Re: [OT] Scribal abbreviations (Was: Re: Using strings and other types to return markup)

Hi Graham and Phil, On 12/05/2016, 3:28 AM, "lilypond-user on behalf of Graham King" wrote: Strictly speaking, I think we're talking about a macron, rather than a tilda. It's not just

Re: override NoteHead size for one not in a chord

Hi Ryan, On 12/05/2016, 8:12 AM, "lilypond-user on behalf of Ryan Michael" wrote: I have a chord and I am trying to make the last note, which happens to also be in parenthesize, to have a small

Re: Introduction / GSoC - ScholarLY Annotations

Jeffery, Welcome to LilyPond development! I'm excited to have you working on the ScholarLy project, which can help cement LilyPond's use as a serious music representation tool (perhaps even the premier tool). The project is ambitious, but should prove very useful. I'm excited to offer any help

Re: override NoteHead size for one not in a chord

When within chords, use \tweak and remove the "=": \tuplet 3/2{32 ees'16\harmonic } Best, Abraham On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Ryan Michael wrote: > I have a chord and I am trying to make the last note, which happens to > also be in parenthesize, to have a small

override NoteHead size for one not in a chord

I have a chord and I am trying to make the last note, which happens to also be in parenthesize, to have a small Font-size for the notehead. Here is my lily code : \tuplet 3/2{32 ees'16\harmonic } which currently just renders the same font-size for all notes (the default size) -- ॐ नमः शिवाय

Re: Using extended mensural notation support for Lilypond

Dear Graham, thanks for your mail. You confirm what I found so far, too. And after having read your mail, I also see that lib.ly is missing from the zip file. > Even so, it is very sad > that this remarkable improvement to lilypond appears to remain unusable. That's really a pity. I still hope

Re: Using strings and other types to return markup

On Wed, 11 May 2016 17:58:52 +0100 "Phil Holmes" wrote: > Attached is my LilyPond approximation of that > section of the madrigal. Regarding the ye versus Þe -- it seems wrong to me to simulate the appearance of a handwritten glyph (thorn, but looking like y) with the wrong

Re: Using extended mensural notation support for Lilypond

On Wed, 2016-05-11 at 22:31 +0200, Noeck wrote: > Hi, > > were there changes since "Extended mensural notation support for Lilypond": > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2015-02/msg00152.html > > Or in other words, can someone please show me how to use it? Is it > usable

RE: Question about same-foot organ pedal substitutions

Thanks, Thomas. This is great! Joe Srednicki -Original Message- From: Thomas Morley [mailto:thomasmorle...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 5:02 PM To: Joseph N. Srednicki Cc: Kieren MacMillan ; Lilypond-User Mailing List

Re: Question about same-foot organ pedal substitutions

2016-05-11 22:28 GMT+02:00 Joseph N. Srednicki : > Thanks, Kieren. I am currently using the items that Abraham provided for > alternate-foot substitutions. > > However, I am looking to notate same-foot substitutions, such as: > > ^- -- above the note = right toe to right

Using extended mensural notation support for Lilypond

Hi, were there changes since "Extended mensural notation support for Lilypond": https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2015-02/msg00152.html Or in other words, can someone please show me how to use it? Is it usable directly or do I need to patch lilypond somehow? There were some

RE: Question about same-foot organ pedal substitutions

Thanks, Kieren. I am currently using the items that Abraham provided for alternate-foot substitutions. However, I am looking to notate same-foot substitutions, such as: ^- -- above the note = right toe to right heel ^- -- below the note = left toe to left heel Thanks. Joe Srednicki

Re: Question about same-foot organ pedal substitutions

Hi Joe, More recently, Abraham did something nice in this area: Hope that helps! Kieren. Kieren MacMillan, composer ‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info ‣ email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info

Question about same-foot organ pedal substitutions

Hello I am working on an organ piece I want to notate substitutions from heel to toe and toe to heel on the same foot. I found a message from Kieren MacMillan in the mail archive. The message is dated December 27, 2007, and contains the following: \version "2.11.33" \layout {

[OT] Scribal abbreviations (Was: Re: Using strings and other types to return markup)

Strictly speaking, I think we're talking about a macron, rather than a tilda. It's not just macrons of course: Phil is dabbling in the wonderful world of scribal abbreviations. Most people are interested in expanding (rather than reproducing) the abbreviations, and for anyone trying to do so the

Re: Using strings and other types to return markup

On 05/11/2016 11:58 AM, Phil Holmes wrote: I didn't think it was really a tilde either, but it just seemed to make a close approximation. Attached is my LilyPond approximation of that section of the madrigal. It is a tilde; the tilde derives precisely from the scriptural abbreviation for

Re: Using strings and other types to return markup

- Original Message - From: Andrew Bernard To: Phil Holmes ; lilypond-user@gnu.org Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 4:45 PM Subject: Re: Using strings and other types to return markup [Sorry plain texters this is just not able to be shown in 7 bit ASCII] Manually back to text :-) As to

Re: Using strings and other types to return markup

Hi Phil, On 12/05/2016, 1:04 AM, "Phil Holmes" wrote: Here we go - late C16 (1597 to be precise). Note also the abbreviated "ye" - I think this is a tiny "e" above the "y". Yes, ‘ye' is interesting. >From the good wikipedia article on Ye:

Re: Using strings and other types to return markup

- Original Message - From: "Andrew Bernard" To: Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 2:04 PM Subject: Re: Using strings and other types to return markup Hi Phil, On 11/05/2016, 9:12 PM, "lilypond-user on behalf of Phil Holmes"

Re: Using strings and other types to return markup

Hi Phil, On 11/05/2016, 9:12 PM, "lilypond-user on behalf of Phil Holmes" wrote: >2. It's a bit more complicated, though. 16th century printers have a habit >of eliding an n from a word and instead

Re: [OT] sorry for the spam

On 2016-05-11 10:41, Chris Yate wrote: > There's no point having passwords that you can't remember; In fact, there is: no one can force you to divulge a password that you don't know. Which is why I have started using Keepass with a Yubikey. The Yubikey contains a password that I certainly

Re: Using strings and other types to return markup

At 12:12 11/05/2016 +0100, Phil Holmes wrote: ... (if I had a list of unicode characters with tildes over them to hand) ... See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tilde#Precomposed_Unicode_characters . Brian Barker ___ lilypond-user mailing list

Re: Using strings and other types to return markup

- Original Message - From: "Johan Vromans" To: Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 11:19 AM Subject: Re: Using strings and other types to return markup On Wed, 11 May 2016 09:31:28 + (UTC) Phil Holmes wrote: I want

Re: Using strings and other types to return markup

On Wed, 11 May 2016 09:31:28 + (UTC) Phil Holmes wrote: > I want to create a function in scheme that will take a string argument > something like "san~t" and return a markup which will place the tilde > above the n. Why not just write sañt ? Lilypond understands

Re: [OT] sorry for the spam

On 11/05/2016, 6:41 PM, "lilypond-user on behalf of Chris Yate" wrote: There's no point having passwords that you can't remember I never buy this argument. You can have strong passwords that you can

Re: Using strings and other types to return markup

Thanks both. I was sure I'd tried that as one of my variants, but clearly not. I think if I had tried it, I was incorrectly calling the procedure with a string without the # before it. FWIW I'd copied the syntax from the (markup (number->string newval) in

Re: Using strings and other types to return markup

Am 11.05.2016 um 11:43 schrieb Jan-Peter Voigt: > Hi Phil, > > you just need to remove the parens around 'theText'. Also inside > (markup ...) everything is interpreted as a parameter for the function > (macro or whatever) 'markup' and evaluated as a scheme-expression for > thet purpose. To

Re: Using strings and other types to return markup

Hi Phil, you just need to remove the parens around 'theText'. Also inside (markup ...) everything is interpreted as a parameter for the function (macro or whatever) 'markup' and evaluated as a scheme-expression for thet purpose. HTH Jan-Peter #(define-markup-command (do-tilde layout props

Using strings and other types to return markup

> I'm not top posting I want to create a function in scheme that will take a string argument something like "san~t" and return a markup which will place the tilde above the n. I know how to create the markup using markup functions like combine and translate, but I want to make this easier by

Re: [OT] sorry for the spam

On Wed, 11 May 2016 at 08:39 Johan Vromans wrote: > > There are a few websites that > > provide strong password generators that make pretty much uncrackable > > passwords. > > Password Security: https://xkcd.com/936/ ;-) There's no point having passwords that you can't

Re: [OT] sorry for the spam

On Wed, 11 May 2016 11:30:51 +1000 Andrew Bernard wrote: > There are a few websites that > provide strong password generators that make pretty much uncrackable > passwords. Being paranoid, I'd never use an arbitrary 3rd party web site for this. There are many open

Re: sorry for the spam

On 11/05/16 03:30, Andrew Bernard wrote: > > a way in to your email account has been found, generally through a password > attack. The main advice I can give is to replace all > your mail account passwords with very strong passwords that are not readily cracked. > Although it can be annoying