Hi,
fot this particular goal, I would suggest to look here:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/skipping-corrected-music
It needs much less code changes than the tags.
Cheers,
Joram
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Is there any way to generate statistics for a file? Things like, let
say, a concordance or the number of a's b's or bes's, or repeated
markup's? (I know I can do stuff like this with grep, but that's very
singular.)
--
Dave Higgins
Littleton, Colorado
dave.higg...@dkds.us
See my photos at
On Fri, 8 Apr 2016, Simon Albrecht wrote:
> My understanding is quite limited, but I believe this can’t give you much of
> an advantage, since most of the calculations done in LilyPond are not directly
> about graphics. If you compile a larger score, you’ll see that most of the
GPU computation is
Mark,
No offense to Herr Bach or his playfulness - as an organist, I deeply
appreciate his genius - and I never thought my innocent question would spark
such dialog.
>From an engineering standpoint, I would expect the "default" settings of an
>application to adequately address the "majority"
David Wright writes:
> On Fri 08 Apr 2016 at 01:43:01 (+0200), David Kastrup wrote:
>> tyronicus writes:
>> > David Kastrup wrote
>> >> LilyPond will not make use of a graphics card. Indeed, for a single
>> >> score, LilyPond will not make use
> When my score becomes bigger i have to wait long to see my
> result and this slows me down in my working proces.
>
> So i was wondering if lilypond could work faster
>
Here is an alternative approach to achieving faster compilation for large
scores.
Well, it is a workaround, since this
Simon,
May I be so bold as to inquire, how does the beaming "clearly indicate"
nothing more than distribution of notes between hands?
I also present the final measure of the Gigue of the French Suite VI in
which all of the notes are ascribed to the right hand yet the structure is
three groups of
On Fri 08 Apr 2016 at 01:43:01 (+0200), David Kastrup wrote:
> tyronicus writes:
> > David Kastrup wrote
> >> LilyPond will not make use of a graphics card. Indeed, for a single
> >> score, LilyPond will not make use of more than a single CPU core.
> >
> > After Lily
tyronicus writes:
> David Kastrup wrote
>> LilyPond will not make use of a graphics card. Indeed, for a single
>> score, LilyPond will not make use of more than a single CPU core.
>
> After Lily decides how many systems to draw, could she
> use multiple threads to draw
David Kastrup wrote
> LilyPond will not make use of a graphics card. Indeed, for a single
> score, LilyPond will not make use of more than a single CPU core.
After Lily decides how many systems to draw, could she
use multiple threads to draw systems simultaneously?
--
View this message in
Am 08.04.2016 um 00:15 schrieb Simon Albrecht:
> On 07.04.2016 21:51, Philip Bergwerf wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> in the past i have woked with blender which is a 3d open source
>> modelling,
>> animation program. And i noticed that when you have a fast video
>> card, the
>> pogram works
On 07.04.2016 21:51, Philip Bergwerf wrote:
Hello everyone,
in the past i have woked with blender which is a 3d open source modelling,
animation program. And i noticed that when you have a fast video card, the
pogram works much faster. How about lilypond? lilypond works very slow in
grapic way.
Please ignore this e-mail. I’ve been having problems with my Internet
connection and it seemed like the previous one had failed to arrive. Sorry.
On 08.04.2016 00:05, Simon Albrecht wrote:
On 07.04.2016 04:21, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote:
Martin,
Hemiola?
Cf. WTC I 3 Prelude, measures 97 –
On 07.04.2016 04:21, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote:
Martin,
Hemiola?
Cf. WTC I 3 Prelude, measures 97 – 104.
I don’t quite know how this is related to the current discussion, since
this example is clearly a case for manual beaming. What’s more, it’s
nothing to do with a hemiola. A hemiola
bill wolf writes:
> Good Lilyponders,
>
> The code below achieves my goals. I'm wondering if it could be done more
> simply.
>
> \version "2.18.2"
>
> \relative c'' {
>
>
> \new Staff <<
>
> \new Voice { \voiceOne c8 e~ \once \hideNotes \once \override
>
Philip Bergwerf writes:
> Hello everyone,
>
> in the past i have woked with blender which is a 3d open source modelling,
> animation program. And i noticed that when you have a fast video card, the
> pogram works much faster. How about lilypond? lilypond works very
On 07.04.2016 04:21, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote:
Martin,
Hemiola?
Cf. WTC I 3 Prelude, measures 97 – 104.
The Neue Bach-Ausgabe has the semiquavers beamed three and three only in
m. 97 & 98, and this clearly indicates primarily the distribution to the
hands: first three notes sinistra,
Good Lilyponders,The code below achieves my goals. I'm wondering if it could be done more simply.\version "2.18.2"\relative c'' { \new Staff << \new Voice { \voiceOne c8 e~ \once \hideNotes \once \override NoteColumn.force-hshift = #-1.2 e4 g8 d'~ \once \hideNotes d4
Hello everyone,
in the past i have woked with blender which is a 3d open source modelling,
animation program. And i noticed that when you have a fast video card, the
pogram works much faster. How about lilypond? lilypond works very slow in
grapic way. When my score becomes bigger i have to wait
On my Mac with the same OS X (10.11.4) and version of Lilypond, Christoph’s
code produces the expected results.
One difference in installation is is that the .chord and .text font files are
installed in the Lilypond app, in the same font directories mentioned. Mine are
named LilyJAZZChord.otf
Thomas Morley writes:
> The situation is a little more problematic, though.
> \chordmode { c_\markup { test } }
> works, yes, but both of the following two return an error:
> \chordmode { c-\markup { test } }
> \chordmode { c^\markup { test } }
Yes, I was already
21 matches
Mail list logo