>
> I assume the problem lies somewhere else in your infrastructure.
>
> HTH
> Urs
>
I used an 2.16.2 as it is in the repository of Ubuntu 14.04 LTS.
That was the problem.
I have downloaded 2.18.2 and have installed it manually. Now it works. Even
when I put \version "2.16".
Thank you Ur
Hi,
Unstable release 2.19.15 has been around for a few months now. Is it
good news or bad news that we haven't seen a 2.19.16 release since then?
Just interested what's happening behind the developers screens.
--
MT
___
lilypond-user mailing list
Am 16.12.2014 00:22, schrieb Hans Sommer:
Urs Liska openlilylib.org> writes:
It's define-music-function,
not "define-music function"
HTH
Urs
Am 15.12.2014 23:56, schrieb Hans
Sommer:
Hello,
Ich wrote a scheme function for getting a
Urs Liska openlilylib.org> writes:
>
>
> It's define-music-function,
> not "define-music function"
> HTH
> Urs
> Am 15.12.2014 23:56, schrieb Hans
> Sommer:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> Ich wrote a scheme function for getting a shortcut for the \relative
It's define-music-function, not "define-music function"
HTH
Urs
Am 15.12.2014 23:56, schrieb Hans Sommer:
Hello,
Ich wrote a scheme function for getting a shortcut for the \relative command.
rel = #(define-music function
(parser location p notes)
Hello,
Ich wrote a scheme function for getting a shortcut for the \relative command.
rel = #(define-music function
(parser location p notes)
> "Dan" == Dan van Ginhoven writes:
Dan> Hi! I'm writing lilypond score for six brass instruments from
Dan> old handwritten sheets. The tune I'm working with has the form:
Dan> {Intro 4 bars} {A repeat twice 32 bars} {B repeat twice 16 bars}
Dan> {A 32 bars} {Trio repeat twice 32 bars }
D
On 12/15/2014 03:07 PM, Dan van Ginhoven wrote:
> I'm writing lilypond score for six brass instruments from old
> handwritten sheets.
> The tune I'm working with has the form:
>
> {Intro 4 bars} {A repeat twice 32 bars} {B repeat twice 16 bars} {A 32
> bars} {Trio repeat twice 32 bars }
>
> Alas
Hi!
I'm writing lilypond score for six brass instruments from old
handwritten sheets.
The tune I'm working with has the form:
{Intro 4 bars} {A repeat twice 32 bars} {B repeat twice 16 bars} {A 32
bars} {Trio repeat twice 32 bars }
Alas, Tenor I breaks the form thus:
{Intro 4 bars} {A 64
Find below is the corrected version of the modified snippet.
\version "2.18.2"
%{ P Gentry 15 December 2014 08:23
;; Modified version of the LilyPond snippet enharmonic.ly (probably better as
enharmonic.ily)
;; This script will enharmonically spell a music object
;; Semi-tone intervals are dealt
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 20:33:57 +0600
Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
> PS is much easier to write than PDF, since PS can be pure text, while PDF
> is always binary, even in „text“ form.
Technically, this is true. Experience has taught me that generating
PostScript via text fragments can easily lead to
Am 2014-12-15 um 17:35 schrieb Urs Liska :
>
> Am 15.12.2014 12:31, schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
>>> 1) Is it clear that nobody would need Postscript output itself,
>>>e.g. to produce something different than PDF?
>> PDF can be converted back to PS easily.
>>
>>> 2) Is that a feasible goal?
>> W
On 15.12.2014 11:05, Johan Vromans wrote:
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 10:18:21 +0100
Knut Petersen wrote:
Shall we open a lilypond bug report? I don't know - the generated ps code
is valid and works, so there is no real bug. I think it would be a
feature request.
It's a bit of both. PostScript is muc
Am 15.12.2014 12:31, schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
1) Is it clear that nobody would need Postscript output itself,
e.g. to produce something different than PDF?
PDF can be converted back to PS easily.
2) Is that a feasible goal?
Well, it would be a good solution. However, we need a PDF creati
> 1) Is it clear that nobody would need Postscript output itself,
>e.g. to produce something different than PDF?
PDF can be converted back to PS easily.
> 2) Is that a feasible goal?
Well, it would be a good solution. However, we need a PDF creation
library, I guess...
Werner
___
The solution I posted below works fine in the later 2.19 releases.
In 2.18 it is necessary to add a \layout block to the two scores.
Trevor
> Joerg Peter wrote Sunday, December 14, 2014 7:09 PM
>
>> Is it possible to engrave the second StaffGroup to the right of the
>> first one without a line
Am 15. Dezember 2014 11:05:59 MEZ, schrieb Johan Vromans :
>On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 10:18:21 +0100
>Knut Petersen wrote:
>
>> Shall we open a lilypond bug report? I don't know - the generated ps
>code
>> is valid and works, so there is no real bug. I think it would be a
>> feature request.
>
>It's a
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 10:18:21 +0100
Knut Petersen wrote:
> Shall we open a lilypond bug report? I don't know - the generated ps code
> is valid and works, so there is no real bug. I think it would be a
> feature request.
It's a bit of both. PostScript is much more optimized to deal with normal
's
I suggest you (because you know about that best) write a report to bug-lilypond.
I think this should be opened on our issue tracker,regardless labeling it bug
or enhancement.
Best
Urs
Am 15. Dezember 2014 10:18:21 MEZ, schrieb Knut Petersen
:
>
> you can't suppress subsetting for the Emmen
you can't suppress subsetting for the Emmentaler fonts. Can you send
a bug report to the gs people?
After a first look at the gs code I filed a bugreport:
http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=695728
And I think the comments to that are quite interesting. AFAICT (which isn't
very au
20 matches
Mail list logo
