Please, Always use the Replay to All
I'm sorry but I'm not a midi user so then if there is anything strange with
the midi file I will not know what to do.
And It's much more convenient if you do it your self.
On Windows to open a command prompt:
On Wed, 2015-04-22 at 08:31 -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Richard,
Interesting, I didn't realize that this was a reason to use a front-end
to generate the LilyPond. With the Denemo front end it is Del,M to
delete a measure in all the staffs.
Does that work even when the code is
Hi,
I hope there is no intention to drop the MIDI output.
Oh, goodness, no!
Even though I don’t yet use it myself, I *want* to (soon), and I know it’s very
important to others.
Killer MIDI output would be a significant selling point for potential new users
— along with MusicXML, it should
Hi James,
I think there's one command in Finale that demonstrates a major obstacle to
widespread adoption of LilyPond: Delete Measure Stack. This is an extremely
common need when editing scores, and raw LilyPond code offers no clean,
easy way to do it.
+ 1 x 10^googol
This is such a good
Am 22.04.2015 um 14:30 schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
We try to explain this away by saying that LP is an engraving tool,
not a composition tool, but -- if we're really serious about making LP
more attractive to the average user of notation software, this is too glib.
Agreed.
It will be
Hi Trevor,
You mean Lilypond can’t handle \global \lyrics , where \global contains
the repeat structure?
Depends.
Thanks for the clarification, and the various links. Interesting, all.
I hope there’s an opportunity to fix this soon, and completely. Much like the
irritating grace-note
Hi Richard,
Interesting, I didn't realize that this was a reason to use a front-end
to generate the LilyPond. With the Denemo front end it is Del,M to
delete a measure in all the staffs.
Does that work even when the code is abstracted into one or more shared global
variables, etc.?
Or does
Greetings, All!
I've uploaded a few maintenance updates to fonts.openlilylib.org
http://fonts.openlilylib.org/#whats-new, including the addition of a new
font family that I teased about before.
Head on over and let me know if any links are broken. Your web browser may
have the site's pages
All,
I've been thinking about this a lot lately, even going so far as to create
my own Quick Start tutorials for new users, but I can only go so far in
my own head. I really have two questions that I keep wondering about:
1. What is the thing you (especially new users) like the least about
Anyone planning on attending this conference in Paris at the end of May? I
see a couple of LilyPonders on the program, Trevor Bača and Mike Solomon,
and Daniel Spreadbury will be presenting on the SMuFL font standard.
-Paul
anders.vinjar wrote
Topics:
Fwd: [AFIM.INFO] TENOR 2015: First
Am 22.04.2015 um 14:30 schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
We try to explain this away by saying that LP is an engraving tool,
not a composition tool, but -- if we're really serious about making LP
more attractive to the average user of notation software, this is
too glib.
In using LilyPond for all my
Hi Pete,
So major compositional changes -- the ones we're
calling structural here -- are implemented at that
first (gen.purp.prog.lang) level, tossing LP not much
to trip over then or fail to carry through.
My point, then: Why stuff a complicated-enough
engraving program with
Am 22.04.2015 um 17:48 schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
Hi Pete,
So major compositional changes -- the ones we're
calling structural here -- are implemented at that
first (gen.purp.prog.lang) level, tossing LP not much
to trip over then or fail to carry through.
My point, then: Why stuff a
Am 22. April 2015 19:20:38 MESZ, schrieb Kieren MacMillan
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca:
Hi Simon,
1. In 2013, I composed and engraved a piece with nearly 12,000
frames (57 staves x 208 measures). It contains two sections (of ~32 and
~16 measures) which were specifically added for That
Hi Stephen,
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Stephen MacNeil classicalja...@gmail.com
wrote:
Harm , Thomas Morley and others
I like to follow the discussions even if I don't understand/need something
because I usually learn a lot and sometimes even adapt some ideas or code
into something I
Hi Simon,
1. In 2013, I composed and engraved a piece with nearly 12,000 frames (57
staves x 208 measures). It contains two sections (of ~32 and ~16 measures)
which were specifically added for That Production” (and, as such, contain
“external material”). Now I want to modify the piece —
Paul,
Thank you for your jianpu3.ly
I try to use it in key D the score display correctly, but the jianpu display
differently. I don't know scheme. I am hoping in your spare time you can
update it. Very much appreciated.
Immanuel,Ming
On Tuesday, April 21, 2015 12:06 AM, Paul Morris
Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Pete,
So major compositional changes -- the ones we're
calling structural here -- are implemented at that
first (gen.purp.prog.lang) level, tossing LP not much
to trip over then or fail to carry through.
My point, then: Why stuff a complicated-enough
engraving
Harm , Thomas Morley and others
I like to follow the discussions even if I don't understand/need something
because I usually learn a lot and sometimes even adapt some ideas or code
into something I can use later.
In this thread I was amazed that the scheme created could interpret the
chords!!! I
The current workaround, of course, is to use \tag around the
section(s) in question. In particular, that method [relatively]
easily solves “hide these 16 measures” types of situations (like my
Example #2) and “depending on the version/edition, use either THIS
or THIS” (like my Example #1).
Hi Abraham
I've been using LilyPond since 6 years.
I think that LilyPond documentation is great. Learning Manual is a gentle
introduction (basically 3 chapters only) for new users and Notation
Reference is a complete reference, well indexed and easy to search through.
I never found anything
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Federico Bruni [via Lilypond]
ml-node+s1069038n175021...@n5.nabble.com wrote:
What I would find useful is an interactive guide to lilypond syntax:
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4200
I totally agree! How about some collaboration with
Hi Urs,
I think you could vastly benefit from using openLilyLib's GridLY library.
No doubt true. (I look forward to examining GridLY, when I have a spare moment.)
Of course thst's only viable for new projects.
We should strive to create tools for which this isn’t [ever] true. =)
Someone
Hi David.
I am the OP.
Looking at your example, you have a bit of code similar to another person
who has assisted me.
\markup \rN { I }
I can't find documentation for the escape sequence and it throws and error
when I try to compile.
:14:11 0: error: unknown escaped string: `\rN'
\markup
Thanks David!
That actual is very handy.
to your point.
If I'm understanding you correctly, you mean to be able to feed it, say, a
Beethoven sonata and have it provide a Roman numeral analysis? Sorting
out harmonic rhythm, embellishing tones, deciding on the current key,
etc.?Now that would be a
Am 22.04.2015 um 20:33 schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
The current workaround, of course, is to use \tag around the
section(s) in question. In particular, that method [relatively]
easily solves “hide these 16 measures” types of situations (like my
Example #2) and “depending on the version/edition, use
Am 22.04.2015 um 20:48 schrieb Federico Bruni:
Hi Abraham
I've been using LilyPond since 6 years.
I think that LilyPond documentation is great. Learning Manual is a
gentle introduction (basically 3 chapters only) for new users and
Notation Reference is a complete reference, well indexed and
What is the thing you (especially new users) like the least about LilyPond's
documentation structure?
Insufficient explanation of the object model, the process model and the
hierarchy of languages used and how they fit together. Example: Does
anyone here really understand what a voice actually
I started using Lily for serious maybe a month ago, so I'm what you'd call
new. I find the guide far more useful than the manual (the former seems
more structured around how to do specific things, while the latter seems
much more a general conceptual introduction).
However (and this is something
2015-04-22 20:07 GMT+02:00 Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca:
Someone spoke of python being able to translate between parallel and
non-parallel music. Wouldn’t it be great to have a tool where you could:
1. Say “Given the current Lilypond file being outputted, show me ‘in
Hello.
I think you could vastly benefit from using openLilyLib's GridLY
library. Of course thst's only viable for new projects.
That looks interesting just from a quick reading of
https://github.com/openlilylib/openlilylib/tree/master/ly/gridly
I stumbled upon that page only through a web
Hello.
On Wed, 22 Apr 2015 21:19:12 +0200, N. Andrew Walsh wrote:
I started using Lily for serious maybe a month ago, so I'm what you'd
call
new. I find the guide far more useful than the manual (the former
seems
more structured around how to do specific things, while the latter
seems
much
My problem is that too much of it is written like the following response
from Elaine, which looks like Pprogrammers Only Need Apply.
I get frustrated when I'm looking for something to answer the question How
do I increase/decrease the space between the bottom system and the footer?
...and cannot
On Wed, 22 Apr 2015, Abraham Lee wrote:
Greetings, All!
I've uploaded a few maintenance updates to fonts.openlilylib.org, including the
addition of a new font family that I teased about before.
Head on over and let me know if any links are broken. Your web browser may have
the site's
Am 22.04.2015 um 21:29 schrieb Gilles:
Hello.
I think you could vastly benefit from using openLilyLib's GridLY
library. Of course thst's only viable for new projects.
That looks interesting just from a quick reading of
https://github.com/openlilylib/openlilylib/tree/master/ly/gridly
I
Am 22.04.2015 um 21:26 schrieb Calixte Faure:
Or have a script/feature/tool that automatically counts measures : it
would be able to put bar numbers in comment, and with another script
we could say delete/comment/whatever measure n to m.
I think this is something that will eventually be
Larry,
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Larry Kent-2 [via Lilypond]
ml-node+s1069038n175030...@n5.nabble.com wrote:
My problem is that too much of it is written like the following response
from Elaine, which looks like Pprogrammers Only Need Apply.
I get frustrated when I'm looking for
Hi Harm,
Speaking as a user, I always thought about a Voice like a
_musician_, never had problems with that thinking.
But (he says, taking on the role of the average newbie user) a pianist is a
musician.
So why can’t I write all of the piano music I need that musician to play in a
single
Hi, Ming!
Here's a table of how the numbers should be converted. Please take a look.
David Zhang
-- 原始邮件 --
发件人: MING TSANG;tsan...@rogers.com;
发送时间: 2015年4月23日(星期四) 凌晨1:34
收件人: Paul Morrisp...@paulwmorris.com;
抄送:
From: Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca
Subject: Re: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 149, Issue 155
it makes me feel frustrated as a professional programmer that after
years of using lilypond, I still have very little clue how it works
I?ve heard you say that a lot, and it confuses
On Wed, 22 Apr 2015 21:53:42 -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Gilles,
Yet you long for some_tool that would know how to remove a set of
bars from That Production project. :-P
A tool could do that *if* it knew what structure to expect.
I don’t believe that’s necessary… but we can leave that
On Wed, 22 Apr 2015 19:17:53 -0700, Flaming Hakama by Elaine wrote:
[...]
Without getting too technical, objects are things that you can
create, have
properties and relationships with other well-defined objects.
This is true for things like staves, staff groups, scores, books,
etc.
You can
Hello.
[Changing subject line; so many different topics in a single
thread...]
On Wed, 22 Apr 2015 19:14:15 -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Gilles (et al.),
Best practices, yes; for any score (not just large ones).[1]
A flexible structure that would be compelling and foster the
creation
well you need to
1. remove the space with sed, so music % 1 becomes %1 also I added a at
the end so it wouldn't get confused ie. %1 will also remove %10 %100 etc
2. since you used it after measure one sed can only delete measures after
-- so 2 on
you could just input %1x in the files where you
To note, when in 1=C, a note in D should be notated as 2, and when in 1=D, the
same note should be notated as 1, as demonstrated in the table.___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hi Gilles,
Yet you long for some_tool that would know how to remove a set of
bars from That Production project. :-P
A tool could do that *if* it knew what structure to expect.
I don’t believe that’s necessary… but we can leave that aside for now, since
the technical investigation required to
Thanks Harm,
I do think it would be cool -- i must say i only played a bit with it and
yes in little examples :)
Apart from the most simple cases and only in c-major. ;)
actually I got it to go in all keys :) a hack i do admit .. but it does the
job.
anyway that as I said would be a great
Hi,
Is it possible that you always use the “LilyPond/Engrave (Publish)” option to
run LilyPond? This removes the links between the input and the pdf. If you
use “LilyPond/Engrave (Preview)” or the LilyPond icon on the toolbar, the
links are included in the pdf.
That does it!
Of course,
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 04:19:08AM +0200, Gilles wrote:
On Wed, 22 Apr 2015 21:53:42 -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
[...]
So, to output a simple 16-bar lead sheet, a user should always [be
forced to] create 3 files (voice.ily, chords.ily, score.ly)? Or maybe
four (lyrics.ily)? Or more?
For God's sake don't deprecate \relative. It is far faster to input
and you can convert with Frescobaldi.
Shane
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 8:48 PM, Kieren MacMillan
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote:
Hi Stephen (et al.)
anyway I tried a few examples and used %1a %2a etc for measures and used
Hi Ming,
On Apr 22, 2015, at 1:34 PM, MING TSANG tsan...@rogers.com wrote:
Thank you for your jianpu3.ly
I try to use it in key D the score display correctly, but the jianpu
display differently. I don't know scheme. I am hoping in your spare time you
can update it. Very much
So now I'm going to jump in on what I think a Voice context is.
A Voice context is a context, which means it can contain engravers,
performers, and music expressions.
It is a bottom context, which means it cannot contain other contexts.
By default, it contains engravers that create the
On 4/22/15 8:59 PM, Paul Morris p...@paulwmorris.com wrote:
P.S. In case anyone is wondering, in 2.18 the context property
³keySignature becomes ³keyAlterations in 2.19. I believe this was to
prevent confusion with the ³KeySignature grob.
If your code has version strings, convert-ly should
Hi Carl (et al.),
maybe it's worth setting up a LilyPond StackExchange
Maybe… But we already hear complaints about how “the documentation” is spread
across too many sites: the multiple doc books; LSR; the list archives; Scores
of Beauty and similar; etc.
I don't believe you do have to write
Hi Andrew,
I started using Lily for serious maybe a month ago, so I'm what you'd call
new.
Welcome! =)
There's been a lot of mention (I imagine rightfully) about how Lily is
capable, above all, of making beautifully engraved scores, and her
suitability to managing a text-based,
Hey Calixte
what a great idea it made me think.
what about sed?
Or have a script/feature/tool that automatically counts measures : it
would
be able to put bar numbers in comment, and with another script we could say
delete/comment/whatever measure n to m
anyway I tried a few examples and used
Yet another subject ;-)
[...]
Yet another reason to deprecate \relative, which I now avoid like the
plague. (Unfortunately, I was suckered into using it when I started
using Lilypond over a decade ago, so all my legacy code is in
\relative mode. Using Frescobaldi, I’m slowly converting all my
On 4/22/15 6:53 PM, Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca
wrote:
Hi Gilles,
Yet you long for some_tool that would know how to remove a set of
bars from That Production project. :-P
A tool could do that *if* it knew what structure to expect.
I don¹t believe that¹s necessaryŠ but we
On 4/22/15 9:01 PM, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
On 4/22/15 5:19 PM, Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca
wrote:
I would be happy to help write a ³Best Practices² guide (with whatever
small free time I currently have), if only we as a community could agree
on what that
Hi Stephen (et al.)
anyway I tried a few examples and used %1a %2a etc for measures and used the
bar check (|) as an end
eg.
%1a
music |
I use
music | % 1
Would sed still work?
worked almost every time, only problem I had was if I had to fix the octave
Yet another reason to
Hi Gilles,
deprecate \relative, which I now avoid like the plague.
Why?
1. It doesn’t play well with reuse: both trivial reuse (i.e., cut-and-paste)
and more advanced (i.e., referenced in variables) require extra care at the
very least, and outright extra work (e.g., octave checks,
Carl Sorensen c_sorensen at byu.edu writes:
%%% Start of model
Contexts are LilyPond objects that contain properties, music expressions,
and translators. Some contexts, like Score and Staff, can contain other
contexts as well. Other contexts, like Voice, are bottom contexts and
cannot
On 4/22/15 5:19 PM, Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca
wrote:
I would be happy to help write a ³Best Practices² guide (with whatever
small free time I currently have), if only we as a community could agree
on what that document would look like, where it would live, and what it
On 4/22/15 7:17 PM, Flaming Hakama by Elaine ela...@flaminghakama.com
wrote:
Since I understand programming languages rather well, if I understanding
how something is organized, then I can code it 100% of the time.
Surely, I will have to refer to manuals to find out specifics about
objects,
Greetings,
The reasons for one not using relative mode are clear, but it hardly
justifies calling for its deprecation. As a composer of primarily
piano music, it is an absolute lifesaver. And all to whom I have
introduced LilyPond, primarily pianists or harpists, immediately
gravitated to
On 22/04/15 20:19, N. Andrew Walsh wrote:
I don't see anywhere in the reference or the manual where that sort of
comprehensive style guide is presented. I'm thinking something like the
doorstops O'Reilly's uses for documenting, say, HTML. I hate to use the
term (it's already been ruined by
Kieren,
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Kieren MacMillan [via Lilypond]
ml-node+s1069038n175042...@n5.nabble.com wrote:
Hi Joram (et al.),
just use point-and-click in Frescobaldi which brings me
quickly to the place where I want to change something.
That feature doesn't work for me.
On Apr 22, 2015, at 5:25 PM, Flaming Hakama by Elaine
ela...@flaminghakama.com wrote:
Or, thinking in the old-fashioned way, a thematic index of the documentation
contents.
Maybe something like this? :-)
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/lilypond-index
That is quite an example of taking my long hair code and making it
efficient. It will take some reading for me to understand what all is
happening here.
Thanks for your assistance.
Lance
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 3:19 AM, Simon Albrecht simon.albre...@mail.de
wrote:
Am 22.04.2015 um 04:29
2015-04-22 19:24 GMT+02:00 Stephen MacNeil classicalja...@gmail.com:
Harm , Thomas Morley and others
I like to follow the discussions even if I don't understand/need something
because I usually learn a lot and sometimes even adapt some ideas or code
into something I can use later.
In this
All,
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Noeck [via Lilypond]
ml-node+s1069038n175034...@n5.nabble.com wrote:
this is a triviality for most of you and it does not solve the original
issue of deleting a measure easily.
I have really enjoyed following this thread. It's always fascinating to
hear
David Elaine Alt finds that a major obstacle to understanding lilypond is
the lack of a comprehensive (and/or comprehensible) object model. The
question was asked: Does anyone really understand what a Voice is?
I think there are two levels at which object models need to be understood:
the user
Looks really nice Abraham! The font situation is now becoming an
embarrassment of riches!
And I would also like to mention that the openlilylib
install-lily-fonts program worked like a charm and now I have these
newest updates. Nice job all the way around!
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 12:45 PM,
Hi Joram (et al.),
just use point-and-click in Frescobaldi which brings me
quickly to the place where I want to change something.
That feature doesn't work for me.
Is that because of the way I’ve structured my files?
Thanks,
Kieren.
Kieren MacMillan,
On 4/22/15 1:30 PM, Martin Tarenskeen m.tarensk...@zonnet.nl wrote:
Stiil, I will try to give a sketch what happens to me again and again:
I want to learn about how to change defaults and how to tweak default
output so I open the Notation Reference:
Notation Refence - 5. Changing Defaults
A
My problem is that too much of it is written like the following response
from Elaine, which looks like Pprogrammers Only Need Apply.
There is no getting around the fact that lilypond is a programming
language. I don't see how to bridge that gap except with GUIs. Even then,
the GUI would
2015-04-22 4:23 GMT+02:00 SonusProj . sonusproject...@gmail.com:
That solution is also quite elegant. I need to spend some time
understanding what you have created.
Your chosen syntax is beyond my current understanding.
Thanks for your input.
Respectfully,
Lance
Well, you wrote:
Hi Larry,
I get frustrated when I'm looking for something to answer the question How
do I increase/decrease the space between the bottom system and the footer?
...and cannot find an answer that begins Here's how to increase/decrease the
space between the bottom system and the footer.”
On 4/22/15 4:13 PM, Eyolf Østrem ey...@oestrem.com wrote:
On 22.04.2015 (21:19), Carl Sorensen wrote:
If the manual were to show you exactly how to make every possible
particular tweak or change every possible default setting, it would need
to be many times longer than it is. The goal is
2015-04-23 1:29 GMT+02:00 Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu:
David Elaine Alt finds that a major obstacle to understanding lilypond is
the lack of a comprehensive (and/or comprehensible) object model. The
question was asked: Does anyone really understand what a Voice is?
Speaking as a user, I
Hi,
There is no getting around the fact that lilypond is a programming language.
Nope.
I don't see how to bridge that gap except with GUIs.
If you mean make it so that users don’t realize it’s a programming language
while they’re using it, then I agree.
it makes me feel frustrated as a
Hi Gilles (et al.),
Best practices, yes; for any score (not just large ones).[1]
A flexible structure that would be compelling and foster the creation of
compliant tools.
I have a pretty rich imagination, and I can’t begin to conceive of a Lilypond
best practice [singular] or flexible
2015-04-22 22:38 GMT+02:00 tisimst tisimst.lilyp...@gmail.com:
All,
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Noeck [via Lilypond] [hidden email]
wrote:
this is a triviality for most of you and it does not solve the original
issue of deleting a measure easily.
I have really enjoyed following this
Hello,
I recall that I was always thinking it would be best to have a person at
hand, maybe even sharing a ‘bureau’, who could answer my question. Or
attending a class, in which one would for example be guided in coding
example scores, and receive immediate feedback. Later I realised that I
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 17:11:34 -0400
From: Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca
To: Noeck noeck.marb...@gmx.de
Subject: Re: Do we really offer the future?
Hi Joram (et al.),
just use point-and-click in Frescobaldi which brings me
quickly to the place where I
Hi Wol,
What I'd like to see is worked, documented examples.
I’m happy to supply a few… But there are so many questions:
1. Where would they be kept?
2. How “rich” would the examples need to be, or not be? Even just a one-page
excerpt from my Passacaglia for String Quartet would require
Ok, the problem was that your music file was for LilyPond 2.19 and
jianpu3.ly only works with 2.18.
Have you proposed adding this to LilyPond? It seems like this would
be a promising thing to add to the core, since it's another standard
notation.
But it's still *far* away from the look of
Greetings Ponderers,
In relation to cross staff beaming, referring to the attached image snippet,
bar A is what I want (no, this is not Common Practice Era engraving), but the
lilypond compiler issues the following warning:
warning: weird stem size, check for narrow beams
Bar B compiles
Hi Carl,
On Apr 23, 2015, at 12:24 AM, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
On 4/22/15 8:59 PM, Paul Morris p...@paulwmorris.com wrote:
P.S. In case anyone is wondering, in 2.18 the context property
łkeySignature becomes łkeyAlterations in 2.19. I believe this was to
prevent
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 2:46 PM, David Bellows [via Lilypond]
ml-node+s1069038n175038...@n5.nabble.com wrote:
Looks really nice Abraham! The font situation is now becoming an
embarrassment of riches!
Thanks, David! I guess you could say that I never want custom
housestyles to be a stumbling
On 4/22/15 8:59 PM, Paul Morris p...@paulwmorris.com wrote:
Ok, the problem was that your music file was for LilyPond 2.19 and
jianpu3.ly only works with 2.18.
Have you proposed adding this to LilyPond? It seems like this would be a
promising thing to add to the core, since it's another
On Apr 23, 2015, at 12:30 AM, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
On 4/22/15 8:59 PM, Paul Morris p...@paulwmorris.com wrote:
Ok, the problem was that your music file was for LilyPond 2.19 and
jianpu3.ly only works with 2.18.
Have you proposed adding this to LilyPond? It seems like
On April 22, 2015 7:43:10 PM Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk wrote:
Although not well-publicised there is a way of entering multi-voice or
multi-staff music complete bar by complete bar. There is a restriction
that bars must be all the same length, but at least all the notes of a bar
Hello!
As the one who raise this topic, I would love to see this adding to the core
(and well documented) when all gears' up, as it could be read by a billion and
written by millions.
Seheme, as a dialect of Lisp, can be annotated with ;; so that our Scheme codes
implementing Jianpu can be
Am 22.04.2015 um 22:05 schrieb tisimst:
Larry,
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Larry Kent-2 [via Lilypond] [hidden
email] /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=175032i=0 wrote:
My problem is that too much of it is written like the following
response from Elaine, which looks like
Hi,
this is a triviality for most of you and it does not solve the original
issue of deleting a measure easily.
But I wanted to mention how jumping between staves and selecting
measures gets much easier than searching the ly file. Once the file
structure is done and the score is (partially)
On Wed, 22 Apr 2015, Larry Kent wrote:
I get frustrated when I'm looking for something to answer the question How do
I increase/decrease the space between the bottom system and the
footer? ...and cannot find an answer that begins Here's how to increase/decrease
the space between the bottom
On 4/21/15 6:48 PM, James jworl...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, Carl. This does what I'm looking for. Is this in the
documentation? I couldn't (and still can't) find it.
I think it's in the documentation, but maybe you can find a way to express
it more clearly. The places I found it are listed
2015-04-22 21:41 GMT+02:00 Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org:
Am 22.04.2015 um 21:29 schrieb Gilles:
Hello.
I think you could vastly benefit from using openLilyLib's GridLY
library. Of course thst's only viable for new projects.
That looks interesting just from a quick reading of
Am 22.04.2015 um 23:19 schrieb Carl Sorensen:
On 4/22/15 1:30 PM, Martin Tarenskeen m.tarensk...@zonnet.nl wrote:
Stiil, I will try to give a sketch what happens to me again and again:
I want to learn about how to change defaults and how to tweak default
output so I open the Notation
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
