - I use a browser-based e-mail system (for the moment), and clicking on Stan's link produces a new tab in IE 9.0.4, but with no content.  Cutting pasting the link into a separate Chrome works

Re: wish: more midi-functionality

2012-02-03 Thread James
Hello, On 2 February 2012 14:37, Markus W. Kropp kr...@koelnklassik.de wrote: dear composers and programmers, i need more functions for midi with lilypond. i know - lilypond is NOT a sequencer, but i try to tell you, what i want (and i read this wish in a forum, too) i work often with

Re: Tie at end of first repeat

2012-02-03 Thread James
Hello, On 2 February 2012 23:27, Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi Carl, 2012/2/3 Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu: On 2/2/12 11:54 AM, Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi Brent, 2012/2/2 Brent Annable brentanna...@gmail.com: Perhaps this is

Re: Roadblock MacOSX 10.4 for release of LilyPond 2.16

2012-02-03 Thread Hans Aberg
On 3 Feb 2012, at 20:26, James wrote: Quick search shows 10.5 for between $200-300. Definite ouch, especially for a dead-end OS, IMO. Since it seems to have been discontinued, there is no way to ensure that was is sold is legal. As for 10.7, one can create an install DVD - just net

Re: Roadblock MacOSX 10.4 for release of LilyPond 2.16

2012-02-03 Thread James
Hello, On 3 February 2012 19:52, Hans Aberg haber...@telia.com wrote: On 3 Feb 2012, at 20:26, James wrote: Quick search shows 10.5 for between $200-300. Definite ouch, especially for a dead-end OS, IMO. Since it seems to have been discontinued, there is no way to ensure that was is sold

Re: polychords: a working solution

2012-02-03 Thread James
Hello, On 3 February 2012 09:27, Jean-Alexis Montignies j...@montignies.info wrote: Hi, For those interested, I've came to a satisfactory solution for me to display polychords. Here's a working code, though to be complete, it would require adding all the possibilities in the exceptions.

Re: polychords: a working solution

2012-02-03 Thread Tim McNamara
On Feb 3, 2012, at 2:07 PM, James wrote: Attached is the output Those look good! Nice job to the OP! But for that last chord with all the add stuff- is that the default output? Yuck. The repetitive use of the word add should not happen, although I have no clue how to fix it

Re: Unable to find file ice-9/boot-9.scm in load path

2012-02-03 Thread Marek Klein
Hello, 2012/2/3 Helge Kruse helge.kruse-nos...@gmx.net So the bug is: GUILE_LOAD_PATH is appended to the home directory of the non-adminstrative user instead of either append it to the directory where guile.exe is started or using it as an absolute path. I have submitted it as

Re: Experimental Web-based Lilypond Editor

2012-02-03 Thread Hans Aikema
On 3-2-2012 20:01, GRAEME F ST CLAIR wrote: Odd result here - I use a browser-based e-mail system (for the moment), and clicking on Stan's link produces a new tab in IE 9.0.4, but with no content. Cutting pasting the link into a separate Chrome works fine. Also when accessing the e-mail

Re: Experimental Web-based Lilypond Editor

2012-02-03 Thread GRAEME F ST CLAIR
Actually, I think the truly surprising thing is that it works so well in almost all contexts that have been reported so far! Much kudos to Trevor. Rgds, GFStC. On Fri, 3 Feb 2012 19:28:16 + James pkx1...@gmail.com wrote: On 3 February 2012 19:01, GRAEME F ST CLAIR

Re: Experimental Web-based Lilypond Editor

2012-02-03 Thread padovani
really great! It would be nice to be able to edit multiple files in a directory, so that it would be possible to work on more complex examples (that would require \include). congratulations! Em 2/3/12 3:10 AM, trevordixon escreveu: Now allows for compiling with either the latest stable

Re: polychords: a working solution

2012-02-03 Thread Janek Warchoł
2012/2/3 Tim McNamara tim...@bitstream.net: On Feb 3, 2012, at 2:07 PM, James wrote: Attached is the output Those look good!  Nice job to the OP! +1! ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: Experimental Web-based Lilypond Editor

2012-02-03 Thread Jonathan Kulp
Completely Awesome! I'm going to show this to my students. They'll find this much easier than trying to deal with a separate editor, opening pdf reader, etc. Thanks for sharing! Jon On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 4:08 PM, padovani zepadovani.li...@gmail.com wrote: really great! It would be nice to be

Re: Tremolos between two whole notes

2012-02-03 Thread Xavier Scheuer
On 3 February 2012 17:00, Brent Annable brentanna...@gmail.com wrote: Hello everyone, I have a question, and perhaps a suggestion. I just typeset the following tremolo between two whole notes: \score { \relative c'' { \repeat tremolo 16 { gis32 b } } } and was quite disappointed by

Re: Tremolos between two whole notes

2012-02-03 Thread Brent Annable
Xavier, Ok thanks for the reply. Sorry if I'm talking about things already under discussion; I do my best, but still find it very difficult to sift through all the old stuff online to see if these issues are known or not. I've put the issues link in my bookmarks and I'll look there first from now

Re: Tremolos between two whole notes

2012-02-03 Thread Janek Warchoł
2012/2/4 Xavier Scheuer x.sche...@gmail.com: Maybe the last time this was discussed was in a thread with Janek and his new tremolo styles? I don't recall discussions about whole note tremolo related to the tremolo style i was working on. As for the said tremolo style, i'd like to finish that

Re: Experimental Web-based Lilypond Editor

2012-02-03 Thread Hayden Muhl
What did you use to write this? GWT? On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Jonathan Kulp jonlancek...@gmail.comwrote: Completely Awesome! I'm going to show this to my students. They'll find this much easier than trying to deal with a separate editor, opening pdf reader, etc. Thanks for sharing!

Re: Tie at end of first repeat

2012-02-03 Thread Thomas Morley
Hi James, What Carl meant (I think) is that we link the snippet directly in the manual so it appears for instance like this: http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/notation/short-repeats#percent-repeats scroll down to the snippets... Adding a snippet automatically takes the

Re: Using other NoteHeads with \harmonicByFret?

2012-02-03 Thread Thomas Morley
Hi Marc, 2012/2/3 Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de: [...] BTW, should harmonic-mixed be the default for guitar notation? What do you think? Regards, Marc IMHO harmonic-mixed and \set harmonicDots = ##t should be the default! But I remember at least three different ways notating harmonics for

Re: polychords: a working solution

2012-02-03 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 2/3/12 1:43 PM, Tim McNamara tim...@bitstream.net wrote: On Feb 3, 2012, at 2:07 PM, James wrote: Attached is the output Those look good! Nice job to the OP! But for that last chord with all the add stuff- is that the default output? Yuck. The repetitive use of the word add

Re: Using other NoteHeads with \harmonicByFret?

2012-02-03 Thread Nick Payne
On 04/02/12 12:03, Thomas Morley wrote: Hi Marc, 2012/2/3 Marc Hohlm...@hohlart.de: [...] BTW, should harmonic-mixed be the default for guitar notation? What do you think? Regards, Marc IMHO harmonic-mixed and \set harmonicDots = ##t should be the default! But I remember at least three

Re: polychords: a working solution

2012-02-03 Thread Tim McNamara
On Feb 3, 2012, at 7:16 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote: On 2/3/12 1:43 PM, Tim McNamara tim...@bitstream.net wrote: On Feb 3, 2012, at 2:07 PM, James wrote: Attached is the output Those look good! Nice job to the OP! But for that last chord with all the add stuff- is that the

Re: Experimental Web-based Lilypond Editor

2012-02-03 Thread trevordixon
100% javascript. Node.js, jQuery, CodeMirror, MongoDB. Hayden Muhl wrote: What did you use to write this? GWT? On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Jonathan Kulp jonlancek...@gmail.comwrote: Completely Awesome! I'm going to show this to my students. They'll find this much easier than

Re: wish: more midi-functionality

2012-02-03 Thread Keith OHara
Markus W. Kropp kropp at koelnklassik.de writes: on midi-channel 12 there is the violin. in the linuxsampler is loaded the sound for violin-sustain. this is ok for the first 4 measures. but then, i need staccato-violins. and later some other articulations of the violins. Probably you know

Re: Experimental Web-based Lilypond Editor

2012-02-03 Thread James
Hello ? On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Jonathan Kulp jonlancek...@gmail.comwrote: Completely Awesome! I'm going to show this to my students. They'll find this much easier than trying to deal with a separate editor, opening pdf reader, etc. Thanks for sharing! Frescobaldi? James

Burden and Volta with Coventry Carol

2012-02-03 Thread dadadharma @dslextreme.com
Hi Folks, I'm getting Christmas carols ready for December 2012. In this case, the Coventry Carol. I don't know how to arrange for 2 blocks of lyrics: a burden (a front-loaded chorus), followed by three stanzas. I explain my problem here, with .ly and .pdf files.