James Harkins-2 wrote:
Actually, this doesn't help in 2.14.2 -- same result with this:
I had tested with 2.15.36 where it seems ok.
now I run 2.14.2 and it looks queer from beginning (the dynamics are to far
off below the staff).
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
Hi,
I started using version 2.13.56 and I realized that this bug seems fixed:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1459
As hideNotes/unHideNotes work fine in TabStaff now, I'm thinking that it
would be nice to add a TabNoteHead override/revert in their definitions
in
Hi LilyPonders,
unfortunately I'm not able to create a minimal example which reproduces
the problem. Find attached a simplified version of my file.
The problem is in bar 20.
If you comment the line starting with \hideNotes, then the repeat bar is
printed once instead of twice.
This is a
Federico,
On 14 April 2012 10:57, Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I started using version 2.13.56 and I realized that this bug seems fixed:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1459
As hideNotes/unHideNotes work fine in TabStaff now, I'm thinking that it
would be
Hello,
On 14 April 2012 12:13, Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi LilyPonders,
unfortunately I'm not able to create a minimal example which reproduces the
problem. Find attached a simplified version of my file.
So are you _really_ saying if you remove a *single* line from your
Il 14/04/2012 13:26, James ha scritto:
So are you_really_ saying if you remove a*single* line from your
\global settings the problem goes away? For instance if were to remove
the \key d \major line or the \time 4/4 line the problem 'goes away'?
Not any single line, but line 91 of the file I
At 13:36 on 14 Apr 2012, Federico Bruni wrote:
Il 14/04/2012 13:26, James ha scritto:
So are you_really_ saying if you remove a*single* line from your
\global settings the problem goes away? For instance if were to
remove the \key d \major line or the \time 4/4 line the problem
'goes away'?
Il 14/04/2012 14:17, Mark Knoop ha scritto:
See Known issues and warnings here:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond/Special-rhythmic-concerns#Grace-notes
Thanks Mark!
I added \grace { s8 } to the other voice and now the output is correct.
Am 14.04.2012 11:57, schrieb Federico Bruni:
Hi,
I started using version 2.13.56 and I realized that this bug seems fixed:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1459
As hideNotes/unHideNotes work fine in TabStaff now, I'm thinking that
it would be nice to add a TabNoteHead
From: -Eluze
Subject: Re: Re:Dynamic context that can follow system breaks?
I had tested with 2.15.36 where it seems ok.
now I run 2.14.2 and it looks queer from beginning (the dynamics are to far
off below the staff).
Yes, that's exactly the problem I saw.
But... Oh, wow, the dynamics
Hello,
On 14 April 2012 15:47, Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de wrote:
Am 14.04.2012 11:57, schrieb Federico Bruni:
Hi,
I started using version 2.13.56 and I realized that this bug seems fixed:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1459
I'll verify that if no one else has. I am
How do I make (just) the rehearsal marks larger?
I have, as recommended in the docs, looked at the file
scm/translation-functions.scm
I see that make-bold-markup makes the marks bold, but I do not see a similar
make-larger-markup function, nor can I find where make-bold-markup is
defined.
Hi Mogens,
How do I make (just) the rehearsal marks larger?
I have, as recommended in the docs, looked at the file
scm/translation-functions.scm
I see that make-bold-markup makes the marks bold, but I do not see a similar
make-larger-markup function, nor can I find where make-bold-markup
Hello,
On 14 April 2012 20:26, Mogens Lemvig Hansen mog...@kayju.com wrote:
How do I make (just) the rehearsal marks larger?
Just add an appropriate extra font markup in your \mark command
\mark \markup { \huge F }
See also
On 13-4-2012 11:27, Gagi Petrovic wrote:
PS If somebody also can help me with making the whole
rests look more clear: how do I add the horizontal line
(seewholerest.png) on top of it?
I would appreciate it a lot!
Hi all,
Responses so far indicate that I wasn't clear. Again,
I would like to have larger rehearsal marks.
With explicit markup, it is easy,
\mark \markup { \huge F }
but how do I do it with the default marks,
\mark \default
?
-Original Message-
From: Mogens Lemvig Hansen
Sent:
Hello,
On 14 April 2012 21:24, Mogens Lemvig Hansen mog...@kayju.com wrote:
Hi all,
Responses so far indicate that I wasn't clear. Again,
I would like to have larger rehearsal marks.
With explicit markup, it is easy,
\mark \markup { \huge F }
but how do I do it with the default marks,
Thank you!
Now I see the link at the bottom of the docs on Rehearsal marks to
RehearsalMarks in the Internals Reference, and that page in turn lists
font-size as a parameter.
Why is it always so obvious after the fact. Sigh.
Thanks again,
Mogens
-Original Message-
From: James
18 matches
Mail list logo
