Dear Robert,
thanks for Your proposals.
I think a dotted quarter rest isn't a good solution.
Musicians normally don't like them because they can easily be overlooked.
And there is no keysignature, it's so called atonal music.
2012/9/14 Robert Schmaus robert.schm...@web.de
Hi Stefan,
as far
Hugh Resnick writes:
Consider lumping your measures together, so: s1*3 instead of s1 s1 s1
—Josiah
Perfect. Thank you so much.
I'd like to ask some more silly questions here
* why is this [*3] necessary?
and if it is necessary, then
* why isn't it obvious?
and if it isn't obvious,
- Original Message -
From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org
To: Hugh Resnick hugh.resn...@gmail.com
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2012 10:24 AM
Subject: Re: Compress Full Bar Rests
Hugh Resnick writes:
Consider lumping your measures together, so: s1*3
Have a look at the attached source and the png, the problem is obvious.
The first appearance dictates which of the two enharmonic equivalents is
chosen for the ambitus.
cu,
Knut
attachment: amtest.png\version 2.16.0
\header { tagline = ##f}
\layout{ \context { \Voice \consists Ambitus_engraver
Knut Petersen Knut_Petersen at t-online.de writes:
Have a look at the attached source and the png, the problem is obvious.
The first appearance dictates which of the two enharmonic equivalents is
chosen for the ambitus.
Yes. The ambitus was formerly sorted in staff-position order, and
On 15 Sep 2012, at 19:59, Keith OHara wrote:
If one sets the actual tuning in LilyPond, so that she knows that E-sharp
is a slightly higher pitch than F, she will make the ambitus consistently.
Maybe not everyone agrees with me that E-sharp is a higher pitch than F.
It depends on the
Keith OHara wrote:
Knut PetersenKnut_Petersenat t-online.de writes:
Have a look at the attached source and the png, the problem is obvious.
The first appearance dictates which of the two enharmonic equivalents is
chosen for the ambitus.
Yes. The ambitus was formerly sorted in
On Sat, 15 Sep 2012 11:24:30 +0200
Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org wrote:
Hugh Resnick writes:
Consider lumping your measures together, so: s1*3 instead of s1 s1
s1
—Josiah
Perfect. Thank you so much.
I'd like to ask some more silly questions here
* why is this [*3]
PMA PeterArmstrong at aya.yale.edu writes:
Keith OHara wrote:
Maybe by default LilyPond could break the ties based on staff-position,
Might \naturalizeMusic specifically target Ambitus?
I would think that the desired output is to show the versions that indicate
the full range of
Keith OHara k-ohara5a5a at oco.net writes:
The actual request on the bug tracker,
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=762
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hi all
If I run this with no arguments (or have a tagline) everything's fine
if run the file with -dbackend=eps the bottom stem is clipped
any clues?
thanks
Damian
\header{ tagline = }
\version 2.16.0
musicRH = {
{
}
\\
{
\change Staff = LH b8[
On 15 Sep 2012, at 22:35, Damian leGassick wrote:
Hi all
If I run this with no arguments (or have a tagline) everything's fine
if run the file with -dbackend=eps the bottom stem is clipped
any clues?
thanks
Damian
\header{ tagline = }
\version 2.16.0
musicRH = {
{
Damian leGassick wrote
Hi all
If I run this with no arguments (or have a tagline) everything's fine
if run the file with -dbackend=eps the bottom stem is clipped
any clues?
how do you open the eps file? I use IrfanView and have no problem!
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
13 matches
Mail list logo
